All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>,
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] crypto: xctr - Add XCTR support
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 20:43:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXEGvSBoOy+TNK749+sUx8cbwSu7YHYFQKu3vA1XvXrE9Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfLx8vU1jziBsihp@sol.localdomain>

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 20:26, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:42:49AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/crypto/xctr.h b/include/crypto/xctr.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..0d025e08ca26
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/crypto/xctr.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> > > +/*
> > > + * XCTR: XOR Counter mode
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright 2021 Google LLC
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef _CRYPTO_XCTR_H
> > > +#define _CRYPTO_XCTR_H
> > > +
> > > +static inline void u32_to_le_block(u8 *a, u32 x, unsigned int size)
> > > +{
> > > +       memset(a, 0, size);
> > > +       put_unaligned(cpu_to_le32(x), (u32 *)a);
> >
> > Please use put_unaligned_le32() here.
> >
> > And casting 'a' to (u32 *) is invalid C, so just pass 'a' directly.
> > Otherwise, the compiler might infer that 'a' is guaranteed to be
> > aligned after all, and use an aligned access instead.
>
> I agree that put_unaligned_le32() is more suitable here, but I don't think
> casting 'a' to 'u32 *' is undefined; it's only dereferencing it that would be
> undefined.  If such casts were undefined, then get_unaligned() and
> put_unaligned() would be unusable under any circumstance.  Here's an example of
> code that would be incorrect in that case:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20220119093109.1567314-1-ardb@kernel.org
>

Good point :-)

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>,
	 Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] crypto: xctr - Add XCTR support
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 20:43:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXEGvSBoOy+TNK749+sUx8cbwSu7YHYFQKu3vA1XvXrE9Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfLx8vU1jziBsihp@sol.localdomain>

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 20:26, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:42:49AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/crypto/xctr.h b/include/crypto/xctr.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..0d025e08ca26
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/crypto/xctr.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> > > +/*
> > > + * XCTR: XOR Counter mode
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright 2021 Google LLC
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef _CRYPTO_XCTR_H
> > > +#define _CRYPTO_XCTR_H
> > > +
> > > +static inline void u32_to_le_block(u8 *a, u32 x, unsigned int size)
> > > +{
> > > +       memset(a, 0, size);
> > > +       put_unaligned(cpu_to_le32(x), (u32 *)a);
> >
> > Please use put_unaligned_le32() here.
> >
> > And casting 'a' to (u32 *) is invalid C, so just pass 'a' directly.
> > Otherwise, the compiler might infer that 'a' is guaranteed to be
> > aligned after all, and use an aligned access instead.
>
> I agree that put_unaligned_le32() is more suitable here, but I don't think
> casting 'a' to 'u32 *' is undefined; it's only dereferencing it that would be
> undefined.  If such casts were undefined, then get_unaligned() and
> put_unaligned() would be unusable under any circumstance.  Here's an example of
> code that would be incorrect in that case:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20220119093109.1567314-1-ardb@kernel.org
>

Good point :-)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-27 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-25  1:44 [RFC PATCH 0/7] crypto: HCTR2 support Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-25  1:44 ` Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-25  1:44 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] crypto: xctr - Add XCTR support Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-25  1:44   ` Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-27  5:28   ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27  5:28     ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27  9:42   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27  9:42     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 19:26     ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27 19:26       ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27 19:43       ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2022-01-27 19:43         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-25  1:44 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] crypto: polyval - Add POLYVAL support Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-25  1:44   ` Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-27  5:19   ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27  5:19     ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-25  1:44 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] crypto: hctr2 - Add HCTR2 support Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-25  1:44   ` Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-27  5:08   ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27  5:08     ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27  5:20     ` Herbert Xu
2022-01-27  5:20       ` Herbert Xu
2022-01-27  5:36       ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27  5:36         ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27  5:40         ` Herbert Xu
2022-01-27  5:40           ` Herbert Xu
2022-01-27  5:44           ` Herbert Xu
2022-01-27  5:44             ` Herbert Xu
2022-01-27  6:41             ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27  6:41               ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27  6:35   ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27  6:35     ` Eric Biggers
2022-02-01 18:25     ` Eric Biggers
2022-02-01 18:25       ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27  9:29   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27  9:29     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-27 19:20     ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-27 19:20       ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-25  1:44 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] crypto: x86/aesni-xctr: Add accelerated implementation of XCTR Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-25  1:44   ` Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-25 12:29   ` kernel test robot
2022-01-25  1:44 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] crypto: arm64/aes-xctr: " Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-25  1:44   ` Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-28 14:10   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-28 14:10     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-07 10:00     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-07 10:00       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-25  1:44 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] crypto: x86/polyval: Add PCLMULQDQ accelerated implementation of POLYVAL Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-25  1:44   ` Nathan Huckleberry
2022-02-01 18:18   ` Eric Biggers
2022-02-01 18:18     ` Eric Biggers
2022-02-03  3:28   ` Eric Biggers
2022-02-03  3:28     ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-25  1:44 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] crypto: arm64/polyval: Add PMULL " Nathan Huckleberry
2022-01-25  1:44   ` Nathan Huckleberry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMj1kXEGvSBoOy+TNK749+sUx8cbwSu7YHYFQKu3vA1XvXrE9Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhuck@google.com \
    --cc=paulcrowley@google.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.