All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] memcg: remove pre_destroy()
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:47:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALWz4iwBSuFJaARiNdKWWoF6Xc5S3CHG4CgBXDqc6CyK3Pzc7Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F86BCCE.5050802@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:30 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Tejun Heo, cgroup maintainer, tries to remove ->pre_destroy() to
> prevent rmdir() from failure of EBUSY or some.
>
> This patch removes pre_destroy() in memcg. All remaining charges
> will be moved to other cgroup, without any failure,  ->destroy()
> just schedule a work and it will destroy the memcg.
> Then, rmdir will never fail. The kernel will take care of remaining
> resources in the cgroup to be accounted correctly.
>
> After this patch, memcg will be destroyed by workqueue in asynchrnous way.

Is it necessary to change the destroy asynchronously?

Frankly, i don't that that much. It will leave the system in a
deterministic state on admin perspective. The current synchronous
destroy works fine, and admin can rely on that w/ charging change
after the destroy returns.

--Ying

> Then, we can modify 'moving' logic to work asynchrnously, i.e,
> we don't force users to wait for the end of rmdir(), now. We don't
> need to use heavy synchronous calls. This patch modifies logics as
>
>  - Use mem_cgroup_drain_stock_async rather tan drain_stock_sync.
>  - lru_add_drain_all() will be called only when necessary, in a lazy way.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 22c8faa..e466809 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -315,6 +315,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_INET
>        struct tcp_memcontrol tcp_mem;
>  #endif
> +
> +       struct work_struct work_destroy;
>  };
>
>  /* Stuffs for move charges at task migration. */
> @@ -2105,7 +2107,6 @@ static void drain_all_stock_async(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
>        mutex_unlock(&percpu_charge_mutex);
>  }
>
> -/* This is a synchronous drain interface. */
>  static void drain_all_stock_sync(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
>  {
>        /* called when force_empty is called */
> @@ -3661,10 +3662,9 @@ static int mem_cgroup_recharge_lru(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>                pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
>
>                ret = mem_cgroup_move_parent(page, pc, memcg, GFP_KERNEL);
> -               if (ret == -EINTR)
> -                       break;
>
> -               if (ret == -EBUSY || ret == -EINVAL) {
> +               VM_BUG_ON(ret != 0 && ret != -EBUSY);
> +               if (ret) {
>                        /* found lock contention or "pc" is obsolete. */
>                        busy = page;
>                        cond_resched();
> @@ -3677,22 +3677,19 @@ static int mem_cgroup_recharge_lru(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>        return ret;
>  }
>
> -
> -static int mem_cgroup_recharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +/*
> + * This function is called after ->destroy(). So, we cannot access cgroup
> + * of this memcg.
> + */
> +static void mem_cgroup_recharge(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
> +       struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>        int ret, node, zid;
> -       struct cgroup *cgrp = memcg->css.cgroup;
>
> +       memcg = container_of(work, struct mem_cgroup, work_destroy);
> +       /* No task points this memcg. call this only once */
> +       drain_all_stock_async(memcg);
>        do {
> -               ret = -EBUSY;
> -               if (cgroup_task_count(cgrp) || !list_empty(&cgrp->children))
> -                       goto out;
> -               ret = -EINTR;
> -               if (signal_pending(current))
> -                       goto out;
> -               /* This is for making all *used* pages to be on LRU. */
> -               lru_add_drain_all();
> -               drain_all_stock_sync(memcg);
>                ret = 0;
>                mem_cgroup_start_move(memcg);
>                for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
> @@ -3710,13 +3707,14 @@ static int mem_cgroup_recharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>                }
>                mem_cgroup_end_move(memcg);
>                cond_resched();
> -       /* "ret" should also be checked to ensure all lists are empty. */
> -       } while (memcg->res.usage > 0 || ret);
> -out:
> -       return ret;
> +               /* drain LRU only when we canoot find pages on LRU */
> +               if (res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE) &&
> +                   !mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, LRU_ALL))
> +                       lru_add_drain_all();
> +       } while (res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE) || ret);
> +       mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
>  }
>
> -
>  /*
>  * make mem_cgroup's charge to be 0 if there is no task. This is only called
>  * by memory.force_empty file, an user request.
> @@ -4803,6 +4801,7 @@ static void vfree_work(struct work_struct *work)
>        memcg = container_of(work, struct mem_cgroup, work_freeing);
>        vfree(memcg);
>  }
> +
>  static void vfree_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
>  {
>        struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> @@ -4982,20 +4981,14 @@ free_out:
>        return ERR_PTR(error);
>  }
>
> -static int mem_cgroup_pre_destroy(struct cgroup *cont)
> -{
> -       struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
> -
> -       return mem_cgroup_recharge(memcg);
> -}
> -
>  static void mem_cgroup_destroy(struct cgroup *cont)
>  {
>        struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
>
>        kmem_cgroup_destroy(cont);
>
> -       mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> +       INIT_WORK(&memcg->work_destroy, mem_cgroup_recharge);
> +       schedule_work(&memcg->work_destroy);
>  }
>
>  static int mem_cgroup_populate(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> @@ -5589,7 +5582,6 @@ struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys = {
>        .name = "memory",
>        .subsys_id = mem_cgroup_subsys_id,
>        .create = mem_cgroup_create,
> -       .pre_destroy = mem_cgroup_pre_destroy,
>        .destroy = mem_cgroup_destroy,
>        .populate = mem_cgroup_populate,
>        .can_attach = mem_cgroup_can_attach,
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ying Han <yinghan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
	<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	"cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] memcg: remove pre_destroy()
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:47:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALWz4iwBSuFJaARiNdKWWoF6Xc5S3CHG4CgBXDqc6CyK3Pzc7Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F86BCCE.5050802-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:30 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Tejun Heo, cgroup maintainer, tries to remove ->pre_destroy() to
> prevent rmdir() from failure of EBUSY or some.
>
> This patch removes pre_destroy() in memcg. All remaining charges
> will be moved to other cgroup, without any failure,  ->destroy()
> just schedule a work and it will destroy the memcg.
> Then, rmdir will never fail. The kernel will take care of remaining
> resources in the cgroup to be accounted correctly.
>
> After this patch, memcg will be destroyed by workqueue in asynchrnous way.

Is it necessary to change the destroy asynchronously?

Frankly, i don't that that much. It will leave the system in a
deterministic state on admin perspective. The current synchronous
destroy works fine, and admin can rely on that w/ charging change
after the destroy returns.

--Ying

> Then, we can modify 'moving' logic to work asynchrnously, i.e,
> we don't force users to wait for the end of rmdir(), now. We don't
> need to use heavy synchronous calls. This patch modifies logics as
>
>  - Use mem_cgroup_drain_stock_async rather tan drain_stock_sync.
>  - lru_add_drain_all() will be called only when necessary, in a lazy way.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 22c8faa..e466809 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -315,6 +315,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_INET
>        struct tcp_memcontrol tcp_mem;
>  #endif
> +
> +       struct work_struct work_destroy;
>  };
>
>  /* Stuffs for move charges at task migration. */
> @@ -2105,7 +2107,6 @@ static void drain_all_stock_async(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
>        mutex_unlock(&percpu_charge_mutex);
>  }
>
> -/* This is a synchronous drain interface. */
>  static void drain_all_stock_sync(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
>  {
>        /* called when force_empty is called */
> @@ -3661,10 +3662,9 @@ static int mem_cgroup_recharge_lru(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>                pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
>
>                ret = mem_cgroup_move_parent(page, pc, memcg, GFP_KERNEL);
> -               if (ret == -EINTR)
> -                       break;
>
> -               if (ret == -EBUSY || ret == -EINVAL) {
> +               VM_BUG_ON(ret != 0 && ret != -EBUSY);
> +               if (ret) {
>                        /* found lock contention or "pc" is obsolete. */
>                        busy = page;
>                        cond_resched();
> @@ -3677,22 +3677,19 @@ static int mem_cgroup_recharge_lru(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>        return ret;
>  }
>
> -
> -static int mem_cgroup_recharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +/*
> + * This function is called after ->destroy(). So, we cannot access cgroup
> + * of this memcg.
> + */
> +static void mem_cgroup_recharge(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
> +       struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>        int ret, node, zid;
> -       struct cgroup *cgrp = memcg->css.cgroup;
>
> +       memcg = container_of(work, struct mem_cgroup, work_destroy);
> +       /* No task points this memcg. call this only once */
> +       drain_all_stock_async(memcg);
>        do {
> -               ret = -EBUSY;
> -               if (cgroup_task_count(cgrp) || !list_empty(&cgrp->children))
> -                       goto out;
> -               ret = -EINTR;
> -               if (signal_pending(current))
> -                       goto out;
> -               /* This is for making all *used* pages to be on LRU. */
> -               lru_add_drain_all();
> -               drain_all_stock_sync(memcg);
>                ret = 0;
>                mem_cgroup_start_move(memcg);
>                for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
> @@ -3710,13 +3707,14 @@ static int mem_cgroup_recharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>                }
>                mem_cgroup_end_move(memcg);
>                cond_resched();
> -       /* "ret" should also be checked to ensure all lists are empty. */
> -       } while (memcg->res.usage > 0 || ret);
> -out:
> -       return ret;
> +               /* drain LRU only when we canoot find pages on LRU */
> +               if (res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE) &&
> +                   !mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, LRU_ALL))
> +                       lru_add_drain_all();
> +       } while (res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE) || ret);
> +       mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
>  }
>
> -
>  /*
>  * make mem_cgroup's charge to be 0 if there is no task. This is only called
>  * by memory.force_empty file, an user request.
> @@ -4803,6 +4801,7 @@ static void vfree_work(struct work_struct *work)
>        memcg = container_of(work, struct mem_cgroup, work_freeing);
>        vfree(memcg);
>  }
> +
>  static void vfree_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
>  {
>        struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> @@ -4982,20 +4981,14 @@ free_out:
>        return ERR_PTR(error);
>  }
>
> -static int mem_cgroup_pre_destroy(struct cgroup *cont)
> -{
> -       struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
> -
> -       return mem_cgroup_recharge(memcg);
> -}
> -
>  static void mem_cgroup_destroy(struct cgroup *cont)
>  {
>        struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
>
>        kmem_cgroup_destroy(cont);
>
> -       mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> +       INIT_WORK(&memcg->work_destroy, mem_cgroup_recharge);
> +       schedule_work(&memcg->work_destroy);
>  }
>
>  static int mem_cgroup_populate(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> @@ -5589,7 +5582,6 @@ struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys = {
>        .name = "memory",
>        .subsys_id = mem_cgroup_subsys_id,
>        .create = mem_cgroup_create,
> -       .pre_destroy = mem_cgroup_pre_destroy,
>        .destroy = mem_cgroup_destroy,
>        .populate = mem_cgroup_populate,
>        .can_attach = mem_cgroup_can_attach,
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo-Bw31MaZKKs0EbZ0PF+XxCw@public.gmane.org  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org"> email-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-17 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-12 11:17 [PATCH v1 0/7] memcg remove pre_destroy KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 11:20 ` [PATCH 1/7] res_counter: add a function res_counter_move_parent() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 11:20   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 13:22   ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-12 14:30     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-13  0:57       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-13  0:57         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-13  1:04         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-13  1:04           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-13  1:05           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-16 22:19   ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-16 22:19     ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-18  6:59     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-18  6:59       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-16 22:31   ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-18  7:04     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-18  7:04       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-18 17:03       ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-18 17:03         ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-12 11:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] memcg: move charge to parent only when necessary KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 11:21   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-16 22:21   ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-16 22:21     ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-18  7:01     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-18  7:01       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 11:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] memcg: move charges to root at rmdir() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 11:22   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-16 22:30   ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-16 22:30     ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-18  7:02     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 11:24 ` [PATCH 4/7] memcg: remove 'uncharge' argument from mem_cgroup_move_account() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 11:24   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 13:27   ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-13  1:01     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 11:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] memcg: divide force_empty into 2 functions, avoid memory reclaim at rmdir KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 11:28   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 13:33   ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-17 17:29   ` Ying Han
2012-04-18  7:14     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-18  7:14       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 11:30 ` [PATCH 6/7] memcg: remove pre_destroy() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 11:30   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-16 22:38   ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-18  7:12     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-18  7:12       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-17 17:47   ` Ying Han [this message]
2012-04-17 17:47     ` Ying Han
2012-04-12 11:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] memcg: remove drain_all_stock_sync KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 11:31   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 13:35   ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-12 13:35     ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-12 13:20 ` [PATCH v1 0/7] memcg remove pre_destroy Glauber Costa
2012-04-12 13:20   ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-12 16:06 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-12 16:06   ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-12 18:57   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-12 18:57     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-12 23:59     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-13  8:50       ` Michal Hocko
2012-04-13  8:50         ` Michal Hocko
2012-04-13 22:19         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-13 22:19           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-16 22:41 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-16 22:41   ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-17 17:35 ` Ying Han
2012-04-18  7:15   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-18  7:15     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALWz4iwBSuFJaARiNdKWWoF6Xc5S3CHG4CgBXDqc6CyK3Pzc7Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yinghan@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.