All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 梦龙董 <dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eddy Z <eddyz87@gmail.com>,  Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	 Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	 X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>,
	 bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/9] bpf: tracing: add support to record and check the accessed args
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:53:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALz3k9g9k7fEwdTZVLhrmGoXp8CE47Q+83r-AZDXrzzuR+CjVA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQLwgw8bQ7OHBbqLhcPJ2QpxiGw3fkMFur+2cjZpM_78oA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:42 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 7:42 PM 梦龙董 <dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com> wrote:
> >
[......]
>
> I see.
> I thought you're sharing the trampoline across attachments.
> (since bpf prog is the same).

That seems to be a good idea, which I hadn't thought before.

> But above approach cannot possibly work with a shared trampoline.
> You need to create individual trampoline for all attachment
> and point them to single bpf prog.
>
> tbh I'm less excited about this feature now, since sharing
> the prog across different attachments is nice, but it won't scale
> to thousands of attachments.
> I assumed that there will be a single trampoline with max(argno)
> across attachments and attach/detach will scale to thousands.
>
> With individual trampoline this will work for up to a hundred
> attachments max.

What does "a hundred attachments max" means? Can't I
trace thousands of kernel functions with a bpf program of
tracing multi-link?

>
> Let's step back.
> What is the exact use case you're trying to solve?
> Not an artificial one as selftest in patch 9, but the real use case?

I have a tool, which is used to diagnose network problems,
and its name is "nettrace". It will trace many kernel functions, whose
function args contain "skb", like this:

./nettrace -p icmp
begin trace...
***************** ffff889be8fbd500,ffff889be8fbcd00 ***************
[1272349.614564] [dev_gro_receive     ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614579] [__netif_receive_skb_core] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614585] [ip_rcv              ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614592] [ip_rcv_core         ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614599] [skb_clone           ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614616] [nf_hook_slow        ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614629] [nft_do_chain        ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614635] [ip_rcv_finish       ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614643] [ip_route_input_slow ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614647] [fib_validate_source ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614652] [ip_local_deliver    ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614658] [nf_hook_slow        ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614663] [ip_local_deliver_finish] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614666] [icmp_rcv            ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614671] [icmp_echo           ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614675] [icmp_reply          ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614715] [consume_skb         ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614722] [packet_rcv          ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614725] [consume_skb         ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220

For now, I have to create a bpf program for every kernel
function that I want to trace, which is up to 200.

With this multi-link, I only need to create 5 bpf program,
like this:

int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_1, struct *skb);
int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_2, u64 arg0, struct *skb);
int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_3, u64 arg0, u64 arg1, struct *skb);
int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_4, u64 arg0, u64 arg1, u64 arg2, struct *skb);
int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_5, u64 arg0, u64 arg1, u64 arg2, u64 arg3, struct *skb);

Then, I can attach trace_skb_1 to all the kernel functions that
I want to trace and whose first arg is skb; attach trace_skb_2 to kernel
functions whose 2nd arg is skb, etc.

Or, I can create only one bpf program and store the index
of skb to the attachment cookie, and attach this program to all
the kernel functions that I want to trace.

This is my use case. With the multi-link, now I only have
1 bpf program, 1 bpf link, 200 trampolines, instead of 200
bpf programs, 200 bpf link and 200 trampolines.

The shared trampoline you mentioned seems to be a
wonderful idea, which can make the 200 trampolines
to one. Let me have a look, we create a trampoline and
record the max args count of all the target functions, let's
mark it as arg_count.

During generating the trampoline, we assume that the
function args count is arg_count. During attaching, we
check the consistency of all the target functions, just like
what we do now.

Am I right?

Thanks!
Menglong Dong

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: 梦龙董 <dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eddy Z <eddyz87@gmail.com>,  Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	 Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	 X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>,
	 bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/9] bpf: tracing: add support to record and check the accessed args
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:53:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALz3k9g9k7fEwdTZVLhrmGoXp8CE47Q+83r-AZDXrzzuR+CjVA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQLwgw8bQ7OHBbqLhcPJ2QpxiGw3fkMFur+2cjZpM_78oA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:42 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 7:42 PM 梦龙董 <dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com> wrote:
> >
[......]
>
> I see.
> I thought you're sharing the trampoline across attachments.
> (since bpf prog is the same).

That seems to be a good idea, which I hadn't thought before.

> But above approach cannot possibly work with a shared trampoline.
> You need to create individual trampoline for all attachment
> and point them to single bpf prog.
>
> tbh I'm less excited about this feature now, since sharing
> the prog across different attachments is nice, but it won't scale
> to thousands of attachments.
> I assumed that there will be a single trampoline with max(argno)
> across attachments and attach/detach will scale to thousands.
>
> With individual trampoline this will work for up to a hundred
> attachments max.

What does "a hundred attachments max" means? Can't I
trace thousands of kernel functions with a bpf program of
tracing multi-link?

>
> Let's step back.
> What is the exact use case you're trying to solve?
> Not an artificial one as selftest in patch 9, but the real use case?

I have a tool, which is used to diagnose network problems,
and its name is "nettrace". It will trace many kernel functions, whose
function args contain "skb", like this:

./nettrace -p icmp
begin trace...
***************** ffff889be8fbd500,ffff889be8fbcd00 ***************
[1272349.614564] [dev_gro_receive     ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614579] [__netif_receive_skb_core] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614585] [ip_rcv              ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614592] [ip_rcv_core         ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614599] [skb_clone           ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614616] [nf_hook_slow        ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614629] [nft_do_chain        ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614635] [ip_rcv_finish       ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614643] [ip_route_input_slow ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614647] [fib_validate_source ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614652] [ip_local_deliver    ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614658] [nf_hook_slow        ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614663] [ip_local_deliver_finish] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614666] [icmp_rcv            ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614671] [icmp_echo           ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614675] [icmp_reply          ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614715] [consume_skb         ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614722] [packet_rcv          ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614725] [consume_skb         ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220

For now, I have to create a bpf program for every kernel
function that I want to trace, which is up to 200.

With this multi-link, I only need to create 5 bpf program,
like this:

int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_1, struct *skb);
int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_2, u64 arg0, struct *skb);
int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_3, u64 arg0, u64 arg1, struct *skb);
int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_4, u64 arg0, u64 arg1, u64 arg2, struct *skb);
int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_5, u64 arg0, u64 arg1, u64 arg2, u64 arg3, struct *skb);

Then, I can attach trace_skb_1 to all the kernel functions that
I want to trace and whose first arg is skb; attach trace_skb_2 to kernel
functions whose 2nd arg is skb, etc.

Or, I can create only one bpf program and store the index
of skb to the attachment cookie, and attach this program to all
the kernel functions that I want to trace.

This is my use case. With the multi-link, now I only have
1 bpf program, 1 bpf link, 200 trampolines, instead of 200
bpf programs, 200 bpf link and 200 trampolines.

The shared trampoline you mentioned seems to be a
wonderful idea, which can make the 200 trampolines
to one. Let me have a look, we create a trampoline and
record the max args count of all the target functions, let's
mark it as arg_count.

During generating the trampoline, we assume that the
function args count is arg_count. During attaching, we
check the consistency of all the target functions, just like
what we do now.

Am I right?

Thanks!
Menglong Dong

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: 梦龙董 <dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eddy Z <eddyz87@gmail.com>,  Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	 Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	 David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	 X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>,
	 bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/9] bpf: tracing: add support to record and check the accessed args
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:53:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALz3k9g9k7fEwdTZVLhrmGoXp8CE47Q+83r-AZDXrzzuR+CjVA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQLwgw8bQ7OHBbqLhcPJ2QpxiGw3fkMFur+2cjZpM_78oA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:42 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 7:42 PM 梦龙董 <dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com> wrote:
> >
[......]
>
> I see.
> I thought you're sharing the trampoline across attachments.
> (since bpf prog is the same).

That seems to be a good idea, which I hadn't thought before.

> But above approach cannot possibly work with a shared trampoline.
> You need to create individual trampoline for all attachment
> and point them to single bpf prog.
>
> tbh I'm less excited about this feature now, since sharing
> the prog across different attachments is nice, but it won't scale
> to thousands of attachments.
> I assumed that there will be a single trampoline with max(argno)
> across attachments and attach/detach will scale to thousands.
>
> With individual trampoline this will work for up to a hundred
> attachments max.

What does "a hundred attachments max" means? Can't I
trace thousands of kernel functions with a bpf program of
tracing multi-link?

>
> Let's step back.
> What is the exact use case you're trying to solve?
> Not an artificial one as selftest in patch 9, but the real use case?

I have a tool, which is used to diagnose network problems,
and its name is "nettrace". It will trace many kernel functions, whose
function args contain "skb", like this:

./nettrace -p icmp
begin trace...
***************** ffff889be8fbd500,ffff889be8fbcd00 ***************
[1272349.614564] [dev_gro_receive     ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614579] [__netif_receive_skb_core] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614585] [ip_rcv              ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614592] [ip_rcv_core         ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614599] [skb_clone           ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614616] [nf_hook_slow        ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614629] [nft_do_chain        ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614635] [ip_rcv_finish       ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614643] [ip_route_input_slow ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614647] [fib_validate_source ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614652] [ip_local_deliver    ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614658] [nf_hook_slow        ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614663] [ip_local_deliver_finish] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614666] [icmp_rcv            ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614671] [icmp_echo           ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614675] [icmp_reply          ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614715] [consume_skb         ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614722] [packet_rcv          ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220
[1272349.614725] [consume_skb         ] ICMP: 169.254.128.15 ->
172.27.0.6 ping request, seq: 48220

For now, I have to create a bpf program for every kernel
function that I want to trace, which is up to 200.

With this multi-link, I only need to create 5 bpf program,
like this:

int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_1, struct *skb);
int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_2, u64 arg0, struct *skb);
int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_3, u64 arg0, u64 arg1, struct *skb);
int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_4, u64 arg0, u64 arg1, u64 arg2, struct *skb);
int BPF_PROG(trace_skb_5, u64 arg0, u64 arg1, u64 arg2, u64 arg3, struct *skb);

Then, I can attach trace_skb_1 to all the kernel functions that
I want to trace and whose first arg is skb; attach trace_skb_2 to kernel
functions whose 2nd arg is skb, etc.

Or, I can create only one bpf program and store the index
of skb to the attachment cookie, and attach this program to all
the kernel functions that I want to trace.

This is my use case. With the multi-link, now I only have
1 bpf program, 1 bpf link, 200 trampolines, instead of 200
bpf programs, 200 bpf link and 200 trampolines.

The shared trampoline you mentioned seems to be a
wonderful idea, which can make the 200 trampolines
to one. Let me have a look, we create a trampoline and
record the max args count of all the target functions, let's
mark it as arg_count.

During generating the trampoline, we assume that the
function args count is arg_count. During attaching, we
check the consistency of all the target functions, just like
what we do now.

Am I right?

Thanks!
Menglong Dong

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-13  1:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 161+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-11  9:35 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/9] bpf: make tracing program support multi-link Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35 ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35 ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/9] bpf: tracing: add support to record and check the accessed args Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-12  1:46   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  1:46     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  1:46     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  2:01     ` [External] " 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:01       ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:01       ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:09       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  2:09         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  2:09         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  2:42         ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:42           ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:42           ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:49           ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:49             ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:49             ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12 16:42           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12 16:42             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12 16:42             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-13  1:53             ` 梦龙董 [this message]
2024-03-13  1:53               ` 梦龙董
2024-03-13  1:53               ` 梦龙董
2024-03-14  0:25               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-14  0:25                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-14  0:25                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-14  6:27                 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-14  6:27                   ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-14  6:27                   ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-15  8:17                   ` 梦龙董
2024-03-15  8:17                     ` 梦龙董
2024-03-15  8:17                     ` 梦龙董
2024-03-15  8:00                 ` 梦龙董
2024-03-15  8:00                   ` 梦龙董
2024-03-15  8:00                   ` 梦龙董
2024-03-28 14:43                   ` 梦龙董
2024-03-28 14:43                     ` 梦龙董
2024-03-28 14:43                     ` 梦龙董
2024-03-28 15:13                     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-28 15:13                       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-28 15:13                       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-28 23:17                       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-28 23:17                         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-28 23:17                         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-30  3:36                         ` 梦龙董
2024-03-30  3:36                           ` 梦龙董
2024-03-30  3:36                           ` 梦龙董
2024-03-29 23:28                       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-29 23:28                         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-29 23:28                         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-29 23:28                         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-29 23:28                         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-29 23:28                         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-29 23:28                         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-29 23:28                         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-29 23:28                         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-30  4:16                         ` 梦龙董
2024-03-30  4:16                           ` 梦龙董
2024-03-30  4:16                           ` 梦龙董
2024-03-30 12:27                         ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-30 12:27                           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-30 12:27                           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-30 17:52                           ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-30 17:52                             ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-30 17:52                             ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-31  2:34                             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-31  2:34                               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-31  2:34                               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-31  2:34                               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-31  2:34                               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-31  2:34                               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-31  2:34                               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-31  2:34                               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-30  3:18                       ` 梦龙董
2024-03-30  3:18                         ` 梦龙董
2024-03-30  3:18                         ` 梦龙董
2024-03-30 19:37                         ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-30 19:37                           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-30 19:37                           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-04-01  2:28                           ` 梦龙董
2024-04-01  2:28                             ` 梦龙董
2024-04-01  2:28                             ` 梦龙董
2024-04-01 15:59                             ` Steven Rostedt
2024-04-01 15:59                               ` Steven Rostedt
2024-04-01 15:59                               ` Steven Rostedt
2024-03-11  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/9] bpf: refactor the modules_array to ptr_array Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-12  1:48   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  1:48     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  1:48     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  1:53     ` [External] " 梦龙董
2024-03-12  1:53       ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  1:53       ` 梦龙董
2024-03-11  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/9] bpf: trampoline: introduce struct bpf_tramp_link_conn Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/9] bpf: trampoline: introduce bpf_tramp_multi_link Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/9] bpf: verifier: add btf to the function args of bpf_check_attach_target Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-12  1:51   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  1:51     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  1:51     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  3:13     ` [External] " 梦龙董
2024-03-12  3:13       ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  3:13       ` 梦龙董
2024-03-11  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/9] bpf: tracing: add multi-link support Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11 18:59   ` kernel test robot
2024-03-11 18:59     ` kernel test robot
2024-03-11 18:59     ` kernel test robot
2024-03-11 21:36   ` kernel test robot
2024-03-11 21:36     ` kernel test robot
2024-03-11 21:36     ` kernel test robot
2024-03-11  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/9] libbpf: don't free btf if program of multi-link tracing existing Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-12  1:55   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  1:55     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  1:55     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  2:05     ` [External] " 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:05       ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:05       ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:13       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  2:13         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  2:13         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  2:56         ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:56           ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:56           ` 梦龙董
2024-03-11  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/9] libbpf: add support for the multi-link of tracing Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11 15:29   ` Quentin Monnet
2024-03-11 15:29     ` Quentin Monnet
2024-03-11 15:29     ` Quentin Monnet
2024-03-12  1:43     ` [External] " 梦龙董
2024-03-12  1:43       ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  1:43       ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  1:56   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  1:56     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  1:56     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12  2:44     ` [External] " 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:44       ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12  2:44       ` 梦龙董
2024-03-12 16:11       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12 16:11         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-12 16:11         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-03-13  1:14         ` 梦龙董
2024-03-13  1:14           ` 梦龙董
2024-03-13  1:14           ` 梦龙董
2024-03-11  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 9/9] selftests/bpf: add testcases for " Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong
2024-03-11  9:35   ` Menglong Dong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALz3k9g9k7fEwdTZVLhrmGoXp8CE47Q+83r-AZDXrzzuR+CjVA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.