* [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling
@ 2011-07-07 20:44 Brian Norris
2011-07-07 20:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] Makefile: fix "make clean" for cross-compile Brian Norris
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2011-07-07 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Artem Bityutskiy; +Cc: Brian Norris, linux-mtd
When using "make CROSS=mipsel-linux-", I get the following errors:
/bin/sh: /home/norris/git/mtd-utils/mipsel-linux/include/version.h.tmp: No such file or directory
make: *** [/home/norris/git/mtd-utils/mipsel-linux/include/version.h.tmp] Error 1
So instead of "building" our version.h within $(BUILDIR), we should
just build it in the main source directory, as it isn't architecture-
specific or anything. Hopefully that doesn't "break the rules" of our
cross-compilation setup...
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
---
Makefile | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index afbe201..7c20ea5 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ TARGETS = $(BINS)
TARGETS += lib/libmtd.a
TARGETS += ubi-utils/libubi.a
-OBJDEPS = $(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h
+OBJDEPS = include/version.h
include common.mk
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ endif
find $(BUILDDIR)/ -xdev \
'(' -name '*.[ao]' -o -name '.*.c.dep' ')' \
-exec rm -f {} +
- rm -f $(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h
+ rm -f include/version.h
$(MAKE) -C $(TESTS) clean
install:: ${BINS} ${SCRIPTS}
@@ -68,9 +68,9 @@ tests::
cscope:
cscope -bR
-$(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h: $(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h.tmp
+include/version.h: include/version.h.tmp
$(Q)cmp -s $@ $@.tmp && rm -f $@.tmp || mv $@.tmp $@
-$(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h.tmp:
+include/version.h.tmp:
$(Q)echo '#define VERSION "$(VERSION)"' > $@
#
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] Makefile: fix "make clean" for cross-compile
2011-07-07 20:44 [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling Brian Norris
@ 2011-07-07 20:44 ` Brian Norris
2011-07-07 20:48 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-07 20:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] Makefile: show nice message when checking version.h Brian Norris
2011-07-07 20:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling Mike Frysinger
2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2011-07-07 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Artem Bityutskiy; +Cc: Brian Norris, linux-mtd
When cross-compiling (make CROSS=mipsel-linux-), I get this error:
rm -rf /home/norris/git/mtd-utils/mipsel-linux
find /home/norris/git/mtd-utils/mipsel-linux/ -xdev \
'(' -name '*.[ao]' -o -name '.*.c.dep' ')' \
-exec rm -f {} +
find: `/home/norris/git/mtd-utils/mipsel-linux/': No such file or directory
make: *** [clean] Error 1
Now, for cross-compiling, we've already deleted the $(BUILDDIR), so we
should check this before cleaning individual objects with "find."
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
---
Makefile | 8 +++++---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 7c20ea5..78f5f9f 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -50,9 +50,11 @@ ifneq ($(BUILDDIR),$(CURDIR))
endif
endif
endif
- find $(BUILDDIR)/ -xdev \
- '(' -name '*.[ao]' -o -name '.*.c.dep' ')' \
- -exec rm -f {} +
+ @if test -d "$(BUILDDIR)/"; then \
+ find $(BUILDDIR)/ -xdev \
+ '(' -name '*.[ao]' -o -name '.*.c.dep' ')' \
+ -exec rm -f {} + ; \
+ fi
rm -f include/version.h
$(MAKE) -C $(TESTS) clean
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] Makefile: show nice message when checking version.h
2011-07-07 20:44 [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling Brian Norris
2011-07-07 20:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] Makefile: fix "make clean" for cross-compile Brian Norris
@ 2011-07-07 20:44 ` Brian Norris
2011-07-07 20:48 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-07 20:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling Mike Frysinger
2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2011-07-07 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Artem Bityutskiy; +Cc: Brian Norris, linux-mtd
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
---
Makefile | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 78f5f9f..27e8a01 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ cscope:
cscope -bR
include/version.h: include/version.h.tmp
+ $(call BECHO,CHK)
$(Q)cmp -s $@ $@.tmp && rm -f $@.tmp || mv $@.tmp $@
include/version.h.tmp:
$(Q)echo '#define VERSION "$(VERSION)"' > $@
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling
2011-07-07 20:44 [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling Brian Norris
2011-07-07 20:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] Makefile: fix "make clean" for cross-compile Brian Norris
2011-07-07 20:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] Makefile: show nice message when checking version.h Brian Norris
@ 2011-07-07 20:48 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-07 21:09 ` Brian Norris
2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-07-07 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris; +Cc: linux-mtd, Artem Bityutskiy
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 16:44, Brian Norris wrote:
> When using "make CROSS=mipsel-linux-", I get the following errors:
>
> /bin/sh: /home/norris/git/mtd-utils/mipsel-linux/include/version.h.tmp: No such file or directory
> make: *** [/home/norris/git/mtd-utils/mipsel-linux/include/version.h.tmp] Error 1
>
> So instead of "building" our version.h within $(BUILDIR), we should
> just build it in the main source directory, as it isn't architecture-
> specific or anything. Hopefully that doesn't "break the rules" of our
> cross-compilation setup...
i dont think it's just a matter of "diff build dir for diff
toolchains, so common version.h is ok". it's a matter of "building
out of tree should build out of tree".
i think the fix to your problem is:
$(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h.tmp
+ $(Q)mkdir -p $(dir $@)
$(Q)echo '#define VERSION "$(VERSION)"' > $@
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] Makefile: show nice message when checking version.h
2011-07-07 20:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] Makefile: show nice message when checking version.h Brian Norris
@ 2011-07-07 20:48 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-07-07 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris; +Cc: linux-mtd, Artem Bityutskiy
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] Makefile: fix "make clean" for cross-compile
2011-07-07 20:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] Makefile: fix "make clean" for cross-compile Brian Norris
@ 2011-07-07 20:48 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-07-07 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris; +Cc: linux-mtd, Artem Bityutskiy
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling
2011-07-07 20:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling Mike Frysinger
@ 2011-07-07 21:09 ` Brian Norris
2011-07-07 21:12 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2011-07-07 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Frysinger; +Cc: linux-mtd, Artem Bityutskiy
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
> i dont think it's just a matter of "diff build dir for diff
> toolchains, so common version.h is ok". it's a matter of "building
> out of tree should build out of tree".
OK, but what is the point of in- vs. out-of-tree? So that we can have
a readonly source directory where the mtd-utils code stays? Or so that
we keep object files away from code? Or some other reason?
> i think the fix to your problem is:
> $(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h.tmp
> + $(Q)mkdir -p $(dir $@)
> $(Q)echo '#define VERSION "$(VERSION)"' > $@
Except that gives this error:
CC ftl_format.o
CC lib/libmtd.o
In file included from lib/libmtd.c:40:0:
./include/common.h:28:21: fatal error: version.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [/home/norris/git/mtd-utils/mipsel-linux/lib/libmtd.o] Error 1
Really, the build system is setup to look for headers in-tree, not
out-of-tree. I'm not sure a good way to fix this other than to
generate that header in-tree...any better suggestions?
Brian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling
2011-07-07 21:09 ` Brian Norris
@ 2011-07-07 21:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-07 21:36 ` Brian Norris
2011-07-08 3:57 ` [PATCH " Artem Bityutskiy
0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-07-07 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris; +Cc: linux-mtd, Artem Bityutskiy
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 17:09, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> i dont think it's just a matter of "diff build dir for diff
>> toolchains, so common version.h is ok". it's a matter of "building
>> out of tree should build out of tree".
>
> OK, but what is the point of in- vs. out-of-tree? So that we can have
> a readonly source directory where the mtd-utils code stays?
this one imo, but maybe Artem can speak to the origins (which predate
my contributions)
>> i think the fix to your problem is:
>> $(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h.tmp
>> + $(Q)mkdir -p $(dir $@)
>> $(Q)echo '#define VERSION "$(VERSION)"' > $@
>
> Except that gives this error:
> CC ftl_format.o
> CC lib/libmtd.o
> In file included from lib/libmtd.c:40:0:
> ./include/common.h:28:21: fatal error: version.h: No such file or directory
> compilation terminated.
> make: *** [/home/norris/git/mtd-utils/mipsel-linux/lib/libmtd.o] Error 1
>
> Really, the build system is setup to look for headers in-tree, not
> out-of-tree. I'm not sure a good way to fix this other than to
> generate that header in-tree...any better suggestions?
top level Makefile:
-CPPFLAGS += -I./include -I./ubi-utils/include $(ZLIBCPPFLAGS) $(LZOCPPFLAGS)
+CPPFLAGS += -I./include -I$(BUILDDIR)/include -I./ubi-utils/include
$(ZLIBCPPFLAGS) $(LZOCPPFLAGS)
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling
2011-07-07 21:12 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2011-07-07 21:36 ` Brian Norris
2011-07-07 21:49 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-08 3:57 ` [PATCH " Artem Bityutskiy
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2011-07-07 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Frysinger; +Cc: linux-mtd, Artem Bityutskiy
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
> top level Makefile:
> -CPPFLAGS += -I./include -I./ubi-utils/include $(ZLIBCPPFLAGS) $(LZOCPPFLAGS)
> +CPPFLAGS += -I./include -I$(BUILDDIR)/include -I./ubi-utils/include
> $(ZLIBCPPFLAGS) $(LZOCPPFLAGS)
I still get the same error.
The rule for:
CC lib/libmtd.o
doesn't include $(CPPFLAGS). Is this intentional? See:
%: %.o $(LDDEPS)
$(call BECHO,LD)
$(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS_$(notdir $@)) -g -o
$@ $^ $(LDLIBS) $(LDLIBS_$(notdir $@))
Anyway, it's hard to trade lines about Makefile fixes, since one fix
will pop up another problem in hacked-together build systems like
mtd-utils...can you reproduce my bug completely, Mike? Or shall I
continue trial and error until we find something good enough for both
of us? :)
Brian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling
2011-07-07 21:36 ` Brian Norris
@ 2011-07-07 21:49 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-07 21:53 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-07-07 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris; +Cc: linux-mtd, Artem Bityutskiy
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 17:36, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> top level Makefile:
>> -CPPFLAGS += -I./include -I./ubi-utils/include $(ZLIBCPPFLAGS) $(LZOCPPFLAGS)
>> +CPPFLAGS += -I./include -I$(BUILDDIR)/include -I./ubi-utils/include
>> $(ZLIBCPPFLAGS) $(LZOCPPFLAGS)
>
> I still get the same error.
>
> The rule for:
> CC lib/libmtd.o
> doesn't include $(CPPFLAGS). Is this intentional? See:
> %: %.o $(LDDEPS)
> $(call BECHO,LD)
> $(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS_$(notdir $@)) -g -o
> $@ $^ $(LDLIBS) $(LDLIBS_$(notdir $@))
that's a link, not a compile, so CPPFLAGS shouldnt be needed as it
should only be used on *.o files. that also shows "BECHO,LD" but your
quoted output is "CC ...", and the CC rule does use CPPFLAGS.
> Anyway, it's hard to trade lines about Makefile fixes, since one fix
> will pop up another problem in hacked-together build systems like
> mtd-utils...can you reproduce my bug completely, Mike? Or shall I
> continue trial and error until we find something good enough for both
> of us? :)
np ... i'll look at it
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling
2011-07-07 21:49 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2011-07-07 21:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-07 22:14 ` Brian Norris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-07-07 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris; +Cc: linux-mtd, Artem Bityutskiy
with my two proposed changes, it's working for me now ...
$ git clean -x -d
$ git diff
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
VERSION = 1.4.5
-CPPFLAGS += -I./include -I./ubi-utils/include $(ZLIBCPPFLAGS) $(LZOCPPFLAGS)
+CPPFLAGS += -I./include -I$(BUILDDIR)/include -I./ubi-utils/include
$(ZLIBCPPFLAGS) $(LZOCPPFLAGS)
ifeq ($(WITHOUT_XATTR), 1)
CPPFLAGS += -DWITHOUT_XATTR
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ cscope:
$(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h: $(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h.tmp
$(Q)cmp -s $@ $@.tmp && rm -f $@.tmp || mv $@.tmp $@
$(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h.tmp:
+ $(Q)mkdir -p $(dir $@)
$(Q)echo '#define VERSION "$(VERSION)"' > $@
#
$ make CROSS=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu- -j2
... success ...
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling
2011-07-07 21:53 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2011-07-07 22:14 ` Brian Norris
2011-07-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v2 " Brian Norris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2011-07-07 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Frysinger; +Cc: linux-mtd, Artem Bityutskiy
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
> with my two proposed changes, it's working for me now ...
Oops, never mind, I just goofed on my git-rebase! Looks good. I'll
send v2 in a moment.
Thanks,
Brian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling
2011-07-07 22:14 ` Brian Norris
@ 2011-07-07 22:16 ` Brian Norris
2011-07-07 22:22 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2011-07-07 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Artem Bityutskiy; +Cc: Brian Norris, linux-mtd, Mike Frysinger
When using "make CROSS=mipsel-linux-", I get the following errors:
/bin/sh: /home/norris/git/mtd-utils/mipsel-linux/include/version.h.tmp: No such file or directory
make: *** [/home/norris/git/mtd-utils/mipsel-linux/include/version.h.tmp] Error 1
Fix (suggested by Mike Frysinger): create the directory if it doesn't
exist. Also, $(CC) needs to be able to find the generated header in
$(BUILDDIR)/include.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
---
Makefile | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index afbe201..1f3e270 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
VERSION = 1.4.5
-CPPFLAGS += -I./include -I./ubi-utils/include $(ZLIBCPPFLAGS) $(LZOCPPFLAGS)
+CPPFLAGS += -I./include -I$(BUILDDIR)/include -I./ubi-utils/include $(ZLIBCPPFLAGS) $(LZOCPPFLAGS)
ifeq ($(WITHOUT_XATTR), 1)
CPPFLAGS += -DWITHOUT_XATTR
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ cscope:
$(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h: $(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h.tmp
$(Q)cmp -s $@ $@.tmp && rm -f $@.tmp || mv $@.tmp $@
$(BUILDDIR)/include/version.h.tmp:
+ ${Q}mkdir -p $(dir $@)
$(Q)echo '#define VERSION "$(VERSION)"' > $@
#
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling
2011-07-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v2 " Brian Norris
@ 2011-07-07 22:22 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-07-07 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris; +Cc: linux-mtd, Artem Bityutskiy
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling
2011-07-07 21:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-07 21:36 ` Brian Norris
@ 2011-07-08 3:57 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-07-19 18:17 ` Brian Norris
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2011-07-08 3:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Frysinger; +Cc: Brian Norris, linux-mtd
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 17:12 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 17:09, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> i dont think it's just a matter of "diff build dir for diff
> >> toolchains, so common version.h is ok". it's a matter of "building
> >> out of tree should build out of tree".
> >
> > OK, but what is the point of in- vs. out-of-tree? So that we can have
> > a readonly source directory where the mtd-utils code stays?
>
> this one imo, but maybe Artem can speak to the origins (which predate
> my contributions)
Sorry, I do not know about the origins, I came into MTD area when most
of the things have been already implemented and worked.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling
2011-07-08 3:57 ` [PATCH " Artem Bityutskiy
@ 2011-07-19 18:17 ` Brian Norris
2011-07-20 5:29 ` Artem Bityutskiy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2011-07-19 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dedekind1; +Cc: linux-mtd, Mike Frysinger
May I get I push for these?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling
2011-07-19 18:17 ` Brian Norris
@ 2011-07-20 5:29 ` Artem Bityutskiy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2011-07-20 5:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris; +Cc: linux-mtd, Mike Frysinger
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 11:17 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> May I get I push for these?
Done, sorry and thanks for reminding!
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-20 5:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-07 20:44 [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling Brian Norris
2011-07-07 20:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] Makefile: fix "make clean" for cross-compile Brian Norris
2011-07-07 20:48 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-07 20:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] Makefile: show nice message when checking version.h Brian Norris
2011-07-07 20:48 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-07 20:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: fix "version.h" build for cross-compiling Mike Frysinger
2011-07-07 21:09 ` Brian Norris
2011-07-07 21:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-07 21:36 ` Brian Norris
2011-07-07 21:49 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-07 21:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-07 22:14 ` Brian Norris
2011-07-07 22:16 ` [PATCH v2 " Brian Norris
2011-07-07 22:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-07-08 3:57 ` [PATCH " Artem Bityutskiy
2011-07-19 18:17 ` Brian Norris
2011-07-20 5:29 ` Artem Bityutskiy
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.