All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Matt Fleming
	<matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Riku Voipio <riku.voipio-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: fdt: avoid FDT manipulation after ExitBootServices()
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:41:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8gUqqczZiZTaoPFn_1Fb2GsjoXK+yzQdxwtyjfR_LGnA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF7UmSyYvmo8k910mJEAYhaOJy9j_bpXw6f+Cj=cS_m_iYiCCQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On 1 February 2017 at 13:39, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 1 February 2017 at 13:11, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Some AArch64 UEFI implementations disable the MMU in ExitBootServices(),
>> after which unaligned accesses to RAM are no longer supported.
>>
>> Commit abfb7b686a3e ("efi/libstub/arm*: Pass latest memory map to the
>> kernel") fixed an issue in the memory map handling of the stub FDT code,
>> but inadvertently created an issue with such firmwares, by moving some
>> of the FDT manipulation to after the invocation of ExitBootServices().
>> However, the stub's libfdt implementation uses the ordinary, accelerated
>> string functions, which rely on hardware handling of unaligned accesses,
>> resulting in alignment faults when executed with the MMU off.
>>
>> Whether disabling the MMU in ExitBootServices() complies with the UEFI
>> spec is unclear, but it is a reality we have to deal with, given that
>> it wasn't a problem before commit abfb7b686a3e was applied.
>
> I'm not sure it's unclear, but someone not reading the specification
> and instead looking
> at what the unfortunate LinuxLoader did might incorrectly deduce that
> such is the case.
>
>> So fix the situation by moving the update_fdt_memmap() into the callback
>> invoked by efi_exit_boot_services() right before it hits the button.
>>
>> Fixes: abfb7b686a3e ("efi/libstub/arm*: Pass latest memory map to the kernel")
>
> I would sort argue against the Fixes: tag, given that I don't consider
> that code to be
> incorrect.
>

Well, that patch ended up in -stable, and is breaking actual systems
that worked 'fine' before.

> I agree that this is a good change regardless.
>

Cheers.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org (Ard Biesheuvel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] efi: fdt: avoid FDT manipulation after ExitBootServices()
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:41:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8gUqqczZiZTaoPFn_1Fb2GsjoXK+yzQdxwtyjfR_LGnA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF7UmSyYvmo8k910mJEAYhaOJy9j_bpXw6f+Cj=cS_m_iYiCCQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 1 February 2017 at 13:39, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 1 February 2017 at 13:11, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Some AArch64 UEFI implementations disable the MMU in ExitBootServices(),
>> after which unaligned accesses to RAM are no longer supported.
>>
>> Commit abfb7b686a3e ("efi/libstub/arm*: Pass latest memory map to the
>> kernel") fixed an issue in the memory map handling of the stub FDT code,
>> but inadvertently created an issue with such firmwares, by moving some
>> of the FDT manipulation to after the invocation of ExitBootServices().
>> However, the stub's libfdt implementation uses the ordinary, accelerated
>> string functions, which rely on hardware handling of unaligned accesses,
>> resulting in alignment faults when executed with the MMU off.
>>
>> Whether disabling the MMU in ExitBootServices() complies with the UEFI
>> spec is unclear, but it is a reality we have to deal with, given that
>> it wasn't a problem before commit abfb7b686a3e was applied.
>
> I'm not sure it's unclear, but someone not reading the specification
> and instead looking
> at what the unfortunate LinuxLoader did might incorrectly deduce that
> such is the case.
>
>> So fix the situation by moving the update_fdt_memmap() into the callback
>> invoked by efi_exit_boot_services() right before it hits the button.
>>
>> Fixes: abfb7b686a3e ("efi/libstub/arm*: Pass latest memory map to the kernel")
>
> I would sort argue against the Fixes: tag, given that I don't consider
> that code to be
> incorrect.
>

Well, that patch ended up in -stable, and is breaking actual systems
that worked 'fine' before.

> I agree that this is a good change regardless.
>

Cheers.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-01 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-01 13:11 [PATCH] efi: fdt: avoid FDT manipulation after ExitBootServices() Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 13:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
     [not found] ` <1485954693-25750-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-01 13:39   ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-01 13:39     ` Leif Lindholm
     [not found]     ` <CAF7UmSyYvmo8k910mJEAYhaOJy9j_bpXw6f+Cj=cS_m_iYiCCQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-01 13:41       ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2017-02-01 13:41         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 14:08   ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-01 14:08     ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-01 14:46   ` Riku Voipio
2017-02-01 14:46     ` Riku Voipio
2017-02-01 17:45 [GIT PULL] EFI urgent fix for v4.10 Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 17:45 ` [PATCH] efi: fdt: avoid FDT manipulation after ExitBootServices() Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 17:45   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 17:49   ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-01 17:49     ` Leif Lindholm
2017-02-01 19:03   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-01 19:03     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-01 19:03     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-01 19:28     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 19:28       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 19:28       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-01 20:16       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-01 20:16         ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-01 20:16         ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-01 21:08   ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-02-01 21:08     ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-02-01 21:08     ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-02-01 22:59     ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-02-01 22:59       ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-02-01 22:59       ` Jeffrey Hugo
2017-02-02 16:14       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-02 16:14         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-02 16:14         ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu8gUqqczZiZTaoPFn_1Fb2GsjoXK+yzQdxwtyjfR_LGnA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ard.biesheuvel-qsej5fyqhm4dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=james.morse-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=riku.voipio-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.