All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	"Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>,
	"moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)" 
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)" 
	<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)" 
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv)" 
	<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs at all levels in the shadow MMU
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 14:34:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALzav=fQoqet7-MnNvsJ-deJ7RxiuiH_bHMwAEHNuXJ1VGqg0Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YnlB8n8UMCuaCj1G@google.com>

On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 9:31 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe a slight tweak to the shortlog?  "Zap collapsible SPTEs at all levels in
> the shadow MMU" left me wondering "when is KVM zapping at all levels?"
>
>   KVM: x86/mmu: Zap all possible levels in shadow MMU when collapsing SPTEs
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, David Matlack wrote:
> > Currently KVM only zaps collapsible 4KiB SPTEs in the shadow MMU (i.e.
> > in the rmap). This is fine for now KVM never creates intermediate huge
> > pages during dirty logging, i.e. a 1GiB page is never partially split to
> > a 2MiB page.
>
> "partially" is really confusing.  I think what you mean is that KVM can split a
> 1gb to a 2mb page, and not split all the way down to 4kb.  But "partially" makes
> it sound like KVM ends up with a huge SPTE that is half split or something.  I
> think you can just avoid that altogether and be more explicit:
>
>   i.e. a 1GiB pager is never split to just 2MiB, dirty logging always splits
>   down to 4KiB pages.
>
> > However, this will stop being true once the shadow MMU participates in
> > eager page splitting, which can in fact leave behind partially split
>
> "partially" again.  Maybe
>
>   which can in fact leave behind 2MiB pages after splitting 1GiB huge pages.

Looks good, I'll incorporate these edits into v5.

>
> > huge pages. In preparation for that change, change the shadow MMU to
> > iterate over all necessary levels when zapping collapsible SPTEs.
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > index ed65899d15a2..479c581e8a96 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > @@ -6098,18 +6098,25 @@ static bool kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte(struct kvm *kvm,
> >       return need_tlb_flush;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void kvm_rmap_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
> > +                                        const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> > +{
> > +     /*
> > +      * Note, use KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL - 1 since there's no need to zap
> > +      * pages that are already mapped at the maximum possible level.
> > +      */
> > +     if (slot_handle_level(kvm, slot, kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte,
> > +                           PG_LEVEL_4K, KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL - 1,
> > +                           true))
> > +             kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
> > +}
> > +
> >  void kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
> >                                  const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> >  {
> >       if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm)) {
> >               write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > -             /*
> > -              * Zap only 4k SPTEs since the legacy MMU only supports dirty
> > -              * logging at a 4k granularity and never creates collapsible
> > -              * 2m SPTEs during dirty logging.
> > -              */
> > -             if (slot_handle_level_4k(kvm, slot, kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte, true))
> > -                     kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
> > +             kvm_rmap_zap_collapsible_sptes(kvm, slot);
> >               write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> >       }
> >
> > --
> > 2.36.0.rc2.479.g8af0fa9b8e-goog
> >

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS \(KVM/mips\)"
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS \(KVM/mips\)"
	<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V \(KVM/riscv\)"
	<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>,
	"moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 \(KVM/arm64\)"
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs at all levels in the shadow MMU
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 14:34:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALzav=fQoqet7-MnNvsJ-deJ7RxiuiH_bHMwAEHNuXJ1VGqg0Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YnlB8n8UMCuaCj1G@google.com>

On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 9:31 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe a slight tweak to the shortlog?  "Zap collapsible SPTEs at all levels in
> the shadow MMU" left me wondering "when is KVM zapping at all levels?"
>
>   KVM: x86/mmu: Zap all possible levels in shadow MMU when collapsing SPTEs
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, David Matlack wrote:
> > Currently KVM only zaps collapsible 4KiB SPTEs in the shadow MMU (i.e.
> > in the rmap). This is fine for now KVM never creates intermediate huge
> > pages during dirty logging, i.e. a 1GiB page is never partially split to
> > a 2MiB page.
>
> "partially" is really confusing.  I think what you mean is that KVM can split a
> 1gb to a 2mb page, and not split all the way down to 4kb.  But "partially" makes
> it sound like KVM ends up with a huge SPTE that is half split or something.  I
> think you can just avoid that altogether and be more explicit:
>
>   i.e. a 1GiB pager is never split to just 2MiB, dirty logging always splits
>   down to 4KiB pages.
>
> > However, this will stop being true once the shadow MMU participates in
> > eager page splitting, which can in fact leave behind partially split
>
> "partially" again.  Maybe
>
>   which can in fact leave behind 2MiB pages after splitting 1GiB huge pages.

Looks good, I'll incorporate these edits into v5.

>
> > huge pages. In preparation for that change, change the shadow MMU to
> > iterate over all necessary levels when zapping collapsible SPTEs.
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > index ed65899d15a2..479c581e8a96 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > @@ -6098,18 +6098,25 @@ static bool kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte(struct kvm *kvm,
> >       return need_tlb_flush;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void kvm_rmap_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
> > +                                        const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> > +{
> > +     /*
> > +      * Note, use KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL - 1 since there's no need to zap
> > +      * pages that are already mapped at the maximum possible level.
> > +      */
> > +     if (slot_handle_level(kvm, slot, kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte,
> > +                           PG_LEVEL_4K, KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL - 1,
> > +                           true))
> > +             kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
> > +}
> > +
> >  void kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
> >                                  const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> >  {
> >       if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm)) {
> >               write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > -             /*
> > -              * Zap only 4k SPTEs since the legacy MMU only supports dirty
> > -              * logging at a 4k granularity and never creates collapsible
> > -              * 2m SPTEs during dirty logging.
> > -              */
> > -             if (slot_handle_level_4k(kvm, slot, kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte, true))
> > -                     kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
> > +             kvm_rmap_zap_collapsible_sptes(kvm, slot);
> >               write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> >       }
> >
> > --
> > 2.36.0.rc2.479.g8af0fa9b8e-goog
> >
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-09 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-22 21:05 [PATCH v4 00/20] KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 01/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize MMU page cache lookup for all direct SPs David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-07  7:46   ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-07  7:46     ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 02/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Use a bool for direct David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-07  7:46   ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-07  7:46     ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 03/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive shadow MMU page role from parent David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-05 21:50   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-05 21:50     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 22:10     ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 22:10       ` David Matlack
2022-05-10  2:38       ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-10  2:38         ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-07  8:28   ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-07  8:28     ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-09 21:04     ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 21:04       ` David Matlack
2022-05-10  2:58       ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-10  2:58         ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-10 13:31         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-10 13:31           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-12 16:10         ` David Matlack
2022-05-12 16:10           ` David Matlack
2022-05-13 18:26           ` David Matlack
2022-05-13 18:26             ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 04/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Decompose kvm_mmu_get_page() into separate functions David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-05 21:58   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-05 21:58     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 05/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Consolidate shadow page allocation and initialization David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-05 22:10   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-05 22:10     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 20:53     ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 20:53       ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 06/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename shadow MMU functions that deal with shadow pages David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-05 22:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-05 22:15     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 07/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Move guest PT write-protection to account_shadowed() David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-05 22:51   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-05 22:51     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 21:18     ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 21:18       ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 08/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass memory caches to allocate SPs separately David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-05 23:00   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-05 23:00     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 09/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu with kvm in kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 10/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass kvm pointer separately from vcpu to kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 11/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow for NULL vcpu pointer in __kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-05 23:33   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-05 23:33     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 21:26     ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 21:26       ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 22:56       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 22:56         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 23:59         ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 23:59           ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 12/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 13/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Decouple rmap_add() and link_shadow_page() from kvm_vcpu David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-05 23:46   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-05 23:46     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 21:27     ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 21:27       ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 14/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Update page stats in __rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 15/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Cache the access bits of shadowed translations David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-06 19:47   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-06 19:47     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 16:10   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 16:10     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 21:29     ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 21:29       ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 16/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_huge_page_split_spte() for the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 16:22   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 16:22     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 21:31     ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 21:31       ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 17/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs at all levels in " David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 16:31   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 16:31     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 21:34     ` David Matlack [this message]
2022-05-09 21:34       ` David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 18/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor drop_large_spte() David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 16:36   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 16:36     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 19/20] KVM: Allow for different capacities in kvm_mmu_memory_cache structs David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-04-23  8:08   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-23  8:08     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-24 15:21   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-24 15:21     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-22 21:05 ` [PATCH v4 20/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend Eager Page Splitting to nested MMUs David Matlack
2022-04-22 21:05   ` David Matlack
2022-05-07  7:51   ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-07  7:51     ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-05-09 21:40     ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 21:40       ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 16:48   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 16:48     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 21:44     ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 21:44       ` David Matlack
2022-05-09 22:47       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-09 22:47         ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALzav=fQoqet7-MnNvsJ-deJ7RxiuiH_bHMwAEHNuXJ1VGqg0Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pfeiner@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.