* In ovs-2.4 version, why can't stop dpdk-bond port by `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN`?
@ 2017-11-27 10:07 Sam
2017-11-27 10:08 ` Sam
[not found] ` <CAOE=1Z3bo+iDps96mWNfVmOVEZg51sR3Mf5tMp7WdV8_k0dO8w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sam @ 2017-11-27 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw, ovs-dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ
Hi all,
I'm working in ovs 2.4 version, and I use "dpdkb" type netdev. Then I
call `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN` to down this device, at last, my
code call "rte_eth_dev_stop(dev->port_id);".
But counter shows the port is still rx/tx, why?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: In ovs-2.4 version, why can't stop dpdk-bond port by `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN`?
2017-11-27 10:07 In ovs-2.4 version, why can't stop dpdk-bond port by `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN`? Sam
@ 2017-11-27 10:08 ` Sam
[not found] ` <CAOE=1Z3bo+iDps96mWNfVmOVEZg51sR3Mf5tMp7WdV8_k0dO8w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sam @ 2017-11-27 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, ovs-dev
The "dev->port_id" is bond port id, should I use slave port id instead ?
2017-11-27 18:07 GMT+08:00 Sam <batmanustc@gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working in ovs 2.4 version, and I use "dpdkb" type netdev. Then I
> call `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN` to down this device, at last, my
> code call "rte_eth_dev_stop(dev->port_id);".
>
> But counter shows the port is still rx/tx, why?
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: In ovs-2.4 version, why can't stop dpdk-bond port by `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN`?
[not found] ` <CAOE=1Z3bo+iDps96mWNfVmOVEZg51sR3Mf5tMp7WdV8_k0dO8w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2017-11-27 19:28 ` Ben Pfaff
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ben Pfaff @ 2017-11-27 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam; +Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw, ovs-dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 06:07:35PM +0800, Sam wrote:
> I'm working in ovs 2.4 version, and I use "dpdkb" type netdev. Then I
> call `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN` to down this device, at last, my
> code call "rte_eth_dev_stop(dev->port_id);".
>
> But counter shows the port is still rx/tx, why?
OVS 2.4 is pretty old and no longer supported. You should probably try
a newer version.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-27 19:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-27 10:07 In ovs-2.4 version, why can't stop dpdk-bond port by `ovs-ofctl mod br dpdkbond DOWN`? Sam
2017-11-27 10:08 ` Sam
[not found] ` <CAOE=1Z3bo+iDps96mWNfVmOVEZg51sR3Mf5tMp7WdV8_k0dO8w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-27 19:28 ` Ben Pfaff
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.