* [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause
@ 2018-06-15 20:16 Andre McCurdy
2018-06-15 22:13 ` Mark Hatle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andre McCurdy @ 2018-06-15 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: André Draszik
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com>
Some projects are starting to use it.
https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>
---
meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ded8897
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+
+Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
+All rights reserved.
+
+Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
+
+Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause
2018-06-15 20:16 [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause Andre McCurdy
@ 2018-06-15 22:13 ` Mark Hatle
2018-06-15 22:25 ` Andre McCurdy
2018-06-15 22:36 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mark Hatle @ 2018-06-15 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andre McCurdy, openembedded-core; +Cc: André Draszik
On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com>
>
> Some projects are starting to use it.
> https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
>
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
> (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
> Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>
> diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ded8897
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +
> +Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
> +All rights reserved.
> +
> +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
> +
> +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct? I don't think it makes sense to list
BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
Maybe a <Organization Here> would be more appropriate.
--Mark
IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE FOR ANY
DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
(INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON
ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> +
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause
2018-06-15 22:13 ` Mark Hatle
@ 2018-06-15 22:25 ` Andre McCurdy
2018-06-15 22:36 ` Khem Raj
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andre McCurdy @ 2018-06-15 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Hatle; +Cc: André Draszik, OE Core mailing list
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> wrote:
> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com>
>>
>> Some projects are starting to use it.
>> https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
>> (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
>> Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..ded8897
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>> +
>> +Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
>> +All rights reserved.
>> +
>> +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
>> +
>> +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>> +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
>
> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct? I don't think it makes sense to list
> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
You're right.
There doesn't seem to be much consistency in the various BSD licenses
in meta/files/common-licenses. We currently have:
BSD : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' ...
BSD-0-Clause : THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" ...
BSD-1-Clause : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software
Design, Inc. "AS IS" ...
BSD-2-Clause : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE FREEBSD PROJECT ``AS IS`` ...
BSD-3-Clause : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" ...
BSD-4-Clause : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY <COPYRIGHT HOLDER> ``AS IS`` ...
Every one slightly different!
> Maybe a <Organization Here> would be more appropriate.
>
> --Mark
>
> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
> DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE FOR ANY
> DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
> (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON
> ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
> SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
>> +
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause
2018-06-15 22:13 ` Mark Hatle
2018-06-15 22:25 ` Andre McCurdy
@ 2018-06-15 22:36 ` Khem Raj
2018-06-15 22:48 ` Andre McCurdy
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2018-06-15 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Hatle
Cc: André Draszik, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> > From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com>
> >
> > Some projects are starting to use it.
> > https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
> >
> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..ded8897
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> > +
> > +Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
> > +All rights reserved.
> > +
> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
> > +
> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
>
> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct? I don't think it makes sense to list
> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
>
> Maybe a <Organization Here> would be more appropriate.
>
I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
> --Mark
>
> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
> DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE FOR ANY
> DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
> (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON
> ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
> SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> > +
> >
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause
2018-06-15 22:36 ` Khem Raj
@ 2018-06-15 22:48 ` Andre McCurdy
2018-06-16 0:23 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andre McCurdy @ 2018-06-15 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj
Cc: André Draszik, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> > From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com>
>> >
>> > Some projects are starting to use it.
>> > https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
>> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
>> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> > meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>> > create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >
>> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 0000000..ded8897
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>> > +
>> > +Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
>> > +All rights reserved.
>> > +
>> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
>> > +
>> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
>>
>> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct? I don't think it makes sense to list
>> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
>>
>> Maybe a <Organization Here> would be more appropriate.
>>
>
> I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
versions are inconsistent too:
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-1-Clause.txt
: THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-2-Clause.txt
: THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
"AS IS"
etc...
>
>> --Mark
>>
>> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
>> DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE FOR ANY
>> DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
>> (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
>> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON
>> ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
>> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
>> SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
>> > +
>> >
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause
2018-06-15 22:48 ` Andre McCurdy
@ 2018-06-16 0:23 ` Khem Raj
2018-06-18 16:20 ` Mark Hatle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2018-06-16 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andre McCurdy
Cc: André Draszik, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3583 bytes --]
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> >> > From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com>
> >> >
> >> > Some projects are starting to use it.
> >> > https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
> >> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++
> >> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >> > create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> > new file mode 100644
> >> > index 0000000..ded8897
> >> > --- /dev/null
> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> >> > +
> >> > +Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
> >> > +All rights reserved.
> >> > +
> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
> >> > +
> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
> >>
> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct? I don't think it makes sense
> to list
> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
> >>
> >> Maybe a <Organization Here> would be more appropriate.
> >>
> >
> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
>
> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
> versions are inconsistent too:
We should report that to spdx folks since they
Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this
>
>
> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-1-Clause.txt
> : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
>
> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-2-Clause.txt
> : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
> "AS IS"
>
> etc...
>
> >
> >> --Mark
> >>
> >> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> PURPOSE ARE
> >> DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE
> FOR ANY
> >> DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
> DAMAGES
> >> (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR
> SERVICES;
> >> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED
> AND ON
> >> ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> >> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
> OF THIS
> >> SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> >> > +
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5643 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause
2018-06-16 0:23 ` Khem Raj
@ 2018-06-18 16:20 ` Mark Hatle
2018-06-18 17:52 ` Andre McCurdy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mark Hatle @ 2018-06-18 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj, Andre McCurdy
Cc: André Draszik, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On 6/15/18 7:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com
> <mailto:armccurdy@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com
> <mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com
> <mailto:mark.hatle@windriver.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> >> > From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com <mailto:andre.draszik@jci.com>>
> >> >
> >> > Some projects are starting to use it.
> >> > https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com
> <mailto:andre.draszik@jci.com>>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com
> <mailto:ross.burton@intel.com>>
> >> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com
> <mailto:armccurdy@gmail.com>>
> >> > ---
> >> > meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++
> >> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >> > create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> > new file mode 100644
> >> > index 0000000..ded8897
> >> > --- /dev/null
> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> >> > +
> >> > +Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
> >> > +All rights reserved.
> >> > +
> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
> >> > +
> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
> this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
> >>
> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct? I don't think it makes sense to
> list
> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
> >>
> >> Maybe a <Organization Here> would be more appropriate.
> >>
> >
> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
>
> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
> versions are inconsistent too:
>
>
> We should report that to spdx folks since they
> Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this
Agreed. I think we need to get the SPDX to fix their examples, and then use
them once they are fixed.
As for our version of the code, I'd suggest the "<COPYRIGHT HOLDER>" (as in the
BSD-4-clause example) in all cases.
--Mark
>
>
> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-1-Clause.txt
> : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
>
> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-2-Clause.txt
> : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
> "AS IS"
>
> etc...
>
> >
> >> --Mark
> >>
> >> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> PURPOSE ARE
> >> DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE
> FOR ANY
> >> DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
> >> (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
> >> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED
> AND ON
> >> ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> >> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
> >> SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> >> > +
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> <mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause
2018-06-18 16:20 ` Mark Hatle
@ 2018-06-18 17:52 ` Andre McCurdy
2018-06-18 17:54 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andre McCurdy @ 2018-06-18 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Hatle
Cc: André Draszik, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> wrote:
> On 6/15/18 7:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com
>> <mailto:armccurdy@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com
>> <mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com
>> <mailto:mark.hatle@windriver.com>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> >> > From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com <mailto:andre.draszik@jci.com>>
>> >> >
>> >> > Some projects are starting to use it.
>> >> > https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com
>> <mailto:andre.draszik@jci.com>>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com
>> <mailto:ross.burton@intel.com>>
>> >> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com
>> <mailto:armccurdy@gmail.com>>
>> >> > ---
>> >> > meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++
>> >> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>> >> > create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> > new file mode 100644
>> >> > index 0000000..ded8897
>> >> > --- /dev/null
>> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>> >> > +
>> >> > +Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
>> >> > +All rights reserved.
>> >> > +
>> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
>> >> > +
>> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
>> this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
>> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
>> >>
>> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct? I don't think it makes sense to
>> list
>> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
>> >>
>> >> Maybe a <Organization Here> would be more appropriate.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
>> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
>>
>> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
>> versions are inconsistent too:
>>
>> We should report that to spdx folks since they
>> Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this
>
> Agreed. I think we need to get the SPDX to fix their examples, and then use
> them once they are fixed.
>
> As for our version of the code, I'd suggest the "<COPYRIGHT HOLDER>" (as in the
> BSD-4-clause example) in all cases.
Agreed. So while Mark and Khem fix up master, is it OK for Armin to
backport the current version to rocko? Or should master and sumo be
updated first?
>>
>> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-1-Clause.txt
>> : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
>>
>> https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/master/text/BSD-2-Clause.txt
>> : THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
>> "AS IS"
>>
>> etc...
>>
>> >
>> >> --Mark
>> >>
>> >> IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
>> PURPOSE ARE
>> >> DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL Berkeley Software Design, Inc. BE LIABLE
>> FOR ANY
>> >> DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
>> >> (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
>> >> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED
>> AND ON
>> >> ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
>> >> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
>> >> SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
>> >> > +
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> <mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
>> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause
2018-06-18 17:52 ` Andre McCurdy
@ 2018-06-18 17:54 ` Khem Raj
2018-06-18 18:00 ` Andre McCurdy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2018-06-18 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andre McCurdy
Cc: André Draszik, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:52 AM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> wrote:
> > On 6/15/18 7:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com
> >> <mailto:armccurdy@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com
> >> <mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com
> >> <mailto:mark.hatle@windriver.com>> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> >> >> > From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com <mailto:andre.draszik@jci.com>>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Some projects are starting to use it.
> >> >> > https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com
> >> <mailto:andre.draszik@jci.com>>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com
> >> <mailto:ross.burton@intel.com>>
> >> >> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com
> >> <mailto:armccurdy@gmail.com>>
> >> >> > ---
> >> >> > meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++
> >> >> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >> >> > create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> >> >
> >> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> >> > new file mode 100644
> >> >> > index 0000000..ded8897
> >> >> > --- /dev/null
> >> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
> >> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
> >> >> > +All rights reserved.
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> >> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
> >> this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> >> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
> >> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
> >> >>
> >> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct? I don't think it makes sense to
> >> list
> >> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
> >> >>
> >> >> Maybe a <Organization Here> would be more appropriate.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
> >> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
> >>
> >> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
> >> versions are inconsistent too:
> >>
> >> We should report that to spdx folks since they
> >> Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this
> >
> > Agreed. I think we need to get the SPDX to fix their examples, and then use
> > them once they are fixed.
> >
> > As for our version of the code, I'd suggest the "<COPYRIGHT HOLDER>" (as in the
> > BSD-4-clause example) in all cases.
>
> Agreed. So while Mark and Khem fix up master, is it OK for Armin to
> backport the current version to rocko? Or should master and sumo be
> updated first?
It should get into master for sure before it hits release branches.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause
2018-06-18 17:54 ` Khem Raj
@ 2018-06-18 18:00 ` Andre McCurdy
2018-06-19 4:17 ` akuster808
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andre McCurdy @ 2018-06-18 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj
Cc: André Draszik, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:52 AM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> wrote:
>> > On 6/15/18 7:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com
>> >> <mailto:armccurdy@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com
>> >> <mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com
>> >> <mailto:mark.hatle@windriver.com>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>> >> >> > From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com <mailto:andre.draszik@jci.com>>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Some projects are starting to use it.
>> >> >> > https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com
>> >> <mailto:andre.draszik@jci.com>>
>> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com
>> >> <mailto:ross.burton@intel.com>>
>> >> >> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
>> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com
>> >> <mailto:armccurdy@gmail.com>>
>> >> >> > ---
>> >> >> > meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++
>> >> >> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>> >> >> > create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> >> > new file mode 100644
>> >> >> > index 0000000..ded8897
>> >> >> > --- /dev/null
>> >> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>> >> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>> >> >> > +
>> >> >> > +Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
>> >> >> > +All rights reserved.
>> >> >> > +
>> >> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>> >> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
>> >> >> > +
>> >> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
>> >> this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>> >> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
>> >> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct? I don't think it makes sense to
>> >> list
>> >> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Maybe a <Organization Here> would be more appropriate.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
>> >> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
>> >>
>> >> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
>> >> versions are inconsistent too:
>> >>
>> >> We should report that to spdx folks since they
>> >> Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this
>> >
>> > Agreed. I think we need to get the SPDX to fix their examples, and then use
>> > them once they are fixed.
>> >
>> > As for our version of the code, I'd suggest the "<COPYRIGHT HOLDER>" (as in the
>> > BSD-4-clause example) in all cases.
>>
>> Agreed. So while Mark and Khem fix up master, is it OK for Armin to
>> backport the current version to rocko? Or should master and sumo be
>> updated first?
>
> It should get into master for sure before it hits release branches.
The current version of the BSD-1 license text has been in master since
January. It's already been released in sumo.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause
2018-06-18 18:00 ` Andre McCurdy
@ 2018-06-19 4:17 ` akuster808
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: akuster808 @ 2018-06-19 4:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andre McCurdy, Khem Raj
Cc: André Draszik, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On 06/18/2018 11:00 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:52 AM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> wrote:
>>>> On 6/15/18 7:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:48 PM Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com
>>>>> <mailto:armccurdy@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com
>>>>> <mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:14 PM Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com
>>>>> <mailto:mark.hatle@windriver.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On 6/15/18 3:16 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>>>>> >> > From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com <mailto:andre.draszik@jci.com>>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Some projects are starting to use it.
>>>>> >> > https://spdx.org/licenses//BSD-1-Clause.html
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@jci.com
>>>>> <mailto:andre.draszik@jci.com>>
>>>>> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com
>>>>> <mailto:ross.burton@intel.com>>
>>>>> >> > (cherry picked from commit 77f692ecb39d880b2cb420850a31534860eb2cc5)
>>>>> >> > Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com
>>>>> <mailto:armccurdy@gmail.com>>
>>>>> >> > ---
>>>>> >> > meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause | 9 +++++++++
>>>>> >> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>>> >> > create mode 100644 meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > diff --git a/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>>>>> b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>>>>> >> > new file mode 100644
>>>>> >> > index 0000000..ded8897
>>>>> >> > --- /dev/null
>>>>> >> > +++ b/meta/files/common-licenses/BSD-1-Clause
>>>>> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>>>>> >> > +
>>>>> >> > +Copyright (c) <YEAR>, <OWNER>
>>>>> >> > +All rights reserved.
>>>>> >> > +
>>>>> >> > +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>>>>> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
>>>>> >> > +
>>>>> >> > +Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
>>>>> this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>>>>> >> > +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY Berkeley Software Design, Inc. "AS IS"
>>>>> AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Hate to nitpick, but isn't BSDi defunct? I don't think it makes sense to
>>>>> list
>>>>> >> BSDI, since as far as I know they never had a '1-Clause' license.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Maybe a <Organization Here> would be more appropriate.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I think we should sync the files we carry with SPDX e.g.
>>>>> > https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/master/text
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't look like that will fix the inconsistencies... those
>>>>> versions are inconsistent too:
>>>>>
>>>>> We should report that to spdx folks since they
>>>>> Work on licenses and might be interested in addressing this
>>>> Agreed. I think we need to get the SPDX to fix their examples, and then use
>>>> them once they are fixed.
>>>>
>>>> As for our version of the code, I'd suggest the "<COPYRIGHT HOLDER>" (as in the
>>>> BSD-4-clause example) in all cases.
>>> Agreed. So while Mark and Khem fix up master, is it OK for Armin to
>>> backport the current version to rocko? Or should master and sumo be
>>> updated first?
>> It should get into master for sure before it hits release branches.
> The current version of the BSD-1 license text has been in master since
> January. It's already been released in sumo.
got it.
in stable/rocko-nmut
- armin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-06-19 4:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-06-15 20:16 [rocko][PATCH] common-licenses: Add BSD-1-Clause Andre McCurdy
2018-06-15 22:13 ` Mark Hatle
2018-06-15 22:25 ` Andre McCurdy
2018-06-15 22:36 ` Khem Raj
2018-06-15 22:48 ` Andre McCurdy
2018-06-16 0:23 ` Khem Raj
2018-06-18 16:20 ` Mark Hatle
2018-06-18 17:52 ` Andre McCurdy
2018-06-18 17:54 ` Khem Raj
2018-06-18 18:00 ` Andre McCurdy
2018-06-19 4:17 ` akuster808
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.