Re: Migrate, or not Migrate, that's the question!!!

[Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1446 bytes --]

Bryan,


On 28 January 2016 at 13:49, Bryan Evenson <bevenson@melinkcorp.com> wrote:

> In my opinion, I think in the long term it would be easier to make a clean
> break.  Start with a recent branch, like Jethro, get a minimal image to
> build for your hardware and then add your own layer with your proprietary
> recipes.  I think that will be a lot easier than trying to get oe-core
> working with 5+ year old versions of gcc and eglibc.  Yes, that would mean
> additional testing, but it may be less testing/integration than you are
> currently doing just trying to keep your current image maintained.
>
>
>

Thanks for your opinion.

But unfortunately, updating the packages is out of scope in this moment
since the product is certificated and doing this will require a new process.

Maybe I can use the Arago External Pre-built Binary Toolchain (2011-09)[1]
in which is supported by TI until daisy branch[2].


[1] -
http://software-dl.ti.com/sdoemb/sdoemb_public_sw/arago_toolchain/2011_09/index_FDS.html
[2] -
http://arago-project.org/git/?p=meta-arago.git;a=tree;f=meta-arago-extras/conf/distro/include;h=23e7bcba85ab80e4bf813fd43f64c61a12ba3f0a;hb=refs/heads/daisy


Regards,

--
*dS
Diego Sueiro

Administrador do Embarcados
www.embarcados.com.br
<http://www.embarcados.com.br/?utm_source=assinatura_diego&utm_medium=e-mail&utm_campaign=Assinatura%20Email%20Diego>

/*long live rock 'n roll*/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2774 bytes --]