Re: renesas/master bisection: baseline-nfs.bootrr.rockchip-usb2phy0-probed on rk3399-gru-kevin

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@collabora.com>
Cc: kernelci-results@groups.io, Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Maciej Matuszczyk <maccraft123mc@gmail.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Cameron Nemo <cnemo@tutanota.com>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>,
	Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@rock-chips.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: renesas/master bisection: baseline-nfs.bootrr.rockchip-usb2phy0-probed on rk3399-gru-kevin
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:21:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW4iyRTxuhjhAEpaHfD=Y8_nUF0Cv+A_H=ci5Je_dC-Hw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUi_=xnvYFgiWXxSyrfoMn0JJCcH+TXFUh+1JUf=4u87A@mail.gmail.com>

CC kernelci@groups.io
dropped kernelci-reports@groups.io ("500 This message has been flagged as spam")
dropped Jacob ("550 jacob2.chen@rock-chips.com:user not exist")

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:17 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Guillaume et al,
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 8:05 AM Guillaume Tucker
> <guillaume.tucker@collabora.com> wrote:
> > Please see the bisection report below about usb2phy failing to
> > probe on rk3399-gru-kevin.
> >
> > Reports aren't automatically sent to the public while we're
> > trialing new bisection features on kernelci.org but this one
> > looks valid.
>
> Thanks for your report!
>
> > The bisection was run in the Renesas tree but the same regression
> > is present in mainline for both usb2phy0 and usb2phy1 devices:
>
> Exactly, the faulty commit is part of v5.14-rc1.
>
> > > Breaking commit found:
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > commit 8c3d64251ac5c5a3d10364f6b07d3603ac1e7b4a
> > > Author: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
> > > Date:   Tue Jun 1 18:47:59 2021 +0200
> > >
> > >     arm64: dts: rockchip: rename nodename for phy-rockchip-inno-usb2
>
> P.S. KernelCI is sending lots of reports to linux-reneas-soc[1] for
>      (a) issues on non-Renesas platforms[2], and
>      (b) issues not originating in the renesas-devel tree, like this one.
>
> Suggestions for improvement:
>   1. If a regression is detected in an upstream tree, there is no
>      need to report it for downstream trees, unless it affects
>      the downstream tree, or originated there.
>   2. If a regression is detected for a platform, there is no need
>      to report it for different platform trees, unless it originated
>      there.
>
> BTW, I do look at the reports for Renesas platforms, but usually I
> don't see what's wrong, and the same platform works fine locally.
> Note that yesterday and today I get "Error while loading data from the
> server (error code: 500). Please contact the website administrator".
>
> Thanks!
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/?q=kernelci.org
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/60ff86ff.1c69fb81.dfe6f.6a7c@mx.google.com/
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds