All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: amritha.nambiar@intel.com,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
	sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next,RFC PATCH] Introduce TC Range classifier
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:09:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVf-iPRZNipWo9VJrK5H5A44ti1zbXyfVCtd_mQeJZQWw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180914094932.GK25110@nanopsycho>

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:53 AM Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
>
> Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:52:01PM CEST, amritha.nambiar@intel.com wrote:
> >This patch introduces a TC range classifier to support filtering based
> >on ranges. Only port-range filters are supported currently. This can
> >be combined with flower classifier to support filters that are a
> >combination of port-ranges and other parameters based on existing
> >fields supported by cls_flower. The 'goto chain' action can be used to
> >combine the flower and range filter.
> >The filter precedence is decided based on the 'prio' value.
>
> For example Spectrum ASIC supports mask-based and range-based matching
> in a single TCAM rule. No chains needed. Also, I don't really understand
> why is this a separate cls. I believe that this functionality should be
> put as an extension of existing cls_flower.

Exactly. u32 filters support range matching too with proper masks.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-15  2:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-13 20:52 [net-next,RFC PATCH] Introduce TC Range classifier Amritha Nambiar
2018-09-13 20:52 ` [net-next, RFC PATCH] net: sched: cls_range: Introduce " Amritha Nambiar
2018-09-14  9:58   ` Jiri Pirko
2018-09-15  1:31     ` Nambiar, Amritha
2018-09-14 21:06   ` Cong Wang
2018-09-14  9:49 ` [net-next,RFC PATCH] Introduce TC " Jiri Pirko
2018-09-14 21:09   ` Cong Wang [this message]
2018-09-15  1:29     ` Nambiar, Amritha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAM_iQpVf-iPRZNipWo9VJrK5H5A44ti1zbXyfVCtd_mQeJZQWw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.