From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> Cc: "Naveen Naidu" <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>, PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/22] PCI: Unify PCI error response checking Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:06:42 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLobP9MM0EFnof_nDOBrox=gKH3xe3EQbqPceq8pRRgyA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20211013024355.GA1865721@bhelgaas> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 9:43 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote: > > [+cc Pali] > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:05:54PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:08:32PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote: > > > An MMIO read from a PCI device that doesn't exist or doesn't respond > > > causes a PCI error. There's no real data to return to satisfy the > > > CPU read, so most hardware fabricates ~0 data. > > > > > > Use SET_PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE() to set the error response and > > > RESPONSE_IS_PCI_ERROR() to check the error response during hardware > > > read. > > > > > > These definitions make error checks consistent and easier to find. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/pci/access.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c > > > index 46935695cfb9..e1954bbbd137 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/access.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/access.c > > > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ int pci_generic_config_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, > > > > > > addr = bus->ops->map_bus(bus, devfn, where); > > > if (!addr) { > > > - *val = ~0; > > > + SET_PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE(val); > > > > This to me doesn't look like kernel style. I'd rather see a define > > replace just '~0', but I defer to Bjorn. > > > > > return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > > > > Neither does this using custom error codes rather than standard Linux > > errno. I point this out as I that's were I'd start with the config > > accessors. Though there are lots of occurrences so we'd need a way to do > > this in manageable steps. > > I would love to see PCIBIOS_* confined to arch/x86 and everywhere else > using standard Linux error codes. Based on Pali's and your replies, I take it that these values originate in x86 firmware, so the x86 code needs to convert to Linux error codes and everywhere else can use Linux error codes everywhere. > That's probably a lot of work, but > Naveen has a lot of energy :) There's 210 in drivers/pci/, 62 in the rest of drivers/ and 437 in arch/. 332 are PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL which won't change values. Most of drivers/pci/ and arch/ returning the value while the rest of drivers/ is comparing the returned value (mostly to PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL). There could be checks such as 'if (ret > 0)' which are harder to find. A coccinelle patch might be helpful here. I think we want to do things in the following order: - Rework any callers expecting a positive return value - Make the config accessor defines convert positive error codes to Linux error codes - Convert pci_ops implementations to Linux error codes one by one. I also considered we could make the accessors convert negative error codes back to positive PCIBIOS_ values, then no callers have to be checked/fixed first. > > Can't we make PCI_OP_READ and PCI_USER_READ_CONFIG set the data value > > and delete the drivers all doing this? Then we have 2 copies (in source) > > rather than the many this series modifies. Though I'm not sure if there > > are other cases of calling pci_bus.ops.read() which expect to get ~0. > > That does seem like a really good idea. I don't it matters what order we do these, so this can happen first. Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>, "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/22] PCI: Unify PCI error response checking Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:06:42 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLobP9MM0EFnof_nDOBrox=gKH3xe3EQbqPceq8pRRgyA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20211013024355.GA1865721@bhelgaas> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 9:43 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote: > > [+cc Pali] > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:05:54PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:08:32PM +0530, Naveen Naidu wrote: > > > An MMIO read from a PCI device that doesn't exist or doesn't respond > > > causes a PCI error. There's no real data to return to satisfy the > > > CPU read, so most hardware fabricates ~0 data. > > > > > > Use SET_PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE() to set the error response and > > > RESPONSE_IS_PCI_ERROR() to check the error response during hardware > > > read. > > > > > > These definitions make error checks consistent and easier to find. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/pci/access.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c > > > index 46935695cfb9..e1954bbbd137 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/access.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/access.c > > > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ int pci_generic_config_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, > > > > > > addr = bus->ops->map_bus(bus, devfn, where); > > > if (!addr) { > > > - *val = ~0; > > > + SET_PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE(val); > > > > This to me doesn't look like kernel style. I'd rather see a define > > replace just '~0', but I defer to Bjorn. > > > > > return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > > > > Neither does this using custom error codes rather than standard Linux > > errno. I point this out as I that's were I'd start with the config > > accessors. Though there are lots of occurrences so we'd need a way to do > > this in manageable steps. > > I would love to see PCIBIOS_* confined to arch/x86 and everywhere else > using standard Linux error codes. Based on Pali's and your replies, I take it that these values originate in x86 firmware, so the x86 code needs to convert to Linux error codes and everywhere else can use Linux error codes everywhere. > That's probably a lot of work, but > Naveen has a lot of energy :) There's 210 in drivers/pci/, 62 in the rest of drivers/ and 437 in arch/. 332 are PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL which won't change values. Most of drivers/pci/ and arch/ returning the value while the rest of drivers/ is comparing the returned value (mostly to PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL). There could be checks such as 'if (ret > 0)' which are harder to find. A coccinelle patch might be helpful here. I think we want to do things in the following order: - Rework any callers expecting a positive return value - Make the config accessor defines convert positive error codes to Linux error codes - Convert pci_ops implementations to Linux error codes one by one. I also considered we could make the accessors convert negative error codes back to positive PCIBIOS_ values, then no callers have to be checked/fixed first. > > Can't we make PCI_OP_READ and PCI_USER_READ_CONFIG set the data value > > and delete the drivers all doing this? Then we have 2 copies (in source) > > rather than the many this series modifies. Though I'm not sure if there > > are other cases of calling pci_bus.ops.read() which expect to get ~0. > > That does seem like a really good idea. I don't it matters what order we do these, so this can happen first. Rob _______________________________________________ Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-13 13:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-10-11 17:35 [PATCH 00/22] PCI: Unify PCI error response checking Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:35 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:35 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:35 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:35 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:35 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:37 ` [PATCH 01/22] PCI: Add PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE and it's related defintions Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:37 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:37 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:37 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:37 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:37 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:38 ` [PATCH 02/22] PCI: Unify PCI error response checking Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:38 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 22:05 ` Rob Herring 2021-10-11 22:05 ` Rob Herring 2021-10-12 16:21 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-12 16:21 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-12 18:02 ` Rob Herring 2021-10-12 18:02 ` Rob Herring 2021-10-12 22:52 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-12 22:52 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-13 2:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2021-10-13 2:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2021-10-13 13:06 ` Rob Herring [this message] 2021-10-13 13:06 ` Rob Herring 2021-10-13 17:16 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-13 17:16 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-13 17:54 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-13 17:54 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-13 18:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2021-10-13 18:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2021-10-13 21:47 ` Rob Herring 2021-10-13 21:47 ` Rob Herring 2021-10-13 22:03 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-13 22:03 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-13 22:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2021-10-13 22:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2021-10-11 17:45 ` [PATCH 03/22] PCI: thunder: Use SET_PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE() when device not found Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:45 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:45 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:46 ` [PATCH 04/22] PCI: iproc: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:46 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:46 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:51 ` [PATCH 05/22] PCI: mediatek: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:51 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:51 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:51 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH 06/22] PCI: exynos: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:52 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:52 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:53 ` [PATCH 07/22] PCI: histb: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:53 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:55 ` [PATCH 08/22] PCI: kirin: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:55 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:56 ` [PATCH 09/22] PCI: aardvark: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:56 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 17:56 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:08 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-11 18:08 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-11 18:08 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-11 18:28 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:28 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:28 ` Naveen Naidu [not found] ` <20211011182526.kboaxqofdpd2jjrl@theprophet> 2021-10-11 18:41 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-11 18:41 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-11 18:41 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-12 15:59 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-12 15:59 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-12 15:59 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-13 2:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2021-10-13 2:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2021-10-13 2:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2021-10-13 17:59 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-13 17:59 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-13 17:59 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-11 18:00 ` [PATCH 10/22] PCI: mvebu: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:00 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:00 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:00 ` [PATCH 11/22] PCI: altera: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:00 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:02 ` [PATCH 12/22] PCI: rcar: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:02 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:02 ` [PATCH 13/22] PCI: rockchip: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:02 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:02 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:02 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:04 ` [PATCH 14/22] PCI/ERR: Use RESPONSE_IS_PCI_ERROR() to check read from hardware Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:04 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:06 ` [PATCH 15/22] PCI: vmd: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:06 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-14 18:04 ` Jonathan Derrick 2021-10-14 18:04 ` Jonathan Derrick 2021-10-11 18:07 ` [PATCH 16/22] PCI: pciehp: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:07 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 19:47 ` Lukas Wunner 2021-10-11 19:47 ` Lukas Wunner 2021-10-12 16:05 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-12 16:05 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-12 23:12 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-12 23:12 ` Pali Rohár 2021-10-13 12:20 ` Lukas Wunner 2021-10-13 12:20 ` Lukas Wunner 2021-10-11 18:08 ` [PATCH 17/22] PCI/DPC: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:08 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:08 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:10 ` [PATCH 18/22] PCI/PME: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:10 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:11 ` [PATCH 19/22] PCI: cpqphp: " Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:11 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:11 ` [PATCH 20/22] PCI: keystone: Use PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE to specify hardware error Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:11 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:12 ` [PATCH 21/22] PCI: hv: Use PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE to specify hardware read error Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:12 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:13 ` [PATCH 22/22] PCI: xgene: Use PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE to specify hardware error Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:13 ` Naveen Naidu 2021-10-11 18:13 ` Naveen Naidu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAL_JsqLobP9MM0EFnof_nDOBrox=gKH3xe3EQbqPceq8pRRgyA@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=robh@kernel.org \ --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \ --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=naveennaidu479@gmail.com \ --cc=pali@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.