newly passing xfstests

newly passing xfstests

[Steve French]

Do you notice additional xfstests that we should be adding to the
ksmbd buildbot group?

e.g. I noticed xfstests generic/115 116 and 121 passing ... do you see
those passing in your test setups as well?

-- 
Thanks,

Steve

Re: newly passing xfstests

[Namjae Jeon]

2021-09-13 14:54 GMT+09:00, Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>:
> Do you notice additional xfstests that we should be adding to the
> ksmbd buildbot group?
I am relying on the xfstests test list you shared. I haven't recently
ever run the total tests. And some tests may have pass/fail
differences depending on the local fs (i.e. reflink).
>
> e.g. I noticed xfstests generic/115 116 and 121 passing ... do you see
> those passing in your test setups as well?
Yep, You have shared these tests passed since ksmbd support
FSCTL_DUPLICATE_EXTENTS_TO_FILE ioctl. i.e. Local filesystem need to
support reflink.
After a while, I'll re-run the total xfstest tests including them and
share if there are any additional ones.

Thanks!
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>

Re: newly passing xfstests

[Namjae Jeon]

2021-09-13 17:17 GMT+09:00, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>:
> 2021-09-13 14:54 GMT+09:00, Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>:
>> Do you notice additional xfstests that we should be adding to the
>> ksmbd buildbot group?
> I am relying on the xfstests test list you shared. I haven't recently
> ever run the total tests. And some tests may have pass/fail
> differences depending on the local fs (i.e. reflink).
>>
>> e.g. I noticed xfstests generic/115 116 and 121 passing ... do you see
>> those passing in your test setups as well?
> Yep, You have shared these tests passed since ksmbd support
> FSCTL_DUPLICATE_EXTENTS_TO_FILE ioctl. i.e. Local filesystem need to
> support reflink.
> After a while, I'll re-run the total xfstest tests including them and
> share if there are any additional ones.

I can also see generic/115 116 and 121 passing on my setup. I am
running total xfstest tests now.

linkinjeon@linkinjeon-System-Product-Name:~/git/xfstests-cifsd$ sudo
./check generic/115
FSTYP         -- cifs
PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 linkinjeon-System-Product-Name 5.14.0+
#1 SMP Sun Sep 5 10:40:54 JST 2021
MKFS_OPTIONS  -- //127.0.0.1/homes2
MOUNT_OPTIONS --
-ousername=linkinjeon,password=1234,noperm,vers=3.11,mfsymlinks
//127.0.0.1/homes2 /mnt/scratch

generic/115	 1s
Ran: generic/115
Passed all 1 tests

linkinjeon@linkinjeon-System-Product-Name:~/git/xfstests-cifsd$ sudo
./check generic/116
FSTYP         -- cifs
PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 linkinjeon-System-Product-Name 5.14.0+
#1 SMP Sun Sep 5 10:40:54 JST 2021
MKFS_OPTIONS  -- //127.0.0.1/homes2
MOUNT_OPTIONS --
-ousername=linkinjeon,password=1234,noperm,vers=3.11,mfsymlinks
//127.0.0.1/homes2 /mnt/scratch

generic/116	 1s
Ran: generic/116
Passed all 1 tests

linkinjeon@linkinjeon-System-Product-Name:~/git/xfstests-cifsd$ sudo
./check generic/121
FSTYP         -- cifs
PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 linkinjeon-System-Product-Name 5.14.0+
#1 SMP Sun Sep 5 10:40:54 JST 2021
MKFS_OPTIONS  -- //127.0.0.1/homes2
MOUNT_OPTIONS --
-ousername=linkinjeon,password=1234,noperm,vers=3.11,mfsymlinks
//127.0.0.1/homes2 /mnt/scratch

generic/121	 1s
Ran: generic/121
Passed all 1 tests

Thanks!
>
> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve
>>
>