All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] sock: Move the socket inuse to namespace.
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:28:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMDZJNXPtcNf4zHjbkJWwfvToXt-i7mxfm5VDf+0FSR4ZFV_Hg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512667208.25033.13.camel@gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 08:45 -0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
>> In some case, we want to know how many sockets are in use in
>> different _net_ namespaces. It's a key resource metric.
>>
>
> ...
>
>> +static void sock_inuse_add(struct net *net, int val)
>> +{
>> +     if (net->core.prot_inuse)
>> +             this_cpu_add(*net->core.sock_inuse, val);
>> +}
>
> This is very confusing.
>
> Why testing net->core.prot_inuse for NULL is needed at all ?
>
> Why not testing net->core.sock_inuse instead ?
>
Hi Eric and Cong, oh it's a typo. it's net->core.sock_inuse there. Why
we should check the net->core.sock_inuse
Now show you the code:

cleanup_net will call all of the network namespace exit methods,
rcu_barrier, and then remove the _net_ namespace.

cleanup_net:
    list_for_each_entry_reverse(ops, &pernet_list, list)
         ops_exit_list(ops, &net_exit_list);

    rcu_barrier(); /* for netlink sock, the ‘deferred_put_nlk_sk’ will
be called. But sock_inuse has been released. */


    /* Finally it is safe to free my network namespace structure */
    list_for_each_entry_safe(net, tmp, &net_exit_list, exit_list) {}



Release the netlink sock created in kernel(not hold the _net_ namespace):

netlink_release
       call_rcu(&nlk->rcu, deferred_put_nlk_sk);

deferred_put_nlk_sk
       sk_free(sk);


I may add a comment for sock_inuse_add in v6.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-08  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-07 16:45 [PATCH v5 1/2] sock: Change the netns_core member name Tonghao Zhang
2017-12-07 16:45 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] sock: Move the socket inuse to namespace Tonghao Zhang
2017-12-07 17:20   ` Eric Dumazet
2017-12-07 21:28     ` Cong Wang
2017-12-08  5:28     ` Tonghao Zhang [this message]
2017-12-08  5:40       ` Eric Dumazet
2017-12-08  9:52         ` Tonghao Zhang
2017-12-08 11:29           ` Tonghao Zhang
2017-12-08 13:24             ` Eric Dumazet
2017-12-09  5:25               ` Tonghao Zhang
2017-12-08 22:09       ` Cong Wang
2017-12-09  5:27         ` Tonghao Zhang
2017-12-09 19:42           ` Cong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMDZJNXPtcNf4zHjbkJWwfvToXt-i7mxfm5VDf+0FSR4ZFV_Hg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.