* [PATCH] dmaengine: remove debugfs #ifdef
@ 2021-09-20 12:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2021-09-20 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hyun Kwon, Laurent Pinchart, Vinod Koul, Michal Simek,
Sanjay R Mehta, Peter Ujfalusi
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Jianqiang Chen, Quanyang Wang, Yang Li,
Allen Pais, Lad Prabhakar, Biju Das, Andy Shevchenko, dmaengine,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The ptdma driver has added debugfs support, but this fails to build
when debugfs is disabled:
drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c: In function 'ptdma_debugfs_setup':
drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:93:54: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
93 | debugfs_create_file("info", 0400, pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root, pt,
| ^
drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:96:55: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
96 | debugfs_create_file("stats", 0400, pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root, pt,
| ^
drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:102:52: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
102 | debugfs_create_dir("q", pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root);
| ^
Remove the #ifdef in the header, as this only saves a few bytes,
but would require ugly #ifdefs in each driver using it.
Simplify the other user while we're at it.
Fixes: e2fb2e2a33fa ("dmaengine: ptdma: Add debugfs entries for PTDMA")
Fixes: 26cf132de6f7 ("dmaengine: Create debug directories for DMA devices")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c | 15 +--------------
include/linux/dmaengine.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c
index b280a53e8570..ce5c66e6897d 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c
@@ -271,9 +271,6 @@ struct xilinx_dpdma_device {
/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* DebugFS
*/
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
-
#define XILINX_DPDMA_DEBUGFS_READ_MAX_SIZE 32
#define XILINX_DPDMA_DEBUGFS_UINT16_MAX_STR "65535"
@@ -299,7 +296,7 @@ struct xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_request {
static void xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_desc_done_irq(struct xilinx_dpdma_chan *chan)
{
- if (chan->id == dpdma_debugfs.chan_id)
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) && chan->id == dpdma_debugfs.chan_id)
dpdma_debugfs.xilinx_dpdma_irq_done_count++;
}
@@ -462,16 +459,6 @@ static void xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_init(struct xilinx_dpdma_device *xdev)
dev_err(xdev->dev, "Failed to create debugfs testcase file\n");
}
-#else
-static void xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_init(struct xilinx_dpdma_device *xdev)
-{
-}
-
-static void xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_desc_done_irq(struct xilinx_dpdma_chan *chan)
-{
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
-
/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* I/O Accessors
*/
diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
index e5c2c9e71bf1..9000f3ffce8b 100644
--- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
+++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
@@ -944,10 +944,8 @@ struct dma_device {
void (*device_issue_pending)(struct dma_chan *chan);
void (*device_release)(struct dma_device *dev);
/* debugfs support */
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
void (*dbg_summary_show)(struct seq_file *s, struct dma_device *dev);
struct dentry *dbg_dev_root;
-#endif
};
static inline int dmaengine_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: remove debugfs #ifdef
2021-09-20 12:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2021-09-20 12:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2021-09-20 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Hyun Kwon, Vinod Koul, Michal Simek, Sanjay R Mehta,
Peter Ujfalusi, Arnd Bergmann, Jianqiang Chen, Quanyang Wang,
Yang Li, Allen Pais, Lad Prabhakar, Biju Das, Andy Shevchenko,
dmaengine, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Hi Arnd,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 02:20:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> The ptdma driver has added debugfs support, but this fails to build
> when debugfs is disabled:
>
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c: In function 'ptdma_debugfs_setup':
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:93:54: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
> 93 | debugfs_create_file("info", 0400, pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root, pt,
> | ^
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:96:55: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
> 96 | debugfs_create_file("stats", 0400, pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root, pt,
> | ^
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:102:52: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
> 102 | debugfs_create_dir("q", pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root);
> | ^
>
> Remove the #ifdef in the header, as this only saves a few bytes,
> but would require ugly #ifdefs in each driver using it.
> Simplify the other user while we're at it.
>
> Fixes: e2fb2e2a33fa ("dmaengine: ptdma: Add debugfs entries for PTDMA")
> Fixes: 26cf132de6f7 ("dmaengine: Create debug directories for DMA devices")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c | 15 +--------------
> include/linux/dmaengine.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c
> index b280a53e8570..ce5c66e6897d 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c
> @@ -271,9 +271,6 @@ struct xilinx_dpdma_device {
> /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * DebugFS
> */
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> -
It's only a few bytes of data in struct dma_device, but a bit more in
.text here. Is the simplification really required in this driver ?
> #define XILINX_DPDMA_DEBUGFS_READ_MAX_SIZE 32
> #define XILINX_DPDMA_DEBUGFS_UINT16_MAX_STR "65535"
>
> @@ -299,7 +296,7 @@ struct xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_request {
>
> static void xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_desc_done_irq(struct xilinx_dpdma_chan *chan)
> {
> - if (chan->id == dpdma_debugfs.chan_id)
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) && chan->id == dpdma_debugfs.chan_id)
> dpdma_debugfs.xilinx_dpdma_irq_done_count++;
> }
>
> @@ -462,16 +459,6 @@ static void xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_init(struct xilinx_dpdma_device *xdev)
> dev_err(xdev->dev, "Failed to create debugfs testcase file\n");
> }
>
> -#else
> -static void xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_init(struct xilinx_dpdma_device *xdev)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -static void xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_desc_done_irq(struct xilinx_dpdma_chan *chan)
> -{
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
> -
> /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * I/O Accessors
> */
> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> index e5c2c9e71bf1..9000f3ffce8b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> @@ -944,10 +944,8 @@ struct dma_device {
> void (*device_issue_pending)(struct dma_chan *chan);
> void (*device_release)(struct dma_device *dev);
> /* debugfs support */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> void (*dbg_summary_show)(struct seq_file *s, struct dma_device *dev);
> struct dentry *dbg_dev_root;
> -#endif
> };
>
> static inline int dmaengine_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: remove debugfs #ifdef
@ 2021-09-20 12:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2021-09-20 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Hyun Kwon, Vinod Koul, Michal Simek, Sanjay R Mehta,
Peter Ujfalusi, Arnd Bergmann, Jianqiang Chen, Quanyang Wang,
Yang Li, Allen Pais, Lad Prabhakar, Biju Das, Andy Shevchenko,
dmaengine, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Hi Arnd,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 02:20:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> The ptdma driver has added debugfs support, but this fails to build
> when debugfs is disabled:
>
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c: In function 'ptdma_debugfs_setup':
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:93:54: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
> 93 | debugfs_create_file("info", 0400, pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root, pt,
> | ^
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:96:55: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
> 96 | debugfs_create_file("stats", 0400, pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root, pt,
> | ^
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:102:52: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
> 102 | debugfs_create_dir("q", pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root);
> | ^
>
> Remove the #ifdef in the header, as this only saves a few bytes,
> but would require ugly #ifdefs in each driver using it.
> Simplify the other user while we're at it.
>
> Fixes: e2fb2e2a33fa ("dmaengine: ptdma: Add debugfs entries for PTDMA")
> Fixes: 26cf132de6f7 ("dmaengine: Create debug directories for DMA devices")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c | 15 +--------------
> include/linux/dmaengine.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c
> index b280a53e8570..ce5c66e6897d 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/xilinx_dpdma.c
> @@ -271,9 +271,6 @@ struct xilinx_dpdma_device {
> /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * DebugFS
> */
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> -
It's only a few bytes of data in struct dma_device, but a bit more in
.text here. Is the simplification really required in this driver ?
> #define XILINX_DPDMA_DEBUGFS_READ_MAX_SIZE 32
> #define XILINX_DPDMA_DEBUGFS_UINT16_MAX_STR "65535"
>
> @@ -299,7 +296,7 @@ struct xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_request {
>
> static void xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_desc_done_irq(struct xilinx_dpdma_chan *chan)
> {
> - if (chan->id == dpdma_debugfs.chan_id)
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) && chan->id == dpdma_debugfs.chan_id)
> dpdma_debugfs.xilinx_dpdma_irq_done_count++;
> }
>
> @@ -462,16 +459,6 @@ static void xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_init(struct xilinx_dpdma_device *xdev)
> dev_err(xdev->dev, "Failed to create debugfs testcase file\n");
> }
>
> -#else
> -static void xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_init(struct xilinx_dpdma_device *xdev)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -static void xilinx_dpdma_debugfs_desc_done_irq(struct xilinx_dpdma_chan *chan)
> -{
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
> -
> /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * I/O Accessors
> */
> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> index e5c2c9e71bf1..9000f3ffce8b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> @@ -944,10 +944,8 @@ struct dma_device {
> void (*device_issue_pending)(struct dma_chan *chan);
> void (*device_release)(struct dma_device *dev);
> /* debugfs support */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> void (*dbg_summary_show)(struct seq_file *s, struct dma_device *dev);
> struct dentry *dbg_dev_root;
> -#endif
> };
>
> static inline int dmaengine_slave_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: remove debugfs #ifdef
2021-09-20 12:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
@ 2021-09-20 12:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2021-09-20 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laurent Pinchart
Cc: Hyun Kwon, Vinod Koul, Michal Simek, Sanjay R Mehta,
Peter Ujfalusi, Arnd Bergmann, Jianqiang Chen, Quanyang Wang,
Yang Li, Allen Pais, Lad Prabhakar, Biju Das, Andy Shevchenko,
dmaengine, Linux ARM, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 2:47 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
>
> It's only a few bytes of data in struct dma_device, but a bit more in
> .text here. Is the simplification really required in this driver ?
The intention was to not change the resulting object code in this driver,
and I still don't see where it would grow after dead-code-elimination removes
all the unused static functions. What am I missing?
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: remove debugfs #ifdef
@ 2021-09-20 12:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2021-09-20 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Laurent Pinchart
Cc: Hyun Kwon, Vinod Koul, Michal Simek, Sanjay R Mehta,
Peter Ujfalusi, Arnd Bergmann, Jianqiang Chen, Quanyang Wang,
Yang Li, Allen Pais, Lad Prabhakar, Biju Das, Andy Shevchenko,
dmaengine, Linux ARM, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 2:47 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
>
> It's only a few bytes of data in struct dma_device, but a bit more in
> .text here. Is the simplification really required in this driver ?
The intention was to not change the resulting object code in this driver,
and I still don't see where it would grow after dead-code-elimination removes
all the unused static functions. What am I missing?
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: remove debugfs #ifdef
2021-09-20 12:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2021-09-20 16:28 ` Laurent Pinchart
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2021-09-20 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Hyun Kwon, Vinod Koul, Michal Simek, Sanjay R Mehta,
Peter Ujfalusi, Arnd Bergmann, Jianqiang Chen, Quanyang Wang,
Yang Li, Allen Pais, Lad Prabhakar, Biju Das, Andy Shevchenko,
dmaengine, Linux ARM, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 02:50:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 2:47 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >
> > It's only a few bytes of data in struct dma_device, but a bit more in
> > .text here. Is the simplification really required in this driver ?
>
> The intention was to not change the resulting object code in this driver,
> and I still don't see where it would grow after dead-code-elimination removes
> all the unused static functions. What am I missing?
Indeed, gcc does a fairly good job there. The .text section doesn't
grow. Interestingly, there's an increase in size in the .data and
.rodata sections in the xilinx-dpdma module:
- 8 .rodata.str1.8 0000029f 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00003660 2**3
+ 8 .rodata.str1.8 000002a7 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00003660 2**3
- 10 .rodata 00001080 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00003960 2**5
+ 10 .rodata 000010e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00003960 2**5
- 15 .data 00001050 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00004e40 2**5
+ 15 .data 00001090 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00004ea0 2**5
I'm not entirely sure where it comes from, it may be related to
instrumentation caused by debugging options.
For your patch,
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: remove debugfs #ifdef
@ 2021-09-20 16:28 ` Laurent Pinchart
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2021-09-20 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Hyun Kwon, Vinod Koul, Michal Simek, Sanjay R Mehta,
Peter Ujfalusi, Arnd Bergmann, Jianqiang Chen, Quanyang Wang,
Yang Li, Allen Pais, Lad Prabhakar, Biju Das, Andy Shevchenko,
dmaengine, Linux ARM, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 02:50:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 2:47 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >
> > It's only a few bytes of data in struct dma_device, but a bit more in
> > .text here. Is the simplification really required in this driver ?
>
> The intention was to not change the resulting object code in this driver,
> and I still don't see where it would grow after dead-code-elimination removes
> all the unused static functions. What am I missing?
Indeed, gcc does a fairly good job there. The .text section doesn't
grow. Interestingly, there's an increase in size in the .data and
.rodata sections in the xilinx-dpdma module:
- 8 .rodata.str1.8 0000029f 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00003660 2**3
+ 8 .rodata.str1.8 000002a7 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00003660 2**3
- 10 .rodata 00001080 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00003960 2**5
+ 10 .rodata 000010e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00003960 2**5
- 15 .data 00001050 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00004e40 2**5
+ 15 .data 00001090 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00004ea0 2**5
I'm not entirely sure where it comes from, it may be related to
instrumentation caused by debugging options.
For your patch,
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: remove debugfs #ifdef
2021-09-20 12:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2021-10-25 6:31 ` Vinod Koul
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Vinod Koul @ 2021-10-25 6:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Hyun Kwon, Laurent Pinchart, Michal Simek, Sanjay R Mehta,
Peter Ujfalusi, Arnd Bergmann, Jianqiang Chen, Quanyang Wang,
Yang Li, Allen Pais, Lad Prabhakar, Biju Das, Andy Shevchenko,
dmaengine, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On 20-09-21, 14:20, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> The ptdma driver has added debugfs support, but this fails to build
> when debugfs is disabled:
>
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c: In function 'ptdma_debugfs_setup':
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:93:54: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
> 93 | debugfs_create_file("info", 0400, pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root, pt,
> | ^
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:96:55: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
> 96 | debugfs_create_file("stats", 0400, pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root, pt,
> | ^
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:102:52: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
> 102 | debugfs_create_dir("q", pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root);
> | ^
>
> Remove the #ifdef in the header, as this only saves a few bytes,
> but would require ugly #ifdefs in each driver using it.
> Simplify the other user while we're at it.
Applied, thanks
--
~Vinod
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: remove debugfs #ifdef
@ 2021-10-25 6:31 ` Vinod Koul
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Vinod Koul @ 2021-10-25 6:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Hyun Kwon, Laurent Pinchart, Michal Simek, Sanjay R Mehta,
Peter Ujfalusi, Arnd Bergmann, Jianqiang Chen, Quanyang Wang,
Yang Li, Allen Pais, Lad Prabhakar, Biju Das, Andy Shevchenko,
dmaengine, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On 20-09-21, 14:20, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> The ptdma driver has added debugfs support, but this fails to build
> when debugfs is disabled:
>
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c: In function 'ptdma_debugfs_setup':
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:93:54: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
> 93 | debugfs_create_file("info", 0400, pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root, pt,
> | ^
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:96:55: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
> 96 | debugfs_create_file("stats", 0400, pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root, pt,
> | ^
> drivers/dma/ptdma/ptdma-debugfs.c:102:52: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'dbg_dev_root'
> 102 | debugfs_create_dir("q", pt->dma_dev.dbg_dev_root);
> | ^
>
> Remove the #ifdef in the header, as this only saves a few bytes,
> but would require ugly #ifdefs in each driver using it.
> Simplify the other user while we're at it.
Applied, thanks
--
~Vinod
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread