From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/xor: use EOR3 instructions when available Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:05:34 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAMj1kXGadU-_dM9OtXzy6OqKqReYyzEB-F6NVwDOEodpzwtemw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXFKuHuzsrDBcUjbaVO6-NQkj8J+vMty_qU3Y0pDwT905w@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 09:19, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote: > > + Arnd > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 03:37, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Ard, > > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 03:02:52PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > Use the EOR3 instruction to implement xor_blocks() if the instruction is > > > available, which is the case if the CPU implements the SHA-3 extension. > > > This is about 20% faster on Apple M1 when using the 5-way version. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> > > > > Our CI reported that this patch as commit ce9ba49a2460 ("arm64/xor: use > > EOR3 instructions when available") in the arm64 tree breaks > > allyesconfig: > > > > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration2/runs/4514540083?check_suite_focus=true > > > > I also see this when building with GCC 11.2.0: > > > > WARNING: modpost: EXPORT symbol "xor_block_inner_neon" [vmlinux] version ... > > Is "xor_block_inner_neon" prototyped in <asm/asm-prototypes.h>? > > aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/arm64/lib/xor-neon.o: relocation R_AARCH64_ABS32 against `__crc_xor_block_inner_neon' can not be used when making a shared object > > I suspect this is another genksyms crash, preventing the > __crc_xor_block_inner_neon symbol from ever being emitted. > > This is a recurring annoyance and I am not sure how to address this > properly. Arnd might have some thoughts on the matter as well. > > I managed to reproduce this: it's not a crash but definitely a bug in genksyms, as it simply fails to produce the output containing the assignment of __crc_xor_block_inner_neon. Moving the definition of xor_block_inner_neon as below works around the issue. Catalin: would you like me to spin a v3? Or do your prefer to just fold this into the existing one? diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/xor-neon.c b/arch/arm64/lib/xor-neon.c index 5c8688700f63..d189cf4e70ea 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/lib/xor-neon.c +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/xor-neon.c @@ -167,6 +167,15 @@ void xor_arm64_neon_5(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *p1, } while (--lines > 0); } +struct xor_block_template xor_block_inner_neon __ro_after_init = { + .name = "__inner_neon__", + .do_2 = xor_arm64_neon_2, + .do_3 = xor_arm64_neon_3, + .do_4 = xor_arm64_neon_4, + .do_5 = xor_arm64_neon_5, +}; +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xor_block_inner_neon); + static inline uint64x2_t eor3(uint64x2_t p, uint64x2_t q, uint64x2_t r) { uint64x2_t res; @@ -296,15 +305,6 @@ static void xor_arm64_eor3_5(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *p1, } while (--lines > 0); } -struct xor_block_template xor_block_inner_neon __ro_after_init = { - .name = "__inner_neon__", - .do_2 = xor_arm64_neon_2, - .do_3 = xor_arm64_neon_3, - .do_4 = xor_arm64_neon_4, - .do_5 = xor_arm64_neon_5, -}; -EXPORT_SYMBOL(xor_block_inner_neon); - static int __init xor_neon_init(void) { if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AS_HAS_SHA3) && cpu_have_named_feature(SHA3)) {
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/xor: use EOR3 instructions when available Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:05:34 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAMj1kXGadU-_dM9OtXzy6OqKqReYyzEB-F6NVwDOEodpzwtemw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXFKuHuzsrDBcUjbaVO6-NQkj8J+vMty_qU3Y0pDwT905w@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 09:19, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote: > > + Arnd > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 03:37, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Ard, > > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 03:02:52PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > Use the EOR3 instruction to implement xor_blocks() if the instruction is > > > available, which is the case if the CPU implements the SHA-3 extension. > > > This is about 20% faster on Apple M1 when using the 5-way version. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> > > > > Our CI reported that this patch as commit ce9ba49a2460 ("arm64/xor: use > > EOR3 instructions when available") in the arm64 tree breaks > > allyesconfig: > > > > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration2/runs/4514540083?check_suite_focus=true > > > > I also see this when building with GCC 11.2.0: > > > > WARNING: modpost: EXPORT symbol "xor_block_inner_neon" [vmlinux] version ... > > Is "xor_block_inner_neon" prototyped in <asm/asm-prototypes.h>? > > aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/arm64/lib/xor-neon.o: relocation R_AARCH64_ABS32 against `__crc_xor_block_inner_neon' can not be used when making a shared object > > I suspect this is another genksyms crash, preventing the > __crc_xor_block_inner_neon symbol from ever being emitted. > > This is a recurring annoyance and I am not sure how to address this > properly. Arnd might have some thoughts on the matter as well. > > I managed to reproduce this: it's not a crash but definitely a bug in genksyms, as it simply fails to produce the output containing the assignment of __crc_xor_block_inner_neon. Moving the definition of xor_block_inner_neon as below works around the issue. Catalin: would you like me to spin a v3? Or do your prefer to just fold this into the existing one? diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/xor-neon.c b/arch/arm64/lib/xor-neon.c index 5c8688700f63..d189cf4e70ea 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/lib/xor-neon.c +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/xor-neon.c @@ -167,6 +167,15 @@ void xor_arm64_neon_5(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *p1, } while (--lines > 0); } +struct xor_block_template xor_block_inner_neon __ro_after_init = { + .name = "__inner_neon__", + .do_2 = xor_arm64_neon_2, + .do_3 = xor_arm64_neon_3, + .do_4 = xor_arm64_neon_4, + .do_5 = xor_arm64_neon_5, +}; +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xor_block_inner_neon); + static inline uint64x2_t eor3(uint64x2_t p, uint64x2_t q, uint64x2_t r) { uint64x2_t res; @@ -296,15 +305,6 @@ static void xor_arm64_eor3_5(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *p1, } while (--lines > 0); } -struct xor_block_template xor_block_inner_neon __ro_after_init = { - .name = "__inner_neon__", - .do_2 = xor_arm64_neon_2, - .do_3 = xor_arm64_neon_3, - .do_4 = xor_arm64_neon_4, - .do_5 = xor_arm64_neon_5, -}; -EXPORT_SYMBOL(xor_block_inner_neon); - static int __init xor_neon_init(void) { if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AS_HAS_SHA3) && cpu_have_named_feature(SHA3)) { _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 11:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-12-13 14:02 [PATCH v2] arm64/xor: use EOR3 instructions when available Ard Biesheuvel 2021-12-13 19:19 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-12-14 2:36 ` Nathan Chancellor 2021-12-14 2:36 ` Nathan Chancellor 2021-12-14 8:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2021-12-14 8:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2021-12-14 11:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message] 2021-12-14 11:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2021-12-14 11:36 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-12-14 11:36 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-12-14 12:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2021-12-14 12:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel 2021-12-15 15:15 ` Catalin Marinas 2021-12-15 15:15 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAMj1kXGadU-_dM9OtXzy6OqKqReYyzEB-F6NVwDOEodpzwtemw@mail.gmail.com \ --to=ardb@kernel.org \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=nathan@kernel.org \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.