All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	skrzynka@konradybcio.pl, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement qcom,skip-init
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:20:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMS8qEXNh6n9SpMkPAr8cPneasPvJPELD2TZ4gxUf0byxNePbg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200721154415.GA5758@jcrouse1-lnx.qualcomm.com>

>The current
>focus has been on moving more of the SMMU specific bits into the arm-smmu-qcom
>implementation [1] and I think that is the right way to go.

Pardon if I overlooked something obvious, but I can't seem to find a
clean way for implementing qcom,skip-init in arm-smmu-qcom, as neither
the arm_smmu_test_smr_masks nor the probe function seem to be
alterable with arm_smmu_impl. I'm open to your ideas guys.

Konrad

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	 Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	skrzynka@konradybcio.pl,  Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	 DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement qcom,skip-init
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:20:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMS8qEXNh6n9SpMkPAr8cPneasPvJPELD2TZ4gxUf0byxNePbg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200721154415.GA5758@jcrouse1-lnx.qualcomm.com>

>The current
>focus has been on moving more of the SMMU specific bits into the arm-smmu-qcom
>implementation [1] and I think that is the right way to go.

Pardon if I overlooked something obvious, but I can't seem to find a
clean way for implementing qcom,skip-init in arm-smmu-qcom, as neither
the arm_smmu_test_smr_masks nor the probe function seem to be
alterable with arm_smmu_impl. I'm open to your ideas guys.

Konrad
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	 Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	skrzynka@konradybcio.pl,  Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	 DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement qcom,skip-init
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:20:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMS8qEXNh6n9SpMkPAr8cPneasPvJPELD2TZ4gxUf0byxNePbg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200721154415.GA5758@jcrouse1-lnx.qualcomm.com>

>The current
>focus has been on moving more of the SMMU specific bits into the arm-smmu-qcom
>implementation [1] and I think that is the right way to go.

Pardon if I overlooked something obvious, but I can't seem to find a
clean way for implementing qcom,skip-init in arm-smmu-qcom, as neither
the arm_smmu_test_smr_masks nor the probe function seem to be
alterable with arm_smmu_impl. I'm open to your ideas guys.

Konrad

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-21 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-04 12:28 [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement qcom,skip-init Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-04 12:28 ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-04 12:28 ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-04 13:09 ` Will Deacon
2020-07-04 13:09   ` Will Deacon
2020-07-04 13:09   ` Will Deacon
2020-07-04 13:20   ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-04 13:20     ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-04 13:20     ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-05  3:35   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-07-05  3:35     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-07-05  3:35     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-07-21 15:04     ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-21 15:04       ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-21 15:04       ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-21 15:44       ` Jordan Crouse
2020-07-21 15:44         ` Jordan Crouse
2020-07-21 15:44         ` Jordan Crouse
2020-07-21 16:20         ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2020-07-21 16:20           ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-21 16:20           ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-21 23:56           ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-07-21 23:56             ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-07-21 23:56             ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-07-22 20:11             ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-22 20:11               ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-22 20:11               ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-07-31  5:48               ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-07-31  5:48                 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-07-31  5:48                 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-08-03 23:57                 ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-08-03 23:57                   ` Konrad Dybcio
2020-08-03 23:57                   ` Konrad Dybcio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMS8qEXNh6n9SpMkPAr8cPneasPvJPELD2TZ4gxUf0byxNePbg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=konradybcio@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=skrzynka@konradybcio.pl \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.