All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saugata Das <saugata.das@linaro.org>
To: merez@codeaurora.org
Cc: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mmc: core: Support packed command for eMMC4.5 device
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:31:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKLKtzfzs7hxjXjb0rztvmTUjpiEpLHZeeSr5Sc5xxskZ8rYHw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4934441a17d25c3249556f7bf281b1be.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>

On 29 February 2012 23:40,  <merez@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> This patch supports packed command of eMMC4.5 device.
>> Several reads(or writes) can be grouped in packed command
>> and all data of the individual commands can be sent in a
>> single transfer on the bus.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/card/block.c   |  496
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  drivers/mmc/card/queue.c   |   48 ++++-
>>  drivers/mmc/card/queue.h   |   13 ++
>>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c |    1 +
>>  include/linux/mmc/core.h   |    4 +
>>  5 files changed, 535 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
> Hi,
>
> We ran performance tests on the packed commands patch. We found out that
> enabling the read packing didn't improve the performance in any of the
> scenarios we ran (see the detailed results below).
> Therefore, we suggest to move the read packing code to a different patch
> and approve only the write packing code for now. The read packing adds
> complexity to the code and we don't see a point in adding it while the
> intention is to disable it.

Have  you seen improvement in the write packing ?


>
> Test results:
>
> Long read operation:
> ----------------------
> no-packing: 39.5 MB/s
> packed commands patch (both READ and WRITE packing are enabled): 39.5 MB/s
> packed commands patch + enabling only READ packing: 39.5 MB/s
>
> Several parallel read operations (sum of all the read throughputs):
> ---------------------------
> no-packing: 42.6 MB/s
> packed commands patch(both READ and WRITE packing are enabled): 38 MB/s
> packed commands patch + enabling only READ packing: 38.2 MB/s
>
> Parallel long read and long write operations (read throughput):
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> no-packing: 23.8 MB/s
> packed commands patch (both READ and WRITE packing are enabled): 12.6 MB/s
> packed commands patch + enabling only READ packing: 12.5 MB/s
>
> Parallel short read and long write operations (read throughput):
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> no-packing: 22.9 MB/s
> packed commands patch (both READ and WRITE packing are enabled): 8.4 MB/s
> packed commands patch + enabling only READ packing: 8.6 MB/s
>
> Several Parallel short read and short write operations (sum of all the
> read throughputs):
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> no-packing: 41.6 MB/s
> packed commands patch (both READ and WRITE packing are enabled): 35 MB/s
> packed commands patch + enabling only READ packing: 36 MB/s
>
> Thanks,
> Maya Erez
> Consultant for Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-01  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-29 18:10 [PATCH v5 2/2] mmc: core: Support packed command for eMMC4.5 device merez
2012-03-01  7:47 ` Namjae Jeon
2012-03-02 14:26   ` merez
2012-03-02 14:26     ` merez
2012-03-04  8:09     ` Saugata Das
2012-03-05  5:21       ` merez
2012-03-05  5:21         ` merez
2012-03-04  8:25     ` Namjae Jeon
2012-03-06 14:10       ` merez
2012-03-06 14:10         ` merez
2012-03-07  0:17         ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-03-11 21:36           ` merez
2012-03-11 21:36             ` merez
2012-03-13  0:47             ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-03-17 14:59               ` merez
2012-03-17 14:59                 ` merez
2012-03-01  9:01 ` Saugata Das [this message]
2012-03-02  0:09 ` Seungwon Jeon
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-26 12:21 merez
2012-04-30  0:31 ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-05-02 18:35   ` merez
2012-05-02 18:35     ` merez
2012-05-08 23:41     ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-02-27 10:20 Seungwon Jeon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKLKtzfzs7hxjXjb0rztvmTUjpiEpLHZeeSr5Sc5xxskZ8rYHw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=saugata.das@linaro.org \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=merez@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.