All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/core 1/1] arch/x86/um/../lib/csum-partial_64.c:98:12: error: implicit declaration of function 'load_unaligned_zeropad'
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:02:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+hQTn26hK-4CA=cAwCxEMzogqD30PYdqz4NP8kjmH2gg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+K6=Kc0weayD_phAPn9YT=2UUje+1BZfg=kUiLp7ELqQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 8:57 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:

>
> Unless fixups can be handled, the signature of the function needs to
> be different.
>
> In UM, we would need to provide a number of bytes that can be read.

We can make this a bit less ugly  of course.

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
index 5ec35626945b6db2f7f41c6d46d5e422810eac46..7a3c4e7e05c4b21566e1ee3813a071509a9d54ff
100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
@@ -21,6 +21,25 @@ static inline unsigned short from32to16(unsigned a)
        return b;
 }

+
+static inline unsigned long load_partial_long(const void *buff, int len)
+{
+#ifndef CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
+               union {
+                       unsigned long   ulval;
+                       u8              bytes[sizeof(long)];
+               } v;
+
+               v.ulval = 0;
+               memcpy(v.bytes, buff, len);
+               return v.ulval;
+#else
+               unsigned int shift = (sizeof(long) - len) * BITS_PER_BYTE;
+
+               return (load_unaligned_zeropad(buff) << shift) >> shift;
+#endif
+}
+
 /*
  * Do a checksum on an arbitrary memory area.
  * Returns a 32bit checksum.
@@ -91,11 +110,9 @@ __wsum csum_partial(const void *buff, int len, __wsum sum)
                        : "memory");
                buff += 8;
        }
-       if (len & 7) {
-               unsigned int shift = (8 - (len & 7)) * 8;
-               unsigned long trail;
-
-               trail = (load_unaligned_zeropad(buff) << shift) >> shift;
+       len &= 7;
+       if (len) {
+               unsigned long trail = load_partial_long(buff, len);

                asm("addq %[trail],%[res]\n\t"
                    "adcq $0,%[res]"

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/core 1/1] arch/x86/um/../lib/csum-partial_64.c:98:12: error: implicit declaration of function 'load_unaligned_zeropad'
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:02:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+hQTn26hK-4CA=cAwCxEMzogqD30PYdqz4NP8kjmH2gg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+K6=Kc0weayD_phAPn9YT=2UUje+1BZfg=kUiLp7ELqQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1839 bytes --]

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 8:57 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:

>
> Unless fixups can be handled, the signature of the function needs to
> be different.
>
> In UM, we would need to provide a number of bytes that can be read.

We can make this a bit less ugly  of course.

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
index 5ec35626945b6db2f7f41c6d46d5e422810eac46..7a3c4e7e05c4b21566e1ee3813a071509a9d54ff
100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
@@ -21,6 +21,25 @@ static inline unsigned short from32to16(unsigned a)
        return b;
 }

+
+static inline unsigned long load_partial_long(const void *buff, int len)
+{
+#ifndef CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
+               union {
+                       unsigned long   ulval;
+                       u8              bytes[sizeof(long)];
+               } v;
+
+               v.ulval = 0;
+               memcpy(v.bytes, buff, len);
+               return v.ulval;
+#else
+               unsigned int shift = (sizeof(long) - len) * BITS_PER_BYTE;
+
+               return (load_unaligned_zeropad(buff) << shift) >> shift;
+#endif
+}
+
 /*
  * Do a checksum on an arbitrary memory area.
  * Returns a 32bit checksum.
@@ -91,11 +110,9 @@ __wsum csum_partial(const void *buff, int len, __wsum sum)
                        : "memory");
                buff += 8;
        }
-       if (len & 7) {
-               unsigned int shift = (8 - (len & 7)) * 8;
-               unsigned long trail;
-
-               trail = (load_unaligned_zeropad(buff) << shift) >> shift;
+       len &= 7;
+       if (len) {
+               unsigned long trail = load_partial_long(buff, len);

                asm("addq %[trail],%[res]\n\t"
                    "adcq $0,%[res]"

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/core 1/1] arch/x86/um/../lib/csum-partial_64.c:98:12: error: implicit declaration of function 'load_unaligned_zeropad'
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:02:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+hQTn26hK-4CA=cAwCxEMzogqD30PYdqz4NP8kjmH2gg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+K6=Kc0weayD_phAPn9YT=2UUje+1BZfg=kUiLp7ELqQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 8:57 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:

>
> Unless fixups can be handled, the signature of the function needs to
> be different.
>
> In UM, we would need to provide a number of bytes that can be read.

We can make this a bit less ugly  of course.

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
index 5ec35626945b6db2f7f41c6d46d5e422810eac46..7a3c4e7e05c4b21566e1ee3813a071509a9d54ff
100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
@@ -21,6 +21,25 @@ static inline unsigned short from32to16(unsigned a)
        return b;
 }

+
+static inline unsigned long load_partial_long(const void *buff, int len)
+{
+#ifndef CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
+               union {
+                       unsigned long   ulval;
+                       u8              bytes[sizeof(long)];
+               } v;
+
+               v.ulval = 0;
+               memcpy(v.bytes, buff, len);
+               return v.ulval;
+#else
+               unsigned int shift = (sizeof(long) - len) * BITS_PER_BYTE;
+
+               return (load_unaligned_zeropad(buff) << shift) >> shift;
+#endif
+}
+
 /*
  * Do a checksum on an arbitrary memory area.
  * Returns a 32bit checksum.
@@ -91,11 +110,9 @@ __wsum csum_partial(const void *buff, int len, __wsum sum)
                        : "memory");
                buff += 8;
        }
-       if (len & 7) {
-               unsigned int shift = (8 - (len & 7)) * 8;
-               unsigned long trail;
-
-               trail = (load_unaligned_zeropad(buff) << shift) >> shift;
+       len &= 7;
+       if (len) {
+               unsigned long trail = load_partial_long(buff, len);

                asm("addq %[trail],%[res]\n\t"
                    "adcq $0,%[res]"

_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-18 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-17 18:45 [tip:x86/core 1/1] arch/x86/um/../lib/csum-partial_64.c:98:12: error: implicit declaration of function 'load_unaligned_zeropad' kernel test robot
2021-11-17 18:45 ` kernel test robot
2021-11-17 18:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-17 18:55   ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-17 19:40   ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-17 19:40     ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-18 16:00     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-18 16:00       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-18 16:00       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-18 16:26       ` Johannes Berg
2021-11-18 16:26         ` Johannes Berg
2021-11-18 16:26         ` Johannes Berg
2021-11-18 16:57         ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-18 16:57           ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-18 16:57           ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-18 17:02           ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2021-11-18 17:02             ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-18 17:02             ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  1:58           ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  1:58             ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  1:58             ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  2:56             ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  2:56               ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  2:56               ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  3:41               ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  3:41                 ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  3:41                 ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  4:00                 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  4:00                   ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  4:00                   ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  4:08                   ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  4:08                     ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  4:08                     ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  4:20                     ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  4:20                       ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  4:20                       ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  4:56                       ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  4:56                         ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  4:56                         ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  5:09                         ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  5:09                           ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  5:09                           ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  6:32                           ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  6:32                             ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  6:32                             ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  6:45                             ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  6:45                               ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  6:45                               ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-25  6:49                               ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  6:49                                 ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  6:49                                 ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  6:47                             ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  6:47                               ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-25  6:47                               ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-26 17:18                   ` David Laight
2021-11-26 17:18                     ` David Laight
2021-11-26 17:18                     ` David Laight
2021-11-26 18:09                     ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-26 18:09                       ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-26 18:09                       ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-26 22:41                       ` David Laight
2021-11-26 22:41                         ` David Laight
2021-11-26 22:41                         ` David Laight
2021-11-26 23:04                         ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-26 23:04                           ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-26 23:04                           ` Noah Goldstein
2021-11-28 18:30                           ` David Laight
2021-11-28 18:30                             ` David Laight
2021-11-28 18:30                             ` David Laight
2021-12-29  6:00       ` Al Viro
2021-12-29  6:00         ` Al Viro
2021-12-29  6:00         ` Al Viro
2022-01-31  2:29         ` Al Viro
2022-01-31  2:29           ` Al Viro
2022-01-31  2:29           ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANn89i+hQTn26hK-4CA=cAwCxEMzogqD30PYdqz4NP8kjmH2gg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.