All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] kexec: simplify compat_sys_kexec_load
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 11:55:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2kjF5v9OyNL+8m_855xqjcW3MWfRrigmWirAaEk1O6nw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1y2cbzmnw.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:45 AM Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> writes:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:05 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:41 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
> I think something like the untested diff below is enough to get rid of
> compat_alloc_user cleanly.
>
> Certainly it should be enough to give any idea what I am thinking.

Yes, that looks sufficient to me. I had started a slightly different
approach by trying
to move the kimage_alloc_init() into the top-level entry points to
avoid the extra
kmalloc, but that got rather complicated, and your patch is simpler overall.

The allocation could still be combined with kexec_load_check() into a new
function to reduce the number of duplicate lines, but if you think the current
version is ok, then I'll leave this part as it is.

I've fixed a duplicate kfree() and some whitespace damage, and rebased the
rest of my series on top of this to give it a spin on the build test boxes.
I'll send a v4 series once I have made sure there are no build-time regressions.

Can I add your Signed-off-by for the patch?
Is there a set of tests I should run on it?

      Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	 Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,  "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	 Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] kexec: simplify compat_sys_kexec_load
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 11:55:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2kjF5v9OyNL+8m_855xqjcW3MWfRrigmWirAaEk1O6nw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1y2cbzmnw.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:45 AM Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> writes:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:05 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:41 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
> I think something like the untested diff below is enough to get rid of
> compat_alloc_user cleanly.
>
> Certainly it should be enough to give any idea what I am thinking.

Yes, that looks sufficient to me. I had started a slightly different
approach by trying
to move the kimage_alloc_init() into the top-level entry points to
avoid the extra
kmalloc, but that got rather complicated, and your patch is simpler overall.

The allocation could still be combined with kexec_load_check() into a new
function to reduce the number of duplicate lines, but if you think the current
version is ok, then I'll leave this part as it is.

I've fixed a duplicate kfree() and some whitespace damage, and rebased the
rest of my series on top of this to give it a spin on the build test boxes.
I'll send a v4 series once I have made sure there are no build-time regressions.

Can I add your Signed-off-by for the patch?
Is there a set of tests I should run on it?

      Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] kexec: simplify compat_sys_kexec_load
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 11:55:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2kjF5v9OyNL+8m_855xqjcW3MWfRrigmWirAaEk1O6nw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1y2cbzmnw.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:45 AM Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> writes:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:05 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:41 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
> I think something like the untested diff below is enough to get rid of
> compat_alloc_user cleanly.
>
> Certainly it should be enough to give any idea what I am thinking.

Yes, that looks sufficient to me. I had started a slightly different
approach by trying
to move the kimage_alloc_init() into the top-level entry points to
avoid the extra
kmalloc, but that got rather complicated, and your patch is simpler overall.

The allocation could still be combined with kexec_load_check() into a new
function to reduce the number of duplicate lines, but if you think the current
version is ok, then I'll leave this part as it is.

I've fixed a duplicate kfree() and some whitespace damage, and rebased the
rest of my series on top of this to give it a spin on the build test boxes.
I'll send a v4 series once I have made sure there are no build-time regressions.

Can I add your Signed-off-by for the patch?
Is there a set of tests I should run on it?

      Arnd

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-19  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-17 20:33 [PATCH v3 0/4] compat: remove compat_alloc_user_space callers Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] kexec: simplify compat_sys_kexec_load Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  3:57   ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18  3:57     ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18  3:57     ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18  3:57     ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18  6:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  6:40       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  6:40       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  7:44       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  7:44         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  7:44         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  7:44         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  6:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  6:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  6:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  7:47     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  7:47       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  7:47       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  7:47       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 13:41   ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18 13:41     ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18 13:41     ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18 13:41     ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18 14:05     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 14:05       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 14:05       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 14:05       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 14:17       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 14:17         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 14:17         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 14:17         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 16:01         ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18 16:01           ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18 16:01           ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18 16:01           ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18 22:45         ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18 22:45           ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18 22:45           ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18 22:45           ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-19  9:55           ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2021-05-19  9:55             ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-19  9:55             ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-19  9:55             ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 20:47   ` David Laight
2021-05-18 20:47     ` David Laight
2021-05-18 20:47     ` David Laight
2021-05-17 20:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm: simplify compat_sys_move_pages Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  6:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  6:42     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  6:42     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 20:49   ` David Laight
2021-05-18 20:49     ` David Laight
2021-05-18 20:49     ` David Laight
2021-05-19 13:41     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-19 13:41       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-19 13:41       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-19 13:41       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: simplify compat numa syscalls Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  6:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  6:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  6:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-17 20:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] compat: remove some compat entry points Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  6:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  6:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  6:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-19 20:33   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-19 20:33     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-19 20:33     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-19 21:00     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-19 21:00       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-19 21:00       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-19 21:00       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-20  9:21       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-20  9:21         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-20  9:21         ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-20  9:21         ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK8P3a2kjF5v9OyNL+8m_855xqjcW3MWfRrigmWirAaEk1O6nw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.