From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos5422-odroidxu3: Added UHS-I bus speed support
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:57:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANAwSgRBzFqHB98wSQnQu-ggGqRT2H6wC415wULXVhPg0uw_3A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561C7DF1.6000609@samsung.com>
Hi Krzysztof,
On 13 October 2015 at 09:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> On 13.10.2015 12:08, Anand Moon wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On 13 October 2015 at 05:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> >> On 13.10.2015 00:32, Anand Moon wrote:
> >>> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>>
> >>> On 12 October 2015 at 11:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >>> <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 12.10.2015 00:46, Anand Moon wrote:
> >>>>> Added support for UHS-I bus speed 50MB/s (SDR50, DDR50) 104MB/s (SDR104)
> >>>>
> >>>> This description is not entirely correct. The MMC driver already
> >>>> supports these UHS speeds (you did not any code) so you rather enabled
> >>>> it (description of bindings says "is supported").
> >>>>
> >>>> You mentioned DDR50 but I don't see respective property below.
> >>>>
> >>>> How do you know that these modes are really supported? I don't know. Can
> >>>> you convince me?
> >>>
> >>> Setting this DDR50 capability give me this error. That's the reason to
> >>> drop this capability.
> >>
> >> But you mentioned it in commit message! "Added support for UHS-I ...
> >> (DDR50)"
> >>
> >> In the same time dropping DDR50 is not an sufficient proof that "SDR50
> >> and SDR104 are really supported".
> >>
> >
> > These changes are related to the microSD card capabilities.
> > So SDR50 have better frequency over DDR50. On the same Sandisk card.
> >
> > When the card select the capability for DDR50
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > [ 4.001477] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot
> > req 50000000Hz, actual 50000000HZ div = 0)
> > [ 4.001604] mmc1: new ultra high speed DDR50 SDHC card at address aaaa
> > [ 4.004505] mmcblk0: mmc1:aaaa SL32G 29.7 GiB
> > [ 4.009179] mmcblk0: error -110 sending status command, retrying
> > [ 4.009271] mmcblk0: error -115 sending stop command, original cmd
> > response 0x900, card status 0x900
> > [ 4.009275] mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 0, nr 8,
> > cmd response 0x900, card status 0x0
> > [ 4.025563] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot
> > req 400000Hz, actual 396825HZ div = 63)
> > [ 4.067770] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 274x77
> > [ 4.098782] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot
> > req 50000000Hz, actual 50000000HZ div = 0)
> > [ 4.099692] mmc1: tried to reset card
> > [ 4.101332] mmcblk0: p1 p2
> >
> >
> > When the card select the capability for SDR50
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [ 2.439806] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 100000000Hz (slot req
> > 100000000Hz, actual 100000000HZ div = 0)
> > [ 2.449729] mmc1: new ultra high speed SDR50 SDHC card at address aaaa
> > [ 2.455984] mmcblk0: mmc1:aaaa SL32G 29.7 GiB
> > [ 2.461743] mmcblk0: p1 p2
> >
> > Which will relate to better read/write speed.
>
> Which is not an answer to my question. To none of my previous questions.
>
Basically UHS-I capability (sd-uhs-sdr12, sd-uhs-sdr25, sd-uhs-sdr50,
sd-uhs-sdr104) help tune speed supported for mmc
I have tired to compare the speed on high speed UHS-I vs ultra high
speed UHS-I using izone utility.
[ 2.572469] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot
req 50000000Hz, actual 50000000HZ div = 0)
[ 2.572609] mmc1: new high speed SDHC card at address aaaa
Command line used: ./iozone -L64 -S32 -azecwI -+n -r4k -r64k
-r128k -s10M -i0 -i1 -i2 -f datafile -Rb out.xls
Output is in kBytes/sec
Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds.
Processor cache size set to 32 kBytes.
Processor cache line size set to 64 bytes.
File stride size set to 17 * record size.
random
random bkwd record stride
kB reclen write rewrite read reread read
write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread
freread
10240 4 1631 0 6556 0 5538 982
10240 64 8828 0 18897 0 17994 303
10240 128 6269 0 20670 0 20128 1096
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 2.613761] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 100000000Hz (slot
req 100000000Hz, actual 100000000HZ div = 0)
[ 2.623573] mmc1: new ultra high speed SDR50 SDHC card at address aaaa
Command line used: ./iozone -L64 -S32 -azecwI -+n -r4k -r64k
-r128k -s10M -i0 -i1 -i2 -f datafile -Rb out.xls
Output is in kBytes/sec
Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds.
Processor cache size set to 32 kBytes.
Processor cache line size set to 64 bytes.
File stride size set to 17 * record size.
random
random bkwd record stride
kB reclen write rewrite read reread read
write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread
freread
10240 4 1809 0 7507 0 5233 859
10240 64 11622 0 31250 0 28072 516
10240 128 4320 0 34417 0 32509 1148
My observation is that their slight increase in read/write operation.
Hope I have tried to answer you query. If I am wrong please let me know.
-Anand Moon
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
<k.kozlowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org>,
Lukasz Majewski
<l.majewski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Jaehoon Chung
<jh80.chung-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
"linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Linux Kernel
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos5422-odroidxu3: Added UHS-I bus speed support
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:57:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANAwSgRBzFqHB98wSQnQu-ggGqRT2H6wC415wULXVhPg0uw_3A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561C7DF1.6000609-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Hi Krzysztof,
On 13 October 2015 at 09:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<k.kozlowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> On 13.10.2015 12:08, Anand Moon wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On 13 October 2015 at 05:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <k.kozlowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> On 13.10.2015 00:32, Anand Moon wrote:
> >>> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>>
> >>> On 12 October 2015 at 11:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >>> <k.kozlowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >>>> On 12.10.2015 00:46, Anand Moon wrote:
> >>>>> Added support for UHS-I bus speed 50MB/s (SDR50, DDR50) 104MB/s (SDR104)
> >>>>
> >>>> This description is not entirely correct. The MMC driver already
> >>>> supports these UHS speeds (you did not any code) so you rather enabled
> >>>> it (description of bindings says "is supported").
> >>>>
> >>>> You mentioned DDR50 but I don't see respective property below.
> >>>>
> >>>> How do you know that these modes are really supported? I don't know. Can
> >>>> you convince me?
> >>>
> >>> Setting this DDR50 capability give me this error. That's the reason to
> >>> drop this capability.
> >>
> >> But you mentioned it in commit message! "Added support for UHS-I ...
> >> (DDR50)"
> >>
> >> In the same time dropping DDR50 is not an sufficient proof that "SDR50
> >> and SDR104 are really supported".
> >>
> >
> > These changes are related to the microSD card capabilities.
> > So SDR50 have better frequency over DDR50. On the same Sandisk card.
> >
> > When the card select the capability for DDR50
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > [ 4.001477] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot
> > req 50000000Hz, actual 50000000HZ div = 0)
> > [ 4.001604] mmc1: new ultra high speed DDR50 SDHC card at address aaaa
> > [ 4.004505] mmcblk0: mmc1:aaaa SL32G 29.7 GiB
> > [ 4.009179] mmcblk0: error -110 sending status command, retrying
> > [ 4.009271] mmcblk0: error -115 sending stop command, original cmd
> > response 0x900, card status 0x900
> > [ 4.009275] mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 0, nr 8,
> > cmd response 0x900, card status 0x0
> > [ 4.025563] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot
> > req 400000Hz, actual 396825HZ div = 63)
> > [ 4.067770] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 274x77
> > [ 4.098782] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot
> > req 50000000Hz, actual 50000000HZ div = 0)
> > [ 4.099692] mmc1: tried to reset card
> > [ 4.101332] mmcblk0: p1 p2
> >
> >
> > When the card select the capability for SDR50
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [ 2.439806] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 100000000Hz (slot req
> > 100000000Hz, actual 100000000HZ div = 0)
> > [ 2.449729] mmc1: new ultra high speed SDR50 SDHC card at address aaaa
> > [ 2.455984] mmcblk0: mmc1:aaaa SL32G 29.7 GiB
> > [ 2.461743] mmcblk0: p1 p2
> >
> > Which will relate to better read/write speed.
>
> Which is not an answer to my question. To none of my previous questions.
>
Basically UHS-I capability (sd-uhs-sdr12, sd-uhs-sdr25, sd-uhs-sdr50,
sd-uhs-sdr104) help tune speed supported for mmc
I have tired to compare the speed on high speed UHS-I vs ultra high
speed UHS-I using izone utility.
[ 2.572469] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot
req 50000000Hz, actual 50000000HZ div = 0)
[ 2.572609] mmc1: new high speed SDHC card at address aaaa
Command line used: ./iozone -L64 -S32 -azecwI -+n -r4k -r64k
-r128k -s10M -i0 -i1 -i2 -f datafile -Rb out.xls
Output is in kBytes/sec
Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds.
Processor cache size set to 32 kBytes.
Processor cache line size set to 64 bytes.
File stride size set to 17 * record size.
random
random bkwd record stride
kB reclen write rewrite read reread read
write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread
freread
10240 4 1631 0 6556 0 5538 982
10240 64 8828 0 18897 0 17994 303
10240 128 6269 0 20670 0 20128 1096
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 2.613761] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 100000000Hz (slot
req 100000000Hz, actual 100000000HZ div = 0)
[ 2.623573] mmc1: new ultra high speed SDR50 SDHC card at address aaaa
Command line used: ./iozone -L64 -S32 -azecwI -+n -r4k -r64k
-r128k -s10M -i0 -i1 -i2 -f datafile -Rb out.xls
Output is in kBytes/sec
Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds.
Processor cache size set to 32 kBytes.
Processor cache line size set to 64 bytes.
File stride size set to 17 * record size.
random
random bkwd record stride
kB reclen write rewrite read reread read
write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread
freread
10240 4 1809 0 7507 0 5233 859
10240 64 11622 0 31250 0 28072 516
10240 128 4320 0 34417 0 32509 1148
My observation is that their slight increase in read/write operation.
Hope I have tried to answer you query. If I am wrong please let me know.
-Anand Moon
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux.amoon@gmail.com (Anand Moon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos5422-odroidxu3: Added UHS-I bus speed support
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:57:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANAwSgRBzFqHB98wSQnQu-ggGqRT2H6wC415wULXVhPg0uw_3A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561C7DF1.6000609@samsung.com>
Hi Krzysztof,
On 13 October 2015 at 09:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> On 13.10.2015 12:08, Anand Moon wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On 13 October 2015 at 05:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> >> On 13.10.2015 00:32, Anand Moon wrote:
> >>> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>>
> >>> On 12 October 2015 at 11:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >>> <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 12.10.2015 00:46, Anand Moon wrote:
> >>>>> Added support for UHS-I bus speed 50MB/s (SDR50, DDR50) 104MB/s (SDR104)
> >>>>
> >>>> This description is not entirely correct. The MMC driver already
> >>>> supports these UHS speeds (you did not any code) so you rather enabled
> >>>> it (description of bindings says "is supported").
> >>>>
> >>>> You mentioned DDR50 but I don't see respective property below.
> >>>>
> >>>> How do you know that these modes are really supported? I don't know. Can
> >>>> you convince me?
> >>>
> >>> Setting this DDR50 capability give me this error. That's the reason to
> >>> drop this capability.
> >>
> >> But you mentioned it in commit message! "Added support for UHS-I ...
> >> (DDR50)"
> >>
> >> In the same time dropping DDR50 is not an sufficient proof that "SDR50
> >> and SDR104 are really supported".
> >>
> >
> > These changes are related to the microSD card capabilities.
> > So SDR50 have better frequency over DDR50. On the same Sandisk card.
> >
> > When the card select the capability for DDR50
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > [ 4.001477] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot
> > req 50000000Hz, actual 50000000HZ div = 0)
> > [ 4.001604] mmc1: new ultra high speed DDR50 SDHC card at address aaaa
> > [ 4.004505] mmcblk0: mmc1:aaaa SL32G 29.7 GiB
> > [ 4.009179] mmcblk0: error -110 sending status command, retrying
> > [ 4.009271] mmcblk0: error -115 sending stop command, original cmd
> > response 0x900, card status 0x900
> > [ 4.009275] mmcblk0: error -84 transferring data, sector 0, nr 8,
> > cmd response 0x900, card status 0x0
> > [ 4.025563] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot
> > req 400000Hz, actual 396825HZ div = 63)
> > [ 4.067770] Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 274x77
> > [ 4.098782] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot
> > req 50000000Hz, actual 50000000HZ div = 0)
> > [ 4.099692] mmc1: tried to reset card
> > [ 4.101332] mmcblk0: p1 p2
> >
> >
> > When the card select the capability for SDR50
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [ 2.439806] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 100000000Hz (slot req
> > 100000000Hz, actual 100000000HZ div = 0)
> > [ 2.449729] mmc1: new ultra high speed SDR50 SDHC card at address aaaa
> > [ 2.455984] mmcblk0: mmc1:aaaa SL32G 29.7 GiB
> > [ 2.461743] mmcblk0: p1 p2
> >
> > Which will relate to better read/write speed.
>
> Which is not an answer to my question. To none of my previous questions.
>
Basically UHS-I capability (sd-uhs-sdr12, sd-uhs-sdr25, sd-uhs-sdr50,
sd-uhs-sdr104) help tune speed supported for mmc
I have tired to compare the speed on high speed UHS-I vs ultra high
speed UHS-I using izone utility.
[ 2.572469] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot
req 50000000Hz, actual 50000000HZ div = 0)
[ 2.572609] mmc1: new high speed SDHC card at address aaaa
Command line used: ./iozone -L64 -S32 -azecwI -+n -r4k -r64k
-r128k -s10M -i0 -i1 -i2 -f datafile -Rb out.xls
Output is in kBytes/sec
Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds.
Processor cache size set to 32 kBytes.
Processor cache line size set to 64 bytes.
File stride size set to 17 * record size.
random
random bkwd record stride
kB reclen write rewrite read reread read
write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread
freread
10240 4 1631 0 6556 0 5538 982
10240 64 8828 0 18897 0 17994 303
10240 128 6269 0 20670 0 20128 1096
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 2.613761] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 100000000Hz (slot
req 100000000Hz, actual 100000000HZ div = 0)
[ 2.623573] mmc1: new ultra high speed SDR50 SDHC card at address aaaa
Command line used: ./iozone -L64 -S32 -azecwI -+n -r4k -r64k
-r128k -s10M -i0 -i1 -i2 -f datafile -Rb out.xls
Output is in kBytes/sec
Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds.
Processor cache size set to 32 kBytes.
Processor cache line size set to 64 bytes.
File stride size set to 17 * record size.
random
random bkwd record stride
kB reclen write rewrite read reread read
write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread
freread
10240 4 1809 0 7507 0 5233 859
10240 64 11622 0 31250 0 28072 516
10240 128 4320 0 34417 0 32509 1148
My observation is that their slight increase in read/write operation.
Hope I have tried to answer you query. If I am wrong please let me know.
-Anand Moon
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-13 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 138+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-11 15:46 [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: exynos5422-odroidxu3: use cd-gpio method to detect sd-card Anand Moon
2015-10-11 15:46 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-11 15:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: use vmmc-supply of emmc/sd for exynos5422-odroidxu3 Anand Moon
2015-10-11 15:46 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 4:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 4:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 5:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 5:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 11:08 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 11:08 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 11:08 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 12:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 12:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 12:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 14:33 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 14:33 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 0:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 0:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 2:29 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 2:29 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 2:39 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-13 2:39 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-13 2:45 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 2:45 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 2:45 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-11 15:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos5422-odroidxu3: Added UHS-I bus speed support Anand Moon
2015-10-11 15:46 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 5:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 5:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 5:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 10:46 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 10:46 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 10:46 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 10:51 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-12 10:51 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-12 10:51 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-12 11:23 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 11:23 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 11:23 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 12:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 12:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 12:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 13:04 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-12 13:04 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-12 13:04 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-12 13:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 13:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 13:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 2:28 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-13 2:28 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-13 2:28 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-12 15:32 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 15:32 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 15:32 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 0:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 0:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 0:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 3:08 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 3:08 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 3:08 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 3:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 3:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 3:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 3:49 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 3:49 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 3:49 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 16:27 ` Anand Moon [this message]
2015-10-13 16:27 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 16:27 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 23:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 23:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 23:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-14 1:06 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-14 1:06 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-14 1:06 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-14 1:15 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-14 1:15 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-14 1:15 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-14 1:40 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-14 1:40 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-14 1:40 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-14 1:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-14 1:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-14 1:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-14 2:08 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-14 2:08 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-14 2:08 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-14 2:13 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-14 2:13 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-14 2:13 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-14 2:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-14 2:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-14 2:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-14 2:26 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-14 2:26 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-14 2:26 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-10-14 22:40 ` Doug Anderson
2015-10-14 22:40 ` Doug Anderson
2015-10-14 22:40 ` Doug Anderson
2015-10-19 10:11 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-19 10:11 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-19 10:11 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-19 13:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-19 13:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-19 13:43 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-19 15:11 ` Doug Anderson
2015-10-19 15:11 ` Doug Anderson
2015-10-19 15:11 ` Doug Anderson
2015-10-14 3:58 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-14 3:58 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-14 3:58 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-14 4:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-14 4:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-14 4:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-21 10:28 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-21 10:28 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-21 10:28 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-12 4:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: exynos5422-odroidxu3: use cd-gpio method to detect sd-card Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 4:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-12 4:43 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-12 4:43 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-12 14:47 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-12 14:47 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 0:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 0:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 0:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-13 2:06 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-13 2:06 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-13 2:06 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-10-13 3:21 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 3:21 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 3:21 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 4:07 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 4:07 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 4:07 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 2:41 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 2:41 ` Anand Moon
2015-10-13 2:41 ` Anand Moon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANAwSgRBzFqHB98wSQnQu-ggGqRT2H6wC415wULXVhPg0uw_3A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=l.majewski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.