All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Remove '-p' from LDFLAGS
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 11:19:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=NfK-P_Z=W=h5-5c2Jv3vfB0FsmdHcZeWEN1y_Fg=YAw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YSQ.7.76.1901051128160.1783@knanqh.ubzr>

On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 8:34 AM Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>
> > This option is not supported by lld:
> >
> >     ld.lld: error: unknown argument: -p
> >
> > This has been a no-op in binutils since 2004 (see commit dea514f51da1 in
> > that tree). Given that the lowest officially supported of binutils for
> > the kernel is 2.20, which was released in 2009, nobody needs this flag
> > around so just remove it. Commit 1a381d4a0a9a ("arm64: remove no-op -p
> > linker flag") did the same for arm64.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> > Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> > Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
>
> You may now submit your patch to RMK's patch system:
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/

http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/info.php
"""
Mailing your patch.
Mail it to patches@armlinux.org.uk and check the reply.
"""

*sighs in GitHub*
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Remove '-p' from LDFLAGS
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 11:19:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=NfK-P_Z=W=h5-5c2Jv3vfB0FsmdHcZeWEN1y_Fg=YAw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YSQ.7.76.1901051128160.1783@knanqh.ubzr>

On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 8:34 AM Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>
> > This option is not supported by lld:
> >
> >     ld.lld: error: unknown argument: -p
> >
> > This has been a no-op in binutils since 2004 (see commit dea514f51da1 in
> > that tree). Given that the lowest officially supported of binutils for
> > the kernel is 2.20, which was released in 2009, nobody needs this flag
> > around so just remove it. Commit 1a381d4a0a9a ("arm64: remove no-op -p
> > linker flag") did the same for arm64.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> > Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> > Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
>
> You may now submit your patch to RMK's patch system:
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/

http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/info.php
"""
Mailing your patch.
Mail it to patches@armlinux.org.uk and check the reply.
"""

*sighs in GitHub*
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-07 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-05  1:42 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: Remove '-p' from LDFLAGS Nathan Chancellor
2018-12-05  1:42 ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-12-05  1:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Wrap '--pic-veneer' with ld-option Nathan Chancellor
2018-12-05  1:42   ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-12-05  7:37   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-05  7:37     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-05  8:06     ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-12-05  8:06       ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-12-05  8:09       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-05  8:09         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-05 18:21         ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-12-05 18:21           ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-12-05 19:30           ` Peter Smith
2018-12-05 19:30             ` Peter Smith
2018-12-05 18:36         ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-12-05 18:36           ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-12-05 18:39           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-05 18:39             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-05 18:41             ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-12-05 18:41               ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-12-05 22:59               ` Stefan Agner
2018-12-05 22:59                 ` Stefan Agner
2018-12-05 23:19                 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-12-05 23:19                   ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-12-05 19:45             ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-12-05 21:03               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-05 21:03                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-29 12:27               ` Stefan Agner
2018-12-29 12:27                 ` Stefan Agner
2019-01-07 19:42                 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-01-07 19:42                   ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-12-05 18:40           ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-12-05 18:40             ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-12-05  7:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: Remove '-p' from LDFLAGS Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-05  7:37   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-05 16:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2018-12-05 16:37   ` Nicolas Pitre
2018-12-05 17:47 ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-12-05 17:47   ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-12-29 12:49 ` Stefan Agner
2018-12-29 12:49   ` Stefan Agner
2018-12-31 18:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Nathan Chancellor
2018-12-31 18:12   ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-01-05 16:34   ` Nicolas Pitre
2019-01-05 16:34     ` Nicolas Pitre
2019-01-07 19:19     ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2019-01-07 19:19       ` Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKwvOd=NfK-P_Z=W=h5-5c2Jv3vfB0FsmdHcZeWEN1y_Fg=YAw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.