All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>,
	Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>,
	Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>,
	Fancy Fang <chen.fang@nxp.com>,
	Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
	Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@linaro.org>,
	Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
	Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi@engicam.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	linux-amarula <linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/14] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add atomic_get_input_bus_fmts
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 22:37:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMty3ZD_+m_3aj2-rXThaEDtP=m3Knfo=bmXvMPH_7LSf6N5qA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56cab7d0-d9fb-d890-0b1c-678980eafd9c@samsung.com>

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:10 PM Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> On 14.11.2022 11:57, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > On 10.11.2022 19:38, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> Finding the right input bus format throughout the pipeline is hard
> >> so add atomic_get_input_bus_fmts callback and initialize with the
> >> proper input format from list of supported output formats.
> >>
> >> This format can be used in pipeline for negotiating bus format between
> >> the DSI-end of this bridge and the other component closer to pipeline
> >> components.
> >>
> >> List of Pixel formats are taken from,
> >> AN13573 i.MX 8/RT MIPI DSI/CSI-2, Rev. 0, 21 March 2022
> >> 3.7.4 Pixel formats
> >> Table 14. DSI pixel packing formats
> >>
> >> v8:
> >> * added pixel formats supported by NXP AN13573 i.MX 8/RT MIPI DSI/CSI-2
> >>
> >> v7, v6, v5, v4:
> >> * none
> >>
> >> v3:
> >> * include media-bus-format.h
> >>
> >> v2:
> >> * none
> >>
> >> v1:
> >> * new patch
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> >> index 0fe153b29e4f..33e5ae9c865f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> >> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> >>   #include <linux/clk.h>
> >>   #include <linux/delay.h>
> >>   #include <linux/irq.h>
> >> +#include <linux/media-bus-format.h>
> >>   #include <linux/of_device.h>
> >>   #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> >>   @@ -1321,6 +1322,57 @@ static void
> >> samsung_dsim_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >>       pm_runtime_put_sync(dsi->dev);
> >>   }
> >>   +/*
> >> + * This pixel output formats list referenced from,
> >> + * AN13573 i.MX 8/RT MIPI DSI/CSI-2, Rev. 0, 21 March 2022
> >> + * 3.7.4 Pixel formats
> >> + * Table 14. DSI pixel packing formats
> >> + */
> >> +static const u32 samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmts[] = {
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_UYVY8_1X16,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB101010_1X30,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB121212_1X36,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB565_1X16,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB666_1X18,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static bool samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmt_supported(u32 fmt)
> >> +{
> >> +    int i;
> >> +
> >> +    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmts); i++) {
> >> +        if (samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmts[i] == fmt)
> >> +            return true;
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    return false;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static u32 *
> >> +samsung_dsim_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >> +                       struct drm_bridge_state *bridge_state,
> >> +                       struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >> +                       struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> >> +                       u32 output_fmt,
> >> +                       unsigned int *num_input_fmts)
> >> +{
> >> +    u32 *input_fmts;
> >> +
> >> +    if (!samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmt_supported(output_fmt))
> >> +        return NULL;
> >
> >
> > Please add support for MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED and maybe default to
> > MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24 if requested format is not matched.
> >
> > Otherwise the above check breaks all current clients of the Samsung
> > DSIM/Exynos DSI. I didn't dig into the bus matching code yet, but all
> > DSI panels requests such format on my test systems...
>
> I've checked a bit more the bus format related code and it looks that
> there are more issues. The DSI panels don't use the MEDIA_BUS_FMT_*
> formats thus the bridge negotiation code selects MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED for
> them. On Arndale board with Toshiba tc358764 bridge the
> MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_SPWG output_fmt is requested in
> samsung_dsim_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts() (forwarded from the LVDS panel,

dsim => tc358764 => panel-simple

If I understand the bridge format negotiation correctly - If
atomic_get_input_bus_fmts is not implemented in tc358764 then
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED will be the output_fmt for dsim so we can assign
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24 for FIXED formats.

from include/drm/drm_bridge.h:

         * This method is called on all elements of the bridge chain as part of
         * the bus format negotiation process that happens in
         * drm_atomic_bridge_chain_select_bus_fmts().
         * This method is optional. When not implemented, the core will bypass
         * bus format negotiation on this element of the bridge without
         * failing, and the previous element in the chain will be passed
         * MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED as its output bus format.

As I can see tc358764 is not implemented either
atomic_get_input_bus_fmts or atomic API, so I think dsim gets the
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED bridge pipeline. I have tested sn65dsi without
atomic_get_input_bus_fmts I can see the dsim is getting
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED.

Can you check the same from your side?

On the other side, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_SPWG is 24-bit samples
transferred over an LVDS bus with four differential data pairs,
serialized into 7-time slots using SPWG which indeed a
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24 input_fmt for the bridge. so handling in the
supported list and reassigning the RGB888_1X24 would be the proper way
to handle this format.

Jagan.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com>,
	linux-amarula <linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@linaro.org>,
	Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi@engicam.com>,
	Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>,
	Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Fancy Fang <chen.fang@nxp.com>,
	Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/14] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add atomic_get_input_bus_fmts
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 22:37:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMty3ZD_+m_3aj2-rXThaEDtP=m3Knfo=bmXvMPH_7LSf6N5qA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56cab7d0-d9fb-d890-0b1c-678980eafd9c@samsung.com>

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:10 PM Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> On 14.11.2022 11:57, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > On 10.11.2022 19:38, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> Finding the right input bus format throughout the pipeline is hard
> >> so add atomic_get_input_bus_fmts callback and initialize with the
> >> proper input format from list of supported output formats.
> >>
> >> This format can be used in pipeline for negotiating bus format between
> >> the DSI-end of this bridge and the other component closer to pipeline
> >> components.
> >>
> >> List of Pixel formats are taken from,
> >> AN13573 i.MX 8/RT MIPI DSI/CSI-2, Rev. 0, 21 March 2022
> >> 3.7.4 Pixel formats
> >> Table 14. DSI pixel packing formats
> >>
> >> v8:
> >> * added pixel formats supported by NXP AN13573 i.MX 8/RT MIPI DSI/CSI-2
> >>
> >> v7, v6, v5, v4:
> >> * none
> >>
> >> v3:
> >> * include media-bus-format.h
> >>
> >> v2:
> >> * none
> >>
> >> v1:
> >> * new patch
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> >> index 0fe153b29e4f..33e5ae9c865f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> >> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> >>   #include <linux/clk.h>
> >>   #include <linux/delay.h>
> >>   #include <linux/irq.h>
> >> +#include <linux/media-bus-format.h>
> >>   #include <linux/of_device.h>
> >>   #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> >>   @@ -1321,6 +1322,57 @@ static void
> >> samsung_dsim_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >>       pm_runtime_put_sync(dsi->dev);
> >>   }
> >>   +/*
> >> + * This pixel output formats list referenced from,
> >> + * AN13573 i.MX 8/RT MIPI DSI/CSI-2, Rev. 0, 21 March 2022
> >> + * 3.7.4 Pixel formats
> >> + * Table 14. DSI pixel packing formats
> >> + */
> >> +static const u32 samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmts[] = {
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_UYVY8_1X16,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB101010_1X30,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB121212_1X36,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB565_1X16,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB666_1X18,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static bool samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmt_supported(u32 fmt)
> >> +{
> >> +    int i;
> >> +
> >> +    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmts); i++) {
> >> +        if (samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmts[i] == fmt)
> >> +            return true;
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    return false;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static u32 *
> >> +samsung_dsim_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >> +                       struct drm_bridge_state *bridge_state,
> >> +                       struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >> +                       struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> >> +                       u32 output_fmt,
> >> +                       unsigned int *num_input_fmts)
> >> +{
> >> +    u32 *input_fmts;
> >> +
> >> +    if (!samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmt_supported(output_fmt))
> >> +        return NULL;
> >
> >
> > Please add support for MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED and maybe default to
> > MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24 if requested format is not matched.
> >
> > Otherwise the above check breaks all current clients of the Samsung
> > DSIM/Exynos DSI. I didn't dig into the bus matching code yet, but all
> > DSI panels requests such format on my test systems...
>
> I've checked a bit more the bus format related code and it looks that
> there are more issues. The DSI panels don't use the MEDIA_BUS_FMT_*
> formats thus the bridge negotiation code selects MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED for
> them. On Arndale board with Toshiba tc358764 bridge the
> MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_SPWG output_fmt is requested in
> samsung_dsim_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts() (forwarded from the LVDS panel,

dsim => tc358764 => panel-simple

If I understand the bridge format negotiation correctly - If
atomic_get_input_bus_fmts is not implemented in tc358764 then
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED will be the output_fmt for dsim so we can assign
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24 for FIXED formats.

from include/drm/drm_bridge.h:

         * This method is called on all elements of the bridge chain as part of
         * the bus format negotiation process that happens in
         * drm_atomic_bridge_chain_select_bus_fmts().
         * This method is optional. When not implemented, the core will bypass
         * bus format negotiation on this element of the bridge without
         * failing, and the previous element in the chain will be passed
         * MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED as its output bus format.

As I can see tc358764 is not implemented either
atomic_get_input_bus_fmts or atomic API, so I think dsim gets the
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED bridge pipeline. I have tested sn65dsi without
atomic_get_input_bus_fmts I can see the dsim is getting
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED.

Can you check the same from your side?

On the other side, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_SPWG is 24-bit samples
transferred over an LVDS bus with four differential data pairs,
serialized into 7-time slots using SPWG which indeed a
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24 input_fmt for the bridge. so handling in the
supported list and reassigning the RGB888_1X24 would be the proper way
to handle this format.

Jagan.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>,
	 Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>,
	Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>,
	 Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>,
	 Fancy Fang <chen.fang@nxp.com>,
	Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
	 Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
	 Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@linaro.org>,
	Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>,
	 Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	 Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
	 Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi@engicam.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	 linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	linux-amarula <linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/14] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add atomic_get_input_bus_fmts
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 22:37:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMty3ZD_+m_3aj2-rXThaEDtP=m3Knfo=bmXvMPH_7LSf6N5qA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56cab7d0-d9fb-d890-0b1c-678980eafd9c@samsung.com>

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:10 PM Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> On 14.11.2022 11:57, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > On 10.11.2022 19:38, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> Finding the right input bus format throughout the pipeline is hard
> >> so add atomic_get_input_bus_fmts callback and initialize with the
> >> proper input format from list of supported output formats.
> >>
> >> This format can be used in pipeline for negotiating bus format between
> >> the DSI-end of this bridge and the other component closer to pipeline
> >> components.
> >>
> >> List of Pixel formats are taken from,
> >> AN13573 i.MX 8/RT MIPI DSI/CSI-2, Rev. 0, 21 March 2022
> >> 3.7.4 Pixel formats
> >> Table 14. DSI pixel packing formats
> >>
> >> v8:
> >> * added pixel formats supported by NXP AN13573 i.MX 8/RT MIPI DSI/CSI-2
> >>
> >> v7, v6, v5, v4:
> >> * none
> >>
> >> v3:
> >> * include media-bus-format.h
> >>
> >> v2:
> >> * none
> >>
> >> v1:
> >> * new patch
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> >> index 0fe153b29e4f..33e5ae9c865f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> >> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> >>   #include <linux/clk.h>
> >>   #include <linux/delay.h>
> >>   #include <linux/irq.h>
> >> +#include <linux/media-bus-format.h>
> >>   #include <linux/of_device.h>
> >>   #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> >>   @@ -1321,6 +1322,57 @@ static void
> >> samsung_dsim_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >>       pm_runtime_put_sync(dsi->dev);
> >>   }
> >>   +/*
> >> + * This pixel output formats list referenced from,
> >> + * AN13573 i.MX 8/RT MIPI DSI/CSI-2, Rev. 0, 21 March 2022
> >> + * 3.7.4 Pixel formats
> >> + * Table 14. DSI pixel packing formats
> >> + */
> >> +static const u32 samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmts[] = {
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_UYVY8_1X16,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB101010_1X30,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB121212_1X36,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB565_1X16,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB666_1X18,
> >> +    MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static bool samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmt_supported(u32 fmt)
> >> +{
> >> +    int i;
> >> +
> >> +    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmts); i++) {
> >> +        if (samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmts[i] == fmt)
> >> +            return true;
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    return false;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static u32 *
> >> +samsung_dsim_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> >> +                       struct drm_bridge_state *bridge_state,
> >> +                       struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >> +                       struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> >> +                       u32 output_fmt,
> >> +                       unsigned int *num_input_fmts)
> >> +{
> >> +    u32 *input_fmts;
> >> +
> >> +    if (!samsung_dsim_pixel_output_fmt_supported(output_fmt))
> >> +        return NULL;
> >
> >
> > Please add support for MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED and maybe default to
> > MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24 if requested format is not matched.
> >
> > Otherwise the above check breaks all current clients of the Samsung
> > DSIM/Exynos DSI. I didn't dig into the bus matching code yet, but all
> > DSI panels requests such format on my test systems...
>
> I've checked a bit more the bus format related code and it looks that
> there are more issues. The DSI panels don't use the MEDIA_BUS_FMT_*
> formats thus the bridge negotiation code selects MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED for
> them. On Arndale board with Toshiba tc358764 bridge the
> MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_SPWG output_fmt is requested in
> samsung_dsim_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts() (forwarded from the LVDS panel,

dsim => tc358764 => panel-simple

If I understand the bridge format negotiation correctly - If
atomic_get_input_bus_fmts is not implemented in tc358764 then
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED will be the output_fmt for dsim so we can assign
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24 for FIXED formats.

from include/drm/drm_bridge.h:

         * This method is called on all elements of the bridge chain as part of
         * the bus format negotiation process that happens in
         * drm_atomic_bridge_chain_select_bus_fmts().
         * This method is optional. When not implemented, the core will bypass
         * bus format negotiation on this element of the bridge without
         * failing, and the previous element in the chain will be passed
         * MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED as its output bus format.

As I can see tc358764 is not implemented either
atomic_get_input_bus_fmts or atomic API, so I think dsim gets the
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED bridge pipeline. I have tested sn65dsi without
atomic_get_input_bus_fmts I can see the dsim is getting
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED.

Can you check the same from your side?

On the other side, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_SPWG is 24-bit samples
transferred over an LVDS bus with four differential data pairs,
serialized into 7-time slots using SPWG which indeed a
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24 input_fmt for the bridge. so handling in the
supported list and reassigning the RGB888_1X24 would be the proper way
to handle this format.

Jagan.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-14 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 181+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-10 18:38 [PATCH v8 00/14] drm: bridge: Add Samsung MIPI DSIM bridge Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38 ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38 ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 01/14] drm: exynos: dsi: Fix MIPI_DSI*_NO_* mode flags Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-11  0:49   ` Nicolas Boichat
2022-11-11  0:49     ` Nicolas Boichat
2022-11-11  0:49     ` Nicolas Boichat
2022-11-11  8:49     ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-11  8:49       ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-11  8:49       ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-11 12:12       ` Nicolas Boichat
2022-11-11 12:12         ` Nicolas Boichat
2022-11-11 12:12         ` Nicolas Boichat
2022-11-11 12:45         ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-11 12:45           ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-11 12:45           ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-13  0:29         ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-13  0:29           ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-13  0:29           ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-14  1:11           ` Nicolas Boichat
2022-11-14  1:11             ` Nicolas Boichat
2022-11-14  1:11             ` Nicolas Boichat
2022-11-14  3:16             ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-14  3:16               ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-14  3:16               ` Marek Vasut
2022-12-05 11:55               ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-05 11:55                 ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-05 11:55                 ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 02/14] drm: exynos: dsi: Properly name HSA/HBP/HFP/HSE bits Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-13  0:25   ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-13  0:25     ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-13  0:25     ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-14  8:27     ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-14  8:27       ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-14  8:27       ` Jagan Teki
2022-12-05 11:59   ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-05 11:59     ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-05 11:59     ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-05 12:06     ` Jagan Teki
2022-12-05 12:06       ` Jagan Teki
2022-12-05 12:06       ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 03/14] drm: bridge: Generalize Exynos-DSI driver into a Samsung DSIM bridge Jagan Teki
2022-11-17  5:01   ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-17  5:01     ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-17  5:01     ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-18  6:40     ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-18  6:40       ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-18  6:40       ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 04/14] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Lookup OF-graph or Child node devices Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 05/14] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Mark PHY as optional Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 06/14] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Handle proper DSI host initialization Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-17  4:58   ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-17  4:58     ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-17  4:58     ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-17 13:04     ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-17 13:04       ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-17 13:04       ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-19 13:36       ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-19 13:36         ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-19 13:36         ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-23 20:09         ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-23 20:09           ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-23 20:09           ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-25 22:14           ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-25 22:14             ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-25 22:14             ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-28 14:43             ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-28 14:43               ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-28 14:43               ` Jagan Teki
2022-12-02 10:52               ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-12-02 10:52                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-12-02 10:52                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-12-02 12:21                 ` Marek Vasut
2022-12-02 12:21                   ` Marek Vasut
2022-12-02 12:21                   ` Marek Vasut
2022-12-02 14:55                   ` Dave Stevenson
2022-12-02 14:55                     ` Dave Stevenson
2022-12-02 14:55                     ` Dave Stevenson
2022-12-05  7:30                     ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-05  7:30                       ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-05  7:30                       ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-05 15:20                       ` Dave Stevenson
2022-12-05 15:20                         ` Dave Stevenson
2022-12-05 15:20                         ` Dave Stevenson
2022-12-05 15:37                         ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-05 15:37                           ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-05 15:37                           ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-06  9:02                           ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-06  9:02                             ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-06  9:02                             ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-08 11:32                             ` Jagan Teki
2022-12-08 11:32                               ` Jagan Teki
2022-12-08 11:32                               ` Jagan Teki
2022-12-08 12:21                               ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-12-08 12:21                                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-12-08 12:21                                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 07/14] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add atomic_check Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 08/14] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add platform PLL_P (PMS_P) offset Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 09/14] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add atomic_get_input_bus_fmts Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-13  0:21   ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-13  0:21     ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-13  0:21     ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-14  7:49     ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-14  7:49       ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-14  7:49       ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-15 12:00       ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-15 12:00         ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-15 12:00         ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-16  8:07         ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-16  8:07           ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-16  8:07           ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-16 10:49           ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-16 10:49             ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-16 10:49             ` Marek Vasut
2022-11-16 11:07             ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-16 11:07               ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-16 11:07               ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-16 11:30               ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-16 11:30                 ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-16 11:30                 ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-14 10:57   ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-14 10:57     ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-14 10:57     ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-14 14:40     ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-14 14:40       ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-14 14:40       ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-14 17:07       ` Jagan Teki [this message]
2022-11-14 17:07         ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-14 17:07         ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-15  8:09         ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-15  8:09           ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-15  8:09           ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-15  8:48           ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-11-15  8:48             ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-11-15  8:48             ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-11-15  9:20             ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-15  9:20               ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-15  9:20               ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-15 21:38               ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-15 21:38                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-15 21:38                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 10/14] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add input_bus_flags Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 11/14] dt-bindings: display: exynos: dsim: Add NXP i.MX8M Mini/Nano support Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 12/14] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add " Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 13/14] dt-bindings: display: exynos: dsim: Add NXP i.MX8M Plus support Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38 ` [PATCH v8 14/14] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add " Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-10 18:38   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-14  8:41 ` [PATCH v8 00/14] drm: bridge: Add Samsung MIPI DSIM bridge Frieder Schrempf
2022-11-14  8:41   ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-11-14  8:41   ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-11-14  8:47   ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-14  8:47     ` Jagan Teki
2022-11-14  8:47     ` Jagan Teki
2022-12-05 13:22 ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-05 13:22   ` Frieder Schrempf
2022-12-05 13:22   ` Frieder Schrempf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMty3ZD_+m_3aj2-rXThaEDtP=m3Knfo=bmXvMPH_7LSf6N5qA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=aford173@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=chen.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=frieder.schrempf@kontron.de \
    --cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
    --cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=matteo.lisi@engicam.com \
    --cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=narmstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=robert.foss@linaro.org \
    --cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=tharvey@gateworks.com \
    --cc=tommaso.merciai@amarulasolutions.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.