All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
	arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: davinci: remove the mach-specific aemif driver - part 1
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:41:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Me6b0e+d6QRTdr7G9zLdqonjxLBp6h6bM_JaF8OytR=QA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMpxmJUBFEF7FDp910HwsrNhGhwJDrgRR_9qL0DE5W1M=39MgQ@mail.gmail.com>

2018-04-17 14:36 GMT+02:00 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>:
> 2018-04-17 12:53 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>:
>> Hi Bartosz,
>>
>> On Tuesday 17 April 2018 03:59 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
>>>
>>> This is the first part of changes required to remove duplicate aemif
>>> support from mach-davinci.
>>>
>>> I actually noticed that one of my previous changes from 2017 broke nand
>>> in legacy mode - the clock lookup no longer works. This series addresses
>>> it as well.
>>>
>>> First patch just uses a static string for the ti-aemif driver name.
>>>
>>> The second adds support for board files to the aemif driver.
>>>
>>> Last two add nand support to da850-lcdk in legacy mode and make
>>> da850-evm use the platform driver instead of the mach-specific one.
>>>
>>> If these patches get accepted, I'll prepere a follow-up moving all
>>> other boards to the new platform driver.
>>>
>>> This series applies on top of v8 of David Lechner's CCF series.
>>
>> Are there any patches in the series that can safely be applied to v4.17-rc1?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sekhar
>
> Hi Sekhar,
>
> yes, all of them. They're not linked to David's work in any way.
>
> Bart

Oops, -ETOOFAST, I rebased it on top of David's v9, let me check how
it works with mainline - it should be mostly fine.

Bart

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: brgl@bgdev.pl (Bartosz Golaszewski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: davinci: remove the mach-specific aemif driver - part 1
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:41:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Me6b0e+d6QRTdr7G9zLdqonjxLBp6h6bM_JaF8OytR=QA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMpxmJUBFEF7FDp910HwsrNhGhwJDrgRR_9qL0DE5W1M=39MgQ@mail.gmail.com>

2018-04-17 14:36 GMT+02:00 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>:
> 2018-04-17 12:53 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>:
>> Hi Bartosz,
>>
>> On Tuesday 17 April 2018 03:59 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
>>>
>>> This is the first part of changes required to remove duplicate aemif
>>> support from mach-davinci.
>>>
>>> I actually noticed that one of my previous changes from 2017 broke nand
>>> in legacy mode - the clock lookup no longer works. This series addresses
>>> it as well.
>>>
>>> First patch just uses a static string for the ti-aemif driver name.
>>>
>>> The second adds support for board files to the aemif driver.
>>>
>>> Last two add nand support to da850-lcdk in legacy mode and make
>>> da850-evm use the platform driver instead of the mach-specific one.
>>>
>>> If these patches get accepted, I'll prepere a follow-up moving all
>>> other boards to the new platform driver.
>>>
>>> This series applies on top of v8 of David Lechner's CCF series.
>>
>> Are there any patches in the series that can safely be applied to v4.17-rc1?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sekhar
>
> Hi Sekhar,
>
> yes, all of them. They're not linked to David's work in any way.
>
> Bart

Oops, -ETOOFAST, I rebased it on top of David's v9, let me check how
it works with mainline - it should be mostly fine.

Bart

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-17 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-17 10:29 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: davinci: remove the mach-specific aemif driver - part 1 Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 10:29 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 10:29 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/4] memory: aemif: don't rely on kbuild for driver's name Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 10:29   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 10:29 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/4] memory: aemif: add support for board files Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 10:29   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 13:57   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-04-17 13:57     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-04-17 10:29 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: davinci: add aemif & nand support to da850-lcdk in legacy mode Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 10:29   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 14:09   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-04-17 14:09     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-04-25  9:14     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-25  9:14       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-25  9:20       ` Sekhar Nori
2018-04-25  9:20         ` Sekhar Nori
2018-04-17 10:29 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: davinci: use aemif platform driver in legacy mode for da850-evm Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 10:29   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 14:12   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-04-17 14:12     ` Sekhar Nori
2018-04-25  9:26     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-25  9:26       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 10:53 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: davinci: remove the mach-specific aemif driver - part 1 Sekhar Nori
2018-04-17 10:53   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-04-17 12:36   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 12:36     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 12:41     ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2018-04-17 12:41       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 13:59       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 13:59         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-17 17:29     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2018-04-17 17:29       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2018-04-18  8:17       ` Sekhar Nori
2018-04-18  8:17         ` Sekhar Nori
2018-04-18 17:15         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2018-04-18 17:15           ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMRc=Me6b0e+d6QRTdr7G9zLdqonjxLBp6h6bM_JaF8OytR=QA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.