* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-06 17:12 ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status Yuri Weinstein
@ 2016-09-06 17:27 ` Gregory Farnum
2016-09-06 17:47 ` Ilya Dryomov
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Farnum @ 2016-09-06 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuri Weinstein, John Spray; +Cc: Ceph Development
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46
>
> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
>
> rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
> rbd
> rgw
> fs
> krbd
> kcephfs
> knfs
> rest
> hadoop
> samba
> ceph-deploy
> ceph-disk
> upgrade/client-upgrade
> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel)
> powercycle
> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
>
> ==============================
> Issues requiring approval/decision:
<snip>
> knfs
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
> (Greg pls rview/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
>
> samba:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
> (Greg pls rview/approve)
John? :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-06 17:12 ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-06 17:27 ` Gregory Farnum
@ 2016-09-06 17:47 ` Ilya Dryomov
2016-09-06 20:19 ` Jason Dillaman
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Dryomov @ 2016-09-06 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuri Weinstein
Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Dachary, Loic, Dachary,
Loic, Weil, Sage, Just, Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, David Zafman
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46
>
> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
>
> rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
> rbd
> rgw
> fs
> krbd
> kcephfs
> knfs
> rest
> hadoop
> samba
> ceph-deploy
> ceph-disk
> upgrade/client-upgrade
> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel)
> powercycle
> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
>
> ==============================
> Issues requiring approval/decision:
>
> rados:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
>
> rbd:
> multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46)
>
> krbd:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
> (Jason pls rview/approve)
I've assigned these tickets to myself. Neither is a blocker, approved.
Thanks,
Ilya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-06 17:12 ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-06 17:27 ` Gregory Farnum
2016-09-06 17:47 ` Ilya Dryomov
@ 2016-09-06 20:19 ` Jason Dillaman
2016-09-06 20:26 ` Yuri Weinstein
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jason Dillaman @ 2016-09-06 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuri Weinstein
Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Dachary, Loic, Dachary,
Loic, Weil, Sage, Just, Samuel, David Zafman
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> rbd:
> multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46)
Approved
--
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-06 17:12 ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status Yuri Weinstein
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-06 20:19 ` Jason Dillaman
@ 2016-09-06 20:26 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-07 6:33 ` Loic Dachary
2016-09-09 18:19 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-13 16:16 ` Yuri Weinstein
5 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2016-09-06 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Dachary, Loic, Dachary,
Loic, Weil, Sage, Just, Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, David Zafman
Missed a line with ceph-disk issue -
ceph-disk:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15350
(Loic, Sam pls review/approve)
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46
>
> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
>
> rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
> rbd
> rgw
> fs
> krbd
> kcephfs
> knfs
> rest
> hadoop
> samba
> ceph-deploy
> ceph-disk
> upgrade/client-upgrade
> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel)
> powercycle
> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
>
> ==============================
> Issues requiring approval/decision:
>
> rados:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
>
> rbd:
> multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46)
>
> krbd:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
> (Jason pls rview/approve)
>
> knfs
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
> (Greg pls rview/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
>
> samba:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
> (Greg pls rview/approve)
>
> upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
> (Sage, Sam, Jason pls rview/approve)
>
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
> (Sam, David pls rview/approve)
>
> powercycle:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
> (Sage pls rview/approve)
>
> Loic, given that we have high number of issues in this release, if you
> and dev leads find that we need to add more backports we may consider
> validating a new point RC (sha1).
>
> Thx
> YuriW
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-06 20:26 ` Yuri Weinstein
@ 2016-09-07 6:33 ` Loic Dachary
2016-09-09 12:41 ` Xiaoxi Chen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-09-07 6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuri Weinstein, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Dachary,
Loic, Weil, Sage, Just, Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, David Zafman
Hi Yuri,
The deph-disk suite must be run on VPS.
Cheers
On 06/09/2016 22:26, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> Missed a line with ceph-disk issue -
>
> ceph-disk:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15350
> (Loic, Sam pls review/approve)
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46
>>
>> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
>>
>> rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
>> rbd
>> rgw
>> fs
>> krbd
>> kcephfs
>> knfs
>> rest
>> hadoop
>> samba
>> ceph-deploy
>> ceph-disk
>> upgrade/client-upgrade
>> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel)
>> powercycle
>> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
>>
>> ==============================
>> Issues requiring approval/decision:
>>
>> rados:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
>>
>> rbd:
>> multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46)
>>
>> krbd:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
>> (Jason pls rview/approve)
>>
>> knfs
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
>> (Greg pls rview/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
>>
>> samba:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
>> (Greg pls rview/approve)
>>
>> upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
>> (Sage, Sam, Jason pls rview/approve)
>>
>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
>> (Sam, David pls rview/approve)
>>
>> powercycle:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
>> (Sage pls rview/approve)
>>
>> Loic, given that we have high number of issues in this release, if you
>> and dev leads find that we need to add more backports we may consider
>> validating a new point RC (sha1).
>>
>> Thx
>> YuriW
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-07 6:33 ` Loic Dachary
@ 2016-09-09 12:41 ` Xiaoxi Chen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoxi Chen @ 2016-09-09 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Loic Dachary
Cc: Yuri Weinstein, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Dachary,
Loic, Weil, Sage, Just, Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, David Zafman
Hi,
Sorry for jump in , we just hit a bug
(http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17252) in our production ,which blocks
cinder service , once cinder hit this bug th cinder-volume service
cannot serve anymore request. It is not hard to reproduce--- our 6
cinder-volume nodes hitting this with 12 hours after restart.
Discussed with Haomai, he will provide a PR very shortly. Do we have
any chance to get this in for 10.2.3 ? Suspecting everyone in jewel
will suffer from this bug.
Xiaoxi
2016-09-07 14:33 GMT+08:00 Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>:
> Hi Yuri,
>
> The deph-disk suite must be run on VPS.
>
> Cheers
>
> On 06/09/2016 22:26, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
>> Missed a line with ceph-disk issue -
>>
>> ceph-disk:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15350
>> (Loic, Sam pls review/approve)
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46
>>>
>>> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
>>>
>>> rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
>>> rbd
>>> rgw
>>> fs
>>> krbd
>>> kcephfs
>>> knfs
>>> rest
>>> hadoop
>>> samba
>>> ceph-deploy
>>> ceph-disk
>>> upgrade/client-upgrade
>>> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
>>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel)
>>> powercycle
>>> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
>>>
>>> ==============================
>>> Issues requiring approval/decision:
>>>
>>> rados:
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
>>>
>>> rbd:
>>> multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46)
>>>
>>> krbd:
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
>>> (Jason pls rview/approve)
>>>
>>> knfs
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
>>> (Greg pls rview/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
>>>
>>> samba:
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
>>> (Greg pls rview/approve)
>>>
>>> upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
>>> (Sage, Sam, Jason pls rview/approve)
>>>
>>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
>>> (Sam, David pls rview/approve)
>>>
>>> powercycle:
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
>>> (Sage pls rview/approve)
>>>
>>> Loic, given that we have high number of issues in this release, if you
>>> and dev leads find that we need to add more backports we may consider
>>> validating a new point RC (sha1).
>>>
>>> Thx
>>> YuriW
>>
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-06 17:12 ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status Yuri Weinstein
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-06 20:26 ` Yuri Weinstein
@ 2016-09-09 18:19 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-12 20:00 ` Loic Dachary
2016-09-13 16:16 ` Yuri Weinstein
5 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2016-09-09 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Dachary, Loic, Dachary,
Loic, Weil, Sage, Just, Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, David Zafman
Ticket http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46 updated with dev
leads approvals (pls review) as following (suites marked with * still
need decision/fix):
rados:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
rbd:
multiple issues (Approved by Jason)
krbd:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
(Approved by Ilya)
* knfs
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
(Greg pls review/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
* samba:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
(Greg pls review/approve)
upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
(Approved by Loic)
upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
(Approved by Loic)
* powercycle:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
(Sage pls review/approve)
* ceph-disk
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17114
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17100
(Loic pls review/approve)
Thx
YuriW
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46
>
> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
>
> rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
> rbd
> rgw
> fs
> krbd
> kcephfs
> knfs
> rest
> hadoop
> samba
> ceph-deploy
> ceph-disk
> upgrade/client-upgrade
> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel)
> powercycle
> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
>
> ==============================
> Issues requiring approval/decision:
>
> rados:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
>
> rbd:
> multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46)
>
> krbd:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
> (Jason pls rview/approve)
>
> knfs
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
> (Greg pls rview/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
>
> samba:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
> (Greg pls rview/approve)
>
> upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
> (Sage, Sam, Jason pls rview/approve)
>
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
> (Sam, David pls rview/approve)
>
> powercycle:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
> (Sage pls rview/approve)
>
> Loic, given that we have high number of issues in this release, if you
> and dev leads find that we need to add more backports we may consider
> validating a new point RC (sha1).
>
> Thx
> YuriW
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-09 18:19 ` Yuri Weinstein
@ 2016-09-12 20:00 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-09-12 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuri Weinstein, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Dachary,
Loic, Weil, Sage, Just, Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, David Zafman
On 09/09/2016 20:19, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> Ticket http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46 updated with dev
> leads approvals (pls review) as following (suites marked with * still
> need decision/fix):
>
> rados:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
>
> rbd:
> multiple issues (Approved by Jason)
>
> krbd:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
> (Approved by Ilya)
>
> * knfs
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
> (Greg pls review/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
>
> * samba:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
> (Greg pls review/approve)
>
> upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
> (Approved by Loic)
>
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
> (Approved by Loic)
>
> * powercycle:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
> (Sage pls review/approve)
>
> * ceph-disk
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17114
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17100
> (Loic pls review/approve)
I confirm that these problems are related to the test suite and not ceph-disk executable. Therefore they are not, in my opinion, blockers for the jewel release.
Cheers
> Thx
> YuriW
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46
>>
>> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
>>
>> rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
>> rbd
>> rgw
>> fs
>> krbd
>> kcephfs
>> knfs
>> rest
>> hadoop
>> samba
>> ceph-deploy
>> ceph-disk
>> upgrade/client-upgrade
>> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel)
>> powercycle
>> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
>>
>> ==============================
>> Issues requiring approval/decision:
>>
>> rados:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
>>
>> rbd:
>> multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46)
>>
>> krbd:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
>> (Jason pls rview/approve)
>>
>> knfs
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
>> (Greg pls rview/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
>>
>> samba:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
>> (Greg pls rview/approve)
>>
>> upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
>> (Sage, Sam, Jason pls rview/approve)
>>
>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
>> (Sam, David pls rview/approve)
>>
>> powercycle:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
>> (Sage pls rview/approve)
>>
>> Loic, given that we have high number of issues in this release, if you
>> and dev leads find that we need to add more backports we may consider
>> validating a new point RC (sha1).
>>
>> Thx
>> YuriW
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-06 17:12 ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status Yuri Weinstein
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2016-09-09 18:19 ` Yuri Weinstein
@ 2016-09-13 16:16 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-15 18:16 ` Sage Weil
5 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2016-09-13 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Dachary, Loic, Dachary,
Loic, Weil, Sage, Just, Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, David Zafman
Please see updates http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46 (after
incorporating results from the latest runs on tip of jewel branch).
samba - passed
khfs - awaiting approval (Greg, John)
powercycle - awaiting approval (Sage, Loic)
Thx
YuriW
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46
>
> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
>
> rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
> rbd
> rgw
> fs
> krbd
> kcephfs
> knfs
> rest
> hadoop
> samba
> ceph-deploy
> ceph-disk
> upgrade/client-upgrade
> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel)
> powercycle
> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
>
> ==============================
> Issues requiring approval/decision:
>
> rados:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
>
> rbd:
> multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46)
>
> krbd:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
> (Jason pls rview/approve)
>
> knfs
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
> (Greg pls rview/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
>
> samba:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
> (Greg pls rview/approve)
>
> upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
> (Sage, Sam, Jason pls rview/approve)
>
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
> (Sam, David pls rview/approve)
>
> powercycle:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
> (Sage pls rview/approve)
>
> Loic, given that we have high number of issues in this release, if you
> and dev leads find that we need to add more backports we may consider
> validating a new point RC (sha1).
>
> Thx
> YuriW
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-13 16:16 ` Yuri Weinstein
@ 2016-09-15 18:16 ` Sage Weil
2016-09-15 19:54 ` Yuri Weinstein
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2016-09-15 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuri Weinstein
Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Dachary, Loic, Dachary,
Loic, Just, Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, David Zafman
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> Please see updates http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46 (after
> incorporating results from the latest runs on tip of jewel branch).
>
> samba - passed
>
> khfs - awaiting approval (Greg, John)
>
> powercycle - awaiting approval (Sage, Loic)
Approved!
Thanks-
sage
>
> Thx
> YuriW
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46
> >
> > The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
> >
> > rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
> > rbd
> > rgw
> > fs
> > krbd
> > kcephfs
> > knfs
> > rest
> > hadoop
> > samba
> > ceph-deploy
> > ceph-disk
> > upgrade/client-upgrade
> > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
> > upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel)
> > powercycle
> > (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
> >
> > ==============================
> > Issues requiring approval/decision:
> >
> > rados:
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
> >
> > rbd:
> > multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46)
> >
> > krbd:
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
> > (Jason pls rview/approve)
> >
> > knfs
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
> > (Greg pls rview/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
> >
> > samba:
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
> > (Greg pls rview/approve)
> >
> > upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
> > (Sage, Sam, Jason pls rview/approve)
> >
> > upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
> > (Sam, David pls rview/approve)
> >
> > powercycle:
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
> > (Sage pls rview/approve)
> >
> > Loic, given that we have high number of issues in this release, if you
> > and dev leads find that we need to add more backports we may consider
> > validating a new point RC (sha1).
> >
> > Thx
> > YuriW
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-15 18:16 ` Sage Weil
@ 2016-09-15 19:54 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-15 20:08 ` Yuri Weinstein
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2016-09-15 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil
Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Dachary, Loic, Dachary,
Loic, Just, Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, David Zafman
The only remaining issue seems to be in knfs suite
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16397
Greg, is it something that jewel 10.2.3 can be released with unfixed?
Thx
YuriW
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-15 19:54 ` Yuri Weinstein
@ 2016-09-15 20:08 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-19 20:12 ` Yuri Weinstein
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2016-09-15 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil, John Spray
Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Dachary, Loic, Dachary,
Loic, Just, Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, David Zafman
Added John as person of interest :)
John, same question.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> The only remaining issue seems to be in knfs suite
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16397
>
> Greg, is it something that jewel 10.2.3 can be released with unfixed?
>
> Thx
> YuriW
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-15 20:08 ` Yuri Weinstein
@ 2016-09-19 20:12 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-19 20:36 ` Alfredo Deza
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2016-09-19 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil, John Spray
Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Dachary, Loic, Dachary,
Loic, Just, Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, David Zafman, Jeff Layton
Alfredo, Sage
All failed jobs/issues had been addressed/approved (details in
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46) and jewel ceph v10.2.3
is ready for release.
Thx
YuriW
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-19 20:12 ` Yuri Weinstein
@ 2016-09-19 20:36 ` Alfredo Deza
2016-09-20 8:45 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alfredo Deza @ 2016-09-19 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuri Weinstein
Cc: Sage Weil, John Spray, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney,
Dachary, Loic, Dachary, Loic, Just, Samuel, Dillaman, Jason,
David Zafman, Jeff Layton
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> Alfredo, Sage
>
> All failed jobs/issues had been addressed/approved (details in
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46) and jewel ceph v10.2.3
> is ready for release.
We are unable to cut a release because Jewel is not building on Xenial.
There are issues in the code that creates a virtualenv for
ceph-disk/ceph-detect-init that uses Python wheels that needs to be
corrected. Andrew and I have
been trying to fix this issue on the Jenkins side, but at this point
we have asked Loic to step in because we haven't been able to get a
workaround.
See http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16169
>
> Thx
> YuriW
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
2016-09-19 20:36 ` Alfredo Deza
@ 2016-09-20 8:45 ` Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-09-20 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alfredo Deza, Yuri Weinstein
Cc: Sage Weil, John Spray, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney,
Dachary, Loic, Just, Samuel, Dillaman, Jason, David Zafman,
Jeff Layton
On 19/09/2016 22:36, Alfredo Deza wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Alfredo, Sage
>>
>> All failed jobs/issues had been addressed/approved (details in
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46) and jewel ceph v10.2.3
>> is ready for release.
> We are unable to cut a release because Jewel is not building on Xenial.
>
> There are issues in the code that creates a virtualenv for
> ceph-disk/ceph-detect-init that uses Python wheels that needs to be
> corrected. Andrew and I have
> been trying to fix this issue on the Jenkins side, but at this point
> we have asked Loic to step in because we haven't been able to get a
> workaround.
>
> See http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16169
It looks like this is a combo of jenkins providing a machine that is poluted by a previous job and the fact that it does not run install-deps.sh. The discussion continues in the tracker.
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread