All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	gshan@redhat.com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: account for hotplug memory when randomizing the linear region
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 07:14:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXGa-WUr8LzDHGEfgG18ctJJp1v8b4UFckbcwtzpoEv+Tw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f0d9bc5-6288-7388-ff10-97198dabac6f@arm.com>

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 04:16, Anshuman Khandual
<anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/12/20 2:55 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > Hi Anshuman,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 09:18:56AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> On 11/11/20 12:44 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:18:57 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>>> As a hardening measure, we currently randomize the placement of
> >>>> physical memory inside the linear region when KASLR is in effect.
> >>>> Since the random offset at which to place the available physical
> >>>> memory inside the linear region is chosen early at boot, it is
> >>>> based on the memblock description of memory, which does not cover
> >>>> hotplug memory. The consequence of this is that the randomization
> >>>> offset may be chosen such that any hotplugged memory located above
> >>>> memblock_end_of_DRAM() that appears later is pushed off the end of
> >>>> the linear region, where it cannot be accessed.
> >>>>
> >>>> [...]
> >>>
> >>> Applied to arm64 (for-next/mem-hotplug), thanks!
> >>>
> >>> [1/1] arm64: mm: account for hotplug memory when randomizing the linear region
> >>>       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/97d6786e0669
> >>
> >> Got delayed and never made here in time, sorry about that. Nonetheless,
> >> I have got something working with respect to the generic mechanism that
> >> David Hildenbrand had asked for earlier.
> >>
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/1600332402-30123-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
> >
> > There was a lot of discussion around this patch but I haven't seen any
> > new version posted.
>
> Just posted before some time.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1605236574-14636-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
>

You failed to cc me on that patch.

The logic looks correct but please fix up the comment block:
- PAGE_END is no longer defined in terms of vabits_actual
- bits [51..48] are not ignored by the MMU

Actually, I think the entire second paragraph of that comment block
can be dropped.

Please also fix up the coding style:
- put && at the end of the first line
- drop the redundant parens
- fix the indentation



> >
> >> I am wondering if we could instead consider merging the above patch with
> >> a small change that Ard had pointed out earlier [1], I will send out a
> >> revision if required.
> >
> > If your patch fixes the randomisation issue that Ard addressed, I'm
> > happy to replace that with your patch. But please post a new version and
> > get some acks in place from the parties involved in the discussion.
>
> The above patch is not a replacement for Ard's randomization patch here but
> rather complements it. Hence both these patches should be considered, which
> will make memory hotplug better on the platform.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	gshan@redhat.com, Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: account for hotplug memory when randomizing the linear region
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 07:14:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXGa-WUr8LzDHGEfgG18ctJJp1v8b4UFckbcwtzpoEv+Tw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f0d9bc5-6288-7388-ff10-97198dabac6f@arm.com>

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 04:16, Anshuman Khandual
<anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/12/20 2:55 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > Hi Anshuman,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 09:18:56AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> On 11/11/20 12:44 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:18:57 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>>> As a hardening measure, we currently randomize the placement of
> >>>> physical memory inside the linear region when KASLR is in effect.
> >>>> Since the random offset at which to place the available physical
> >>>> memory inside the linear region is chosen early at boot, it is
> >>>> based on the memblock description of memory, which does not cover
> >>>> hotplug memory. The consequence of this is that the randomization
> >>>> offset may be chosen such that any hotplugged memory located above
> >>>> memblock_end_of_DRAM() that appears later is pushed off the end of
> >>>> the linear region, where it cannot be accessed.
> >>>>
> >>>> [...]
> >>>
> >>> Applied to arm64 (for-next/mem-hotplug), thanks!
> >>>
> >>> [1/1] arm64: mm: account for hotplug memory when randomizing the linear region
> >>>       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/97d6786e0669
> >>
> >> Got delayed and never made here in time, sorry about that. Nonetheless,
> >> I have got something working with respect to the generic mechanism that
> >> David Hildenbrand had asked for earlier.
> >>
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/1600332402-30123-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
> >
> > There was a lot of discussion around this patch but I haven't seen any
> > new version posted.
>
> Just posted before some time.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1605236574-14636-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
>

You failed to cc me on that patch.

The logic looks correct but please fix up the comment block:
- PAGE_END is no longer defined in terms of vabits_actual
- bits [51..48] are not ignored by the MMU

Actually, I think the entire second paragraph of that comment block
can be dropped.

Please also fix up the coding style:
- put && at the end of the first line
- drop the redundant parens
- fix the indentation



> >
> >> I am wondering if we could instead consider merging the above patch with
> >> a small change that Ard had pointed out earlier [1], I will send out a
> >> revision if required.
> >
> > If your patch fixes the randomisation issue that Ard addressed, I'm
> > happy to replace that with your patch. But please post a new version and
> > get some acks in place from the parties involved in the discussion.
>
> The above patch is not a replacement for Ard's randomization patch here but
> rather complements it. Hence both these patches should be considered, which
> will make memory hotplug better on the platform.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-13  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-14  8:18 [PATCH] arm64: mm: account for hotplug memory when randomizing the linear region Ard Biesheuvel
2020-10-15 10:46 ` Will Deacon
2020-10-16 10:26   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-10-17 12:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-10 19:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-10 19:14   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-11  3:48   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-11-11  3:48     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-11-11  9:11     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-11-11  9:11       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-11-12  9:25     ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-12  9:25       ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-13  3:16       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-11-13  3:16         ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-11-13  6:14         ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2020-11-13  6:14           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-13  7:02           ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-11-13  7:02             ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-11-13  7:06             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-13  7:06               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-13  7:40               ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-11-13  7:40                 ` Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMj1kXGa-WUr8LzDHGEfgG18ctJJp1v8b4UFckbcwtzpoEv+Tw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.