[PATCH v2] PM / Domains: Correct unit address in power-controller example

[PATCH v2] PM / Domains: Correct unit address in power-controller example

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

In example 2 of the generic PM domains DT bindings, the unit address of
the device node representing the child power controller doesn't match
its "reg" property. Correct it.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
---
v2:
  - Add Acked-by
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
index d6505bef655dc2df..32d1d3a399fe2a48 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Example 2:
 		#power-domain-cells = <1>;
 	};
 
-	child: power-controller@12340000 {
+	child: power-controller@12341000 {
 		compatible = "foo,power-controller";
 		reg = <0x12341000 0x1000>;
 		power-domains = <&parent 0>;
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH v2] PM / Domains: Correct unit address in power-controller example

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

ping?

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@glider.be> wrote:
> In example 2 of the generic PM domains DT bindings, the unit address of
> the device node representing the child power controller doesn't match
> its "reg" property. Correct it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
> ---
> v2:
>   - Add Acked-by
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> index d6505bef655dc2df..32d1d3a399fe2a48 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Example 2:
>                 #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>         };
>
> -       child: power-controller@12340000 {
> +       child: power-controller@12341000 {
>                 compatible = "foo,power-controller";
>                 reg = <0x12341000 0x1000>;
>                 power-domains = <&parent 0>;
> --
> 1.9.1

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [PATCH v2] PM / Domains: Correct unit address in power-controller example

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

Hi Geert,

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> ping?

Am I supposed to take this?


> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+renesas@glider.be> wrote:
>> In example 2 of the generic PM domains DT bindings, the unit address of
>> the device node representing the child power controller doesn't match
>> its "reg" property. Correct it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> v2:
>>   - Add Acked-by
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
>> index d6505bef655dc2df..32d1d3a399fe2a48 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
>> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Example 2:
>>                 #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>>         };
>>
>> -       child: power-controller@12340000 {
>> +       child: power-controller@12341000 {
>>                 compatible = "foo,power-controller";
>>                 reg = <0x12341000 0x1000>;
>>                 power-domains = <&parent 0>;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v2] PM / Domains: Correct unit address in power-controller example

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Rafael,

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> ping?
>
> Am I supposed to take this?

I think so, as it's PM Domain documentation.

Thanks!

>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert+renesas@glider.be> wrote:
>>> In example 2 of the generic PM domains DT bindings, the unit address of
>>> the device node representing the child power controller doesn't match
>>> its "reg" property. Correct it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>>> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>>   - Add Acked-by
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
>>> index d6505bef655dc2df..32d1d3a399fe2a48 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
>>> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Example 2:
>>>                 #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>>>         };
>>>
>>> -       child: power-controller@12340000 {
>>> +       child: power-controller@12341000 {
>>>                 compatible = "foo,power-controller";
>>>                 reg = <0x12341000 0x1000>;
>>>                 power-domains = <&parent 0>;

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [PATCH v2] PM / Domains: Correct unit address in power-controller example

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

Hi Geert,

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>> ping?
>>
>> Am I supposed to take this?
>
> I think so, as it's PM Domain documentation.

OK, queud up for 4.3, thanks!

Rafael