All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Karol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>,
	Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mmiotrace: Use cpumask_available for cpumask_var_t variables
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 11:52:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmXgYThHRDpt5dFZy5T1zS6MYQhcBNcq6-rsuc5fjiE6Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200518093117.GA719849@ubuntu-s3-xlarge-x86>

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:31 AM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 01:53:23PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > When building with Clang + -Wtautological-compare and
> > CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK unset:
> >
> > arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c:375:6: warning: comparison of array 'downed_cpus'
> > equal to a null pointer is always false [-Wtautological-pointer-compare]
> >         if (downed_cpus == NULL &&
> >             ^~~~~~~~~~~    ~~~~
> > arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c:405:6: warning: comparison of array 'downed_cpus'
> > equal to a null pointer is always false [-Wtautological-pointer-compare]
> >         if (downed_cpus == NULL || cpumask_weight(downed_cpus) == 0)
> >             ^~~~~~~~~~~    ~~~~
> > 2 warnings generated.
> >
> > Commit f7e30f01a9e2 ("cpumask: Add helper cpumask_available()") added
> > cpumask_available to fix warnings of this nature. Use that here so that
> > clang does not warn regardless of CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK's value.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/982
> > Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>

Thanks for the patch, sorry I'm falling behind on code review!
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>

> > ---
> >  arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c
> > index 109325d77b3e..43fd19b3f118 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c
> > @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void enter_uniprocessor(void)
> >       int cpu;
> >       int err;
> >
> > -     if (downed_cpus == NULL &&
> > +     if (!cpumask_available(downed_cpus) &&
> >           !alloc_cpumask_var(&downed_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> >               pr_notice("Failed to allocate mask\n");
> >               goto out;
> > @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static void leave_uniprocessor(void)
> >       int cpu;
> >       int err;
> >
> > -     if (downed_cpus == NULL || cpumask_weight(downed_cpus) == 0)
> > +     if (!cpumask_available(downed_cpus) || cpumask_weight(downed_cpus) == 0)
> >               return;
> >       pr_notice("Re-enabling CPUs...\n");
> >       for_each_cpu(cpu, downed_cpus) {
> >
> > base-commit: ae46d2aa6a7fbe8ca0946f24b061b6ccdc6c3f25
> > --
> > 2.26.0
> >
>
> Gentle ping for acceptance, I am not sure who should take this.

Looks like Steven or Ingo are the listed maintainers for MMIOTRACE?

-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor
	<natechancellor-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	clang-built-linux
	<clang-built-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>,
	Pekka Paalanen
	<ppaalanen-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mmiotrace: Use cpumask_available for cpumask_var_t variables
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 11:52:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmXgYThHRDpt5dFZy5T1zS6MYQhcBNcq6-rsuc5fjiE6Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200518093117.GA719849@ubuntu-s3-xlarge-x86>

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:31 AM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 01:53:23PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > When building with Clang + -Wtautological-compare and
> > CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK unset:
> >
> > arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c:375:6: warning: comparison of array 'downed_cpus'
> > equal to a null pointer is always false [-Wtautological-pointer-compare]
> >         if (downed_cpus == NULL &&
> >             ^~~~~~~~~~~    ~~~~
> > arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c:405:6: warning: comparison of array 'downed_cpus'
> > equal to a null pointer is always false [-Wtautological-pointer-compare]
> >         if (downed_cpus == NULL || cpumask_weight(downed_cpus) == 0)
> >             ^~~~~~~~~~~    ~~~~
> > 2 warnings generated.
> >
> > Commit f7e30f01a9e2 ("cpumask: Add helper cpumask_available()") added
> > cpumask_available to fix warnings of this nature. Use that here so that
> > clang does not warn regardless of CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK's value.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/982
> > Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Thanks for the patch, sorry I'm falling behind on code review!
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

> > ---
> >  arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c
> > index 109325d77b3e..43fd19b3f118 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c
> > @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void enter_uniprocessor(void)
> >       int cpu;
> >       int err;
> >
> > -     if (downed_cpus == NULL &&
> > +     if (!cpumask_available(downed_cpus) &&
> >           !alloc_cpumask_var(&downed_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> >               pr_notice("Failed to allocate mask\n");
> >               goto out;
> > @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static void leave_uniprocessor(void)
> >       int cpu;
> >       int err;
> >
> > -     if (downed_cpus == NULL || cpumask_weight(downed_cpus) == 0)
> > +     if (!cpumask_available(downed_cpus) || cpumask_weight(downed_cpus) == 0)
> >               return;
> >       pr_notice("Re-enabling CPUs...\n");
> >       for_each_cpu(cpu, downed_cpus) {
> >
> > base-commit: ae46d2aa6a7fbe8ca0946f24b061b6ccdc6c3f25
> > --
> > 2.26.0
> >
>
> Gentle ping for acceptance, I am not sure who should take this.

Looks like Steven or Ingo are the listed maintainers for MMIOTRACE?

-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-18 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-08 20:53 [PATCH] x86: mmiotrace: Use cpumask_available for cpumask_var_t variables Nathan Chancellor
2020-04-08 21:12 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-04-08 21:36   ` Sedat Dilek
2020-04-15 13:58     ` Sedat Dilek
2020-04-15 13:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-15 13:51   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-18  9:31 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-05-18 18:52   ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2020-05-18 18:52     ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-05-18 22:35     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-18 22:35       ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-19  0:29       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-19 17:52 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/mmiotrace: Use cpumask_available() " tip-bot2 for Nathan Chancellor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKwvOdmXgYThHRDpt5dFZy5T1zS6MYQhcBNcq6-rsuc5fjiE6Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=karolherbst@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ppaalanen@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.