All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>, Dave Olsthoorn <dave@bewaar.me>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/8] efi: Export boot-services code and data as debugfs-blobs
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:35:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9YLesC1abXAcUMe+0BE8Vv52Y_BhN-1Ps+h161Q00KKQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0256726-0aa3-b005-0a18-7b6a41533a0b@redhat.com>

On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 15:18, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 09-10-2019 15:07, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 16:51, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sometimes it is useful to be able to dump the efi boot-services code and
> >> data. This commit adds these as debugfs-blobs to /sys/kernel/debug/efi,
> >> but only if efi=debug is passed on the kernel-commandline as this requires
> >> not freeing those memory-regions, which costs 20+ MB of RAM.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> Changes in v5:
> >> -Rename the EFI_BOOT_SERVICES flag to EFI_PRESERVE_BS_REGIONS
> >>
> >> Changes in v4:
> >> -Add new EFI_BOOT_SERVICES flag and use it to determine if the boot-services
> >>   memory segments are available (and thus if it makes sense to register the
> >>   debugfs bits for them)
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> -Do not call pr_err on debugfs call failures
> >> ---
> >>   arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c    |  1 +
> >>   arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c |  4 +++
> >>   drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c     | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   include/linux/efi.h            |  1 +
> >>   4 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> >> index c202e1b07e29..847730f7e74b 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> >> @@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ int __init efi_memblock_x86_reserve_range(void)
> >>               efi.memmap.desc_version);
> >>
> >>          memblock_reserve(pmap, efi.memmap.nr_map * efi.memmap.desc_size);
> >> +       set_bit(EFI_PRESERVE_BS_REGIONS, &efi.flags);
> >
> > Should we add a Kconfig symbol to opt into this behavior [set by the
> > driver in question], instead of always preserving all boot services
> > regions on all x86 systems?
>
> This bit does not control anything, it merely signals that the arch early
> boot EFI code keeps the boot-services code around, which is something
> which the x86 code already does. Where as e.g. on arm / aarch64 this is
> freed early on, this ties in with the other bits:
>
> >
> >>
> >>          return 0;
> >>   }
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> >> index 3b9fd679cea9..fab12ebf0ada 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> >> @@ -411,6 +411,10 @@ void __init efi_free_boot_services(void)
> >>          int num_entries = 0;
> >>          void *new, *new_md;
> >>
> >> +       /* Keep all regions for /sys/kernel/debug/efi */
> >> +       if (efi_enabled(EFI_DBG))
> >> +               return;
> >> +
>
> This is the point where normally on x86 we do actually free the boot-services
> code which is a lot later then on other arches. And this new code actually
> does change things to keep the boot-services code *forever* but only
> if EFI debugging is enabled on the kernel commandline.
>

I get this part. But at some point, your driver is going to expect
this memory to be preserved even if EFI_DBG is not set, right? My
question was whether we should only opt into that if such a driver is
enabled in the first place.

> This ties in with the next bit:
>
> >>          for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) {
> >>                  unsigned long long start = md->phys_addr;
> >>                  unsigned long long size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> >> index 8d3e778e988b..abba49c4c46d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
>
> <snip>
>
> >> @@ -370,6 +420,9 @@ static int __init efisubsys_init(void)
> >>                  goto err_remove_group;
> >>          }
> >>
> >> +       if (efi_enabled(EFI_DBG) && efi_enabled(EFI_PRESERVE_BS_REGIONS))
> >> +               efi_debugfs_init();
> >> +
> >>          return 0;
> >>
> >>   err_remove_group:
>
> Here we register the debugfs dir + files, but only when the
> boot services code has been kept around, so only if the
> EFI_PRESERVE_BS_REGIONS arch feature flag has been set and
> EFI debugging has been requested on the kernel commandline.
>
> IOW this patch already offers to configurability you ask for, but instead
> of through a Kconfig option (which IMHO would be cumbersome) the decision
> is made runtime based on the presence of efi=debug on the kernel commandline.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
> >> index bd3837022307..2a30a1bd8bdf 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/efi.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/efi.h
> >> @@ -1202,6 +1202,7 @@ extern int __init efi_setup_pcdp_console(char *);
> >>   #define EFI_DBG                        8       /* Print additional debug info at runtime */
> >>   #define EFI_NX_PE_DATA         9       /* Can runtime data regions be mapped non-executable? */
> >>   #define EFI_MEM_ATTR           10      /* Did firmware publish an EFI_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES table? */
> >> +#define EFI_PRESERVE_BS_REGIONS        11      /* Are EFI boot-services memory segments available? */
> >>
> >>   #ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> >>   /*
> >> --
> >> 2.23.0
> >>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-04 14:50 [PATCH v7 0/8] efi/firmware/platform-x86: Add EFI embedded fw support Hans de Goede
2019-10-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] efi: Export boot-services code and data as debugfs-blobs Hans de Goede
2019-10-09 13:07   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-09 13:18     ` Hans de Goede
2019-10-09 13:35       ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2019-10-09 13:59         ` Hans de Goede
2019-10-09 14:01           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-10-14  9:11   ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-11-14 11:31     ` Hans de Goede
2019-10-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] efi: Add embedded peripheral firmware support Hans de Goede
2019-10-11 14:48   ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-11-14 11:27     ` Hans de Goede
2019-11-14 19:42       ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-11-14 20:13         ` Hans de Goede
2019-11-14 20:48           ` Hans de Goede
2019-11-14 21:50             ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-11-15 12:09               ` Hans de Goede
2019-10-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] firmware: Rename FW_OPT_NOFALLBACK to FW_OPT_NOFALLBACK_SYSFS Hans de Goede
2019-10-11 15:02   ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-11-14 20:22     ` Hans de Goede
2019-10-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] firmware: Add new platform fallback mechanism and firmware_request_platform() Hans de Goede
2019-10-04 19:33   ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-04 19:33     ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-04 19:33     ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-04 20:45   ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-04 20:45     ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-04 20:45     ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-04 23:17   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-05  9:53     ` Hans de Goede
2019-10-11 15:31     ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-10-11 15:29   ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-11-14 11:32     ` Hans de Goede
2019-10-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] Input: silead - Switch to firmware_request_platform for retreiving the fw Hans de Goede
2019-10-11  0:47   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] Input: icn8505 " Hans de Goede
2019-10-11  0:47   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2019-10-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] platform/x86: touchscreen_dmi: Add EFI embedded firmware info support Hans de Goede
2019-10-05  3:03   ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-05  3:03     ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-05  3:03     ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-05  7:13   ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-05  7:13     ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-05  7:13     ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-04 14:50 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] platform/x86: touchscreen_dmi: Add info for the Chuwi Vi8 Plus tablet Hans de Goede
2019-10-07 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] efi/firmware/platform-x86: Add EFI embedded fw support Ingo Molnar
2019-10-08  9:35   ` Hans de Goede
2019-10-08 11:05     ` Ingo Molnar
2019-10-11 14:10 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-10-11 14:31   ` Hans de Goede
2019-10-11 15:38     ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-10-11 16:38       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-10-14  9:22         ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-10-14  9:29           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-10-14 10:31             ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-10-14 10:57               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-10-16 12:45                 ` Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu9YLesC1abXAcUMe+0BE8Vv52Y_BhN-1Ps+h161Q00KKQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave@bewaar.me \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.