* [PATCH v2] sched: replace if (cond) BUG() with WARN_ON()
@ 2021-03-17 7:33 ` Jiapeng Chong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jiapeng Chong @ 2021-03-17 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jk; +Cc: arnd, mpe, benh, paulus, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, Jiapeng Chong
Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
./arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c:908:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON
instead of if condition followed by BUG.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- replace BUG with WARN_ON.
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
index 3692064..1031448 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
@@ -904,8 +904,7 @@ static noinline void spusched_tick(struct spu_context *ctx)
struct spu_context *new = NULL;
struct spu *spu = NULL;
- if (spu_acquire(ctx))
- BUG(); /* a kernel thread never has signals pending */
+ WARN_ON(spu_acquire(ctx)); /* a kernel thread never has signals pending */
if (ctx->state != SPU_STATE_RUNNABLE)
goto out;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] sched: replace if (cond) BUG() with WARN_ON()
@ 2021-03-17 7:33 ` Jiapeng Chong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jiapeng Chong @ 2021-03-17 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jk; +Cc: Jiapeng Chong, arnd, linux-kernel, paulus, linuxppc-dev
Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
./arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c:908:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON
instead of if condition followed by BUG.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- replace BUG with WARN_ON.
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
index 3692064..1031448 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
@@ -904,8 +904,7 @@ static noinline void spusched_tick(struct spu_context *ctx)
struct spu_context *new = NULL;
struct spu *spu = NULL;
- if (spu_acquire(ctx))
- BUG(); /* a kernel thread never has signals pending */
+ WARN_ON(spu_acquire(ctx)); /* a kernel thread never has signals pending */
if (ctx->state != SPU_STATE_RUNNABLE)
goto out;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] sched: replace if (cond) BUG() with WARN_ON()
2021-03-17 7:33 ` Jiapeng Chong
@ 2021-03-17 7:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2021-03-17 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiapeng Chong
Cc: Jeremy Kerr, Michael Ellerman, Benjamin Herrenschmidt,
Paul Mackerras, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 8:35 AM Jiapeng Chong
<jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
>
> ./arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c:908:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON
> instead of if condition followed by BUG.
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
If you change it from BUG() to WARN_ON(), you should explain why it's safe to
do that in this case. Here it is not, since the following spu_release() will
end up making things worse if the acquire failed. Also if there was a signal
pending, then spusched_tick() will just get called again and constantly
print these warnings.
There is probably a way to use WARN_ON_ONCE() here, in combination
with a way to terminate the thread safely, but this has to be done carefully.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] sched: replace if (cond) BUG() with WARN_ON()
@ 2021-03-17 7:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2021-03-17 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiapeng Chong; +Cc: linux-kernel, Paul Mackerras, Jeremy Kerr, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 8:35 AM Jiapeng Chong
<jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
>
> ./arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c:908:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON
> instead of if condition followed by BUG.
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
If you change it from BUG() to WARN_ON(), you should explain why it's safe to
do that in this case. Here it is not, since the following spu_release() will
end up making things worse if the acquire failed. Also if there was a signal
pending, then spusched_tick() will just get called again and constantly
print these warnings.
There is probably a way to use WARN_ON_ONCE() here, in combination
with a way to terminate the thread safely, but this has to be done carefully.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-17 7:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-17 7:33 [PATCH v2] sched: replace if (cond) BUG() with WARN_ON() Jiapeng Chong
2021-03-17 7:33 ` Jiapeng Chong
2021-03-17 7:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-17 7:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.