From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Dann Frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] arm64: move literal data into .rodata section
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:46:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_oh7q81mr=XPW+HM9zewETtbL=mnN0mkr83f5=n4zr6Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180118114112.GA20091@gondor.apana.org.au>
On 18 January 2018 at 11:41, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:11:35PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Prevent inadvertently creating speculative gadgets by moving literal data
>> into the .rodata section.
>>
>> Patch #1 enables this for C code, by reverting a change that disables the
>> GCC feature implementing this. Note that this conflicts with the mitigation
>> of erratum #843419 for Cortex-A53.
>
> Ard, which tree is this supposed to go through?
>
Hi Herbert,
I am going to drop that first patch, the remaining 6 patches can go
through the crypto tree as they are independent.
Thanks,
Ard.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org (Ard Biesheuvel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] arm64: move literal data into .rodata section
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:46:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_oh7q81mr=XPW+HM9zewETtbL=mnN0mkr83f5=n4zr6Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180118114112.GA20091@gondor.apana.org.au>
On 18 January 2018 at 11:41, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:11:35PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Prevent inadvertently creating speculative gadgets by moving literal data
>> into the .rodata section.
>>
>> Patch #1 enables this for C code, by reverting a change that disables the
>> GCC feature implementing this. Note that this conflicts with the mitigation
>> of erratum #843419 for Cortex-A53.
>
> Ard, which tree is this supposed to go through?
>
Hi Herbert,
I am going to drop that first patch, the remaining 6 patches can go
through the crypto tree as they are independent.
Thanks,
Ard.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-18 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-10 12:11 [PATCH 0/7] arm64: move literal data into .rodata section Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` [PATCH 1/7] arm64: kernel: avoid executable literal pools Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-14 23:27 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-14 23:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm64/crypto: aes-cipher: move S-box to .rodata section Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64/crypto: aes-neon: move literal data " Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm64/crypto: crc32: " Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64/crypto: crct10dif: " Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64/crypto: sha2-ce: move the round constant table " Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64/crypto: sha1-ce: get rid of literal pool Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-10 12:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-18 11:41 ` [PATCH 0/7] arm64: move literal data into .rodata section Herbert Xu
2018-01-18 11:41 ` Herbert Xu
2018-01-18 11:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2018-01-18 11:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-18 12:02 ` Herbert Xu
2018-01-18 12:02 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKv+Gu_oh7q81mr=XPW+HM9zewETtbL=mnN0mkr83f5=n4zr6Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dann.frazier@canonical.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.