All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com>
To: liuzhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, sagark@eecs.berkeley.edu,
	bastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RISC-V: Vector && DSP Extension
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 13:29:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL1e-=jceerbvam57mmXoKWHzepB-qUFL08gBEnSws_ohewLzw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97a6ae9f-2845-4a3c-2a31-367787622268@c-sky.com>

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 11:52 AM liuzhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>     My workmate  and I have been working on Vector & Dsp extension, and
> I'd like to share develop status  with folks.
>
>     The spec references for  Vector extension is riscv-v-spec-0.7.1, and
> riscv-p-spec-0.5 for DSP extension.


Hello, Liu.

I will not answer your questions directly, however I want to bring to you
and others another perspective on this situation.

First, please provide the link to the specifications. Via Google, I found
that "riscv-v-spec-0.7.1" is titled "Working draft of the proposed RISC-V V
vector extension". I could not find "riscv-p-spec-0.5".

I am not sure what the QEMU policy towards "working draft proposal" type of
specification is. Peter, can you perhaps clarify that or any other related
issue?

I would advice some caution in these cases. The major issue is backward
compatibility, but there are other issues too. Let's say, fairness. If we
let emulation of a component based on a "working draft proposal" be
integrated into QEMU, this will set a precedent, and many other developer
would rightfully ask for their contributions based on drafts to be
integrated into QEMU. Our policy should be as equal as possible to all
contribution, large or small, riscv or alpha, cpu or device, tcg or kvm -
in my honest opinion. QEMU upstream should not be a collecting place for
all imaginable experimentations, certain criteria on what is appropriate
for upstreaming exist and must continue to exist.

Yours,
Aleksandar




> The code of vector extension is
> ready and under testing,  the first patch will be sent about two weeks
> later. After that we will forward working on DSP extension, and send the
> first patch in middle  October.
>
>      Could the maintainers  tell me whether the specs referenced are
> appropriate? Is anyone working on these extensions?  I'd like to get
> your status, and maybe discuss questions and work togather.
>
> Best Regards
>
> LIU Zhiwei
>
>
>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com>
To: liuzhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	qemu-riscv@nongnu.org,  Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>,
	sagark@eecs.berkeley.edu,  bastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] RISC-V: Vector && DSP Extension
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 13:29:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL1e-=jceerbvam57mmXoKWHzepB-qUFL08gBEnSws_ohewLzw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97a6ae9f-2845-4a3c-2a31-367787622268@c-sky.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2009 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 11:52 AM liuzhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>     My workmate  and I have been working on Vector & Dsp extension, and
> I'd like to share develop status  with folks.
>
>     The spec references for  Vector extension is riscv-v-spec-0.7.1, and
> riscv-p-spec-0.5 for DSP extension.


Hello, Liu.

I will not answer your questions directly, however I want to bring to you
and others another perspective on this situation.

First, please provide the link to the specifications. Via Google, I found
that "riscv-v-spec-0.7.1" is titled "Working draft of the proposed RISC-V V
vector extension". I could not find "riscv-p-spec-0.5".

I am not sure what the QEMU policy towards "working draft proposal" type of
specification is. Peter, can you perhaps clarify that or any other related
issue?

I would advice some caution in these cases. The major issue is backward
compatibility, but there are other issues too. Let's say, fairness. If we
let emulation of a component based on a "working draft proposal" be
integrated into QEMU, this will set a precedent, and many other developer
would rightfully ask for their contributions based on drafts to be
integrated into QEMU. Our policy should be as equal as possible to all
contribution, large or small, riscv or alpha, cpu or device, tcg or kvm -
in my honest opinion. QEMU upstream should not be a collecting place for
all imaginable experimentations, certain criteria on what is appropriate
for upstreaming exist and must continue to exist.

Yours,
Aleksandar




> The code of vector extension is
> ready and under testing,  the first patch will be sent about two weeks
> later. After that we will forward working on DSP extension, and send the
> first patch in middle  October.
>
>      Could the maintainers  tell me whether the specs referenced are
> appropriate? Is anyone working on these extensions?  I'd like to get
> your status, and maybe discuss questions and work togather.
>
> Best Regards
>
> LIU Zhiwei
>
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3031 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-08 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-08  9:39 [Qemu-devel] RISC-V: Vector && DSP Extension liuzhiwei
2019-08-08  9:39 ` [Qemu-riscv] " liuzhiwei
2019-08-08 11:29 ` Aleksandar Markovic [this message]
2019-08-08 11:29   ` [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] " Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-08 13:48   ` Chih-Min Chao
2019-08-08 13:48     ` [Qemu-riscv] " Chih-Min Chao
2019-08-08 14:19     ` Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-08 14:19       ` [Qemu-riscv] " Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-10 13:35     ` LIU ZhiWei
2019-08-10 13:35       ` [Qemu-riscv] " LIU ZhiWei
2019-08-10  1:54 ` Alistair Francis
2019-08-10  1:54   ` [Qemu-riscv] " Alistair Francis
2019-08-10 13:55   ` LIU ZhiWei
2019-08-10 13:55     ` [Qemu-riscv] " LIU ZhiWei
2019-08-11 16:50     ` Alistair Francis
2019-08-11 16:50       ` [Qemu-riscv] " Alistair Francis
2019-08-15  8:53       ` Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-15  8:53         ` [Qemu-riscv] " Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-15  9:07         ` Peter Maydell
2019-08-15  9:07           ` [Qemu-riscv] " Peter Maydell
2019-08-15 10:32           ` Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-15 10:32             ` [Qemu-riscv] " Aleksandar Markovic
2019-08-15 21:37           ` Alistair Francis
2019-08-15 21:37             ` [Qemu-riscv] " Alistair Francis
2019-08-21 19:31             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-08-21 19:31               ` [Qemu-riscv] " Palmer Dabbelt
2019-08-21 23:10               ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-riscv] " Jonathan Behrens
2019-08-21 23:10                 ` [Qemu-riscv] [Qemu-devel] " Jonathan Behrens
2019-08-22  1:50               ` liuzhiwei
2019-08-22  1:50                 ` [Qemu-riscv] " liuzhiwei
2019-08-22 22:37                 ` Alistair Francis
2019-08-22 22:37                   ` [Qemu-riscv] " Alistair Francis
2019-08-28  0:25                   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-08-28  0:25                     ` [Qemu-riscv] " Palmer Dabbelt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAL1e-=jceerbvam57mmXoKWHzepB-qUFL08gBEnSws_ohewLzw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com \
    --cc=Alistair.Francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=bastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sagark@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.