All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	kernel@openvz.org, Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc: remove memcg accounting for sops objects in do_semtimedop()
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 21:32:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod7Y4pC4XvqVp+tJ==CnS5Ay8YPqrxeUzA8tMLu+0U3hjQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YT8NrsaztWNDpKXk@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:37 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
>
[...]
> > However Shakeel Butt pointed that there are much more popular objects
> > with the same life time and similar memory consumption, the accounting
> > of which was decided to be rejected for performance reasons.
>
> Is there any measurable performance impact in this particular case?
>

I don't think there was any regression report or any performance
evaluation. Linus raised the concern on the potential performance
impact. I suggested to backoff for this allocation for now and revisit
again once we have improved the memcg accounting for kernel memory.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Vasily Averin <vvs-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Linus Torvalds
	<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	kernel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	Cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc: remove memcg accounting for sops objects in do_semtimedop()
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 21:32:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALvZod7Y4pC4XvqVp+tJ==CnS5Ay8YPqrxeUzA8tMLu+0U3hjQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YT8NrsaztWNDpKXk-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:37 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
[...]
> > However Shakeel Butt pointed that there are much more popular objects
> > with the same life time and similar memory consumption, the accounting
> > of which was decided to be rejected for performance reasons.
>
> Is there any measurable performance impact in this particular case?
>

I don't think there was any regression report or any performance
evaluation. Linus raised the concern on the potential performance
impact. I suggested to backoff for this allocation for now and revisit
again once we have improved the memcg accounting for kernel memory.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-14  4:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-11  7:40 [PATCH] ipc: remove memcg accounting for sops objects in do_semtimedop() Vasily Averin
2021-09-11  7:40 ` Vasily Averin
2021-09-12 16:05 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-09-12 16:05   ` Shakeel Butt
2021-09-13  8:37 ` Michal Hocko
2021-09-13  8:37   ` Michal Hocko
2021-09-14  4:32   ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2021-09-14  4:32     ` Shakeel Butt
2021-09-14  7:13     ` Michal Hocko
2021-09-14  7:13       ` Michal Hocko
2021-09-14 14:23       ` Michal Koutný
2021-09-14 14:23         ` Michal Koutný
2021-09-14 14:32         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALvZod7Y4pC4XvqVp+tJ==CnS5Ay8YPqrxeUzA8tMLu+0U3hjQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vvs@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.