All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
	Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
	David Spickett <david.spickett@linaro.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/7] signal: deduplicate code dealing with common _sigfault fields
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 22:07:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMn1gO42arQKGBj1Nnbs86TGYyogpRR_t73H=GbTmQrbAbV30A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200908151326.GV6642@arm.com>

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 8:13 AM Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:10:15PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> > We're about to add more common _sigfault fields, so deduplicate the
> > existing code for initializing _sigfault fields in {send,force}_sig_*,
> > and for copying _sigfault fields in copy_siginfo_to_external32 and
> > post_copy_siginfo_from_user32, to reduce the number of places that
> > will need to be updated by upcoming changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
> > ---
> > View this change in Gerrit: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/q/I4f56174e1b7b2bf4a3c8139e6879cbfd52750a24
> >
> >  include/linux/signal.h |  13 ++++++
> >  kernel/signal.c        | 101 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> >  2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/signal.h b/include/linux/signal.h
> > index 6bb1a3f0258c..3edbf54493ee 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/signal.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/signal.h
> > @@ -50,6 +50,19 @@ enum siginfo_layout {
> >
> >  enum siginfo_layout siginfo_layout(unsigned sig, int si_code);
> >
> > +static inline bool siginfo_layout_is_fault(enum siginfo_layout layout)
> > +{
> > +     switch (layout) {
> > +     case SIL_FAULT:
> > +     case SIL_FAULT_MCEERR:
> > +     case SIL_FAULT_BNDERR:
> > +     case SIL_FAULT_PKUERR:
> > +             return true;
> > +     default:
> > +             return false;
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Define some primitives to manipulate sigset_t.
> >   */
> > diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> > index c80e70bde11d..4ee9dc03f20f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/signal.c
> > +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> > @@ -1649,6 +1649,15 @@ void force_sigsegv(int sig)
> >       force_sig(SIGSEGV);
> >  }
> >
> > +static void set_sigfault_common_fields(struct kernel_siginfo *info, int sig,
> > +                                    int code, void __user *addr)
> > +{
> > +     info->si_signo = sig;
> > +     info->si_errno = 0;
> > +     info->si_code = code;
> > +     info->si_addr = addr;
> > +}
> > +
> >  int force_sig_fault_to_task(int sig, int code, void __user *addr
> >       ___ARCH_SI_TRAPNO(int trapno)
> >       ___ARCH_SI_IA64(int imm, unsigned int flags, unsigned long isr)
> > @@ -1657,10 +1666,7 @@ int force_sig_fault_to_task(int sig, int code, void __user *addr
> >       struct kernel_siginfo info;
> >
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = sig;
> > -     info.si_errno = 0;
> > -     info.si_code  = code;
> > -     info.si_addr  = addr;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, sig, code, addr);
> >  #ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> >       info.si_trapno = trapno;
> >  #endif
> > @@ -1689,10 +1695,7 @@ int send_sig_fault(int sig, int code, void __user *addr
> >       struct kernel_siginfo info;
> >
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = sig;
> > -     info.si_errno = 0;
> > -     info.si_code  = code;
> > -     info.si_addr  = addr;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, sig, code, addr);
> >  #ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> >       info.si_trapno = trapno;
> >  #endif
> > @@ -1710,10 +1713,7 @@ int force_sig_mceerr(int code, void __user *addr, short lsb)
> >
> >       WARN_ON((code != BUS_MCEERR_AO) && (code != BUS_MCEERR_AR));
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
> > -     info.si_errno = 0;
> > -     info.si_code = code;
> > -     info.si_addr = addr;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, SIGBUS, code, addr);
> >       info.si_addr_lsb = lsb;
> >       return force_sig_info(&info);
> >  }
> > @@ -1724,10 +1724,7 @@ int send_sig_mceerr(int code, void __user *addr, short lsb, struct task_struct *
> >
> >       WARN_ON((code != BUS_MCEERR_AO) && (code != BUS_MCEERR_AR));
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
> > -     info.si_errno = 0;
> > -     info.si_code = code;
> > -     info.si_addr = addr;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, SIGBUS, code, addr);
> >       info.si_addr_lsb = lsb;
> >       return send_sig_info(info.si_signo, &info, t);
> >  }
> > @@ -1738,10 +1735,7 @@ int force_sig_bnderr(void __user *addr, void __user *lower, void __user *upper)
> >       struct kernel_siginfo info;
> >
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = SIGSEGV;
> > -     info.si_errno = 0;
> > -     info.si_code  = SEGV_BNDERR;
> > -     info.si_addr  = addr;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, SIGSEGV, SEGV_BNDERR, addr);
> >       info.si_lower = lower;
> >       info.si_upper = upper;
> >       return force_sig_info(&info);
> > @@ -1753,10 +1747,7 @@ int force_sig_pkuerr(void __user *addr, u32 pkey)
> >       struct kernel_siginfo info;
> >
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = SIGSEGV;
> > -     info.si_errno = 0;
> > -     info.si_code  = SEGV_PKUERR;
> > -     info.si_addr  = addr;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, SIGSEGV, SEGV_PKUERR, addr);
> >       info.si_pkey  = pkey;
> >       return force_sig_info(&info);
> >  }
> > @@ -1770,10 +1761,8 @@ int force_sig_ptrace_errno_trap(int errno, void __user *addr)
> >       struct kernel_siginfo info;
> >
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = SIGTRAP;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, SIGTRAP, TRAP_HWBKPT, addr);
> >       info.si_errno = errno;
> > -     info.si_code  = TRAP_HWBKPT;
> > -     info.si_addr  = addr;
> >       return force_sig_info(&info);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -3266,12 +3255,23 @@ int copy_siginfo_from_user(kernel_siginfo_t *to, const siginfo_t __user *from)
> >  void copy_siginfo_to_external32(struct compat_siginfo *to,
> >               const struct kernel_siginfo *from)
> >  {
> > +     enum siginfo_layout layout =
> > +             siginfo_layout(from->si_signo, from->si_code);
> > +
> >       memset(to, 0, sizeof(*to));
> >
> >       to->si_signo = from->si_signo;
> >       to->si_errno = from->si_errno;
> >       to->si_code  = from->si_code;
> > -     switch(siginfo_layout(from->si_signo, from->si_code)) {
> > +
> > +     if (siginfo_layout_is_fault(layout)) {
> > +             to->si_addr = ptr_to_compat(from->si_addr);
> > +#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> > +             to->si_trapno = from->si_trapno;
> > +#endif
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     switch (layout) {
>
> I find the code flow slightly awkward with this change, because the
> fault signal fields are populated partly in the if() above and partly
> in the switch().  Previously, only the universal stuff was done outside.
>
> Would this be easier on future maintainers if we pulled the common
> stuff out into a helper and then called it from the appropriate switch
> cases?  The compiler will probably output some duplicated code in that
> case (depending on how clever it is at undoing the duplication), but
> the amount of affected code is small.

I'm not sure about that. One advantage of the current code structure
is that we end up with siginfo_layout_is_fault containing our single
canonical list of layouts that use the sigfault union member. With
your proposed code structure, the only caller of
siginfo_layout_is_fault would be the code that the next patch adds to
kernel/ptrace.c, which needs to know which layouts use sigfault so
that it can clear si_xflags, and that could relatively easily get out
of sync by accident since it's dealing with a less common case.

That being said, perhaps we could say that a caller of
ptrace(PTRACE_SETSIGINFO) is by definition old, so it wouldn't be
using that API to send signals with new siginfo layouts. That would
preclude a client from upgrading its knowledge of si_xflags
independently of its knowledge of new layouts though, and there would
be nothing preventing a new caller of siginfo_layout_is_fault being
added that would be exposed to new user code.

Peter

> >       case SIL_KILL:
> >               to->si_pid = from->si_pid;
> >               to->si_uid = from->si_uid;
> > @@ -3286,31 +3286,15 @@ void copy_siginfo_to_external32(struct compat_siginfo *to,
> >               to->si_fd   = from->si_fd;
> >               break;
> >       case SIL_FAULT:
> > -             to->si_addr = ptr_to_compat(from->si_addr);
> > -#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> > -             to->si_trapno = from->si_trapno;
> > -#endif
> >               break;
> >       case SIL_FAULT_MCEERR:
> > -             to->si_addr = ptr_to_compat(from->si_addr);
> > -#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> > -             to->si_trapno = from->si_trapno;
> > -#endif
> >               to->si_addr_lsb = from->si_addr_lsb;
> >               break;
> >       case SIL_FAULT_BNDERR:
> > -             to->si_addr = ptr_to_compat(from->si_addr);
> > -#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> > -             to->si_trapno = from->si_trapno;
> > -#endif
> >               to->si_lower = ptr_to_compat(from->si_lower);
> >               to->si_upper = ptr_to_compat(from->si_upper);
> >               break;
> >       case SIL_FAULT_PKUERR:
> > -             to->si_addr = ptr_to_compat(from->si_addr);
> > -#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> > -             to->si_trapno = from->si_trapno;
> > -#endif
> >               to->si_pkey = from->si_pkey;
> >               break;
> >       case SIL_CHLD:
> > @@ -3347,11 +3331,22 @@ int __copy_siginfo_to_user32(struct compat_siginfo __user *to,
> >  static int post_copy_siginfo_from_user32(kernel_siginfo_t *to,
> >                                        const struct compat_siginfo *from)
> >  {
> > +     enum siginfo_layout layout =
> > +             siginfo_layout(from->si_signo, from->si_code);
> > +
> >       clear_siginfo(to);
> >       to->si_signo = from->si_signo;
> >       to->si_errno = from->si_errno;
> >       to->si_code  = from->si_code;
> > -     switch(siginfo_layout(from->si_signo, from->si_code)) {
> > +
> > +     if (siginfo_layout_is_fault(layout)) {
> > +             to->si_addr = compat_ptr(from->si_addr);
> > +#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> > +             to->si_trapno = from->si_trapno;
> > +#endif
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     switch (layout) {
>
> Same comment as for copy_siginfo_to_external32()?
>
> [...]
>
> Otherwise, looks reasonable.
>
> Cheers
> ---Dave

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
	David Spickett <david.spickett@linaro.org>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/7] signal: deduplicate code dealing with common _sigfault fields
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 22:07:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMn1gO42arQKGBj1Nnbs86TGYyogpRR_t73H=GbTmQrbAbV30A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200908151326.GV6642@arm.com>

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 8:13 AM Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:10:15PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> > We're about to add more common _sigfault fields, so deduplicate the
> > existing code for initializing _sigfault fields in {send,force}_sig_*,
> > and for copying _sigfault fields in copy_siginfo_to_external32 and
> > post_copy_siginfo_from_user32, to reduce the number of places that
> > will need to be updated by upcoming changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
> > ---
> > View this change in Gerrit: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/q/I4f56174e1b7b2bf4a3c8139e6879cbfd52750a24
> >
> >  include/linux/signal.h |  13 ++++++
> >  kernel/signal.c        | 101 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> >  2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/signal.h b/include/linux/signal.h
> > index 6bb1a3f0258c..3edbf54493ee 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/signal.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/signal.h
> > @@ -50,6 +50,19 @@ enum siginfo_layout {
> >
> >  enum siginfo_layout siginfo_layout(unsigned sig, int si_code);
> >
> > +static inline bool siginfo_layout_is_fault(enum siginfo_layout layout)
> > +{
> > +     switch (layout) {
> > +     case SIL_FAULT:
> > +     case SIL_FAULT_MCEERR:
> > +     case SIL_FAULT_BNDERR:
> > +     case SIL_FAULT_PKUERR:
> > +             return true;
> > +     default:
> > +             return false;
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Define some primitives to manipulate sigset_t.
> >   */
> > diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> > index c80e70bde11d..4ee9dc03f20f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/signal.c
> > +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> > @@ -1649,6 +1649,15 @@ void force_sigsegv(int sig)
> >       force_sig(SIGSEGV);
> >  }
> >
> > +static void set_sigfault_common_fields(struct kernel_siginfo *info, int sig,
> > +                                    int code, void __user *addr)
> > +{
> > +     info->si_signo = sig;
> > +     info->si_errno = 0;
> > +     info->si_code = code;
> > +     info->si_addr = addr;
> > +}
> > +
> >  int force_sig_fault_to_task(int sig, int code, void __user *addr
> >       ___ARCH_SI_TRAPNO(int trapno)
> >       ___ARCH_SI_IA64(int imm, unsigned int flags, unsigned long isr)
> > @@ -1657,10 +1666,7 @@ int force_sig_fault_to_task(int sig, int code, void __user *addr
> >       struct kernel_siginfo info;
> >
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = sig;
> > -     info.si_errno = 0;
> > -     info.si_code  = code;
> > -     info.si_addr  = addr;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, sig, code, addr);
> >  #ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> >       info.si_trapno = trapno;
> >  #endif
> > @@ -1689,10 +1695,7 @@ int send_sig_fault(int sig, int code, void __user *addr
> >       struct kernel_siginfo info;
> >
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = sig;
> > -     info.si_errno = 0;
> > -     info.si_code  = code;
> > -     info.si_addr  = addr;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, sig, code, addr);
> >  #ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> >       info.si_trapno = trapno;
> >  #endif
> > @@ -1710,10 +1713,7 @@ int force_sig_mceerr(int code, void __user *addr, short lsb)
> >
> >       WARN_ON((code != BUS_MCEERR_AO) && (code != BUS_MCEERR_AR));
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
> > -     info.si_errno = 0;
> > -     info.si_code = code;
> > -     info.si_addr = addr;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, SIGBUS, code, addr);
> >       info.si_addr_lsb = lsb;
> >       return force_sig_info(&info);
> >  }
> > @@ -1724,10 +1724,7 @@ int send_sig_mceerr(int code, void __user *addr, short lsb, struct task_struct *
> >
> >       WARN_ON((code != BUS_MCEERR_AO) && (code != BUS_MCEERR_AR));
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
> > -     info.si_errno = 0;
> > -     info.si_code = code;
> > -     info.si_addr = addr;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, SIGBUS, code, addr);
> >       info.si_addr_lsb = lsb;
> >       return send_sig_info(info.si_signo, &info, t);
> >  }
> > @@ -1738,10 +1735,7 @@ int force_sig_bnderr(void __user *addr, void __user *lower, void __user *upper)
> >       struct kernel_siginfo info;
> >
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = SIGSEGV;
> > -     info.si_errno = 0;
> > -     info.si_code  = SEGV_BNDERR;
> > -     info.si_addr  = addr;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, SIGSEGV, SEGV_BNDERR, addr);
> >       info.si_lower = lower;
> >       info.si_upper = upper;
> >       return force_sig_info(&info);
> > @@ -1753,10 +1747,7 @@ int force_sig_pkuerr(void __user *addr, u32 pkey)
> >       struct kernel_siginfo info;
> >
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = SIGSEGV;
> > -     info.si_errno = 0;
> > -     info.si_code  = SEGV_PKUERR;
> > -     info.si_addr  = addr;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, SIGSEGV, SEGV_PKUERR, addr);
> >       info.si_pkey  = pkey;
> >       return force_sig_info(&info);
> >  }
> > @@ -1770,10 +1761,8 @@ int force_sig_ptrace_errno_trap(int errno, void __user *addr)
> >       struct kernel_siginfo info;
> >
> >       clear_siginfo(&info);
> > -     info.si_signo = SIGTRAP;
> > +     set_sigfault_common_fields(&info, SIGTRAP, TRAP_HWBKPT, addr);
> >       info.si_errno = errno;
> > -     info.si_code  = TRAP_HWBKPT;
> > -     info.si_addr  = addr;
> >       return force_sig_info(&info);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -3266,12 +3255,23 @@ int copy_siginfo_from_user(kernel_siginfo_t *to, const siginfo_t __user *from)
> >  void copy_siginfo_to_external32(struct compat_siginfo *to,
> >               const struct kernel_siginfo *from)
> >  {
> > +     enum siginfo_layout layout =
> > +             siginfo_layout(from->si_signo, from->si_code);
> > +
> >       memset(to, 0, sizeof(*to));
> >
> >       to->si_signo = from->si_signo;
> >       to->si_errno = from->si_errno;
> >       to->si_code  = from->si_code;
> > -     switch(siginfo_layout(from->si_signo, from->si_code)) {
> > +
> > +     if (siginfo_layout_is_fault(layout)) {
> > +             to->si_addr = ptr_to_compat(from->si_addr);
> > +#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> > +             to->si_trapno = from->si_trapno;
> > +#endif
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     switch (layout) {
>
> I find the code flow slightly awkward with this change, because the
> fault signal fields are populated partly in the if() above and partly
> in the switch().  Previously, only the universal stuff was done outside.
>
> Would this be easier on future maintainers if we pulled the common
> stuff out into a helper and then called it from the appropriate switch
> cases?  The compiler will probably output some duplicated code in that
> case (depending on how clever it is at undoing the duplication), but
> the amount of affected code is small.

I'm not sure about that. One advantage of the current code structure
is that we end up with siginfo_layout_is_fault containing our single
canonical list of layouts that use the sigfault union member. With
your proposed code structure, the only caller of
siginfo_layout_is_fault would be the code that the next patch adds to
kernel/ptrace.c, which needs to know which layouts use sigfault so
that it can clear si_xflags, and that could relatively easily get out
of sync by accident since it's dealing with a less common case.

That being said, perhaps we could say that a caller of
ptrace(PTRACE_SETSIGINFO) is by definition old, so it wouldn't be
using that API to send signals with new siginfo layouts. That would
preclude a client from upgrading its knowledge of si_xflags
independently of its knowledge of new layouts though, and there would
be nothing preventing a new caller of siginfo_layout_is_fault being
added that would be exposed to new user code.

Peter

> >       case SIL_KILL:
> >               to->si_pid = from->si_pid;
> >               to->si_uid = from->si_uid;
> > @@ -3286,31 +3286,15 @@ void copy_siginfo_to_external32(struct compat_siginfo *to,
> >               to->si_fd   = from->si_fd;
> >               break;
> >       case SIL_FAULT:
> > -             to->si_addr = ptr_to_compat(from->si_addr);
> > -#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> > -             to->si_trapno = from->si_trapno;
> > -#endif
> >               break;
> >       case SIL_FAULT_MCEERR:
> > -             to->si_addr = ptr_to_compat(from->si_addr);
> > -#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> > -             to->si_trapno = from->si_trapno;
> > -#endif
> >               to->si_addr_lsb = from->si_addr_lsb;
> >               break;
> >       case SIL_FAULT_BNDERR:
> > -             to->si_addr = ptr_to_compat(from->si_addr);
> > -#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> > -             to->si_trapno = from->si_trapno;
> > -#endif
> >               to->si_lower = ptr_to_compat(from->si_lower);
> >               to->si_upper = ptr_to_compat(from->si_upper);
> >               break;
> >       case SIL_FAULT_PKUERR:
> > -             to->si_addr = ptr_to_compat(from->si_addr);
> > -#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> > -             to->si_trapno = from->si_trapno;
> > -#endif
> >               to->si_pkey = from->si_pkey;
> >               break;
> >       case SIL_CHLD:
> > @@ -3347,11 +3331,22 @@ int __copy_siginfo_to_user32(struct compat_siginfo __user *to,
> >  static int post_copy_siginfo_from_user32(kernel_siginfo_t *to,
> >                                        const struct compat_siginfo *from)
> >  {
> > +     enum siginfo_layout layout =
> > +             siginfo_layout(from->si_signo, from->si_code);
> > +
> >       clear_siginfo(to);
> >       to->si_signo = from->si_signo;
> >       to->si_errno = from->si_errno;
> >       to->si_code  = from->si_code;
> > -     switch(siginfo_layout(from->si_signo, from->si_code)) {
> > +
> > +     if (siginfo_layout_is_fault(layout)) {
> > +             to->si_addr = compat_ptr(from->si_addr);
> > +#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> > +             to->si_trapno = from->si_trapno;
> > +#endif
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     switch (layout) {
>
> Same comment as for copy_siginfo_to_external32()?
>
> [...]
>
> Otherwise, looks reasonable.
>
> Cheers
> ---Dave

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-06  5:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-22  5:10 [PATCH v10 0/7] arm64: expose FAR_EL1 tag bits in siginfo Peter Collingbourne
2020-08-22  5:10 ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-08-22  5:10 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] parisc: start using signal-defs.h Peter Collingbourne
2020-08-22  5:10   ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-08-30 17:07   ` Helge Deller
2020-10-03  1:22     ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-10-03 10:04       ` Helge Deller
2020-09-08 15:12   ` Dave Martin
2020-09-08 15:12     ` Dave Martin
2020-08-22  5:10 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] arch: move SA_* definitions to generic headers Peter Collingbourne
2020-08-22  5:10   ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-09-08 15:12   ` Dave Martin
2020-09-08 15:12     ` Dave Martin
2020-10-03  1:14     ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-10-03  1:14       ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-10-05 11:06       ` Dave Martin
2020-10-05 11:06         ` Dave Martin
2020-08-22  5:10 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] signal: clear non-uapi flag bits when passing/returning sa_flags Peter Collingbourne
2020-08-22  5:10   ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-09-08 15:12   ` Dave Martin
2020-09-08 15:12     ` Dave Martin
2020-10-08  2:23     ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-10-08  2:23       ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-08-22  5:10 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] signal: define the SA_UNSUPPORTED bit in sa_flags Peter Collingbourne
2020-08-22  5:10   ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-09-08 15:13   ` Dave Martin
2020-09-08 15:13     ` Dave Martin
2020-10-08  2:21     ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-10-08  2:21       ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-10-12 13:37       ` Dave Martin
2020-10-12 13:37         ` Dave Martin
2020-08-22  5:10 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] signal: deduplicate code dealing with common _sigfault fields Peter Collingbourne
2020-08-22  5:10   ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-09-08 15:13   ` Dave Martin
2020-09-08 15:13     ` Dave Martin
2020-10-06  5:07     ` Peter Collingbourne [this message]
2020-10-06  5:07       ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-10-07  8:56       ` Dave Martin
2020-10-07  8:56         ` Dave Martin
2020-08-22  5:10 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] signal: define the field siginfo.si_xflags Peter Collingbourne
2020-08-22  5:10   ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-09-08 15:13   ` Dave Martin
2020-09-08 15:13     ` Dave Martin
2020-10-08  2:11     ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-10-08  2:11       ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-10-09 18:19       ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-10-09 18:19         ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-10-12 13:57         ` Dave Martin
2020-10-12 13:57           ` Dave Martin
2020-10-12 13:55       ` Dave Martin
2020-10-12 13:55         ` Dave Martin
2020-08-22  5:10 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] arm64: expose FAR_EL1 tag bits in siginfo Peter Collingbourne
2020-08-22  5:10   ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-09-08 15:13   ` Dave Martin
2020-09-08 15:13     ` Dave Martin
2020-10-08  2:54     ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-10-08  2:54       ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-10-12 14:14       ` Dave Martin
2020-10-12 14:14         ` Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMn1gO42arQKGBj1Nnbs86TGYyogpRR_t73H=GbTmQrbAbV30A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david.spickett@linaro.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=eugenis@google.com \
    --cc=kcc@google.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.