Re: [PATCH v7 21/25] Kbuild: add Rust support

[Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>]

> +choice
> +       prompt "Optimization level"
> +       default RUST_OPT_LEVEL_SIMILAR_AS_CHOSEN_FOR_C
> +       depends on RUST
> +       help
> +         Controls rustc's `-Copt-level` codegen option.
> +
> +         This flag controls the optimization level.
> +
> +         If unsure, say "Similar as chosen for C".
> +
> +config RUST_OPT_LEVEL_SIMILAR_AS_CHOSEN_FOR_C
> +       bool "Similar as chosen for C"
> +       help
> +         This choice will pick a similar optimization level as chosen in
> +         the "Compiler optimization level" for C:
> +
> +             -O2 is currently mapped to -Copt-level=2
> +             -O3 is currently mapped to -Copt-level=3
> +             -Os is currently mapped to -Copt-level=s
> +
> +         The mapping may change over time to follow the intended semantics
> +         of the choice for C as sensibly as possible.
> +
> +         This is the default.
> +
> +config RUST_OPT_LEVEL_0
> +       bool "No optimizations (-Copt-level=0)"
> +       help
> +         Not recommended for most purposes. It may come in handy for debugging
> +         suspected optimizer bugs, unexpected undefined behavior, etc.
> +
> +         Note that this level will *not* enable debug assertions nor overflow
> +         checks on its own (like it happens when interacting with rustc
> +         directly). Use the corresponding configuration options to control
> +         that instead, orthogonally.
> +
> +         Note this level may cause excessive stack usage, which can lead to stack
> +         overflow and subsequent crashes.
> +
> +config RUST_OPT_LEVEL_1
> +       bool "Basic optimizations (-Copt-level=1)"
> +       help
> +         Useful for debugging without getting too lost, but without
> +         the overhead and boilerplate of no optimizations at all.
> +
> +         Note this level may cause excessive stack usage, which can lead to stack
> +         overflow and subsequent crashes.
> +
> +config RUST_OPT_LEVEL_2
> +       bool "Some optimizations (-Copt-level=2)"
> +       help
> +         The sensible choice in most cases.
> +
> +config RUST_OPT_LEVEL_3
> +       bool "All optimizations (-Copt-level=3)"
> +       help
> +         Yet more performance (hopefully).
> +
> +config RUST_OPT_LEVEL_S
> +       bool "Optimize for size (-Copt-level=s)"
> +       help
> +         Smaller kernel, ideally without too much performance loss.
> +
> +config RUST_OPT_LEVEL_Z
> +       bool "Optimize for size, no loop vectorization (-Copt-level=z)"
> +       help
> +         Like the previous level, but also turn off loop vectorization.

I'm super not into having the rust optimization level differ from the
C optimization level.  This is just someone having too much fun
wrapping every compiler flag in a kbuild option.  Either folks wan't
smaller size or more optimizations. Allowing for RUST_OPT_LEVEL_S and
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE or RUST_OPT_LEVEL_3 and
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is just wacky nonsense that's going to
make randconfig bug reports more confusing to tease out.
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv