All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
To: sean.wang@kernel.org
Cc: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Fan Chen <fan.chen@mediatek.com>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, owen.chen@mediatek.com,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] clk: mediatek: Disable tuner_en before change PLL rate
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 07:54:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANMq1KB4tt9jdmE+LJXfji=QXC9-6wuhXWjJPkpNfo6hEMXH=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGp9Lzro5YHCYqzOWFJJa4g75odf6yK52cean_aS3p2STOtJYg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 4:37 AM Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> 於 2018年11月26日 週一 下午7:45寫道:
> >
> > From: Owen Chen <owen.chen@mediatek.com>
> >
> > PLLs with tuner_en bit, such as APLL1, need to disable
> > tuner_en before apply new frequency settings, or the new frequency
> > settings (pcw) will not be applied.
> > The tuner_en bit will be disabled during changing PLL rate
> > and be restored after new settings applied.
>
> It looks like a bug fix. If so, you should add a fixes tag and even cc
> stable tree
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Owen Chen <owen.chen@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c
> > index 1db161aced31..81400601f107 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c
> > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> >  #define CON0_BASE_EN           BIT(0)
> >  #define CON0_PWR_ON            BIT(0)
> >  #define CON0_ISO_EN            BIT(1)
> > -#define CON0_PCW_CHG           BIT(31)
> > +#define CON1_PCW_CHG           BIT(31)
>
> it seems like an unnecessary change

Below, you have:
con1 |= CON1_PCW_CHG;

Presumably PCW_CHG is on BIT(31) of CON1(?), so I think this is a good
change. Maybe this needs to be a separate patch, though?

> >
> >  #define AUDPLL_TUNER_EN                BIT(31)
> >
> > @@ -97,9 +97,31 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw,
> >  {
> >         u32 con1, val;
> >         int pll_en;
> > +       u32 tuner_en = 0;
> > +       u32 tuner_en_mask;
> > +       void __iomem *tuner_en_addr = NULL;
> >
> >         pll_en = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON0) & CON0_BASE_EN;
> >
> > +       /* disable tuner */
>
> similar code pieces are ready on mtk_pll_[un]prepare. maybe we can add
> common tuner operations for them to reuse.
>
> > +       if (pll->tuner_en_addr) {
> > +               tuner_en_addr = pll->tuner_en_addr;
> > +               tuner_en_mask = BIT(pll->data->tuner_en_bit);
> > +       } else if (pll->tuner_addr) {
> > +               tuner_en_addr = pll->tuner_addr;
> > +               tuner_en_mask = AUDPLL_TUNER_EN;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       if (tuner_en_addr) {
> > +               val = readl(tuner_en_addr);
> > +               tuner_en = val & tuner_en_mask;
> > +
> > +               if (tuner_en) {
> > +                       val &= ~tuner_en_mask;
> > +                       writel(val, tuner_en_addr);
> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +
> >         /* set postdiv */
> >         val = readl(pll->pd_addr);
> >         val &= ~(POSTDIV_MASK << pll->data->pd_shift);
> > @@ -120,12 +142,19 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw,
> >         con1 = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON1);
> >
> >         if (pll_en)
> > -               con1 |= CON0_PCW_CHG;
> > +               con1 |= CON1_PCW_CHG;
> >
> >         writel(con1, pll->base_addr + REG_CON1);
> >         if (pll->tuner_addr)
> >                 writel(con1 + 1, pll->tuner_addr);
> >
> > +       /* restore tuner_en */
> > +       if (tuner_en_addr && tuner_en) {
>
> if (tuner_en) is sufficient
>
> > +               val = readl(tuner_en_addr);
> > +               val |= tuner_en_mask;
> > +               writel(val, tuner_en_addr);
> > +       }
> > +
> >         if (pll_en)
> >                 udelay(20);
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.18.0
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: drinkcat@chromium.org (Nicolas Boichat)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/11] clk: mediatek: Disable tuner_en before change PLL rate
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 07:54:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANMq1KB4tt9jdmE+LJXfji=QXC9-6wuhXWjJPkpNfo6hEMXH=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGp9Lzro5YHCYqzOWFJJa4g75odf6yK52cean_aS3p2STOtJYg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 4:37 AM Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> ? 2018?11?26? ?? ??7:45???
> >
> > From: Owen Chen <owen.chen@mediatek.com>
> >
> > PLLs with tuner_en bit, such as APLL1, need to disable
> > tuner_en before apply new frequency settings, or the new frequency
> > settings (pcw) will not be applied.
> > The tuner_en bit will be disabled during changing PLL rate
> > and be restored after new settings applied.
>
> It looks like a bug fix. If so, you should add a fixes tag and even cc
> stable tree
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Owen Chen <owen.chen@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c
> > index 1db161aced31..81400601f107 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c
> > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> >  #define CON0_BASE_EN           BIT(0)
> >  #define CON0_PWR_ON            BIT(0)
> >  #define CON0_ISO_EN            BIT(1)
> > -#define CON0_PCW_CHG           BIT(31)
> > +#define CON1_PCW_CHG           BIT(31)
>
> it seems like an unnecessary change

Below, you have:
con1 |= CON1_PCW_CHG;

Presumably PCW_CHG is on BIT(31) of CON1(?), so I think this is a good
change. Maybe this needs to be a separate patch, though?

> >
> >  #define AUDPLL_TUNER_EN                BIT(31)
> >
> > @@ -97,9 +97,31 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw,
> >  {
> >         u32 con1, val;
> >         int pll_en;
> > +       u32 tuner_en = 0;
> > +       u32 tuner_en_mask;
> > +       void __iomem *tuner_en_addr = NULL;
> >
> >         pll_en = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON0) & CON0_BASE_EN;
> >
> > +       /* disable tuner */
>
> similar code pieces are ready on mtk_pll_[un]prepare. maybe we can add
> common tuner operations for them to reuse.
>
> > +       if (pll->tuner_en_addr) {
> > +               tuner_en_addr = pll->tuner_en_addr;
> > +               tuner_en_mask = BIT(pll->data->tuner_en_bit);
> > +       } else if (pll->tuner_addr) {
> > +               tuner_en_addr = pll->tuner_addr;
> > +               tuner_en_mask = AUDPLL_TUNER_EN;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       if (tuner_en_addr) {
> > +               val = readl(tuner_en_addr);
> > +               tuner_en = val & tuner_en_mask;
> > +
> > +               if (tuner_en) {
> > +                       val &= ~tuner_en_mask;
> > +                       writel(val, tuner_en_addr);
> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +
> >         /* set postdiv */
> >         val = readl(pll->pd_addr);
> >         val &= ~(POSTDIV_MASK << pll->data->pd_shift);
> > @@ -120,12 +142,19 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw,
> >         con1 = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON1);
> >
> >         if (pll_en)
> > -               con1 |= CON0_PCW_CHG;
> > +               con1 |= CON1_PCW_CHG;
> >
> >         writel(con1, pll->base_addr + REG_CON1);
> >         if (pll->tuner_addr)
> >                 writel(con1 + 1, pll->tuner_addr);
> >
> > +       /* restore tuner_en */
> > +       if (tuner_en_addr && tuner_en) {
>
> if (tuner_en) is sufficient
>
> > +               val = readl(tuner_en_addr);
> > +               val |= tuner_en_mask;
> > +               writel(val, tuner_en_addr);
> > +       }
> > +
> >         if (pll_en)
> >                 udelay(20);
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.18.0
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > Linux-mediatek at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-27 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-27  3:42 [PATCH v2 00/11] Mediatek MT8183 clock and scpsys support Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42 ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42 ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42 ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] clk: mediatek: add new clkmux register API Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  5:05   ` Nicolas Boichat
2018-11-27  5:05     ` Nicolas Boichat
2018-11-27 10:13   ` Sean Wang
2018-11-27 10:13     ` Sean Wang
2018-11-27  3:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] clk: mediatek: add new member to mtk_pll_data Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27 10:41   ` Sean Wang
2018-11-27 10:41     ` Sean Wang
2018-11-27  3:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] clk: mediatek: Disable tuner_en before change PLL rate Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27 20:36   ` Sean Wang
2018-11-27 20:36     ` Sean Wang
2018-11-27 23:54     ` Nicolas Boichat [this message]
2018-11-27 23:54       ` Nicolas Boichat
2018-11-28  0:58       ` Sean Wang
2018-11-28  0:58         ` Sean Wang
2018-11-27  3:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] soc: mediatek: add new flow for mtcmos power Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  5:57   ` Nicolas Boichat
2018-11-27  5:57     ` Nicolas Boichat
2018-11-27  3:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Document bindings for MT8183 Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] clk: mediatek: Add dt-bindings for MT8183 clocks Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] clk: mediatek: Add flags support for mtk_gate data Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] clk: mediatek: Add MT8183 clock support Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27 10:42   ` kbuild test robot
2018-11-27 10:42     ` kbuild test robot
2018-11-27 10:42     ` kbuild test robot
2018-11-27 10:42   ` [PATCH] clk: mediatek: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2018-11-27 10:42     ` kbuild test robot
2018-11-27 10:42     ` kbuild test robot
2018-11-27  3:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] dt-bindings: soc: fix typo of MT8173 power dt-bindings Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] dt-bindings: soc: Add MT8183 " Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] soc: mediatek: Add MT8183 scpsys support Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  3:42   ` Weiyi Lu
2018-11-27  6:11   ` Nicolas Boichat
2018-11-27  6:11     ` Nicolas Boichat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANMq1KB4tt9jdmE+LJXfji=QXC9-6wuhXWjJPkpNfo6hEMXH=A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=fan.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=owen.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sean.wang@kernel.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=weiyi.lu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.