Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: dsa: mt7530: setup core clock even in TRGMII mode

From: Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@gmail.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: dsa: mt7530: setup core clock even in TRGMII mode
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 19:34:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCv0x2HZJXrE7nXu9a+bf1hX5dpUGh1ehqsE_1SyYHFghpiDQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <169c64ac-c200-fa5d-6563-3be5263d0b99@gmail.com>

Hi Florian,

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 7:20 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/10/2021 7:17 PM, Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
> > Hi Vladimir,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 3:10 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Ilya,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:14:20PM -0800, Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
> >>> 3f9ef7785a9c ("MIPS: ralink: manage low reset lines") made it so mt7530
> >>> actually resets the switch on platforms such as mt7621 (where bit 2 is
> >>> the reset line for the switch). That exposed an issue where the switch
> >>> would not function properly in TRGMII mode after a reset.
> >>>
> >>> Reconfigure core clock in TRGMII mode to fix the issue.
> >>>
> >>> Also, disable both core and TRGMII Tx clocks prior to reconfiguring.
> >>> Previously, only the core clock was disabled, but not TRGMII Tx clock.
> >>>
> >>> Tested on Ubiquity ER-X (MT7621) with TRGMII mode enabled.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@gmail.com>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> For the networking subsystem there are two git trees, "net" for bugfixes
> >> and "net-next" for new features, and we specify the target tree using
> >> git send-email --subject-prefix="PATCH net-next".
> >>
> >> I assume you would like the v5.12 kernel to actually be functional on
> >> the Ubiquiti ER-X switch, so I would recommend keeping this patch
> >> minimal and splitting it out from the current series, and targeting it
> >> towards the "net" tree, which will eventually get merged into one of the
> >> v5.12 rc's and then into the final version. The other patches won't go
> >> into v5.12 but into v5.13, hence the "next" name.
> > I thought I figured it out - now I'm confused. Can you explain why
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210311012108.7190-1-ilya.lipnitskiy@gmail.com/
> > is marked as supeseded?
>
> That looks like a mistake on the maintainer side, I do not believe that
> patch should be Superseded since you just submitted it.
Thanks for taking a look. I thought maybe I did something wrong with
submitting the same patch to net and net-next, but the net-next series
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210311020954.842341-1-ilya.lipnitskiy@gmail.com/)
depends on it, so the way I did it made the most sense for me. Let me
know if I did something wrong.
> --
> Florian