From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Add new compatible for static replicator Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:18:40 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CANLsYkw1vaevcJZfjQfF9BeUvi1THGNtu+SH+LR008LjZOc7fA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190412102738.12679-2-leo.yan@linaro.org> Hi Leo, On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 04:28, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> wrote: > > CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator: > > Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator: > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator: > "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit > naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming > convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string > "arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the > compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is kept for backward > compatibility, but tag it as obsolete and suggest to use the new > compatible string. > > As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings: > > Dynamic replicator: > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > Static replicator: > "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > "arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete) > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > index f8aff65ab921..d02d160fa8ac 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > @@ -69,7 +69,10 @@ its hardware characteristcs. > > * compatible: Currently supported value is (note the absence of the > AMBA markee): > - - "arm,coresight-replicator" > + - Coresight Non-configurable Replicator: > + "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > + "arm,coresight-replicator"; (OBSOLETE. For backward > + compatibility and will be removed) > > * port or ports: see "Graph bindings for Coresight" below. > > @@ -169,7 +172,7 @@ Example: > /* non-configurable replicators don't show up on the > * AMBA bus. As such no need to add "arm,primecell". > */ > - compatible = "arm,coresight-replicator"; > + compatible = "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > out-ports { > #address-cells = <1>; > -- > 2.17.1 Since this is a binding patch it needs to be sent on its own. >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Add new compatible for static replicator Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:18:40 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CANLsYkw1vaevcJZfjQfF9BeUvi1THGNtu+SH+LR008LjZOc7fA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190412102738.12679-2-leo.yan@linaro.org> Hi Leo, On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 at 04:28, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> wrote: > > CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator: > > Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator: > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator: > "arm,coresight-replicator"; > > The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit > naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming > convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string > "arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the > compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is kept for backward > compatibility, but tag it as obsolete and suggest to use the new > compatible string. > > As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings: > > Dynamic replicator: > "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; > > Static replicator: > "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > "arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete) > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > index f8aff65ab921..d02d160fa8ac 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt > @@ -69,7 +69,10 @@ its hardware characteristcs. > > * compatible: Currently supported value is (note the absence of the > AMBA markee): > - - "arm,coresight-replicator" > + - Coresight Non-configurable Replicator: > + "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > + "arm,coresight-replicator"; (OBSOLETE. For backward > + compatibility and will be removed) > > * port or ports: see "Graph bindings for Coresight" below. > > @@ -169,7 +172,7 @@ Example: > /* non-configurable replicators don't show up on the > * AMBA bus. As such no need to add "arm,primecell". > */ > - compatible = "arm,coresight-replicator"; > + compatible = "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; > > out-ports { > #address-cells = <1>; > -- > 2.17.1 Since this is a binding patch it needs to be sent on its own. > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-16 20:18 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-04-12 10:27 [PATCH v5 0/4] CoreSight: Support static funnel with DT binding consolidation Leo Yan 2019-04-12 10:27 ` Leo Yan 2019-04-12 10:27 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Add new compatible for static replicator Leo Yan 2019-04-12 10:27 ` Leo Yan 2019-04-12 10:40 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2019-04-12 10:40 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2019-04-12 10:54 ` Leo Yan 2019-04-12 10:54 ` Leo Yan 2019-04-12 10:54 ` Leo Yan 2019-04-16 20:18 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message] 2019-04-16 20:18 ` Mathieu Poirier 2019-04-17 0:09 ` Leo Yan 2019-04-17 0:09 ` Leo Yan 2019-04-17 13:57 ` Mathieu Poirier 2019-04-17 13:57 ` Mathieu Poirier 2019-04-26 14:25 ` Rob Herring 2019-04-26 14:25 ` Rob Herring 2019-04-26 15:03 ` Mathieu Poirier 2019-04-26 15:03 ` Mathieu Poirier 2019-04-26 14:25 ` Rob Herring 2019-04-26 14:25 ` Rob Herring 2019-04-26 14:25 ` Rob Herring 2019-04-12 10:27 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] coresight: replicator: Add new device id " Leo Yan 2019-04-12 10:27 ` Leo Yan 2019-04-12 10:41 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2019-04-12 10:41 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2019-04-12 10:27 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Unify funnel DT binding Leo Yan 2019-04-12 10:27 ` Leo Yan 2019-04-12 10:43 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2019-04-12 10:43 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2019-04-16 20:20 ` Mathieu Poirier 2019-04-16 20:20 ` Mathieu Poirier 2019-04-26 14:26 ` Rob Herring 2019-04-26 14:26 ` Rob Herring 2019-04-26 14:26 ` Rob Herring 2019-04-12 10:27 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] coresight: funnel: Support static funnel Leo Yan 2019-04-12 10:27 ` Leo Yan 2019-05-03 15:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2019-05-03 15:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose 2019-05-05 1:28 ` Leo Yan 2019-05-05 1:28 ` Leo Yan 2019-04-26 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] CoreSight: Support static funnel with DT binding consolidation Mathieu Poirier 2019-04-26 16:26 ` Mathieu Poirier 2019-04-27 0:20 ` Leo Yan 2019-04-27 0:20 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CANLsYkw1vaevcJZfjQfF9BeUvi1THGNtu+SH+LR008LjZOc7fA@mail.gmail.com \ --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \ --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.