All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd: cmdlinepart: fix the wrong partitions number when truncating occurs
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:39:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMiH66HaRG--3bC9HCfNu7S_WWKWx_COEuJdtgmBTNbdYdVt8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346309023.2848.531.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 13:21 -0400, Huang Shijie wrote:
>> This patch is based on the assumption that all the partitions are
>> in the right offset order.
>>
>> Assume we have a 1GB(8Gb) nand chip, and we set the partitions
>> in the command line like this:
>>     #gpmi-nand:100m(boot),100m(kernel),1g(rootfs)
>>
>> In this case, the partition truncating occurs. The current code will
>> get the following result:
>>
>>      ----------------------------------
>>       root@freescale ~$ cat /proc/mtd
>>       dev:    size   erasesize  name
>>       mtd0: 06400000 00040000 "boot"
>>       mtd1: 06400000 00040000 "kernel"
>>      ----------------------------------
>>
>> It is obvious that we lost the truncated partition `rootfs` which should
>> be 824M in this case.
>>
>> Why? The old code sets the wrong partitions number when the truncating
>> occurs. This patch fixes it. Alao add a `break` to shortcut the code in this
>> case.
>>
>> After apply this patch, the result becomes:
>>      ----------------------------------
>>       root@freescale ~$ cat /proc/mtd
>>       dev:    size   erasesize  name
>>       mtd0: 06400000 00040000 "boot"
>>       mtd1: 06400000 00040000 "kernel"
>>       mtd2: 33800000 00040000 "rootfs"
>>      ----------------------------------
>>
>> We get the right result.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>
>
> Should this have CC to -stable?

It's ok to CC to stable.


thanks
Huang Shijie
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Artem Bityutskiy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd: cmdlinepart: fix the wrong partitions number when truncating occurs
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:39:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMiH66HaRG--3bC9HCfNu7S_WWKWx_COEuJdtgmBTNbdYdVt8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346309023.2848.531.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 13:21 -0400, Huang Shijie wrote:
>> This patch is based on the assumption that all the partitions are
>> in the right offset order.
>>
>> Assume we have a 1GB(8Gb) nand chip, and we set the partitions
>> in the command line like this:
>>     #gpmi-nand:100m(boot),100m(kernel),1g(rootfs)
>>
>> In this case, the partition truncating occurs. The current code will
>> get the following result:
>>
>>      ----------------------------------
>>       root@freescale ~$ cat /proc/mtd
>>       dev:    size   erasesize  name
>>       mtd0: 06400000 00040000 "boot"
>>       mtd1: 06400000 00040000 "kernel"
>>      ----------------------------------
>>
>> It is obvious that we lost the truncated partition `rootfs` which should
>> be 824M in this case.
>>
>> Why? The old code sets the wrong partitions number when the truncating
>> occurs. This patch fixes it. Alao add a `break` to shortcut the code in this
>> case.
>>
>> After apply this patch, the result becomes:
>>      ----------------------------------
>>       root@freescale ~$ cat /proc/mtd
>>       dev:    size   erasesize  name
>>       mtd0: 06400000 00040000 "boot"
>>       mtd1: 06400000 00040000 "kernel"
>>       mtd2: 33800000 00040000 "rootfs"
>>      ----------------------------------
>>
>> We get the right result.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>
>
> Should this have CC to -stable?

It's ok to CC to stable.


thanks
Huang Shijie
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Artem Bityutskiy

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-30  6:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-26 17:21 [PATCH 1/3] mtd: cmdlinepart: make the partitions rule more strict Huang Shijie
2012-08-26 17:21 ` Huang Shijie
2012-08-26 17:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] mtd: cmdlinepart: sort the unsorted partitions Huang Shijie
2012-08-26 17:21   ` Huang Shijie
2012-08-31 13:59   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-08-31 13:59     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-08-31 14:29     ` Huang Shijie
2012-08-31 14:29       ` Huang Shijie
2012-09-03  7:21   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-09-03  7:21     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-08-26 17:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] mtd: cmdlinepart: fix the wrong partitions number when truncating occurs Huang Shijie
2012-08-26 17:21   ` Huang Shijie
2012-08-30  6:43   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-08-30  6:43     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-08-30  6:39     ` Huang Shijie [this message]
2012-08-30  6:39       ` Huang Shijie
2012-08-31 11:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] mtd: cmdlinepart: make the partitions rule more strict Artem Bityutskiy
2012-08-31 11:45   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-08-31 13:36   ` Huang Shijie
2012-08-31 13:36     ` Huang Shijie
2012-08-31 14:30   ` Huang Shijie
2012-08-31 14:30     ` Huang Shijie
2012-09-03  7:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-09-03  7:18   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-09-03 15:09   ` Huang Shijie
2012-09-03 15:09     ` Huang Shijie
2012-09-03 15:35     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-09-04  3:23       ` Huang Shijie
2012-09-04 11:48       ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-09-05  2:12         ` Huang Shijie
2012-09-05  5:30           ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-09-22 16:01             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-12-17  1:11           ` Christopher Cordahi
2012-12-18  5:27             ` Brian Norris
2013-01-15 11:49             ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMiH66HaRG--3bC9HCfNu7S_WWKWx_COEuJdtgmBTNbdYdVt8Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=shijie8@gmail.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.