All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "erik elfström" <erik.elfstrom@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] clean: improve performance when removing lots of directories
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 22:31:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMpP7Nbm9Gy6AgULBCCwgeEUBWU4M5r8+SC22iuu8VmaUtst_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150428062422.GM24580@peff.net>

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
>
> This iteration looks reasonable overall to me.
>
> Should this is_git_repository() helper be available to other files? I
> think there are other calls to resolve_gitlink_ref() that would want the
> same treatment (e.g., I think "git status" may have a similar issue).
>
> -Peff

Yes that is probably the direction to go in but I think the current
version is too tailored to the clean case to be generally useful
(although I haven't check the status case). Right now this is more of
a is_this_a_repo_clean_should_care_about_ignoring_some_cornercase_quirks
than a true is_git_repository check.

I would think a general version would look more like this:

static int is_git_repository(struct strbuf *path)
{
    if (is_bare_repository(path))
        return BARE_REPO;
    if (is_submodule(path))
        return SUBMODULE;
    if (is_git_director(path))
        return REPO;
    return 0;
}

probably also communicating any errors back to the caller.

To sum it up I think you are correct in the direction but I suspect
that the current version is not sufficient for the general case and
that it would be best to leave the generalization and making it public
for future work.

/Erik

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-28 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-25  9:06 [PATCH v4 0/5] Improving performance of git clean Erik Elfström
2015-04-25  9:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] setup: add gentle version of read_gitfile Erik Elfström
2015-04-25 16:51   ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-25 16:54     ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-25  9:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] setup: sanity check file size in read_gitfile_gently Erik Elfström
2015-04-25 16:47   ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-25 17:59     ` Erik Elfström
2015-04-26  4:29       ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-26  6:49         ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Improving performance of git clean Erik Elfström
2015-04-26  6:49           ` [PATCH v5 1/5] setup: add gentle version of read_gitfile Erik Elfström
2015-04-28  6:17             ` Jeff King
2015-04-28 20:07               ` erik elfström
2015-04-28 20:19                 ` Jeff King
2015-04-28 20:34                   ` Jonathan Nieder
2015-04-28 20:36                     ` Jeff King
2015-04-28 20:42                       ` Jonathan Nieder
2015-04-28 20:48                         ` Jeff King
2015-04-28 21:06                           ` Jonathan Nieder
2015-04-28 23:34                           ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-29 23:47             ` Stefan Beller
2015-04-30  1:35               ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-26  6:49           ` [PATCH v5 2/5] setup: sanity check file size in read_gitfile_gently Erik Elfström
2015-04-28  6:02             ` Jeff King
2015-04-28  7:21               ` Windows path limites, was " Johannes Schindelin
2015-04-28 15:33                 ` Doug Kelly
2015-04-28 16:20                   ` Windows path limits, " Johannes Schindelin
2015-04-28 19:28               ` erik elfström
2015-04-29 15:42             ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-26  6:49           ` [PATCH v5 3/5] t7300: add tests to document behavior of clean and nested git Erik Elfström
2015-04-26  6:49           ` [PATCH v5 4/5] p7300: add performance tests for clean Erik Elfström
2015-04-28  6:33             ` Jeff King
2015-04-28 19:36               ` erik elfström
2015-04-26  6:49           ` [PATCH v5 5/5] clean: improve performance when removing lots of directories Erik Elfström
2015-04-28  6:24             ` Jeff King
2015-04-28 20:31               ` erik elfström [this message]
2015-04-25  9:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] t7300: add tests to document behavior of clean and nested git Erik Elfström
2015-04-25  9:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] p7300: add performance tests for clean Erik Elfström
2015-04-25  9:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] clean: improve performance when removing lots of directories Erik Elfström

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMpP7Nbm9Gy6AgULBCCwgeEUBWU4M5r8+SC22iuu8VmaUtst_w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=erik.elfstrom@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.