From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Matti Vaittinen" <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
"Sergio Paracuellos" <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
"Chunyan Zhang" <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>,
"Baruch Siach" <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
"Nicolas Saenz Julienne" <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Jianqun Xu" <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>,
"Alexandru Ardelean" <aardelean@deviqon.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <treding@nvidia.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
linux-power <linux-power@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..."
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-unisoc@lists.infradead.org,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, "Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
"Gregory Fong" <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
"Eugeniy Paltsev" <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>, "Orson Zhai" <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
"Chunyan Zhang" <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
"Vladimir Zapolskiy" <vz@mleia.com>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"Grygorii Strashko" <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
"Santosh Shilimkar" <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@kernel.org>,
"Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Ludovic Desroches" <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:40:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Md-TKUETLzf41D2KeQODac153_AumMTW4928XfJ70GRxQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211202210839.79140-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 10:17 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> GPIO library does copy the of_node from the parent device of
> the GPIO chip, there is no need to repeat this in the individual
> drivers. Remove these assignment all at once.
>
> For the details one may look into the of_gpio_dev_init() implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
I have a bad feeling about this but I've gone through the drivers in
this patch and it seems like you don't update any of the drivers that
use multiple child OF nodes so I can't really point out any obvious
bug.
I have another change I'm working on that's related, let me send it shortly.
Bart
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Matti Vaittinen" <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
"Sergio Paracuellos" <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
"Chunyan Zhang" <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>,
"Baruch Siach" <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
"Nicolas Saenz Julienne" <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Jianqun Xu" <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>,
"Alexandru Ardelean" <aardelean@deviqon.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <treding@nvidia.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
linux-power <linux-power@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..."
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-unisoc@lists.infradead.org,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, "Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
"Gregory Fong" <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
"Eugeniy Paltsev" <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>, "Orson Zhai" <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
"Chunyan Zhang" <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
"Vladimir Zapolskiy" <vz@mleia.com>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"Grygorii Strashko" <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
"Santosh Shilimkar" <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@kernel.org>,
"Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Ludovic Desroches" <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:40:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Md-TKUETLzf41D2KeQODac153_AumMTW4928XfJ70GRxQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211202210839.79140-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 10:17 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> GPIO library does copy the of_node from the parent device of
> the GPIO chip, there is no need to repeat this in the individual
> drivers. Remove these assignment all at once.
>
> For the details one may look into the of_gpio_dev_init() implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
I have a bad feeling about this but I've gone through the drivers in
this patch and it seems like you don't update any of the drivers that
use multiple child OF nodes so I can't really point out any obvious
bug.
I have another change I'm working on that's related, let me send it shortly.
Bart
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Matti Vaittinen" <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
"Sergio Paracuellos" <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
"Chunyan Zhang" <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>,
"Baruch Siach" <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
"Nicolas Saenz Julienne" <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Jianqun Xu" <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>,
"Alexandru Ardelean" <aardelean@deviqon.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <treding@nvidia.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
linux-power <linux-power@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..."
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-unisoc@lists.infradead.org,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, "Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
"Gregory Fong" <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
"Eugeniy Paltsev" <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>, "Orson Zhai" <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
"Chunyan Zhang" <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
"Vladimir Zapolskiy" <vz@mleia.com>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"Grygorii Strashko" <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
"Santosh Shilimkar" <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@kernel.org>,
"Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Ludovic Desroches" <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:40:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Md-TKUETLzf41D2KeQODac153_AumMTW4928XfJ70GRxQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211202210839.79140-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 10:17 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> GPIO library does copy the of_node from the parent device of
> the GPIO chip, there is no need to repeat this in the individual
> drivers. Remove these assignment all at once.
>
> For the details one may look into the of_gpio_dev_init() implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
I have a bad feeling about this but I've gone through the drivers in
this patch and it seems like you don't update any of the drivers that
use multiple child OF nodes so I can't really point out any obvious
bug.
I have another change I'm working on that's related, let me send it shortly.
Bart
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Matti Vaittinen" <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
"Sergio Paracuellos" <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
"Chunyan Zhang" <chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com>,
"Baruch Siach" <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
"Nicolas Saenz Julienne" <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Jianqun Xu" <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>,
"Alexandru Ardelean" <aardelean@deviqon.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <treding@nvidia.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
linux-power <linux-power@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..."
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-unisoc@lists.infradead.org,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, "Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
"Gregory Fong" <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
"Eugeniy Paltsev" <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>, "Orson Zhai" <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>,
"Chunyan Zhang" <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
"Vladimir Zapolskiy" <vz@mleia.com>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"Grygorii Strashko" <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
"Santosh Shilimkar" <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@kernel.org>,
"Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Ludovic Desroches" <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:40:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Md-TKUETLzf41D2KeQODac153_AumMTW4928XfJ70GRxQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211202210839.79140-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 10:17 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> GPIO library does copy the of_node from the parent device of
> the GPIO chip, there is no need to repeat this in the individual
> drivers. Remove these assignment all at once.
>
> For the details one may look into the of_gpio_dev_init() implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
I have a bad feeling about this but I've gone through the drivers in
this patch and it seems like you don't update any of the drivers that
use multiple child OF nodes so I can't really point out any obvious
bug.
I have another change I'm working on that's related, let me send it shortly.
Bart
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-03 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-02 21:08 [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 21:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 21:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 21:08 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] gpio: Setup parent device and get rid of unnecessary of_node assignment Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 21:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 21:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 21:08 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] gpio: Propagate firmware node from a parent device Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 21:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 21:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-03 8:40 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2021-12-03 8:40 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in the drivers Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-03 8:40 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-03 8:40 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-03 12:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-03 12:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-03 12:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-03 12:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-05 0:06 ` Linus Walleij
2021-12-05 0:06 ` Linus Walleij
2021-12-05 0:06 ` Linus Walleij
2021-12-05 0:06 ` Linus Walleij
2021-12-06 13:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-06 13:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-06 13:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-06 13:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-06 13:19 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-06 13:19 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-06 13:19 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-06 13:19 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-07 8:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-12-07 8:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-12-07 8:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-12-07 8:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-12-07 8:05 ` Baruch Siach
2021-12-07 8:05 ` Baruch Siach
2021-12-07 8:05 ` Baruch Siach
2021-12-07 8:05 ` Baruch Siach
2021-12-07 10:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-07 10:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-07 10:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-07 10:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-13 13:50 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-13 13:50 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-13 13:50 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-13 13:50 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-13 14:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-13 14:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-13 14:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-13 14:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-17 16:54 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-17 16:54 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-17 16:54 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-17 16:54 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-17 18:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-17 18:21 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-17 18:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-06 19:52 kernel test robot
2021-12-06 20:23 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMRc=Md-TKUETLzf41D2KeQODac153_AumMTW4928XfJ70GRxQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com \
--cc=aardelean@deviqon.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
--cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=chunyan.zhang@unisoc.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.0xf0@gmail.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=jay.xu@rock-chips.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-power@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unisoc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=vz@mleia.com \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.