All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix resource leak" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
@ 2019-11-04  9:35 gregkh
  2019-11-04 14:07 ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2019-11-04  9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jeffrey.l.hugo, vkoul; +Cc: stable


The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 7667819385457b4aeb5fac94f67f52ab52cc10d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:26:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix resource leak

bam_dma_terminate_all() will leak resources if any of the transactions are
committed to the hardware (present in the desc fifo), and not complete.
Since bam_dma_terminate_all() does not cause the hardware to be updated,
the hardware will still operate on any previously committed transactions.
This can cause memory corruption if the memory for the transaction has been
reassigned, and will cause a sync issue between the BAM and its client(s).

Fix this by properly updating the hardware in bam_dma_terminate_all().

Fixes: e7c0fe2a5c84 ("dmaengine: add Qualcomm BAM dma driver")
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191017152606.34120-1-jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>

diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
index 8e90a405939d..ef73f65224b1 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
@@ -694,6 +694,25 @@ static int bam_dma_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *chan)
 
 	/* remove all transactions, including active transaction */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&bchan->vc.lock, flag);
+	/*
+	 * If we have transactions queued, then some might be committed to the
+	 * hardware in the desc fifo.  The only way to reset the desc fifo is
+	 * to do a hardware reset (either by pipe or the entire block).
+	 * bam_chan_init_hw() will trigger a pipe reset, and also reinit the
+	 * pipe.  If the pipe is left disabled (default state after pipe reset)
+	 * and is accessed by a connected hardware engine, a fatal error in
+	 * the BAM will occur.  There is a small window where this could happen
+	 * with bam_chan_init_hw(), but it is assumed that the caller has
+	 * stopped activity on any attached hardware engine.  Make sure to do
+	 * this first so that the BAM hardware doesn't cause memory corruption
+	 * by accessing freed resources.
+	 */
+	if (!list_empty(&bchan->desc_list)) {
+		async_desc = list_first_entry(&bchan->desc_list,
+					      struct bam_async_desc, desc_node);
+		bam_chan_init_hw(bchan, async_desc->dir);
+	}
+
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(async_desc, tmp,
 				 &bchan->desc_list, desc_node) {
 		list_add(&async_desc->vd.node, &bchan->vc.desc_issued);


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix resource leak" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
  2019-11-04  9:35 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix resource leak" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree gregkh
@ 2019-11-04 14:07 ` Sasha Levin
  2019-11-04 14:39   ` Jeffrey Hugo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-11-04 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregkh; +Cc: jeffrey.l.hugo, vkoul, stable

On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:35:26AM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
>The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
>If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
>tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
>id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
>
>thanks,
>
>greg k-h
>
>------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>
>From 7667819385457b4aeb5fac94f67f52ab52cc10d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
>Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:26:06 -0700
>Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix resource leak
>
>bam_dma_terminate_all() will leak resources if any of the transactions are
>committed to the hardware (present in the desc fifo), and not complete.
>Since bam_dma_terminate_all() does not cause the hardware to be updated,
>the hardware will still operate on any previously committed transactions.
>This can cause memory corruption if the memory for the transaction has been
>reassigned, and will cause a sync issue between the BAM and its client(s).
>
>Fix this by properly updating the hardware in bam_dma_terminate_all().
>
>Fixes: e7c0fe2a5c84 ("dmaengine: add Qualcomm BAM dma driver")
>Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
>Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191017152606.34120-1-jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com
>Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>

Is the "Fixes:" tag correct here? Is it an issue without 6b4faeac05bc
("dmaengine: qcom-bam: Process multiple pending descriptors")?

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix resource leak" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
  2019-11-04 14:07 ` Sasha Levin
@ 2019-11-04 14:39   ` Jeffrey Hugo
  2019-11-04 17:12     ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey Hugo @ 2019-11-04 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sasha Levin; +Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, vkoul, stable

On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 7:07 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:35:26AM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> >
> >The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
> >If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> >tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> >id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >greg k-h
> >
> >------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> >
> >From 7667819385457b4aeb5fac94f67f52ab52cc10d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >From: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
> >Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:26:06 -0700
> >Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix resource leak
> >
> >bam_dma_terminate_all() will leak resources if any of the transactions are
> >committed to the hardware (present in the desc fifo), and not complete.
> >Since bam_dma_terminate_all() does not cause the hardware to be updated,
> >the hardware will still operate on any previously committed transactions.
> >This can cause memory corruption if the memory for the transaction has been
> >reassigned, and will cause a sync issue between the BAM and its client(s).
> >
> >Fix this by properly updating the hardware in bam_dma_terminate_all().
> >
> >Fixes: e7c0fe2a5c84 ("dmaengine: add Qualcomm BAM dma driver")
> >Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
> >Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191017152606.34120-1-jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com
> >Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
>
> Is the "Fixes:" tag correct here? Is it an issue without 6b4faeac05bc
> ("dmaengine: qcom-bam: Process multiple pending descriptors")?

Yes.  The issue will occur, even if you submit only one descriptor.
The uart_dm driver which exposed this issue (msm_serial), only uses
one descriptor at a time, despite the hardware and some versions of
the bam driver allowing more than that.

A trivial way to trigger this would be to queue a descriptor to
receive data from some peripheral that is attached to the BAM dma
engine, but the peripheral never sends that data - ie if you had a NIC
and you wanted to prequeue a receive buffer to accept an incoming
packet.  If you then invoke terminate_all(), perhaps you need to
renegotiate the link speed of the NIC, you'll hit the same issue -
with or without "Process multiple pending descriptors".
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix resource leak" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
  2019-11-04 14:39   ` Jeffrey Hugo
@ 2019-11-04 17:12     ` Sasha Levin
  2019-11-04 17:15       ` Jeffrey Hugo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-11-04 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeffrey Hugo; +Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, vkoul, stable

On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 07:39:58AM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 7:07 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:35:26AM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>> >
>> >The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
>> >If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
>> >tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
>> >id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
>> >
>> >thanks,
>> >
>> >greg k-h
>> >
>> >------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>> >
>> >From 7667819385457b4aeb5fac94f67f52ab52cc10d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> >From: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
>> >Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:26:06 -0700
>> >Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix resource leak
>> >
>> >bam_dma_terminate_all() will leak resources if any of the transactions are
>> >committed to the hardware (present in the desc fifo), and not complete.
>> >Since bam_dma_terminate_all() does not cause the hardware to be updated,
>> >the hardware will still operate on any previously committed transactions.
>> >This can cause memory corruption if the memory for the transaction has been
>> >reassigned, and will cause a sync issue between the BAM and its client(s).
>> >
>> >Fix this by properly updating the hardware in bam_dma_terminate_all().
>> >
>> >Fixes: e7c0fe2a5c84 ("dmaengine: add Qualcomm BAM dma driver")
>> >Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
>> >Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> >Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191017152606.34120-1-jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com
>> >Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
>>
>> Is the "Fixes:" tag correct here? Is it an issue without 6b4faeac05bc
>> ("dmaengine: qcom-bam: Process multiple pending descriptors")?
>
>Yes.  The issue will occur, even if you submit only one descriptor.
>The uart_dm driver which exposed this issue (msm_serial), only uses
>one descriptor at a time, despite the hardware and some versions of
>the bam driver allowing more than that.
>
>A trivial way to trigger this would be to queue a descriptor to
>receive data from some peripheral that is attached to the BAM dma
>engine, but the peripheral never sends that data - ie if you had a NIC
>and you wanted to prequeue a receive buffer to accept an incoming
>packet.  If you then invoke terminate_all(), perhaps you need to
>renegotiate the link speed of the NIC, you'll hit the same issue -
>with or without "Process multiple pending descriptors".

In this case I'll happily take a backport of this patch :)

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix resource leak" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
  2019-11-04 17:12     ` Sasha Levin
@ 2019-11-04 17:15       ` Jeffrey Hugo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey Hugo @ 2019-11-04 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sasha Levin; +Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, vkoul, stable

On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:12 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 07:39:58AM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 7:07 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:35:26AM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> >> >
> >> >The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
> >> >If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> >> >tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> >> >id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
> >> >
> >> >thanks,
> >> >
> >> >greg k-h
> >> >
> >> >------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> >> >
> >> >From 7667819385457b4aeb5fac94f67f52ab52cc10d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> >From: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
> >> >Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 08:26:06 -0700
> >> >Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix resource leak
> >> >
> >> >bam_dma_terminate_all() will leak resources if any of the transactions are
> >> >committed to the hardware (present in the desc fifo), and not complete.
> >> >Since bam_dma_terminate_all() does not cause the hardware to be updated,
> >> >the hardware will still operate on any previously committed transactions.
> >> >This can cause memory corruption if the memory for the transaction has been
> >> >reassigned, and will cause a sync issue between the BAM and its client(s).
> >> >
> >> >Fix this by properly updating the hardware in bam_dma_terminate_all().
> >> >
> >> >Fixes: e7c0fe2a5c84 ("dmaengine: add Qualcomm BAM dma driver")
> >> >Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
> >> >Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >> >Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191017152606.34120-1-jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com
> >> >Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> >>
> >> Is the "Fixes:" tag correct here? Is it an issue without 6b4faeac05bc
> >> ("dmaengine: qcom-bam: Process multiple pending descriptors")?
> >
> >Yes.  The issue will occur, even if you submit only one descriptor.
> >The uart_dm driver which exposed this issue (msm_serial), only uses
> >one descriptor at a time, despite the hardware and some versions of
> >the bam driver allowing more than that.
> >
> >A trivial way to trigger this would be to queue a descriptor to
> >receive data from some peripheral that is attached to the BAM dma
> >engine, but the peripheral never sends that data - ie if you had a NIC
> >and you wanted to prequeue a receive buffer to accept an incoming
> >packet.  If you then invoke terminate_all(), perhaps you need to
> >renegotiate the link speed of the NIC, you'll hit the same issue -
> >with or without "Process multiple pending descriptors".
>
> In this case I'll happily take a backport of this patch :)

I'll see what I can do in the next few days.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-04 17:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-11-04  9:35 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: Fix resource leak" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2019-11-04 14:07 ` Sasha Levin
2019-11-04 14:39   ` Jeffrey Hugo
2019-11-04 17:12     ` Sasha Levin
2019-11-04 17:15       ` Jeffrey Hugo

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.