* [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100: add restart handler
@ 2017-02-09 19:12 Chris Brandt
2017-02-10 7:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Brandt @ 2017-02-09 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Horman; +Cc: linux-renesas-soc, Chris Brandt
Add a simple restart handler which enables the watchdog timer with the
device reset option enabled. This is the only way SW can cause a reset on
this SoC.
If someone has a board that needs more specific operations to be done
first, they can override this function in another file.
Signed-off-by: Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@renesas.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r7s72100.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r7s72100.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r7s72100.c
index d46639f..cc6237e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r7s72100.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r7s72100.c
@@ -15,11 +15,40 @@
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
#include "common.h"
+/*
+ * This function is declared weak so if you need to do some board specific stuff
+ * before the reset occurs, you can override this function.
+ *
+ * CAUTION: A reboot command doesn't 'sync' before this function
+ * is called. See function reboot() in kernel/reboot.c
+ */
+extern void __attribute__ ((weak)) r7s72100_restart(enum reboot_mode mode,
+ const char *cmd)
+{
+#define WTCSR 0
+#define WTCNT 2
+#define WRCSR 4
+ void *base = ioremap(0xFCFE0000, 0x10);
+
+ /* Dummy read (must read WRCSR:WOVF at least once before clearing) */
+ readw(base + WRCSR);
+
+ writew(0xA500, base + WRCSR); /* Clear WOVF */
+ writew(0x5A5F, base + WRCSR); /* Reset Enable */
+ writew(0x5A00, base + WTCNT); /* Counter to 00 */
+ writew(0xA578, base + WTCSR); /* Start timer */
+
+ /* Wait for WDT overflow */
+ while (1)
+ ;
+}
+
static const char *const r7s72100_boards_compat_dt[] __initconst = {
"renesas,r7s72100",
NULL,
@@ -29,4 +58,5 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(R7S72100_DT, "Generic R7S72100 (Flattened Device Tree)")
.init_early = shmobile_init_delay,
.init_late = shmobile_init_late,
.dt_compat = r7s72100_boards_compat_dt,
+ .restart = r7s72100_restart,
MACHINE_END
--
2.10.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100: add restart handler
2017-02-09 19:12 [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100: add restart handler Chris Brandt
@ 2017-02-10 7:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-10 14:59 ` Chris Brandt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2017-02-10 7:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Brandt; +Cc: Simon Horman, Linux-Renesas
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@renesas.com> wrote:
> Add a simple restart handler which enables the watchdog timer with the
> device reset option enabled. This is the only way SW can cause a reset on
> this SoC.
>
> If someone has a board that needs more specific operations to be done
> first, they can override this function in another file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@renesas.com>
Thanks for your patch!
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r7s72100.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r7s72100.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r7s72100.c
> index d46639f..cc6237e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r7s72100.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r7s72100.c
> @@ -15,11 +15,40 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
>
> #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>
> #include "common.h"
>
> +/*
> + * This function is declared weak so if you need to do some board specific stuff
> + * before the reset occurs, you can override this function.
> + *
> + * CAUTION: A reboot command doesn't 'sync' before this function
> + * is called. See function reboot() in kernel/reboot.c
> + */
> +extern void __attribute__ ((weak)) r7s72100_restart(enum reboot_mode mode,
> + const char *cmd)
> +{
> +#define WTCSR 0
> +#define WTCNT 2
> +#define WRCSR 4
> + void *base = ioremap(0xFCFE0000, 0x10);
This base address should come from a watchdog device node in DT...
> + /* Dummy read (must read WRCSR:WOVF at least once before clearing) */
> + readw(base + WRCSR);
> +
> + writew(0xA500, base + WRCSR); /* Clear WOVF */
> + writew(0x5A5F, base + WRCSR); /* Reset Enable */
> + writew(0x5A00, base + WTCNT); /* Counter to 00 */
> + writew(0xA578, base + WTCSR); /* Start timer */
> +
> + /* Wait for WDT overflow */
> + while (1)
> + ;
> +}
> +
> static const char *const r7s72100_boards_compat_dt[] __initconst = {
> "renesas,r7s72100",
> NULL,
> @@ -29,4 +58,5 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(R7S72100_DT, "Generic R7S72100 (Flattened Device Tree)")
> .init_early = shmobile_init_delay,
> .init_late = shmobile_init_late,
> .dt_compat = r7s72100_boards_compat_dt,
> + .restart = r7s72100_restart,
> MACHINE_END
Perhaps unsurprisingly, I'd recommend writing a watchdog driver instead.
drivers/watchdog/renesas_wdt.c (currently supporting R-Car Gen3 only) may
serve as an example.
>From an earlier discussion during development of that driver:
| The RWDT exists on various Renesas SoCs.
| From digging into the datasheets, I had discovered two variants a while go:
| 1. 32-bit registers
| a. R-Car Gen2: using RST for restarting
| b. R-Mobile APE6: using SYSC for restarting
| 2. 8-bit registers (SH-Mobile AP4/AG5, R-Mobile A1)
|
| The differences are small: the variant with 8-bit registers has a smaller
| maximum timeout, and no magic value to be stored in the upper bits.
|
| Wolfram discovered the third variant in RZ/A1H, which differs in
| register layout.
IIRC, apart from the different register layout, actual operation on RZ/A1H
is similar to other Renesas SoCs. Depending on the differences, you may
decide to write a new driver instead, though.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100: add restart handler
2017-02-10 7:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2017-02-10 14:59 ` Chris Brandt
2017-02-10 15:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Brandt @ 2017-02-10 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Simon Horman, Linux-Renesas
Hi Geert,
On Friday, February 10, 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > static const char *const r7s72100_boards_compat_dt[] __initconst = {
> > "renesas,r7s72100",
> > NULL,
> > @@ -29,4 +58,5 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(R7S72100_DT, "Generic R7S72100
> (Flattened Device Tree)")
> > .init_early = shmobile_init_delay,
> > .init_late = shmobile_init_late,
> > .dt_compat = r7s72100_boards_compat_dt,
> > + .restart = r7s72100_restart,
> > MACHINE_END
>
> Perhaps unsurprisingly, I'd recommend writing a watchdog driver instead.
> drivers/watchdog/renesas_wdt.c (currently supporting R-Car Gen3 only) may
> serve as an example.
Why do you guys always make things more difficult for me... ;)
To be clear, you are recommending I make a WDT timer driver (and not
use .restart) and that will reset the system?
Or, make a WDT driver just so I can steal the base address?
Note that the WDT timeout for the RZ/A1 is too short in my opinion, so
it's really only good for resetting the system.
> From an earlier discussion during development of that driver:
>
> | The RWDT exists on various Renesas SoCs.
> | From digging into the datasheets, I had discovered two variants a while
> go:
> | 1. 32-bit registers
> | a. R-Car Gen2: using RST for restarting
> | b. R-Mobile APE6: using SYSC for restarting
> | 2. 8-bit registers (SH-Mobile AP4/AG5, R-Mobile A1)
> |
> | The differences are small: the variant with 8-bit registers has a
> | smaller maximum timeout, and no magic value to be stored in the upper
> bits.
> |
> | Wolfram discovered the third variant in RZ/A1H, which differs in
> | register layout.
>
> IIRC, apart from the different register layout, actual operation on RZ/A1H
> is similar to other Renesas SoCs. Depending on the differences, you may
> decide to write a new driver instead, though.
More or less they all do the same thing (all only have 3 registers).
I guess the decision comes down to since the file name is already
"renesas_wdt.c", do we just make the 1 file work for all Renesas SoC
and not add yet another file.
It is only 3 registers we're talking about...it's not like it's going
to turn into another sh_pfc.c file.
Question: R-Car Gen 3 has 3 watchdog timers:
1. RCLK watchdog timer (RWDT)
2. Window Watchdog Timer (WWDT)
3. System Watchdog
#1 and #3 look like they are the same thing (except #3 is enabled on power
on reset). The renesas_wdt.c uses the register names from #1.
Is the idea that you only use #3 to make sure your systems boots and get into
Linux, then from there you use #1 and stop #3 (hence no driver is needed)?
I don’t see the point of having an "overflow interrupt" enabled if the system
is going to reset regardless.
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100: add restart handler
2017-02-10 14:59 ` Chris Brandt
@ 2017-02-10 15:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-10 15:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-02-10 19:46 ` Chris Brandt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2017-02-10 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Brandt; +Cc: Wolfram Sang, Simon Horman, Linux-Renesas
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> wrote:
> On Friday, February 10, 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > static const char *const r7s72100_boards_compat_dt[] __initconst = {
>> > "renesas,r7s72100",
>> > NULL,
>> > @@ -29,4 +58,5 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(R7S72100_DT, "Generic R7S72100
>> (Flattened Device Tree)")
>> > .init_early = shmobile_init_delay,
>> > .init_late = shmobile_init_late,
>> > .dt_compat = r7s72100_boards_compat_dt,
>> > + .restart = r7s72100_restart,
>> > MACHINE_END
>>
>> Perhaps unsurprisingly, I'd recommend writing a watchdog driver instead.
>> drivers/watchdog/renesas_wdt.c (currently supporting R-Car Gen3 only) may
>> serve as an example.
>
> Why do you guys always make things more difficult for me... ;)
>
> To be clear, you are recommending I make a WDT timer driver (and not
> use .restart) and that will reset the system?
>
> Or, make a WDT driver just so I can steal the base address?
I meant a WDT timer driver. If the watchdog driver provides a .restart
callback, it will be used for system reset (hmm, renesas_wdt.c no longer has
the .restart callback, as per arm64 "system reset must be implemented using
PSCI"-policy).
> Note that the WDT timeout for the RZ/A1 is too short in my opinion, so
> it's really only good for resetting the system.
Hmm... max. 125 ms is indeed not much.
Alternatively, you can write a restart driver (cfr.
drivers/power/reset/rmobile-reset.c) that binds against a
"renesas,r7s72100-wdt" device node, but doesn't implement watchdog
functionality.
You're gonna need DT bindings anyway.
>> From an earlier discussion during development of that driver:
>>
>> | The RWDT exists on various Renesas SoCs.
>> | From digging into the datasheets, I had discovered two variants a while
>> go:
>> | 1. 32-bit registers
>> | a. R-Car Gen2: using RST for restarting
>> | b. R-Mobile APE6: using SYSC for restarting
>> | 2. 8-bit registers (SH-Mobile AP4/AG5, R-Mobile A1)
>> |
>> | The differences are small: the variant with 8-bit registers has a
>> | smaller maximum timeout, and no magic value to be stored in the upper
>> bits.
>> |
>> | Wolfram discovered the third variant in RZ/A1H, which differs in
>> | register layout.
>>
>> IIRC, apart from the different register layout, actual operation on RZ/A1H
>> is similar to other Renesas SoCs. Depending on the differences, you may
>> decide to write a new driver instead, though.
>
> More or less they all do the same thing (all only have 3 registers).
> I guess the decision comes down to since the file name is already
> "renesas_wdt.c", do we just make the 1 file work for all Renesas SoC
> and not add yet another file.
> It is only 3 registers we're talking about...it's not like it's going
> to turn into another sh_pfc.c file.
>
> Question: R-Car Gen 3 has 3 watchdog timers:
> 1. RCLK watchdog timer (RWDT)
> 2. Window Watchdog Timer (WWDT)
The WWDT does not exist on R-Car H3 and M3-W ;-)
> 3. System Watchdog
>
> #1 and #3 look like they are the same thing (except #3 is enabled on power
> on reset). The renesas_wdt.c uses the register names from #1.
> Is the idea that you only use #3 to make sure your systems boots and get into
> Linux, then from there you use #1 and stop #3 (hence no driver is needed)?
Isn't the SRWDT restricted to secure mode?
> I don’t see the point of having an "overflow interrupt" enabled if the system
> is going to reset regardless.
?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100: add restart handler
2017-02-10 15:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2017-02-10 15:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-02-10 19:46 ` Chris Brandt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2017-02-10 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Chris Brandt, Simon Horman, Linux-Renesas
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 372 bytes --]
> > #1 and #3 look like they are the same thing (except #3 is enabled on power
> > on reset). The renesas_wdt.c uses the register names from #1.
> > Is the idea that you only use #3 to make sure your systems boots and get into
> > Linux, then from there you use #1 and stop #3 (hence no driver is needed)?
>
> Isn't the SRWDT restricted to secure mode?
Yes.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100: add restart handler
2017-02-10 15:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-10 15:38 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2017-02-10 19:46 ` Chris Brandt
2017-02-13 10:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Brandt @ 2017-02-10 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Wolfram Sang, Simon Horman, Linux-Renesas
Hi Geert,
On Friday, February 10, 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Alternatively, you can write a restart driver (cfr.
> drivers/power/reset/rmobile-reset.c) that binds against a
> "renesas,r7s72100-wdt" device node, but doesn't implement watchdog
> functionality.
> You're gonna need DT bindings anyway.
I like that idea. That should take me no time at all.
Thank you.
Do you think I can still keep my 'weak function' idea in there??
extern void __attribute__ ((weak)) prepare_for_restart(void)
{
/* override to do board specific stuff */
}
static int renesas_wdt_reset_handler(struct notifier_block *this,
unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
{
pr_debug("%s %lu\n", __func__, mode);
prepare_for_restart();
/* set WDT for reset */
. . .
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
Or...do you think I can just use the rmobile-reset.c driver and
just add WDT to it?
Honestly, the only thing different will be rmobile_reset_handler().
I could make a rmobile_wdt_reset_handler() and I could just pass in
a different notifier_block depending on the DT.
What do you think?
static const struct of_device_id rmobile_reset_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "renesas,sysc-rmobile", },
{ .compatible = "renesas,wdt-rmobile", },
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100: add restart handler
2017-02-10 19:46 ` Chris Brandt
@ 2017-02-13 10:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-13 11:50 ` Chris Brandt
2017-02-13 13:36 ` Chris Brandt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2017-02-13 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Brandt; +Cc: Wolfram Sang, Simon Horman, Linux-Renesas
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com> wrote:
> On Friday, February 10, 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Alternatively, you can write a restart driver (cfr.
>> drivers/power/reset/rmobile-reset.c) that binds against a
>> "renesas,r7s72100-wdt" device node, but doesn't implement watchdog
>> functionality.
>> You're gonna need DT bindings anyway.
>
> I like that idea. That should take me no time at all.
> Thank you.
>
> Do you think I can still keep my 'weak function' idea in there??
>
>
> extern void __attribute__ ((weak)) prepare_for_restart(void)
> {
> /* override to do board specific stuff */
> }
>
> static int renesas_wdt_reset_handler(struct notifier_block *this,
> unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
> {
> pr_debug("%s %lu\n", __func__, mode);
>
> prepare_for_restart();
>
> /* set WDT for reset */
> . . .
>
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> }
What do you want to use the board-specific function for?
Have a board-specific reset handler, or do some preparatory cleanup?
In case of the former, please write a separate driver that registers a
reset handler with a higher priority.
In case of the latter, please use register_reboot_notifier() in the driver
that needs it.
> Or...do you think I can just use the rmobile-reset.c driver and
> just add WDT to it?
>
> Honestly, the only thing different will be rmobile_reset_handler().
> I could make a rmobile_wdt_reset_handler() and I could just pass in
> a different notifier_block depending on the DT.
>
> What do you think?
Given the small amount of code to add to the existing driver, and the sheer
amount of boilerplate for writing a new driver, I'm inclined to say yes.
But in the end, it's up to the subsystem maintainer to decide.
> static const struct of_device_id rmobile_reset_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "renesas,sysc-rmobile", },
> { .compatible = "renesas,wdt-rmobile", },
renesas,r7s72100-wdt
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100: add restart handler
2017-02-13 10:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2017-02-13 11:50 ` Chris Brandt
2017-02-13 13:36 ` Chris Brandt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Brandt @ 2017-02-13 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Wolfram Sang, Simon Horman, Linux-Renesas
Hi Geert,
On Monday, February 13, 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@renesas.com>
> wrote:
> > On Friday, February 10, 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Alternatively, you can write a restart driver (cfr.
> >> drivers/power/reset/rmobile-reset.c) that binds against a
> >> "renesas,r7s72100-wdt" device node, but doesn't implement watchdog
> >> functionality.
> >> You're gonna need DT bindings anyway.
> >
> > I like that idea. That should take me no time at all.
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Do you think I can still keep my 'weak function' idea in there??
> >
> >
> > extern void __attribute__ ((weak)) prepare_for_restart(void) {
> > /* override to do board specific stuff */ }
> >
> > static int renesas_wdt_reset_handler(struct notifier_block *this,
> > unsigned long mode, void *cmd) {
> > pr_debug("%s %lu\n", __func__, mode);
> >
> > prepare_for_restart();
> >
> > /* set WDT for reset */
> > . . .
> >
> > return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > }
>
> What do you want to use the board-specific function for?
> Have a board-specific reset handler, or do some preparatory cleanup?
>
> In case of the former, please write a separate driver that registers a
> reset handler with a higher priority.
> In case of the latter, please use register_reboot_notifier() in the driver
> that needs it.
On my board (the RSK), I don't really care. I was thinking more about
other users boards. In other words, what should I tell them what they
should do?
I will suggest your recommendations above (not include the weak modifier).
> > Or...do you think I can just use the rmobile-reset.c driver and just
> > add WDT to it?
> >
> > Honestly, the only thing different will be rmobile_reset_handler().
> > I could make a rmobile_wdt_reset_handler() and I could just pass in a
> > different notifier_block depending on the DT.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> Given the small amount of code to add to the existing driver, and the
> sheer amount of boilerplate for writing a new driver, I'm inclined to say
> yes.
> But in the end, it's up to the subsystem maintainer to decide.
>
> > static const struct of_device_id rmobile_reset_of_match[] = {
> > { .compatible = "renesas,sysc-rmobile", },
> > { .compatible = "renesas,wdt-rmobile", },
>
> renesas,r7s72100-wdt
OK. Thanks!
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100: add restart handler
2017-02-13 10:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-13 11:50 ` Chris Brandt
@ 2017-02-13 13:36 ` Chris Brandt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Brandt @ 2017-02-13 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Wolfram Sang, Simon Horman, Linux-Renesas
Hi Geert,
On Monday, February 13, 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > static const struct of_device_id rmobile_reset_of_match[] = {
> > { .compatible = "renesas,sysc-rmobile", },
> > { .compatible = "renesas,wdt-rmobile", },
>
> renesas,r7s72100-wdt
I remember why I suggested "renesas,wdt-rmobile".
If I thought this WDT was going to be reused again in the RZ/A series,
wouldn't it make sense to just give it a generic name instead off a
specific part number?
And hence "renesas,wdt-rmobile" would be a better name than
"renesas,r7s72100-wdt", "renesas,rza2-wdt", "renesas,rza3-wdt", etc... ?
Or, just stick with the part number and don't worry about it?
Thanks,
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-13 13:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-09 19:12 [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100: add restart handler Chris Brandt
2017-02-10 7:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-10 14:59 ` Chris Brandt
2017-02-10 15:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-10 15:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-02-10 19:46 ` Chris Brandt
2017-02-13 10:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-13 11:50 ` Chris Brandt
2017-02-13 13:36 ` Chris Brandt
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.