From: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] media: atomisp: Only use trace_printk if allowed Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 08:13:00 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CANMq1KCoEZVj=sjxCqBhqLZKBab57+82=Rk_LN7fc3aCuNHMUw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200820102347.15d2f610@oasis.local.home> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 10:23 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:14:12 +0800 > Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> wrote: > > > Technically, we could only initialize the trace_printk buffers > > when the print env is switched, to avoid the build error and > > unconditional boot-time warning, but I assume this printing > > framework will eventually get removed when the driver moves out > > of staging? > > Perhaps this should be converting into a trace event. Look at what bpf > did for their bpf_trace_printk(). > > The more I think about it, the less I like this series. To make it clear, the primary goal of this series is to get rid of trace_printk sprinkled in the kernel by making sure some randconfig builds fail. Since my v2, there already has been one more added (the one that this patch removes), so I'd like to land 2/3 ASAP to prevent even more from being added. Looking at your reply on 1/3, I think we are aligned on that goal? Is there some other approach you'd recommend? Now, I'm not pretending my fixes are the best possible ones, but I would much rather have the burden of converting to trace events on the respective driver maintainers. (btw is there a short documentation/tutorial that I could link to in these patches, to help developers understand what is the recommended way now?) Thanks, > > -- Steve
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>, Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] media: atomisp: Only use trace_printk if allowed Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 08:13:00 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CANMq1KCoEZVj=sjxCqBhqLZKBab57+82=Rk_LN7fc3aCuNHMUw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200820102347.15d2f610@oasis.local.home> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 10:23 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:14:12 +0800 > Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> wrote: > > > Technically, we could only initialize the trace_printk buffers > > when the print env is switched, to avoid the build error and > > unconditional boot-time warning, but I assume this printing > > framework will eventually get removed when the driver moves out > > of staging? > > Perhaps this should be converting into a trace event. Look at what bpf > did for their bpf_trace_printk(). > > The more I think about it, the less I like this series. To make it clear, the primary goal of this series is to get rid of trace_printk sprinkled in the kernel by making sure some randconfig builds fail. Since my v2, there already has been one more added (the one that this patch removes), so I'd like to land 2/3 ASAP to prevent even more from being added. Looking at your reply on 1/3, I think we are aligned on that goal? Is there some other approach you'd recommend? Now, I'm not pretending my fixes are the best possible ones, but I would much rather have the burden of converting to trace events on the respective driver maintainers. (btw is there a short documentation/tutorial that I could link to in these patches, to help developers understand what is the recommended way now?) Thanks, > > -- Steve _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-21 0:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-08-20 9:14 [PATCH v4 1/3, RESEND] media: camss: vfe: Use trace_printk for debugging only Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-20 9:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] kernel/trace: Add TRACING_ALLOW_PRINTK config option Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-20 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-20 9:14 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-20 9:14 ` [f2fs-dev] " Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-20 9:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] media: atomisp: Only use trace_printk if allowed Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-20 9:14 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-20 14:23 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-20 14:23 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-21 0:13 ` Nicolas Boichat [this message] 2020-08-21 0:13 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 0:36 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-21 0:36 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-21 1:39 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 1:39 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 1:57 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-21 1:57 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-21 2:36 ` Joe Perches 2020-08-21 2:36 ` Joe Perches 2020-08-21 2:42 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 2:42 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 2:49 ` Joe Perches 2020-08-21 2:49 ` Joe Perches 2020-08-21 3:04 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-21 3:04 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-21 3:08 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-21 3:08 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-21 2:44 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-21 2:44 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-21 2:39 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 2:39 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 3:01 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-21 3:01 ` Steven Rostedt 2020-08-21 12:19 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 12:19 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 8:48 ` David Laight 2020-08-21 8:48 ` David Laight 2020-08-21 10:27 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 10:27 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 11:32 ` David Laight 2020-08-21 11:32 ` David Laight 2020-08-21 12:07 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 12:07 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 12:18 ` David Laight 2020-08-21 12:18 ` David Laight 2020-08-21 12:37 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-21 12:37 ` Nicolas Boichat 2020-08-20 14:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/3, RESEND] media: camss: vfe: Use trace_printk for debugging only Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CANMq1KCoEZVj=sjxCqBhqLZKBab57+82=Rk_LN7fc3aCuNHMUw@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=drinkcat@chromium.org \ --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \ --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \ --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \ --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.