All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM.
@ 2023-02-06 16:58 Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_WALK ctx->flags for skipping BBM and CMO Ricardo Koller
                   ` (12 more replies)
  0 siblings, 13 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol, Ricardo Koller

Eager Page Splitting improves the performance of dirty-logging (used
in live migrations) when guest memory is backed by huge-pages.  It's
an optimization used in Google Cloud since 2016 on x86, and for the
last couple of months on ARM.

Background and motivation
=========================
Dirty logging is typically used for live-migration iterative copying.
KVM implements dirty-logging at the PAGE_SIZE granularity (will refer
to 4K pages from now on).  It does it by faulting on write-protected
4K pages.  Therefore, enabling dirty-logging on a huge-page requires
breaking it into 4K pages in the first place.  KVM does this breaking
on fault, and because it's in the critical path it only maps the 4K
page that faulted; every other 4K page is left unmapped.  This is not
great for performance on ARM for a couple of reasons:

- Splitting on fault can halt vcpus for milliseconds in some
  implementations. Splitting a block PTE requires using a broadcasted
  TLB invalidation (TLBI) for every huge-page (due to the
  break-before-make requirement). Note that x86 doesn't need this. We
  observed some implementations that take millliseconds to complete
  broadcasted TLBIs when done in parallel from multiple vcpus.  And
  that's exactly what happens when doing it on fault: multiple vcpus
  fault at the same time triggering TLBIs in parallel.

- Read intensive guest workloads end up paying for dirty-logging.
  Only mapping the faulting 4K page means that all the other pages
  that were part of the huge-page will now be unmapped. The effect is
  that any access, including reads, now has to fault.

Eager Page Splitting (on ARM)
=============================
Eager Page Splitting fixes the above two issues by eagerly splitting
huge-pages when enabling dirty logging. The goal is to avoid doing it
while faulting on write-protected pages. This is what the TDP MMU does
for x86 [0], except that x86 does it for different reasons: to avoid
grabbing the MMU lock on fault. Note that taking care of
write-protection faults still requires grabbing the MMU lock on ARM,
but not on x86 (with the fast_page_fault path).

An additional benefit of eagerly splitting huge-pages is that it can
be done in a controlled way (e.g., via an IOCTL). This series provides
two knobs for doing it, just like its x86 counterpart: when enabling
dirty logging, and when using the KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG ioctl. The
benefit of doing it on KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG is that this ioctl takes
ranges, and not complete memslots like when enabling dirty logging.
This means that the cost of splitting (mainly broadcasted TLBIs) can
be throttled: split a range, wait for a bit, split another range, etc.
The benefits of this approach were presented by Oliver Upton at KVM
Forum 2022 [1].

Implementation
==============
Patches 3-4 add a pgtable utility function for splitting huge block
PTEs: kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(). Patches 5-9 add support for eagerly
splitting huge-pages when enabling dirty-logging and when using the
KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG ioctl. Note that this is just like what x86 does,
and the code is actually based on it.  And finally, patch 9:

	KVM: arm64: Use local TLBI on permission relaxation

adds support for using local TLBIs instead of broadcasts when doing
permission relaxation. This last patch is key to achieving good
performance during dirty-logging, as eagerly breaking huge-pages
replaces mapping new pages with permission relaxation. Got this patch
(indirectly) from Marc Z.  and took the liberty of adding a commit
message.

Note: this applies on top of 6.2-rc6.

Performance evaluation
======================
The performance benefits were tested using the dirty_log_perf_test
selftest with 2M huge-pages.

The first test uses a write-only sequential workload where the stride
is 2M instead of 4K [2]. The idea with this experiment is to emulate a
random access pattern writing a different huge-page at every access.
Observe that the benefit increases with the number of vcpus: up to
5.76x for 152 vcpus. This table shows the guest dirtying time when
using the CLEAR ioctl (and KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2):

/dirty_log_perf_test_sparse -s anonymous_hugetlb_2mb -b 1G -v $i -i 3 -m 2

	+-------+----------+------------------+
	| vCPUs | 6.2-rc3  | 6.2-rc3 + series |
	|       |    (ms)  |             (ms) |
	+-------+----------+------------------+
	|    1  |    2.63  |          1.66    |
	|    2  |    2.95  |          1.70    |
	|    4  |    3.21  |          1.71    |
	|    8  |    4.97  |          1.78    |
	|   16  |    9.51  |          1.82    |
	|   32  |   20.15  |          3.03    |
	|   64  |   40.09  |          5.80    |
	|  128  |   80.08  |         12.24    |
	|  152  |  109.81  |         15.14    |
	+-------+----------+------------------+

This secondv test measures the benefit of eager page splitting on read
intensive workloads (1 write for every 10 reads). As in the other
test, the benefit increases with the number of vcpus, up to 8.82x for
152 vcpus. This table shows the guest dirtying time when using the
CLEAR ioctl (and KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2):

./dirty_log_perf_test -s anonymous_hugetlb_2mb -b 1G -v $i -i 3 -m 2 -w 10

	+-------+----------+------------------+
	| vCPUs | 6.2-rc3  | 6.2-rc3 + series |
	|       |   (sec)  |            (sec) |
	+-------+----------+------------------+
	|    1  |    0.65  |          0.07    |
	|    2  |    0.70  |          0.08    |
	|    4  |    0.71  |          0.08    |
	|    8  |    0.72  |          0.08    |
	|   16  |    0.76  |          0.08    |
	|   32  |    1.61  |          0.14    |
	|   64  |    3.46  |          0.30    |
	|  128  |    5.49  |          0.64    |
	|  152  |    6.44  |          0.63    |
	+-------+----------+------------------+

Changes from v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20230113035000.480021-1-ricarkol@google.com/
- added a capability to set the eager splitting chunk size. This
  indirectly sets the number of pages in the cache. It also allows for
  opting out of this feature. (Oliver, Marc)
- changed kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() to split 1g huge-pages
  using either 513 or 1 at a time (with a cache of 1). (Oliver, Marc)
- added force_pte arg to kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_removed().
- renamed free_removed to free_unlinked. (Ben and Oliver)
- added KVM_PGTABLE_WALK ctx->flags for skipping BBM and CMO, instead
  of KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_REMOVED. (Oliver)

Changes from the RFC:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20221112081714.2169495-1-ricarkol@google.com/
- dropped the changes to split on POST visits. No visible perf
  benefit.
- changed the kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_removed() implementation to
  reuse the stage2 mapper.
- dropped the FEAT_BBM changes and optimization. Will send this on a
  different series.

Thanks,
Ricardo

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220119230739.2234394-1-dmatlack@google.com/
[1] https://kvmforum2022.sched.com/event/15jJq/kvmarm-at-scale-improvements-to-the-mmu-in-the-face-of-hardware-growing-pains-oliver-upton-google
[2] https://github.com/ricarkol/linux/commit/f78e9102b2bff4fb7f30bee810d7d611a537b46d
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20221107215644.1895162-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev/

Marc Zyngier (1):
  KVM: arm64: Use local TLBI on permission relaxation

Ricardo Koller (11):
  KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_WALK ctx->flags for skipping BBM and CMO
  KVM: arm64: Rename free_unlinked to free_removed
  KVM: arm64: Add helper for creating unlinked stage2 subtrees
  KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split()
  KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region()
  KVM: arm64: Add kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu()
  KVM: arm64: Export kvm_are_all_memslots_empty()
  KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE
  KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled
  KVM: arm64: Open-code kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked()
  KVM: arm64: Split huge pages during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG

 Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst        |  26 ++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h      |   4 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h     |  18 +++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h      |   1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h  |  85 +++++++++++-
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                  |  22 +++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c    |  10 ++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c |   6 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c         |  54 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c          | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c          |  32 +++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c                  | 183 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
 include/linux/kvm_host.h              |   2 +
 include/uapi/linux/kvm.h              |   1 +
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c                   |   2 +-
 15 files changed, 579 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_WALK ctx->flags for skipping BBM and CMO
  2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-06 16:58 ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: arm64: Rename free_unlinked to free_removed Ricardo Koller
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol, Ricardo Koller

Add two flags to kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx, KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_BBM and
KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_CMO, to indicate that the walk should not
perform break-before-make (BBM) nor cache maintenance operations
(CMO). This will by a future commit to create unlinked tables not
accessible to the HW page-table walker.  This is safe as these removed
tables are not visible to the HW page-table walker.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c         | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
index 63f81b27a4e3..3339192a97a9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
@@ -188,12 +188,20 @@ typedef bool (*kvm_pgtable_force_pte_cb_t)(u64 addr, u64 end,
  *					children.
  * @KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SHARED:		Indicates the page-tables may be shared
  *					with other software walkers.
+ * @KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_BBM:		Visit and update table entries
+ *					without Break-before-make
+ *					requirements.
+ * @KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_CMO:		Visit and update table entries
+ *					without Cache maintenance
+ *					operations required.
  */
 enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags {
 	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF			= BIT(0),
 	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_TABLE_PRE		= BIT(1),
 	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_TABLE_POST		= BIT(2),
 	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SHARED			= BIT(3),
+	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_BBM		= BIT(4),
+	KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_CMO		= BIT(4),
 };
 
 struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx {
@@ -215,6 +223,16 @@ static inline bool kvm_pgtable_walk_shared(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *c
 	return ctx->flags & KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SHARED;
 }
 
+static inline bool kvm_pgtable_walk_skip_bbm(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	return ctx->flags & KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_BBM;
+}
+
+static inline bool kvm_pgtable_walk_skip_cmo(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	return ctx->flags & KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_CMO;
+}
+
 /**
  * struct kvm_pgtable_walker - Hook into a page-table walk.
  * @cb:		Callback function to invoke during the walk.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
index b11cf2c618a6..e093e222daf3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
@@ -717,14 +717,17 @@ static bool stage2_try_break_pte(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
 	if (!stage2_try_set_pte(ctx, KVM_INVALID_PTE_LOCKED))
 		return false;
 
-	/*
-	 * Perform the appropriate TLB invalidation based on the evicted pte
-	 * value (if any).
-	 */
-	if (kvm_pte_table(ctx->old, ctx->level))
-		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, mmu);
-	else if (kvm_pte_valid(ctx->old))
-		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, mmu, ctx->addr, ctx->level);
+	if (!kvm_pgtable_walk_skip_bbm(ctx)) {
+		/*
+		 * Perform the appropriate TLB invalidation based on the
+		 * evicted pte value (if any).
+		 */
+		if (kvm_pte_table(ctx->old, ctx->level))
+			kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, mmu);
+		else if (kvm_pte_valid(ctx->old))
+			kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, mmu,
+				     ctx->addr, ctx->level);
+	}
 
 	if (stage2_pte_is_counted(ctx->old))
 		mm_ops->put_page(ctx->ptep);
@@ -808,11 +811,13 @@ static int stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
 		return -EAGAIN;
 
 	/* Perform CMOs before installation of the guest stage-2 PTE */
-	if (mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc && stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, new))
+	if (!kvm_pgtable_walk_skip_cmo(ctx) && mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc &&
+	    stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, new))
 		mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops),
-						granule);
+					       granule);
 
-	if (mm_ops->icache_inval_pou && stage2_pte_executable(new))
+	if (!kvm_pgtable_walk_skip_cmo(ctx) && mm_ops->icache_inval_pou &&
+	    stage2_pte_executable(new))
 		mm_ops->icache_inval_pou(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops), granule);
 
 	stage2_make_pte(ctx, new);
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: arm64: Rename free_unlinked to free_removed
  2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_WALK ctx->flags for skipping BBM and CMO Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-06 16:58 ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: arm64: Add helper for creating unlinked stage2 subtrees Ricardo Koller
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol, Ricardo Koller

Make it clearer that the "free_removed" functions refer to tables that
have never been part of the paging structure: they are "unlinked".

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h  |  8 ++++----
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c |  6 +++---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c          |  6 +++---
 arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c                  | 10 +++++-----
 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
index 3339192a97a9..7c45082e6c23 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_level_supports_block_mapping(u32 level)
  *				allocation is physically contiguous.
  * @free_pages_exact:		Free an exact number of memory pages previously
  *				allocated by zalloc_pages_exact.
- * @free_removed_table:		Free a removed paging structure by unlinking and
+ * @free_unlinked_table:	Free an unlinked paging structure by unlinking and
  *				dropping references.
  * @get_page:			Increment the refcount on a page.
  * @put_page:			Decrement the refcount on a page. When the
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops {
 	void*		(*zalloc_page)(void *arg);
 	void*		(*zalloc_pages_exact)(size_t size);
 	void		(*free_pages_exact)(void *addr, size_t size);
-	void		(*free_removed_table)(void *addr, u32 level);
+	void		(*free_unlinked_table)(void *addr, u32 level);
 	void		(*get_page)(void *addr);
 	void		(*put_page)(void *addr);
 	int		(*page_count)(void *addr);
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ int __kvm_pgtable_stage2_init(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 void kvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt);
 
 /**
- * kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_removed() - Free a removed stage-2 paging structure.
+ * kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked() - Free un unlinked stage-2 paging structure.
  * @mm_ops:	Memory management callbacks.
  * @pgtable:	Unlinked stage-2 paging structure to be freed.
  * @level:	Level of the stage-2 paging structure to be freed.
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ void kvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt);
  * The page-table is assumed to be unreachable by any hardware walkers prior to
  * freeing and therefore no TLB invalidation is performed.
  */
-void kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_removed(struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops, void *pgtable, u32 level);
+void kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops, void *pgtable, u32 level);
 
 /**
  * kvm_pgtable_stage2_map() - Install a mapping in a guest stage-2 page-table.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
index 552653fa18be..b030170d803b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
@@ -91,9 +91,9 @@ static void host_s2_put_page(void *addr)
 	hyp_put_page(&host_s2_pool, addr);
 }
 
-static void host_s2_free_removed_table(void *addr, u32 level)
+static void host_s2_free_unlinked_table(void *addr, u32 level)
 {
-	kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_removed(&host_mmu.mm_ops, addr, level);
+	kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(&host_mmu.mm_ops, addr, level);
 }
 
 static int prepare_s2_pool(void *pgt_pool_base)
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int prepare_s2_pool(void *pgt_pool_base)
 	host_mmu.mm_ops = (struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops) {
 		.zalloc_pages_exact = host_s2_zalloc_pages_exact,
 		.zalloc_page = host_s2_zalloc_page,
-		.free_removed_table = host_s2_free_removed_table,
+		.free_unlinked_table = host_s2_free_unlinked_table,
 		.phys_to_virt = hyp_phys_to_virt,
 		.virt_to_phys = hyp_virt_to_phys,
 		.page_count = hyp_page_count,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
index e093e222daf3..0a5ef9288371 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
@@ -841,7 +841,7 @@ static int stage2_map_walk_table_pre(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	mm_ops->free_removed_table(childp, ctx->level);
+	mm_ops->free_unlinked_table(childp, ctx->level);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ static int stage2_map_walk_leaf(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
  * The TABLE_PRE callback runs for table entries on the way down, looking
  * for table entries which we could conceivably replace with a block entry
  * for this mapping. If it finds one it replaces the entry and calls
- * kvm_pgtable_mm_ops::free_removed_table() to tear down the detached table.
+ * kvm_pgtable_mm_ops::free_unlinked_table() to tear down the detached table.
  *
  * Otherwise, the LEAF callback performs the mapping at the existing leaves
  * instead.
@@ -1250,7 +1250,7 @@ void kvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt)
 	pgt->pgd = NULL;
 }
 
-void kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_removed(struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops, void *pgtable, u32 level)
+void kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops, void *pgtable, u32 level)
 {
 	kvm_pteref_t ptep = (kvm_pteref_t)pgtable;
 	struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index a3ee3b605c9b..9bd3c2cfb476 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -130,21 +130,21 @@ static void kvm_s2_free_pages_exact(void *virt, size_t size)
 
 static struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops kvm_s2_mm_ops;
 
-static void stage2_free_removed_table_rcu_cb(struct rcu_head *head)
+static void stage2_free_unlinked_table_rcu_cb(struct rcu_head *head)
 {
 	struct page *page = container_of(head, struct page, rcu_head);
 	void *pgtable = page_to_virt(page);
 	u32 level = page_private(page);
 
-	kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_removed(&kvm_s2_mm_ops, pgtable, level);
+	kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(&kvm_s2_mm_ops, pgtable, level);
 }
 
-static void stage2_free_removed_table(void *addr, u32 level)
+static void stage2_free_unlinked_table(void *addr, u32 level)
 {
 	struct page *page = virt_to_page(addr);
 
 	set_page_private(page, (unsigned long)level);
-	call_rcu(&page->rcu_head, stage2_free_removed_table_rcu_cb);
+	call_rcu(&page->rcu_head, stage2_free_unlinked_table_rcu_cb);
 }
 
 static void kvm_host_get_page(void *addr)
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ static struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops kvm_s2_mm_ops = {
 	.zalloc_page		= stage2_memcache_zalloc_page,
 	.zalloc_pages_exact	= kvm_s2_zalloc_pages_exact,
 	.free_pages_exact	= kvm_s2_free_pages_exact,
-	.free_removed_table	= stage2_free_removed_table,
+	.free_unlinked_table	= stage2_free_unlinked_table,
 	.get_page		= kvm_host_get_page,
 	.put_page		= kvm_s2_put_page,
 	.page_count		= kvm_host_page_count,
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: arm64: Add helper for creating unlinked stage2 subtrees
  2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_WALK ctx->flags for skipping BBM and CMO Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: arm64: Rename free_unlinked to free_removed Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-06 16:58 ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-07 14:51   ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() Ricardo Koller
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol, Ricardo Koller

Add a stage2 helper, kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(), for creating
unlinked tables (the opposite of kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked()).
Creating an unlinked table is useful for splitting block PTEs into
subtrees of 4K PTEs.  For example, a 1G block PTE can be split into 4K
PTEs by first creating a fully populated tree, and then use it to
replace the 1G PTE in a single step.  This will be used in a
subsequent commit for eager huge-page splitting (a dirty-logging
optimization).

No functional change intended. This new function will be used in a
subsequent commit.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c         | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
index 7c45082e6c23..e94c92988745 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
@@ -460,6 +460,35 @@ void kvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt);
  */
 void kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops, void *pgtable, u32 level);
 
+/**
+ * kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked() - Create an unlinked stage-2 paging structure.
+ * @pgt:	Page-table structure initialised by kvm_pgtable_stage2_init*().
+ * @new:	Unlinked stage-2 paging structure to be created.
+ * @phys:	Physical address of the memory to map.
+ * @level:	Level of the stage-2 paging structure to be created.
+ * @prot:	Permissions and attributes for the mapping.
+ * @mc:		Cache of pre-allocated and zeroed memory from which to allocate
+ *		page-table pages.
+ * @force_pte:  Force mappings to PAGE_SIZE granularity.
+ *
+ * Create an unlinked page-table tree under @new. If @force_pte is
+ * true and @level is the PMD level, then the tree is mapped up to the
+ * PAGE_SIZE leaf PTE; the tree is mapped up one level otherwise. This
+ * new page-table tree is not reachable (i.e., it is removed) from the
+ * root pgd and it's therefore unreachableby the hardware page-table
+ * walker. No TLB invalidation or CMOs are performed.
+ *
+ * If device attributes are not explicitly requested in @prot, then the
+ * mapping will be normal, cacheable.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 only if a fully populated tree was created (all memory
+ * under @level is mapped), negative error code on failure.
+ */
+int kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt,
+				       kvm_pte_t *new, u64 phys, u32 level,
+				       enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot, void *mc,
+				       bool force_pte);
+
 /**
  * kvm_pgtable_stage2_map() - Install a mapping in a guest stage-2 page-table.
  * @pgt:	Page-table structure initialised by kvm_pgtable_stage2_init*().
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
index 0a5ef9288371..fed314f2b320 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
@@ -1181,6 +1181,53 @@ int kvm_pgtable_stage2_flush(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size)
 	return kvm_pgtable_walk(pgt, addr, size, &walker);
 }
 
+int kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt,
+				      kvm_pte_t *new, u64 phys, u32 level,
+				      enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot, void *mc,
+				      bool force_pte)
+{
+	struct stage2_map_data map_data = {
+		.phys		= phys,
+		.mmu		= pgt->mmu,
+		.memcache	= mc,
+		.force_pte	= force_pte,
+	};
+	struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
+		.cb		= stage2_map_walker,
+		.flags		= KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF |
+				  KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_BBM |
+				  KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_CMO,
+		.arg		= &map_data,
+	};
+	/* .addr (the IPA) is irrelevant for a removed table */
+	struct kvm_pgtable_walk_data data = {
+		.walker	= &walker,
+		.addr	= 0,
+		.end	= kvm_granule_size(level),
+	};
+	struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops = pgt->mm_ops;
+	kvm_pte_t *pgtable;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = stage2_set_prot_attr(pgt, prot, &map_data.attr);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	pgtable = mm_ops->zalloc_page(mc);
+	if (!pgtable)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ret = __kvm_pgtable_walk(&data, mm_ops, (kvm_pteref_t)pgtable,
+				 level + 1);
+	if (ret) {
+		kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(mm_ops, pgtable, level);
+		mm_ops->put_page(pgtable);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	*new = kvm_init_table_pte(pgtable, mm_ops);
+	return 0;
+}
 
 int __kvm_pgtable_stage2_init(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 			      struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops,
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split()
  2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: arm64: Add helper for creating unlinked stage2 subtrees Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-06 16:58 ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-09  5:58   ` Gavin Shan
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() Ricardo Koller
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol, Ricardo Koller

Add a new stage2 function, kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(), for splitting a
range of huge pages. This will be used for eager-splitting huge pages
into PAGE_SIZE pages. The goal is to avoid having to split huge pages
on write-protection faults, and instead use this function to do it
ahead of time for large ranges (e.g., all guest memory in 1G chunks at
a time).

No functional change intended. This new function will be used in a
subsequent commit.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h |  30 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c         | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 135 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
index e94c92988745..871c4eeb0184 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
@@ -658,6 +658,36 @@ bool kvm_pgtable_stage2_is_young(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr);
  */
 int kvm_pgtable_stage2_flush(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size);
 
+/**
+ * kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() - Split a range of huge pages into leaf PTEs pointing
+ *				to PAGE_SIZE guest pages.
+ * @pgt:	 Page-table structure initialised by kvm_pgtable_stage2_init().
+ * @addr:	 Intermediate physical address from which to split.
+ * @size:	 Size of the range.
+ * @mc:		 Cache of pre-allocated and zeroed memory from which to allocate
+ *		 page-table pages.
+ * @mc_capacity: Number of pages in @mc.
+ *
+ * @addr and the end (@addr + @size) are effectively aligned down and up to
+ * the top level huge-page block size. This is an example using 1GB
+ * huge-pages and 4KB granules.
+ *
+ *                          [---input range---]
+ *                          :                 :
+ * [--1G block pte--][--1G block pte--][--1G block pte--][--1G block pte--]
+ *                          :                 :
+ *                   [--2MB--][--2MB--][--2MB--][--2MB--]
+ *                          :                 :
+ *                   [ ][ ][:][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][:][ ][ ][ ]
+ *                          :                 :
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure. Note that
+ * kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() is best effort: it tries to break as many
+ * blocks in the input range as allowed by @mc_capacity.
+ */
+int kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
+			     void *mc, u64 mc_capacity);
+
 /**
  * kvm_pgtable_walk() - Walk a page-table.
  * @pgt:	Page-table structure initialised by kvm_pgtable_*_init().
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
index fed314f2b320..ae80845c8db7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
@@ -1229,6 +1229,111 @@ int kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+struct stage2_split_data {
+	struct kvm_s2_mmu		*mmu;
+	void				*memcache;
+	u64				mc_capacity;
+};
+
+/*
+ * Get the number of page-tables needed to replace a bock with a fully
+ * populated tree, up to the PTE level, at particular level.
+ */
+static inline u32 stage2_block_get_nr_page_tables(u32 level)
+{
+	switch (level) {
+	/* There are no blocks at level 0 */
+	case 1: return 1 + PTRS_PER_PTE;
+	case 2: return 1;
+	case 3: return 0;
+	default:
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+		return ~0;
+	}
+}
+
+static int stage2_split_walker(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
+			       enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags visit)
+{
+	struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops = ctx->mm_ops;
+	struct stage2_split_data *data = ctx->arg;
+	kvm_pte_t pte = ctx->old, new, *childp;
+	enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
+	void *mc = data->memcache;
+	u32 level = ctx->level;
+	u64 phys, nr_pages;
+	bool force_pte;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* No huge-pages exist at the last level */
+	if (level == KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* We only split valid block mappings */
+	if (!kvm_pte_valid(pte) || kvm_pte_table(pte, ctx->level))
+		return 0;
+
+	nr_pages = stage2_block_get_nr_page_tables(level);
+	if (data->mc_capacity >= nr_pages) {
+		/* Build a tree mapped down to the PTE granularity. */
+		force_pte = true;
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * Don't force PTEs. This requires a single page of PMDs at the
+		 * PUD level, or a single page of PTEs at the PMD level. If we
+		 * are at the PUD level, the PTEs will be created recursively.
+		 */
+		force_pte = false;
+		nr_pages = 1;
+	}
+
+	if (data->mc_capacity < nr_pages)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	phys = kvm_pte_to_phys(pte);
+	prot = kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(pte);
+
+	ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(data->mmu->pgt, &new, phys,
+						 level, prot, mc, force_pte);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!stage2_try_break_pte(ctx, data->mmu)) {
+		childp = kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops);
+		kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(mm_ops, childp, level);
+		mm_ops->put_page(childp);
+		return -EAGAIN;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Note, the contents of the page table are guaranteed to be made
+	 * visible before the new PTE is assigned because stage2_make_pte()
+	 * writes the PTE using smp_store_release().
+	 */
+	stage2_make_pte(ctx, new);
+	dsb(ishst);
+	data->mc_capacity -= nr_pages;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
+			     void *mc, u64 mc_capacity)
+{
+	struct stage2_split_data split_data = {
+		.mmu		= pgt->mmu,
+		.memcache	= mc,
+		.mc_capacity	= mc_capacity,
+	};
+
+	struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
+		.cb	= stage2_split_walker,
+		.flags	= KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
+		.arg	= &split_data,
+	};
+
+	return kvm_pgtable_walk(pgt, addr, size, &walker);
+}
+
 int __kvm_pgtable_stage2_init(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 			      struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops,
 			      enum kvm_pgtable_stage2_flags flags,
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region()
  2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-06 16:58 ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-09  6:02   ` Gavin Shan
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu() Ricardo Koller
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol, Ricardo Koller

Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() as a preparation for a future
commit to look cleaner and more understandable. Also, it looks more
like its x86 counterpart (in kvm_mmu_slot_apply_flags()).

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index 9bd3c2cfb476..d2c5e6992459 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1761,20 +1761,27 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
 				   const struct kvm_memory_slot *new,
 				   enum kvm_mr_change change)
 {
+	bool log_dirty_pages = new && new->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
+
 	/*
 	 * At this point memslot has been committed and there is an
 	 * allocated dirty_bitmap[], dirty pages will be tracked while the
 	 * memory slot is write protected.
 	 */
-	if (change != KVM_MR_DELETE && new->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) {
+	if (log_dirty_pages) {
+
+		if (change == KVM_MR_DELETE)
+			return;
+
 		/*
 		 * If we're with initial-all-set, we don't need to write
 		 * protect any pages because they're all reported as dirty.
 		 * Huge pages and normal pages will be write protect gradually.
 		 */
-		if (!kvm_dirty_log_manual_protect_and_init_set(kvm)) {
-			kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(kvm, new->id);
-		}
+		if (kvm_dirty_log_manual_protect_and_init_set(kvm))
+			return;
+
+		kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(kvm, new->id);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu()
  2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-06 16:58 ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] KVM: arm64: Export kvm_are_all_memslots_empty() Ricardo Koller
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol, Ricardo Koller

Add kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu() and move kvm_free_stage2_pgd() into it. A
future commit will add some more things to do inside of
kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu().

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c             | 7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
index e4a7e6369499..058f3ae5bc26 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
@@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ void free_hyp_pgds(void);
 
 void stage2_unmap_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long type);
+void kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm);
 void kvm_free_stage2_pgd(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
 int kvm_phys_addr_ioremap(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t guest_ipa,
 			  phys_addr_t pa, unsigned long size, bool writable);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index d2c5e6992459..812633a75e74 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -766,6 +766,11 @@ int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long t
 	return err;
 }
 
+void kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&kvm->arch.mmu);
+}
+
 static void stage2_unmap_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
 				 struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
 {
@@ -1855,7 +1860,7 @@ void kvm_arch_memslots_updated(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gen)
 
 void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
-	kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&kvm->arch.mmu);
+	kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(kvm);
 }
 
 void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 07/12] KVM: arm64: Export kvm_are_all_memslots_empty()
  2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu() Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-06 16:58 ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE Ricardo Koller
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol, Ricardo Koller

Export kvm_are_all_memslots_empty(). This will be used by a future
commit when checking before setting a capability.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
 include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 4f26b244f6d0..8c5530e03a78 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -991,6 +991,8 @@ static inline bool kvm_memslots_empty(struct kvm_memslots *slots)
 	return RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&slots->gfn_tree);
 }
 
+bool kvm_are_all_memslots_empty(struct kvm *kvm);
+
 #define kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, bkt, slots)			      \
 	hash_for_each(slots->id_hash, bkt, memslot, id_node[slots->node_idx]) \
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!memslot->npages)) {			      \
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 9c60384b5ae0..3940d2467e1b 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -4604,7 +4604,7 @@ int __attribute__((weak)) kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static bool kvm_are_all_memslots_empty(struct kvm *kvm)
+bool kvm_are_all_memslots_empty(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	int i;
 
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE
  2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] KVM: arm64: Export kvm_are_all_memslots_empty() Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-06 16:58 ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-08 11:05   ` Gavin Shan
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled Ricardo Koller
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol, Ricardo Koller, Oliver Upton

Add a capability for userspace to specify the eager split chunk size.
The chunk size specifies how many pages to break at a time, using a
single allocation. Bigger the chunk size, more pages need to be
allocated ahead of time.

Suggested-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst    | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c              |  3 +++
 include/uapi/linux/kvm.h          |  1 +
 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index 9807b05a1b57..a9332e331cce 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -8284,6 +8284,32 @@ structure.
 When getting the Modified Change Topology Report value, the attr->addr
 must point to a byte where the value will be stored or retrieved from.
 
+8.40 KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE
+---------------------------------------
+
+:Capability: KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE
+:Architectures: arm64
+:Type: vm
+:Parameters: arg[0] is the new chunk size.
+:Returns: 0 on success, -EINVAL if any memslot has been created.
+
+This capability sets the chunk size used in Eager Page Splitting.
+
+Eager Page Splitting improves the performance of dirty-logging (used
+in live migrations) when guest memory is backed by huge-pages.  This
+optimization is enabled by default on arm64. It avoids splitting
+huge-pages (into PAGE_SIZE pages) on fault, by doing it eagerly when
+enabling dirty logging (with the KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES flag for a
+memory region), or when using KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG.
+
+The chunk size specifies how many pages to break at a time, using a
+single allocation for each chunk. Bigger the chunk size, more pages
+need to be allocated ahead of time. A good heuristic is to pick the
+size of the huge-pages as the chunk size.
+
+If the chunk size (arg[0]) is zero, then no eager page splitting is
+performed. The default value PMD size (e.g., 2M when PAGE_SIZE is 4K).
+
 9. Known KVM API problems
 =========================
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 35a159d131b5..a69a815719cf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ struct kvm_s2_mmu {
 	/* The last vcpu id that ran on each physical CPU */
 	int __percpu *last_vcpu_ran;
 
+#define KVM_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE_DEFAULT	PMD_SIZE
+
 	struct kvm_arch *arch;
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 9c5573bc4614..c80617ced599 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -101,6 +101,22 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
 		r = 0;
 		set_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_SYSTEM_SUSPEND_ENABLED, &kvm->arch.flags);
 		break;
+	case KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE:
+		mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+		mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
+		/*
+		 * To keep things simple, allow changing the chunk
+		 * size only if there are no memslots created.
+		 */
+		if (!kvm_are_all_memslots_empty(kvm)) {
+			r = -EINVAL;
+		} else {
+			r = 0;
+			kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_chunk_size = cap->args[0];
+		}
+		mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+		break;
 	default:
 		r = -EINVAL;
 		break;
@@ -298,6 +314,12 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
 	case KVM_CAP_ARM_PTRAUTH_GENERIC:
 		r = system_has_full_ptr_auth();
 		break;
+	case KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE:
+		if (kvm)
+			r = kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_chunk_size;
+		else
+			r = KVM_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE_DEFAULT;
+		break;
 	default:
 		r = 0;
 	}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index 812633a75e74..e2ada6588017 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -755,6 +755,9 @@ int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long t
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
 		*per_cpu_ptr(mmu->last_vcpu_ran, cpu) = -1;
 
+	mmu->split_page_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;
+	mmu->split_page_chunk_size = KVM_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE_DEFAULT;
+
 	mmu->pgt = pgt;
 	mmu->pgd_phys = __pa(pgt->pgd);
 	return 0;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 55155e262646..02e05f7918e2 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
 #define KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL 223
 #define KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED_ASYNC_DISABLE 224
 #define KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_WITH_BITMAP 225
+#define KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE 226
 
 #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
 
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled
  2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-06 16:58 ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-09  6:26   ` Gavin Shan
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] KVM: arm64: Open-code kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked() Ricardo Koller
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol, Ricardo Koller

Split huge pages eagerly when enabling dirty logging. The goal is to
avoid doing it while faulting on write-protected pages, which
negatively impacts guest performance.

A memslot marked for dirty logging is split in 1GB pieces at a time.
This is in order to release the mmu_lock and give other kernel threads
the opportunity to run, and also in order to allocate enough pages to
split a 1GB range worth of huge pages (or a single 1GB huge page).
Note that these page allocations can fail, so eager page splitting is
best-effort.  This is not a correctness issue though, as huge pages
can still be split on write-faults.

The benefits of eager page splitting are the same as in x86, added
with commit a3fe5dbda0a4 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Split huge pages mapped by
the TDP MMU when dirty logging is enabled"). For example, when running
dirty_log_perf_test with 64 virtual CPUs (Ampere Altra), 1GB per vCPU,
50% reads, and 2MB HugeTLB memory, the time it takes vCPUs to access
all of their memory after dirty logging is enabled decreased by 44%
from 2.58s to 1.42s.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  16 +++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c              | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index a69a815719cf..eab62d8b3ad4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -154,6 +154,22 @@ struct kvm_s2_mmu {
 	int __percpu *last_vcpu_ran;
 
 #define KVM_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE_DEFAULT	PMD_SIZE
+	/*
+	 * Memory cache used to split
+	 * KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE worth of huge pages. It
+	 * is used to allocate stage2 page tables while splitting huge
+	 * pages. Note that the choice of EAGER_PAGE_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE
+	 * influences both the capacity of the split page cache, and
+	 * how often KVM reschedules. Be wary of raising CHUNK_SIZE
+	 * too high.
+	 *
+	 * A good heuristic to pick CHUNK_SIZE is that it should be
+	 * the size of huge-page to be split.
+	 *
+	 * Protected by kvm->slots_lock.
+	 */
+	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache split_page_cache;
+	uint64_t split_page_chunk_size;
 
 	struct kvm_arch *arch;
 };
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index e2ada6588017..73f8b3953f6a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -31,14 +31,21 @@ static phys_addr_t hyp_idmap_vector;
 
 static unsigned long io_map_base;
 
-static phys_addr_t stage2_range_addr_end(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end)
+static phys_addr_t __stage2_range_addr_end(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end,
+					   phys_addr_t size)
 {
-	phys_addr_t size = kvm_granule_size(KVM_PGTABLE_MIN_BLOCK_LEVEL);
 	phys_addr_t boundary = ALIGN_DOWN(addr + size, size);
 
 	return (boundary - 1 < end - 1) ? boundary : end;
 }
 
+static phys_addr_t stage2_range_addr_end(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end)
+{
+	phys_addr_t size = kvm_granule_size(KVM_PGTABLE_MIN_BLOCK_LEVEL);
+
+	return __stage2_range_addr_end(addr, end, size);
+}
+
 /*
  * Release kvm_mmu_lock periodically if the memory region is large. Otherwise,
  * we may see kernel panics with CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK,
@@ -71,6 +78,72 @@ static int stage2_apply_range(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t addr,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static bool need_topup_split_page_cache_or_resched(struct kvm *kvm, uint64_t min)
+{
+	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache;
+
+	if (need_resched() || rwlock_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock))
+		return true;
+
+	cache = &kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache;
+	return kvm_mmu_memory_cache_nr_free_objects(cache) < min;
+}
+
+static int kvm_mmu_split_nr_page_tables(u64 range)
+{
+	int n = 0;
+
+	if (KVM_PGTABLE_MIN_BLOCK_LEVEL < 2)
+		n += DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(range, PUD_SIZE);
+	n += DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(range, PMD_SIZE);
+	return n;
+}
+
+static int kvm_mmu_split_huge_pages(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t addr,
+				    phys_addr_t end)
+{
+	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache;
+	struct kvm_pgtable *pgt;
+	int ret;
+	u64 next;
+	u64 chunk_size = kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_chunk_size;
+	int cache_capacity = kvm_mmu_split_nr_page_tables(chunk_size);
+
+	if (chunk_size == 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+	cache = &kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache;
+
+	do {
+		if (need_topup_split_page_cache_or_resched(kvm,
+							   cache_capacity)) {
+			write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+			cond_resched();
+			/* Eager page splitting is best-effort. */
+			ret = __kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(cache,
+							   cache_capacity,
+							   cache_capacity);
+			write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+			if (ret)
+				break;
+		}
+
+		pgt = kvm->arch.mmu.pgt;
+		if (!pgt)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		next = __stage2_range_addr_end(addr, end, chunk_size);
+		ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(pgt, addr, next - addr,
+					       cache, cache_capacity);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+	} while (addr = next, addr != end);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 #define stage2_apply_range_resched(kvm, addr, end, fn)			\
 	stage2_apply_range(kvm, addr, end, fn, true)
 
@@ -772,6 +845,7 @@ int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long t
 void kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&kvm->arch.mmu);
+	kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache);
 }
 
 static void stage2_unmap_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
@@ -999,6 +1073,31 @@ static void kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
 	stage2_wp_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, start, end);
 }
 
+/**
+ * kvm_mmu_split_memory_region() - split the stage 2 blocks into PAGE_SIZE
+ *				   pages for memory slot
+ * @kvm:	The KVM pointer
+ * @slot:	The memory slot to split
+ *
+ * Acquires kvm->mmu_lock. Called with kvm->slots_lock mutex acquired,
+ * serializing operations for VM memory regions.
+ */
+static void kvm_mmu_split_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
+{
+	struct kvm_memslots *slots = kvm_memslots(kvm);
+	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot = id_to_memslot(slots, slot);
+	phys_addr_t start, end;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
+
+	start = memslot->base_gfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+	end = (memslot->base_gfn + memslot->npages) << PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+	kvm_mmu_split_huge_pages(kvm, start, end);
+	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+}
+
 /*
  * kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked - enable dirty logging for selected
  * dirty pages.
@@ -1790,6 +1889,16 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
 			return;
 
 		kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(kvm, new->id);
+		kvm_mmu_split_memory_region(kvm, new->id);
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * Free any leftovers from the eager page splitting cache. Do
+		 * this when deleting, moving, disabling dirty logging, or
+		 * creating the memslot (a nop). Doing it for deletes makes
+		 * sure we don't leak memory, and there's no need to keep the
+		 * cache around for any of the other cases.
+		 */
+		kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 10/12] KVM: arm64: Open-code kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked()
  2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-06 16:58 ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG Ricardo Koller
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol, Ricardo Koller

Move the functionality of kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked() into its
caller, kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked().  This will be used
in a subsequent commit in order to share some of the code in
kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked().

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 42 +++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index 73f8b3953f6a..f6fb2bdaab71 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1051,28 +1051,6 @@ static void kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
 	kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
 }
 
-/**
- * kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked() - write protect dirty pages
- * @kvm:	The KVM pointer
- * @slot:	The memory slot associated with mask
- * @gfn_offset:	The gfn offset in memory slot
- * @mask:	The mask of dirty pages at offset 'gfn_offset' in this memory
- *		slot to be write protected
- *
- * Walks bits set in mask write protects the associated pte's. Caller must
- * acquire kvm_mmu_lock.
- */
-static void kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
-		struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
-		gfn_t gfn_offset, unsigned long mask)
-{
-	phys_addr_t base_gfn = slot->base_gfn + gfn_offset;
-	phys_addr_t start = (base_gfn +  __ffs(mask)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
-	phys_addr_t end = (base_gfn + __fls(mask) + 1) << PAGE_SHIFT;
-
-	stage2_wp_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, start, end);
-}
-
 /**
  * kvm_mmu_split_memory_region() - split the stage 2 blocks into PAGE_SIZE
  *				   pages for memory slot
@@ -1099,17 +1077,27 @@ static void kvm_mmu_split_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
 }
 
 /*
- * kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked - enable dirty logging for selected
- * dirty pages.
+ * kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked() - enable dirty logging for selected pages.
+ * @kvm:	The KVM pointer
+ * @slot:	The memory slot associated with mask
+ * @gfn_offset:	The gfn offset in memory slot
+ * @mask:	The mask of pages at offset 'gfn_offset' in this memory
+ *		slot to enable dirty logging on
  *
- * It calls kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked to write protect selected pages to
- * enable dirty logging for them.
+ * Writes protect selected pages to enable dirty logging for them. Caller must
+ * acquire kvm->mmu_lock.
  */
 void kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
 		struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 		gfn_t gfn_offset, unsigned long mask)
 {
-	kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(kvm, slot, gfn_offset, mask);
+	phys_addr_t base_gfn = slot->base_gfn + gfn_offset;
+	phys_addr_t start = (base_gfn +  __ffs(mask)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
+	phys_addr_t end = (base_gfn + __fls(mask) + 1) << PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+	stage2_wp_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, start, end);
 }
 
 static void kvm_send_hwpoison_signal(unsigned long address, short lsb)
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG
  2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] KVM: arm64: Open-code kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked() Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-06 16:58 ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-09  6:29   ` Gavin Shan
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: arm64: Use local TLBI on permission relaxation Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-14  5:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Gavin Shan
  12 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol, Ricardo Koller

This is the arm64 counterpart of commit cb00a70bd4b7 ("KVM: x86/mmu:
Split huge pages mapped by the TDP MMU during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG"),
which has the benefit of splitting the cost of splitting a memslot
across multiple ioctls.

Split huge pages on the range specified using KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG.
And do not split when enabling dirty logging if
KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET is set.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index f6fb2bdaab71..da2fbd04fb01 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1084,8 +1084,8 @@ static void kvm_mmu_split_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
  * @mask:	The mask of pages at offset 'gfn_offset' in this memory
  *		slot to enable dirty logging on
  *
- * Writes protect selected pages to enable dirty logging for them. Caller must
- * acquire kvm->mmu_lock.
+ * Splits selected pages to PAGE_SIZE and then writes protect them to enable
+ * dirty logging for them. Caller must acquire kvm->mmu_lock.
  */
 void kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
 		struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
@@ -1098,6 +1098,13 @@ void kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
 	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
 	stage2_wp_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, start, end);
+
+	/*
+	 * If initially-all-set mode is not set, then huge-pages were already
+	 * split when enabling dirty logging: no need to do it again.
+	 */
+	if (kvm_dirty_log_manual_protect_and_init_set(kvm))
+		kvm_mmu_split_huge_pages(kvm, start, end);
 }
 
 static void kvm_send_hwpoison_signal(unsigned long address, short lsb)
@@ -1884,7 +1891,9 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
 		 * this when deleting, moving, disabling dirty logging, or
 		 * creating the memslot (a nop). Doing it for deletes makes
 		 * sure we don't leak memory, and there's no need to keep the
-		 * cache around for any of the other cases.
+		 * cache around for any of the other cases. Keeping the cache
+		 * is useful for succesive KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG calls, which is
+		 * not handled in this function.
 		 */
 		kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache);
 	}
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: arm64: Use local TLBI on permission relaxation
  2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-06 16:58 ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-14  5:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Gavin Shan
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-06 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol, Ricardo Koller

From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

Broadcasted TLB invalidations (TLBI) are usually less performant than their
local variant. In particular, we observed some implementations that take
millliseconds to complete parallel broadcasted TLBIs.

It's safe to use local, non-shareable, TLBIs when relaxing permissions on a
PTE in the KVM case for a couple of reasons. First, according to the ARM
Arm (DDI 0487H.a D5-4913), permission relaxation does not need
break-before-make.  Second, KVM does not set the VTTBR_EL2.CnP bit, so each
PE has its own TLB entry for the same page. KVM could tolerate that when
doing permission relaxation (i.e., not having changes broadcasted to all
PEs).

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h   |  4 +++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 10 ++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c      | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c       |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c       | 32 ++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
index 43c3bc0f9544..bb17b2ead4c7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ enum __kvm_host_smccc_func {
 	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_vcpu_run,
 	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_flush_vm_context,
 	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa,
+	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh,
 	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid,
 	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_flush_cpu_context,
 	__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_timer_set_cntvoff,
@@ -225,6 +226,9 @@ extern void __kvm_flush_vm_context(void);
 extern void __kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
 extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t ipa,
 				     int level);
+extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
+					 phys_addr_t ipa,
+					 int level);
 extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
 
 extern void __kvm_timer_set_cntvoff(u64 cntvoff);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
index 728e01d4536b..c6bf1e49ca93 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
@@ -125,6 +125,15 @@ static void handle___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
 	__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(kern_hyp_va(mmu), ipa, level);
 }
 
+static void handle___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
+{
+	DECLARE_REG(struct kvm_s2_mmu *, mmu, host_ctxt, 1);
+	DECLARE_REG(phys_addr_t, ipa, host_ctxt, 2);
+	DECLARE_REG(int, level, host_ctxt, 3);
+
+	__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh(kern_hyp_va(mmu), ipa, level);
+}
+
 static void handle___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
 {
 	DECLARE_REG(struct kvm_s2_mmu *, mmu, host_ctxt, 1);
@@ -315,6 +324,7 @@ static const hcall_t host_hcall[] = {
 	HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_vcpu_run),
 	HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_flush_vm_context),
 	HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa),
+	HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh),
 	HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid),
 	HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_flush_cpu_context),
 	HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_timer_set_cntvoff),
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
index d296d617f589..ef2b70587f93 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
@@ -109,6 +109,60 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
 }
 
+void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
+				  phys_addr_t ipa, int level)
+{
+	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
+
+	dsb(nshst);
+
+	/* Switch to requested VMID */
+	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
+
+	/*
+	 * We could do so much better if we had the VA as well.
+	 * Instead, we invalidate Stage-2 for this IPA, and the
+	 * whole of Stage-1. Weep...
+	 */
+	ipa >>= 12;
+	__tlbi_level(ipas2e1, ipa, level);
+
+	/*
+	 * We have to ensure completion of the invalidation at Stage-2,
+	 * since a table walk on another CPU could refill a TLB with a
+	 * complete (S1 + S2) walk based on the old Stage-2 mapping if
+	 * the Stage-1 invalidation happened first.
+	 */
+	dsb(nsh);
+	__tlbi(vmalle1);
+	dsb(nsh);
+	isb();
+
+	/*
+	 * If the host is running at EL1 and we have a VPIPT I-cache,
+	 * then we must perform I-cache maintenance at EL2 in order for
+	 * it to have an effect on the guest. Since the guest cannot hit
+	 * I-cache lines allocated with a different VMID, we don't need
+	 * to worry about junk out of guest reset (we nuke the I-cache on
+	 * VMID rollover), but we do need to be careful when remapping
+	 * executable pages for the same guest. This can happen when KSM
+	 * takes a CoW fault on an executable page, copies the page into
+	 * a page that was previously mapped in the guest and then needs
+	 * to invalidate the guest view of the I-cache for that page
+	 * from EL1. To solve this, we invalidate the entire I-cache when
+	 * unmapping a page from a guest if we have a VPIPT I-cache but
+	 * the host is running at EL1. As above, we could do better if
+	 * we had the VA.
+	 *
+	 * The moral of this story is: if you have a VPIPT I-cache, then
+	 * you should be running with VHE enabled.
+	 */
+	if (icache_is_vpipt())
+		icache_inval_all_pou();
+
+	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
+}
+
 void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
 {
 	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
index ae80845c8db7..b154404547d1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
@@ -1148,7 +1148,7 @@ int kvm_pgtable_stage2_relax_perms(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr,
 	ret = stage2_update_leaf_attrs(pgt, addr, 1, set, clr, NULL, &level,
 				       KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SHARED);
 	if (!ret)
-		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa, pgt->mmu, addr, level);
+		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh, pgt->mmu, addr, level);
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
index 24cef9b87f9e..e69da550cdc5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
@@ -111,6 +111,38 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
 }
 
+void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
+				  phys_addr_t ipa, int level)
+{
+	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
+
+	dsb(nshst);
+
+	/* Switch to requested VMID */
+	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
+
+	/*
+	 * We could do so much better if we had the VA as well.
+	 * Instead, we invalidate Stage-2 for this IPA, and the
+	 * whole of Stage-1. Weep...
+	 */
+	ipa >>= 12;
+	__tlbi_level(ipas2e1, ipa, level);
+
+	/*
+	 * We have to ensure completion of the invalidation at Stage-2,
+	 * since a table walk on another CPU could refill a TLB with a
+	 * complete (S1 + S2) walk based on the old Stage-2 mapping if
+	 * the Stage-1 invalidation happened first.
+	 */
+	dsb(nsh);
+	__tlbi(vmalle1);
+	dsb(nsh);
+	isb();
+
+	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
+}
+
 void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
 {
 	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
-- 
2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: arm64: Add helper for creating unlinked stage2 subtrees
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: arm64: Add helper for creating unlinked stage2 subtrees Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-07 14:51   ` Ricardo Koller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-07 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, gshan, reijiw,
	rananta, bgardon, ricarkol

On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 8:58 AM Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com> wrote:
>
> Add a stage2 helper, kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(), for creating
> unlinked tables (the opposite of kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked()).
> Creating an unlinked table is useful for splitting block PTEs into
> subtrees of 4K PTEs.  For example, a 1G block PTE can be split into 4K
> PTEs by first creating a fully populated tree, and then use it to
> replace the 1G PTE in a single step.  This will be used in a
> subsequent commit for eager huge-page splitting (a dirty-logging
> optimization).
>
> No functional change intended. This new function will be used in a
> subsequent commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c         | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> index 7c45082e6c23..e94c92988745 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> @@ -460,6 +460,35 @@ void kvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt);
>   */
>  void kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops, void *pgtable, u32 level);
>
> +/**
> + * kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked() - Create an unlinked stage-2 paging structure.
> + * @pgt:       Page-table structure initialised by kvm_pgtable_stage2_init*().
> + * @new:       Unlinked stage-2 paging structure to be created.
> + * @phys:      Physical address of the memory to map.
> + * @level:     Level of the stage-2 paging structure to be created.
> + * @prot:      Permissions and attributes for the mapping.
> + * @mc:                Cache of pre-allocated and zeroed memory from which to allocate
> + *             page-table pages.
> + * @force_pte:  Force mappings to PAGE_SIZE granularity.
> + *
> + * Create an unlinked page-table tree under @new. If @force_pte is
> + * true and @level is the PMD level, then the tree is mapped up to the

typo: this should be: "if @force_pte is true OR @level is the PMD, then
                       the tree is mapped up to the PAGE_SIZE leaf PTE"

> + * PAGE_SIZE leaf PTE; the tree is mapped up one level otherwise. This
> + * new page-table tree is not reachable (i.e., it is removed) from the
> + * root pgd and it's therefore unreachableby the hardware page-table
> + * walker. No TLB invalidation or CMOs are performed.
> + *
> + * If device attributes are not explicitly requested in @prot, then the
> + * mapping will be normal, cacheable.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 only if a fully populated tree was created (all memory
> + * under @level is mapped), negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +int kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt,
> +                                      kvm_pte_t *new, u64 phys, u32 level,
> +                                      enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot, void *mc,
> +                                      bool force_pte);
> +
>  /**
>   * kvm_pgtable_stage2_map() - Install a mapping in a guest stage-2 page-table.
>   * @pgt:       Page-table structure initialised by kvm_pgtable_stage2_init*().
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index 0a5ef9288371..fed314f2b320 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -1181,6 +1181,53 @@ int kvm_pgtable_stage2_flush(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size)
>         return kvm_pgtable_walk(pgt, addr, size, &walker);
>  }
>
> +int kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt,
> +                                     kvm_pte_t *new, u64 phys, u32 level,
> +                                     enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot, void *mc,
> +                                     bool force_pte)
> +{
> +       struct stage2_map_data map_data = {
> +               .phys           = phys,
> +               .mmu            = pgt->mmu,
> +               .memcache       = mc,
> +               .force_pte      = force_pte,
> +       };
> +       struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> +               .cb             = stage2_map_walker,
> +               .flags          = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF |
> +                                 KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_BBM |
> +                                 KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SKIP_CMO,
> +               .arg            = &map_data,
> +       };
> +       /* .addr (the IPA) is irrelevant for a removed table */
> +       struct kvm_pgtable_walk_data data = {
> +               .walker = &walker,
> +               .addr   = 0,
> +               .end    = kvm_granule_size(level),
> +       };
> +       struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops = pgt->mm_ops;
> +       kvm_pte_t *pgtable;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = stage2_set_prot_attr(pgt, prot, &map_data.attr);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       pgtable = mm_ops->zalloc_page(mc);
> +       if (!pgtable)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       ret = __kvm_pgtable_walk(&data, mm_ops, (kvm_pteref_t)pgtable,
> +                                level + 1);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(mm_ops, pgtable, level);
> +               mm_ops->put_page(pgtable);
> +               return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       *new = kvm_init_table_pte(pgtable, mm_ops);
> +       return 0;
> +}
>
>  int __kvm_pgtable_stage2_init(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
>                               struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops,
> --
> 2.39.1.519.gcb327c4b5f-goog
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-08 11:05   ` Gavin Shan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Shan @ 2023-02-08 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ricardo Koller, pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta,
	bgardon, ricarkol, Oliver Upton

Hi Ricardo,

On 2/7/23 3:58 AM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Add a capability for userspace to specify the eager split chunk size.
> The chunk size specifies how many pages to break at a time, using a
> single allocation. Bigger the chunk size, more pages need to be
> allocated ahead of time.
> 
> Suggested-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst    | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c              |  3 +++
>   include/uapi/linux/kvm.h          |  1 +
>   5 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index 9807b05a1b57..a9332e331cce 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -8284,6 +8284,32 @@ structure.
>   When getting the Modified Change Topology Report value, the attr->addr
>   must point to a byte where the value will be stored or retrieved from.
>   
> +8.40 KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE
> +---------------------------------------
> +
> +:Capability: KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE
> +:Architectures: arm64
> +:Type: vm
> +:Parameters: arg[0] is the new chunk size.
> +:Returns: 0 on success, -EINVAL if any memslot has been created.
> +
> +This capability sets the chunk size used in Eager Page Splitting.
> +
> +Eager Page Splitting improves the performance of dirty-logging (used
> +in live migrations) when guest memory is backed by huge-pages.  This
> +optimization is enabled by default on arm64. It avoids splitting
> +huge-pages (into PAGE_SIZE pages) on fault, by doing it eagerly when
> +enabling dirty logging (with the KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES flag for a
> +memory region), or when using KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG.
> +
> +The chunk size specifies how many pages to break at a time, using a
> +single allocation for each chunk. Bigger the chunk size, more pages
> +need to be allocated ahead of time. A good heuristic is to pick the
> +size of the huge-pages as the chunk size.
> +
> +If the chunk size (arg[0]) is zero, then no eager page splitting is
> +performed. The default value PMD size (e.g., 2M when PAGE_SIZE is 4K).
> +
>   9. Known KVM API problems
>   =========================
>   
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 35a159d131b5..a69a815719cf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ struct kvm_s2_mmu {
>   	/* The last vcpu id that ran on each physical CPU */
>   	int __percpu *last_vcpu_ran;
>   
> +#define KVM_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE_DEFAULT	PMD_SIZE
> +
>   	struct kvm_arch *arch;
>   };
>   
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 9c5573bc4614..c80617ced599 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,22 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
>   		r = 0;
>   		set_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_SYSTEM_SUSPEND_ENABLED, &kvm->arch.flags);
>   		break;
> +	case KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE:
> +		mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
> +		mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> +		/*
> +		 * To keep things simple, allow changing the chunk
> +		 * size only if there are no memslots created.
> +		 */
> +		if (!kvm_are_all_memslots_empty(kvm)) {
> +			r = -EINVAL;
> +		} else {
> +			r = 0;
> +			kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_chunk_size = cap->args[0];
> +		}
> +		mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> +		mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> +		break;
>   	default:
>   		r = -EINVAL;
>   		break;
> @@ -298,6 +314,12 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>   	case KVM_CAP_ARM_PTRAUTH_GENERIC:
>   		r = system_has_full_ptr_auth();
>   		break;
> +	case KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE:
> +		if (kvm)
> +			r = kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_chunk_size;
> +		else
> +			r = KVM_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE_DEFAULT;
> +		break;
>   	default:
>   		r = 0;
>   	}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 812633a75e74..e2ada6588017 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -755,6 +755,9 @@ int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long t
>   	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
>   		*per_cpu_ptr(mmu->last_vcpu_ran, cpu) = -1;
>   
> +	mmu->split_page_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;
> +	mmu->split_page_chunk_size = KVM_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE_DEFAULT;
> +
>   	mmu->pgt = pgt;
>   	mmu->pgd_phys = __pa(pgt->pgd);
>   	return 0;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 55155e262646..02e05f7918e2 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
>   #define KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL 223
>   #define KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED_ASYNC_DISABLE 224
>   #define KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_WITH_BITMAP 225
> +#define KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE 226
>   
>   #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>   
> 

mmu->split_page_cache and mmu->split_page_chunk_size are defined in PATCH[09/12].
I think you need move the definitions to PATCH[08/12] instead. Otherwise, git-bisect
is broken.

Thanks,
Gavin


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split()
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-09  5:58   ` Gavin Shan
  2023-02-09 12:40     ` Ricardo Koller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Shan @ 2023-02-09  5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ricardo Koller, pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta,
	bgardon, ricarkol

Hi Ricardo,

On 2/7/23 3:58 AM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Add a new stage2 function, kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(), for splitting a
> range of huge pages. This will be used for eager-splitting huge pages
> into PAGE_SIZE pages. The goal is to avoid having to split huge pages
> on write-protection faults, and instead use this function to do it
> ahead of time for large ranges (e.g., all guest memory in 1G chunks at
> a time).
> 
> No functional change intended. This new function will be used in a
> subsequent commit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h |  30 ++++++++
>   arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c         | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 135 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> index e94c92988745..871c4eeb0184 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> @@ -658,6 +658,36 @@ bool kvm_pgtable_stage2_is_young(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr);
>    */
>   int kvm_pgtable_stage2_flush(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size);
>   
> +/**
> + * kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() - Split a range of huge pages into leaf PTEs pointing
> + *				to PAGE_SIZE guest pages.
> + * @pgt:	 Page-table structure initialised by kvm_pgtable_stage2_init().
> + * @addr:	 Intermediate physical address from which to split.
> + * @size:	 Size of the range.
> + * @mc:		 Cache of pre-allocated and zeroed memory from which to allocate
> + *		 page-table pages.
> + * @mc_capacity: Number of pages in @mc.
> + *
> + * @addr and the end (@addr + @size) are effectively aligned down and up to
> + * the top level huge-page block size. This is an example using 1GB
> + * huge-pages and 4KB granules.
> + *
> + *                          [---input range---]
> + *                          :                 :
> + * [--1G block pte--][--1G block pte--][--1G block pte--][--1G block pte--]
> + *                          :                 :
> + *                   [--2MB--][--2MB--][--2MB--][--2MB--]
> + *                          :                 :
> + *                   [ ][ ][:][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][:][ ][ ][ ]
> + *                          :                 :
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure. Note that
> + * kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() is best effort: it tries to break as many
> + * blocks in the input range as allowed by @mc_capacity.
> + */
> +int kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
> +			     void *mc, u64 mc_capacity);
> +
>   /**
>    * kvm_pgtable_walk() - Walk a page-table.
>    * @pgt:	Page-table structure initialised by kvm_pgtable_*_init().
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index fed314f2b320..ae80845c8db7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -1229,6 +1229,111 @@ int kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +struct stage2_split_data {
> +	struct kvm_s2_mmu		*mmu;
> +	void				*memcache;
> +	u64				mc_capacity;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Get the number of page-tables needed to replace a bock with a fully
> + * populated tree, up to the PTE level, at particular level.
> + */
> +static inline u32 stage2_block_get_nr_page_tables(u32 level)
> +{
> +	switch (level) {
> +	/* There are no blocks at level 0 */
> +	case 1: return 1 + PTRS_PER_PTE;
> +	case 2: return 1;
> +	case 3: return 0;
> +	default:
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +		return ~0;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int stage2_split_walker(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
> +			       enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags visit)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops = ctx->mm_ops;
> +	struct stage2_split_data *data = ctx->arg;
> +	kvm_pte_t pte = ctx->old, new, *childp;
> +	enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
> +	void *mc = data->memcache;
> +	u32 level = ctx->level;
> +	u64 phys, nr_pages;
> +	bool force_pte;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* No huge-pages exist at the last level */
> +	if (level == KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* We only split valid block mappings */
> +	if (!kvm_pte_valid(pte) || kvm_pte_table(pte, ctx->level))
> +		return 0;
> +

Since stage2_split_walker() has been specified as a leaf walker by KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
I don't understand how kvm_pte_table() can return true.

> +	nr_pages = stage2_block_get_nr_page_tables(level);
> +	if (data->mc_capacity >= nr_pages) {
> +		/* Build a tree mapped down to the PTE granularity. */
> +		force_pte = true;
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * Don't force PTEs. This requires a single page of PMDs at the
> +		 * PUD level, or a single page of PTEs at the PMD level. If we
> +		 * are at the PUD level, the PTEs will be created recursively.
> +		 */
> +		force_pte = false;
> +		nr_pages = 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (data->mc_capacity < nr_pages)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	phys = kvm_pte_to_phys(pte);
> +	prot = kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(pte);
> +
> +	ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(data->mmu->pgt, &new, phys,
> +						 level, prot, mc, force_pte);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (!stage2_try_break_pte(ctx, data->mmu)) {
> +		childp = kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops);
> +		kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(mm_ops, childp, level);
> +		mm_ops->put_page(childp);
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Note, the contents of the page table are guaranteed to be made
> +	 * visible before the new PTE is assigned because stage2_make_pte()
> +	 * writes the PTE using smp_store_release().
> +	 */
> +	stage2_make_pte(ctx, new);
> +	dsb(ishst);
> +	data->mc_capacity -= nr_pages;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

I think it's possible 'data->mc_capability' to be replaced by 'mc->nobjs'
because they're same thing. With this, we needn't to maintain a duplicate
'data->mc_capability' since 'data->mc' has been existing.

> +int kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
> +			     void *mc, u64 mc_capacity)
> +{
> +	struct stage2_split_data split_data = {
> +		.mmu		= pgt->mmu,
> +		.memcache	= mc,
> +		.mc_capacity	= mc_capacity,
> +	};
> +
> +	struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> +		.cb	= stage2_split_walker,
> +		.flags	= KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> +		.arg	= &split_data,
> +	};
> +
> +	return kvm_pgtable_walk(pgt, addr, size, &walker);
> +}
> +
>   int __kvm_pgtable_stage2_init(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
>   			      struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops,
>   			      enum kvm_pgtable_stage2_flags flags,
> 

Thanks,
Gavin


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region()
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-09  6:02   ` Gavin Shan
  2023-02-15 17:47     ` Ricardo Koller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Shan @ 2023-02-09  6:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ricardo Koller, pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta,
	bgardon, ricarkol

Hi Ricardo,

On 2/7/23 3:58 AM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() as a preparation for a future
> commit to look cleaner and more understandable. Also, it looks more
> like its x86 counterpart (in kvm_mmu_slot_apply_flags()).
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 9bd3c2cfb476..d2c5e6992459 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1761,20 +1761,27 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>   				   const struct kvm_memory_slot *new,
>   				   enum kvm_mr_change change)
>   {
> +	bool log_dirty_pages = new && new->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * At this point memslot has been committed and there is an
>   	 * allocated dirty_bitmap[], dirty pages will be tracked while the
>   	 * memory slot is write protected.
>   	 */
> -	if (change != KVM_MR_DELETE && new->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) {
> +	if (log_dirty_pages) {
> +
> +		if (change == KVM_MR_DELETE)
> +			return;
> +

When @change is KVM_MR_DELETE, @new should be NULL. It means this check
isn't needed?

>   		/*
>   		 * If we're with initial-all-set, we don't need to write
>   		 * protect any pages because they're all reported as dirty.
>   		 * Huge pages and normal pages will be write protect gradually.
>   		 */
> -		if (!kvm_dirty_log_manual_protect_and_init_set(kvm)) {
> -			kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(kvm, new->id);
> -		}
> +		if (kvm_dirty_log_manual_protect_and_init_set(kvm))
> +			return;
> +
> +		kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(kvm, new->id);
>   	}
>   }
>   

Thanks,
Gavin




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-09  6:26   ` Gavin Shan
  2023-02-09 12:50     ` Ricardo Koller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Shan @ 2023-02-09  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ricardo Koller, pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta,
	bgardon, ricarkol

Hi Ricardo,

On 2/7/23 3:58 AM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Split huge pages eagerly when enabling dirty logging. The goal is to
> avoid doing it while faulting on write-protected pages, which
> negatively impacts guest performance.
> 
> A memslot marked for dirty logging is split in 1GB pieces at a time.
> This is in order to release the mmu_lock and give other kernel threads
> the opportunity to run, and also in order to allocate enough pages to
> split a 1GB range worth of huge pages (or a single 1GB huge page).
> Note that these page allocations can fail, so eager page splitting is
> best-effort.  This is not a correctness issue though, as huge pages
> can still be split on write-faults.
> 
> The benefits of eager page splitting are the same as in x86, added
> with commit a3fe5dbda0a4 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Split huge pages mapped by
> the TDP MMU when dirty logging is enabled"). For example, when running
> dirty_log_perf_test with 64 virtual CPUs (Ampere Altra), 1GB per vCPU,
> 50% reads, and 2MB HugeTLB memory, the time it takes vCPUs to access
> all of their memory after dirty logging is enabled decreased by 44%
> from 2.58s to 1.42s.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  16 +++++
>   arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c              | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index a69a815719cf..eab62d8b3ad4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -154,6 +154,22 @@ struct kvm_s2_mmu {
>   	int __percpu *last_vcpu_ran;
>   
>   #define KVM_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE_DEFAULT	PMD_SIZE
> +	/*
> +	 * Memory cache used to split
> +	 * KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE worth of huge pages. It
> +	 * is used to allocate stage2 page tables while splitting huge
> +	 * pages. Note that the choice of EAGER_PAGE_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE
> +	 * influences both the capacity of the split page cache, and
> +	 * how often KVM reschedules. Be wary of raising CHUNK_SIZE
> +	 * too high.
> +	 *
> +	 * A good heuristic to pick CHUNK_SIZE is that it should be
> +	 * the size of huge-page to be split.
> +	 *
> +	 * Protected by kvm->slots_lock.
> +	 */
> +	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache split_page_cache;
> +	uint64_t split_page_chunk_size;
>   
>   	struct kvm_arch *arch;
>   };
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index e2ada6588017..73f8b3953f6a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -31,14 +31,21 @@ static phys_addr_t hyp_idmap_vector;
>   
>   static unsigned long io_map_base;
>   
> -static phys_addr_t stage2_range_addr_end(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end)
> +static phys_addr_t __stage2_range_addr_end(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end,
> +					   phys_addr_t size)
>   {
> -	phys_addr_t size = kvm_granule_size(KVM_PGTABLE_MIN_BLOCK_LEVEL);
>   	phys_addr_t boundary = ALIGN_DOWN(addr + size, size);
>   
>   	return (boundary - 1 < end - 1) ? boundary : end;
>   }
>   
> +static phys_addr_t stage2_range_addr_end(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end)
> +{
> +	phys_addr_t size = kvm_granule_size(KVM_PGTABLE_MIN_BLOCK_LEVEL);
> +
> +	return __stage2_range_addr_end(addr, end, size);
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * Release kvm_mmu_lock periodically if the memory region is large. Otherwise,
>    * we may see kernel panics with CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK,
> @@ -71,6 +78,72 @@ static int stage2_apply_range(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t addr,
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> +static bool need_topup_split_page_cache_or_resched(struct kvm *kvm, uint64_t min)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache;
> +
> +	if (need_resched() || rwlock_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	cache = &kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache;
> +	return kvm_mmu_memory_cache_nr_free_objects(cache) < min;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_mmu_split_nr_page_tables(u64 range)
> +{
> +	int n = 0;
> +
> +	if (KVM_PGTABLE_MIN_BLOCK_LEVEL < 2)
> +		n += DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(range, PUD_SIZE);
> +	n += DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(range, PMD_SIZE);
> +	return n;
> +}
> +

I think it needs comments to explain how the number of page tables are calculated,
similar to what have been done for stage2_block_get_nr_page_tables() in pgtable.c

> +static int kvm_mmu_split_huge_pages(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t addr,
> +				    phys_addr_t end)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache;
> +	struct kvm_pgtable *pgt;
> +	int ret;
> +	u64 next;
> +	u64 chunk_size = kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_chunk_size;
> +	int cache_capacity = kvm_mmu_split_nr_page_tables(chunk_size);
> +
> +	if (chunk_size == 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
> +	cache = &kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache;
> +
> +	do {
> +		if (need_topup_split_page_cache_or_resched(kvm,
> +							   cache_capacity)) {
> +			write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +			cond_resched();
> +			/* Eager page splitting is best-effort. */
> +			ret = __kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(cache,
> +							   cache_capacity,
> +							   cache_capacity);
> +			write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +			if (ret)
> +				break;
> +		}
> +
> +		pgt = kvm->arch.mmu.pgt;
> +		if (!pgt)
> +			return -EINVAL;

I don't think the check to see @pgt is existing or not because the VM can't be
created with its page-table isn't allocated and set in kvm_init_stage2_mmu().

> +
> +		next = __stage2_range_addr_end(addr, end, chunk_size);
> +		ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(pgt, addr, next - addr,
> +					       cache, cache_capacity);
> +		if (ret)
> +			break;
> +	} while (addr = next, addr != end);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   #define stage2_apply_range_resched(kvm, addr, end, fn)			\
>   	stage2_apply_range(kvm, addr, end, fn, true)
>   

I'm wandering if stage2_apply_range() can be reused to avoid invent another similar
function. the gap are the granularity and conditions to reschedule.

> @@ -772,6 +845,7 @@ int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long t
>   void kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
>   {
>   	kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&kvm->arch.mmu);
> +	kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache);
>   }
>   
>   static void stage2_unmap_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
> @@ -999,6 +1073,31 @@ static void kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
>   	stage2_wp_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, start, end);
>   }
>   
> +/**
> + * kvm_mmu_split_memory_region() - split the stage 2 blocks into PAGE_SIZE
> + *				   pages for memory slot
> + * @kvm:	The KVM pointer
> + * @slot:	The memory slot to split
> + *
> + * Acquires kvm->mmu_lock. Called with kvm->slots_lock mutex acquired,
> + * serializing operations for VM memory regions.
> + */
> +static void kvm_mmu_split_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_memslots *slots = kvm_memslots(kvm);
> +	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot = id_to_memslot(slots, slot);
> +	phys_addr_t start, end;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
> +
> +	start = memslot->base_gfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	end = (memslot->base_gfn + memslot->npages) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> +	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +	kvm_mmu_split_huge_pages(kvm, start, end);
> +	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked - enable dirty logging for selected
>    * dirty pages.
> @@ -1790,6 +1889,16 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>   			return;
>   
>   		kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(kvm, new->id);
> +		kvm_mmu_split_memory_region(kvm, new->id);
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * Free any leftovers from the eager page splitting cache. Do
> +		 * this when deleting, moving, disabling dirty logging, or
> +		 * creating the memslot (a nop). Doing it for deletes makes
> +		 * sure we don't leak memory, and there's no need to keep the
> +		 * cache around for any of the other cases.
> +		 */
> +		kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache);
>   	}
>   }
>   
> 

Thanks,
Gavin


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-09  6:29   ` Gavin Shan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Shan @ 2023-02-09  6:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ricardo Koller, pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta,
	bgardon, ricarkol

Hi Ricardo,

On 2/7/23 3:58 AM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> This is the arm64 counterpart of commit cb00a70bd4b7 ("KVM: x86/mmu:
> Split huge pages mapped by the TDP MMU during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG"),
> which has the benefit of splitting the cost of splitting a memslot
> across multiple ioctls.
> 
> Split huge pages on the range specified using KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG.
> And do not split when enabling dirty logging if
> KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET is set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index f6fb2bdaab71..da2fbd04fb01 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1084,8 +1084,8 @@ static void kvm_mmu_split_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
>    * @mask:	The mask of pages at offset 'gfn_offset' in this memory
>    *		slot to enable dirty logging on
>    *
> - * Writes protect selected pages to enable dirty logging for them. Caller must
> - * acquire kvm->mmu_lock.
> + * Splits selected pages to PAGE_SIZE and then writes protect them to enable
> + * dirty logging for them. Caller must acquire kvm->mmu_lock.
>    */
>   void kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
>   		struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> @@ -1098,6 +1098,13 @@ void kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
>   	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>   
>   	stage2_wp_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, start, end);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If initially-all-set mode is not set, then huge-pages were already
> +	 * split when enabling dirty logging: no need to do it again.
> +	 */
> +	if (kvm_dirty_log_manual_protect_and_init_set(kvm))
> +		kvm_mmu_split_huge_pages(kvm, start, end);
>   }
>   
>   static void kvm_send_hwpoison_signal(unsigned long address, short lsb)
> @@ -1884,7 +1891,9 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>   		 * this when deleting, moving, disabling dirty logging, or
>   		 * creating the memslot (a nop). Doing it for deletes makes
>   		 * sure we don't leak memory, and there's no need to keep the
> -		 * cache around for any of the other cases.
> +		 * cache around for any of the other cases. Keeping the cache
> +		 * is useful for succesive KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG calls, which is
> +		 * not handled in this function.
>   		 */
>   		kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache);
>   	}
> 

s/succesive/successive

Thanks,
Gavin


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split()
  2023-02-09  5:58   ` Gavin Shan
@ 2023-02-09 12:40     ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-09 16:17       ` Ricardo Koller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-09 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gavin Shan
  Cc: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack, kvm, kvmarm, qperret,
	catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc, alexandru.elisei,
	suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta, bgardon, ricarkol

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:58 PM Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On 2/7/23 3:58 AM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> > Add a new stage2 function, kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(), for splitting a
> > range of huge pages. This will be used for eager-splitting huge pages
> > into PAGE_SIZE pages. The goal is to avoid having to split huge pages
> > on write-protection faults, and instead use this function to do it
> > ahead of time for large ranges (e.g., all guest memory in 1G chunks at
> > a time).
> >
> > No functional change intended. This new function will be used in a
> > subsequent commit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h |  30 ++++++++
> >   arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c         | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   2 files changed, 135 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> > index e94c92988745..871c4eeb0184 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> > @@ -658,6 +658,36 @@ bool kvm_pgtable_stage2_is_young(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr);
> >    */
> >   int kvm_pgtable_stage2_flush(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() - Split a range of huge pages into leaf PTEs pointing
> > + *                           to PAGE_SIZE guest pages.
> > + * @pgt:      Page-table structure initialised by kvm_pgtable_stage2_init().
> > + * @addr:     Intermediate physical address from which to split.
> > + * @size:     Size of the range.
> > + * @mc:               Cache of pre-allocated and zeroed memory from which to allocate
> > + *            page-table pages.
> > + * @mc_capacity: Number of pages in @mc.
> > + *
> > + * @addr and the end (@addr + @size) are effectively aligned down and up to
> > + * the top level huge-page block size. This is an example using 1GB
> > + * huge-pages and 4KB granules.
> > + *
> > + *                          [---input range---]
> > + *                          :                 :
> > + * [--1G block pte--][--1G block pte--][--1G block pte--][--1G block pte--]
> > + *                          :                 :
> > + *                   [--2MB--][--2MB--][--2MB--][--2MB--]
> > + *                          :                 :
> > + *                   [ ][ ][:][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][:][ ][ ][ ]
> > + *                          :                 :
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure. Note that
> > + * kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() is best effort: it tries to break as many
> > + * blocks in the input range as allowed by @mc_capacity.
> > + */
> > +int kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
> > +                          void *mc, u64 mc_capacity);
> > +
> >   /**
> >    * kvm_pgtable_walk() - Walk a page-table.
> >    * @pgt:    Page-table structure initialised by kvm_pgtable_*_init().
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > index fed314f2b320..ae80845c8db7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > @@ -1229,6 +1229,111 @@ int kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt,
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> >
> > +struct stage2_split_data {
> > +     struct kvm_s2_mmu               *mmu;
> > +     void                            *memcache;
> > +     u64                             mc_capacity;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Get the number of page-tables needed to replace a bock with a fully
> > + * populated tree, up to the PTE level, at particular level.
> > + */
> > +static inline u32 stage2_block_get_nr_page_tables(u32 level)
> > +{
> > +     switch (level) {
> > +     /* There are no blocks at level 0 */
> > +     case 1: return 1 + PTRS_PER_PTE;
> > +     case 2: return 1;
> > +     case 3: return 0;
> > +     default:
> > +             WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> > +             return ~0;
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int stage2_split_walker(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
> > +                            enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags visit)
> > +{
> > +     struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops = ctx->mm_ops;
> > +     struct stage2_split_data *data = ctx->arg;
> > +     kvm_pte_t pte = ctx->old, new, *childp;
> > +     enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
> > +     void *mc = data->memcache;
> > +     u32 level = ctx->level;
> > +     u64 phys, nr_pages;
> > +     bool force_pte;
> > +     int ret;
> > +
> > +     /* No huge-pages exist at the last level */
> > +     if (level == KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1)
> > +             return 0;
> > +
> > +     /* We only split valid block mappings */
> > +     if (!kvm_pte_valid(pte) || kvm_pte_table(pte, ctx->level))
> > +             return 0;
> > +
>
> Since stage2_split_walker() has been specified as a leaf walker by KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> I don't understand how kvm_pte_table() can return true.

Good point. Will remove it. This check made sense for a previous
version (the RFC),
but not anymore.

>
> > +     nr_pages = stage2_block_get_nr_page_tables(level);
> > +     if (data->mc_capacity >= nr_pages) {
> > +             /* Build a tree mapped down to the PTE granularity. */
> > +             force_pte = true;
> > +     } else {
> > +             /*
> > +              * Don't force PTEs. This requires a single page of PMDs at the
> > +              * PUD level, or a single page of PTEs at the PMD level. If we
> > +              * are at the PUD level, the PTEs will be created recursively.
> > +              */
> > +             force_pte = false;
> > +             nr_pages = 1;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (data->mc_capacity < nr_pages)
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +     phys = kvm_pte_to_phys(pte);
> > +     prot = kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(pte);
> > +
> > +     ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(data->mmu->pgt, &new, phys,
> > +                                              level, prot, mc, force_pte);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             return ret;
> > +
> > +     if (!stage2_try_break_pte(ctx, data->mmu)) {
> > +             childp = kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops);
> > +             kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(mm_ops, childp, level);
> > +             mm_ops->put_page(childp);
> > +             return -EAGAIN;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Note, the contents of the page table are guaranteed to be made
> > +      * visible before the new PTE is assigned because stage2_make_pte()
> > +      * writes the PTE using smp_store_release().
> > +      */
> > +     stage2_make_pte(ctx, new);
> > +     dsb(ishst);
> > +     data->mc_capacity -= nr_pages;
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> I think it's possible 'data->mc_capability' to be replaced by 'mc->nobjs'
> because they're same thing. With this, we needn't to maintain a duplicate
> 'data->mc_capability' since 'data->mc' has been existing.

Ah, nice, yes. That would be simpler.

Thanks!
Ricardo

>
> > +int kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
> > +                          void *mc, u64 mc_capacity)
> > +{
> > +     struct stage2_split_data split_data = {
> > +             .mmu            = pgt->mmu,
> > +             .memcache       = mc,
> > +             .mc_capacity    = mc_capacity,
> > +     };
> > +
> > +     struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> > +             .cb     = stage2_split_walker,
> > +             .flags  = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> > +             .arg    = &split_data,
> > +     };
> > +
> > +     return kvm_pgtable_walk(pgt, addr, size, &walker);
> > +}
> > +
> >   int __kvm_pgtable_stage2_init(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
> >                             struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops,
> >                             enum kvm_pgtable_stage2_flags flags,
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled
  2023-02-09  6:26   ` Gavin Shan
@ 2023-02-09 12:50     ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-09 23:09       ` Gavin Shan
  2023-02-15 16:25       ` Ricardo Koller
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-09 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gavin Shan
  Cc: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack, kvm, kvmarm, qperret,
	catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc, alexandru.elisei,
	suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta, bgardon, ricarkol

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 10:26 PM Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On 2/7/23 3:58 AM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> > Split huge pages eagerly when enabling dirty logging. The goal is to
> > avoid doing it while faulting on write-protected pages, which
> > negatively impacts guest performance.
> >
> > A memslot marked for dirty logging is split in 1GB pieces at a time.
> > This is in order to release the mmu_lock and give other kernel threads
> > the opportunity to run, and also in order to allocate enough pages to
> > split a 1GB range worth of huge pages (or a single 1GB huge page).
> > Note that these page allocations can fail, so eager page splitting is
> > best-effort.  This is not a correctness issue though, as huge pages
> > can still be split on write-faults.
> >
> > The benefits of eager page splitting are the same as in x86, added
> > with commit a3fe5dbda0a4 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Split huge pages mapped by
> > the TDP MMU when dirty logging is enabled"). For example, when running
> > dirty_log_perf_test with 64 virtual CPUs (Ampere Altra), 1GB per vCPU,
> > 50% reads, and 2MB HugeTLB memory, the time it takes vCPUs to access
> > all of their memory after dirty logging is enabled decreased by 44%
> > from 2.58s to 1.42s.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  16 +++++
> >   arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c              | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >   2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index a69a815719cf..eab62d8b3ad4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -154,6 +154,22 @@ struct kvm_s2_mmu {
> >       int __percpu *last_vcpu_ran;
> >
> >   #define KVM_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE_DEFAULT      PMD_SIZE
> > +     /*
> > +      * Memory cache used to split
> > +      * KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE worth of huge pages. It
> > +      * is used to allocate stage2 page tables while splitting huge
> > +      * pages. Note that the choice of EAGER_PAGE_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE
> > +      * influences both the capacity of the split page cache, and
> > +      * how often KVM reschedules. Be wary of raising CHUNK_SIZE
> > +      * too high.
> > +      *
> > +      * A good heuristic to pick CHUNK_SIZE is that it should be
> > +      * the size of huge-page to be split.
> > +      *
> > +      * Protected by kvm->slots_lock.
> > +      */
> > +     struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache split_page_cache;
> > +     uint64_t split_page_chunk_size;
> >
> >       struct kvm_arch *arch;
> >   };
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > index e2ada6588017..73f8b3953f6a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > @@ -31,14 +31,21 @@ static phys_addr_t hyp_idmap_vector;
> >
> >   static unsigned long io_map_base;
> >
> > -static phys_addr_t stage2_range_addr_end(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end)
> > +static phys_addr_t __stage2_range_addr_end(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end,
> > +                                        phys_addr_t size)
> >   {
> > -     phys_addr_t size = kvm_granule_size(KVM_PGTABLE_MIN_BLOCK_LEVEL);
> >       phys_addr_t boundary = ALIGN_DOWN(addr + size, size);
> >
> >       return (boundary - 1 < end - 1) ? boundary : end;
> >   }
> >
> > +static phys_addr_t stage2_range_addr_end(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end)
> > +{
> > +     phys_addr_t size = kvm_granule_size(KVM_PGTABLE_MIN_BLOCK_LEVEL);
> > +
> > +     return __stage2_range_addr_end(addr, end, size);
> > +}
> > +
> >   /*
> >    * Release kvm_mmu_lock periodically if the memory region is large. Otherwise,
> >    * we may see kernel panics with CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK,
> > @@ -71,6 +78,72 @@ static int stage2_apply_range(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t addr,
> >       return ret;
> >   }
> >
> > +static bool need_topup_split_page_cache_or_resched(struct kvm *kvm, uint64_t min)
> > +{
> > +     struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache;
> > +
> > +     if (need_resched() || rwlock_needbreak(&kvm->mmu_lock))
> > +             return true;
> > +
> > +     cache = &kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache;
> > +     return kvm_mmu_memory_cache_nr_free_objects(cache) < min;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int kvm_mmu_split_nr_page_tables(u64 range)
> > +{
> > +     int n = 0;
> > +
> > +     if (KVM_PGTABLE_MIN_BLOCK_LEVEL < 2)
> > +             n += DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(range, PUD_SIZE);
> > +     n += DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(range, PMD_SIZE);
> > +     return n;
> > +}
> > +
>
> I think it needs comments to explain how the number of page tables are calculated,
> similar to what have been done for stage2_block_get_nr_page_tables() in pgtable.c

Will add a comment.

>
> > +static int kvm_mmu_split_huge_pages(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t addr,
> > +                                 phys_addr_t end)
> > +{
> > +     struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache;
> > +     struct kvm_pgtable *pgt;
> > +     int ret;
> > +     u64 next;
> > +     u64 chunk_size = kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_chunk_size;
> > +     int cache_capacity = kvm_mmu_split_nr_page_tables(chunk_size);
> > +
> > +     if (chunk_size == 0)
> > +             return 0;
> > +
> > +     lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > +
> > +     cache = &kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache;
> > +
> > +     do {
> > +             if (need_topup_split_page_cache_or_resched(kvm,
> > +                                                        cache_capacity)) {
> > +                     write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > +                     cond_resched();
> > +                     /* Eager page splitting is best-effort. */
> > +                     ret = __kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(cache,
> > +                                                        cache_capacity,
> > +                                                        cache_capacity);
> > +                     write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > +                     if (ret)
> > +                             break;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             pgt = kvm->arch.mmu.pgt;
> > +             if (!pgt)
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
>
> I don't think the check to see @pgt is existing or not because the VM can't be
> created with its page-table isn't allocated and set in kvm_init_stage2_mmu().

GIven that the lock is released/acquired every chunk, the intent was to check
that the page-table wasn't freed in between.

>
> > +
> > +             next = __stage2_range_addr_end(addr, end, chunk_size);
> > +             ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(pgt, addr, next - addr,
> > +                                            cache, cache_capacity);
> > +             if (ret)
> > +                     break;
> > +     } while (addr = next, addr != end);
> > +
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >   #define stage2_apply_range_resched(kvm, addr, end, fn)                      \
> >       stage2_apply_range(kvm, addr, end, fn, true)
> >
>
> I'm wandering if stage2_apply_range() can be reused to avoid invent another similar
> function. the gap are the granularity and conditions to reschedule.

Will try and see what it looks like and report back.

>
> > @@ -772,6 +845,7 @@ int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long t
> >   void kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
> >   {
> >       kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&kvm->arch.mmu);
> > +     kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache);
> >   }
> >
> >   static void stage2_unmap_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
> > @@ -999,6 +1073,31 @@ static void kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
> >       stage2_wp_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, start, end);
> >   }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_mmu_split_memory_region() - split the stage 2 blocks into PAGE_SIZE
> > + *                              pages for memory slot
> > + * @kvm:     The KVM pointer
> > + * @slot:    The memory slot to split
> > + *
> > + * Acquires kvm->mmu_lock. Called with kvm->slots_lock mutex acquired,
> > + * serializing operations for VM memory regions.
> > + */
> > +static void kvm_mmu_split_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
> > +{
> > +     struct kvm_memslots *slots = kvm_memslots(kvm);
> > +     struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot = id_to_memslot(slots, slot);
> > +     phys_addr_t start, end;
> > +
> > +     lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
> > +
> > +     start = memslot->base_gfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +     end = (memslot->base_gfn + memslot->npages) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +
> > +     write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > +     kvm_mmu_split_huge_pages(kvm, start, end);
> > +     write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> >   /*
> >    * kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked - enable dirty logging for selected
> >    * dirty pages.
> > @@ -1790,6 +1889,16 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> >                       return;
> >
> >               kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(kvm, new->id);
> > +             kvm_mmu_split_memory_region(kvm, new->id);
> > +     } else {
> > +             /*
> > +              * Free any leftovers from the eager page splitting cache. Do
> > +              * this when deleting, moving, disabling dirty logging, or
> > +              * creating the memslot (a nop). Doing it for deletes makes
> > +              * sure we don't leak memory, and there's no need to keep the
> > +              * cache around for any of the other cases.
> > +              */
> > +             kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache);
> >       }
> >   }
> >
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split()
  2023-02-09 12:40     ` Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-09 16:17       ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-09 22:48         ` Gavin Shan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-09 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gavin Shan
  Cc: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack, kvm, kvmarm, qperret,
	catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc, alexandru.elisei,
	suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta, bgardon, ricarkol

"(> > > +     if (data->mc_capacity < nr_pages)
> > > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +     phys = kvm_pte_to_phys(pte);
> > > +     prot = kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(pte);
> > > +
> > > +     ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(data->mmu->pgt, &new, phys,
> > > +                                              level, prot, mc, force_pte);
> > > +     if (ret)
> > > +             return ret;
> > > +
> > > +     if (!stage2_try_break_pte(ctx, data->mmu)) {
> > > +             childp = kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops);
> > > +             kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(mm_ops, childp, level);
> > > +             mm_ops->put_page(childp);
> > > +             return -EAGAIN;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     /*
> > > +      * Note, the contents of the page table are guaranteed to be made
> > > +      * visible before the new PTE is assigned because stage2_make_pte()
> > > +      * writes the PTE using smp_store_release().
> > > +      */
> > > +     stage2_make_pte(ctx, new);
> > > +     dsb(ishst);
> > > +     data->mc_capacity -= nr_pages;
> > > +     return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> >
> > I think it's possible 'data->mc_capability' to be replaced by 'mc->nobjs'
> > because they're same thing. With this, we needn't to maintain a duplicate
> > 'data->mc_capability' since 'data->mc' has been existing.
>
> Ah, nice, yes. That would be simpler.
>

Actually, there's a complication. The memcache details are hidden
inside of pgtable.c,
so different types of memcaches (for vhe and nvhe) can be used for allocations.
Specifically, the memcache objects are passed as an opaque pointer ("void *")
and can be used with "struct hyp_pool" and "struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache".

So, here are all the options that I can think of:

        1. stage2_split_walker() is just used on the VHE case with the
        "struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache" memcache, so we could just use it
        instead of a "void *":

                kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(..., struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);

        However, it could be used for the NVHE case as well, plus
        this would go against the overall design of pgtable.c which tries
        to use opaque objects for most things.

        2. add a "get_nobjs()" method to both memcaches. This is tricky
        because "struct hyp_pool" doesn't directly track its capacity. I
        would rather not mess with it.

        3. This whole accounting of available pages in the memcache is
        needed because of the way I implemented stage2_split_walker() and
        the memcache interface.  stage2_split_walker() tries to allocate
        as many pages for the new table as allowed by the capacity of the
        memcache. The issue with blindingly trying until the allocation
        fails is that kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc() WARNs and tries to
        allocate using GFP_ATOMIC when !nobjs. We don't want to do that,
        so we could extend kvm_pgtable_mm_ops.zalloc_page() with a
        NO_GFP_ATOMIC_ON_EMPTY (or similar). This flag would have to be
        ignored on the hyp side.

        4. what this patch is currently doing: tracking the capacity by
        hand.

I prefer options 4 and 3. WDYT?

Thanks,
Ricardo

> Thanks!
> Ricardo
>
> >
> > > +int kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
> > > +                          void *mc, u64 mc_capacity)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct stage2_split_data split_data = {
> > > +             .mmu            = pgt->mmu,
> > > +             .memcache       = mc,
> > > +             .mc_capacity    = mc_capacity,
> > > +     };
> > > +
> > > +     struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> > > +             .cb     = stage2_split_walker,
> > > +             .flags  = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> > > +             .arg    = &split_data,
> > > +     };
> > > +
> > > +     return kvm_pgtable_walk(pgt, addr, size, &walker);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >   int __kvm_pgtable_stage2_init(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
> > >                             struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops,
> > >                             enum kvm_pgtable_stage2_flags flags,
> > >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gavin
> >

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split()
  2023-02-09 16:17       ` Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-09 22:48         ` Gavin Shan
  2023-02-15 17:43           ` Ricardo Koller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Shan @ 2023-02-09 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ricardo Koller
  Cc: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack, kvm, kvmarm, qperret,
	catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc, alexandru.elisei,
	suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta, bgardon, ricarkol

On 2/10/23 3:17 AM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> "(> > > +     if (data->mc_capacity < nr_pages)
>>>> +             return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> +     phys = kvm_pte_to_phys(pte);
>>>> +     prot = kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(pte);
>>>> +
>>>> +     ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(data->mmu->pgt, &new, phys,
>>>> +                                              level, prot, mc, force_pte);
>>>> +     if (ret)
>>>> +             return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (!stage2_try_break_pte(ctx, data->mmu)) {
>>>> +             childp = kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops);
>>>> +             kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(mm_ops, childp, level);
>>>> +             mm_ops->put_page(childp);
>>>> +             return -EAGAIN;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     /*
>>>> +      * Note, the contents of the page table are guaranteed to be made
>>>> +      * visible before the new PTE is assigned because stage2_make_pte()
>>>> +      * writes the PTE using smp_store_release().
>>>> +      */
>>>> +     stage2_make_pte(ctx, new);
>>>> +     dsb(ishst);
>>>> +     data->mc_capacity -= nr_pages;
>>>> +     return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>
>>> I think it's possible 'data->mc_capability' to be replaced by 'mc->nobjs'
>>> because they're same thing. With this, we needn't to maintain a duplicate
>>> 'data->mc_capability' since 'data->mc' has been existing.
>>
>> Ah, nice, yes. That would be simpler.
>>
> 
> Actually, there's a complication. The memcache details are hidden
> inside of pgtable.c,
> so different types of memcaches (for vhe and nvhe) can be used for allocations.
> Specifically, the memcache objects are passed as an opaque pointer ("void *")
> and can be used with "struct hyp_pool" and "struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache".
> 
> So, here are all the options that I can think of:
> 
>          1. stage2_split_walker() is just used on the VHE case with the
>          "struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache" memcache, so we could just use it
>          instead of a "void *":
> 
>                  kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(..., struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);
> 
>          However, it could be used for the NVHE case as well, plus
>          this would go against the overall design of pgtable.c which tries
>          to use opaque objects for most things.
> 
>          2. add a "get_nobjs()" method to both memcaches. This is tricky
>          because "struct hyp_pool" doesn't directly track its capacity. I
>          would rather not mess with it.
> 
>          3. This whole accounting of available pages in the memcache is
>          needed because of the way I implemented stage2_split_walker() and
>          the memcache interface.  stage2_split_walker() tries to allocate
>          as many pages for the new table as allowed by the capacity of the
>          memcache. The issue with blindingly trying until the allocation
>          fails is that kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc() WARNs and tries to
>          allocate using GFP_ATOMIC when !nobjs. We don't want to do that,
>          so we could extend kvm_pgtable_mm_ops.zalloc_page() with a
>          NO_GFP_ATOMIC_ON_EMPTY (or similar). This flag would have to be
>          ignored on the hyp side.
> 
>          4. what this patch is currently doing: tracking the capacity by
>          hand.
> 
> I prefer options 4 and 3. WDYT?
> 

Yeah, stage2_split_walker() is currently only used by VHE and it calls to
stage2_map_walker() to create the unlinked page table, which is shared by
VHE and nVHE. I think option 3 would be better than 4 because we generally
just want to fetch the pre-allocated page table, instead of allocating a
new page table with GFP_ATOMIC. However, I'm also fine with option 4. I
think this can be improved in the future if you agree.

>>
>>>
>>>> +int kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
>>>> +                          void *mc, u64 mc_capacity)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct stage2_split_data split_data = {
>>>> +             .mmu            = pgt->mmu,
>>>> +             .memcache       = mc,
>>>> +             .mc_capacity    = mc_capacity,
>>>> +     };
>>>> +
>>>> +     struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
>>>> +             .cb     = stage2_split_walker,
>>>> +             .flags  = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
>>>> +             .arg    = &split_data,
>>>> +     };
>>>> +
>>>> +     return kvm_pgtable_walk(pgt, addr, size, &walker);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>    int __kvm_pgtable_stage2_init(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
>>>>                              struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops,
>>>>                              enum kvm_pgtable_stage2_flags flags,
>>>>
>>>

Thanks,
Gavin


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled
  2023-02-09 12:50     ` Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-09 23:09       ` Gavin Shan
  2023-02-15 16:25       ` Ricardo Koller
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Shan @ 2023-02-09 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ricardo Koller
  Cc: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack, kvm, kvmarm, qperret,
	catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc, alexandru.elisei,
	suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta, bgardon, ricarkol

Hi Ricardo,

On 2/9/23 11:50 PM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 10:26 PM Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:

[...]

>>
>>> +static int kvm_mmu_split_huge_pages(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t addr,
>>> +                                 phys_addr_t end)
>>> +{
>>> +     struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache;
>>> +     struct kvm_pgtable *pgt;
>>> +     int ret;
>>> +     u64 next;
>>> +     u64 chunk_size = kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_chunk_size;
>>> +     int cache_capacity = kvm_mmu_split_nr_page_tables(chunk_size);
>>> +
>>> +     if (chunk_size == 0)
>>> +             return 0;
>>> +
>>> +     lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>>> +
>>> +     cache = &kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache;
>>> +
>>> +     do {
>>> +             if (need_topup_split_page_cache_or_resched(kvm,
>>> +                                                        cache_capacity)) {
>>> +                     write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>>> +                     cond_resched();
>>> +                     /* Eager page splitting is best-effort. */
>>> +                     ret = __kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(cache,
>>> +                                                        cache_capacity,
>>> +                                                        cache_capacity);
>>> +                     write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>>> +                     if (ret)
>>> +                             break;
>>> +             }
>>> +
>>> +             pgt = kvm->arch.mmu.pgt;
>>> +             if (!pgt)
>>> +                     return -EINVAL;
>>
>> I don't think the check to see @pgt is existing or not because the VM can't be
>> created with its page-table isn't allocated and set in kvm_init_stage2_mmu().
> 
> GIven that the lock is released/acquired every chunk, the intent was to check
> that the page-table wasn't freed in between.
> 

I don't understand how it can be possible. @pgt is free'd when the VM is released
when its reference count reaches zero. The major cross-point is close(vm-fd) and
this ioctl(). The VM file's release function won't be invoked until the file's
reference count is dropped to zero. The ioctl() already had one reference count
on the VM file taken to avoid it.

There may be other cases I missed. If so, I think a comment is still needed to
help reader to understand.

Thanks,
Gavin


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM.
  2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: arm64: Use local TLBI on permission relaxation Ricardo Koller
@ 2023-02-14  5:57 ` Gavin Shan
  2023-02-14  7:33   ` Oliver Upton
  12 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Shan @ 2023-02-14  5:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ricardo Koller, pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack
  Cc: kvm, kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta,
	bgardon, ricarkol

Hi Ricardo,

On 2/7/23 3:58 AM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Eager Page Splitting improves the performance of dirty-logging (used
> in live migrations) when guest memory is backed by huge-pages.  It's
> an optimization used in Google Cloud since 2016 on x86, and for the
> last couple of months on ARM.
> 
> Background and motivation
> =========================
> Dirty logging is typically used for live-migration iterative copying.
> KVM implements dirty-logging at the PAGE_SIZE granularity (will refer
> to 4K pages from now on).  It does it by faulting on write-protected
> 4K pages.  Therefore, enabling dirty-logging on a huge-page requires
> breaking it into 4K pages in the first place.  KVM does this breaking
> on fault, and because it's in the critical path it only maps the 4K
> page that faulted; every other 4K page is left unmapped.  This is not
> great for performance on ARM for a couple of reasons:
> 
> - Splitting on fault can halt vcpus for milliseconds in some
>    implementations. Splitting a block PTE requires using a broadcasted
>    TLB invalidation (TLBI) for every huge-page (due to the
>    break-before-make requirement). Note that x86 doesn't need this. We
>    observed some implementations that take millliseconds to complete
>    broadcasted TLBIs when done in parallel from multiple vcpus.  And
>    that's exactly what happens when doing it on fault: multiple vcpus
>    fault at the same time triggering TLBIs in parallel.
> 
> - Read intensive guest workloads end up paying for dirty-logging.
>    Only mapping the faulting 4K page means that all the other pages
>    that were part of the huge-page will now be unmapped. The effect is
>    that any access, including reads, now has to fault.
> 
> Eager Page Splitting (on ARM)
> =============================
> Eager Page Splitting fixes the above two issues by eagerly splitting
> huge-pages when enabling dirty logging. The goal is to avoid doing it
> while faulting on write-protected pages. This is what the TDP MMU does
> for x86 [0], except that x86 does it for different reasons: to avoid
> grabbing the MMU lock on fault. Note that taking care of
> write-protection faults still requires grabbing the MMU lock on ARM,
> but not on x86 (with the fast_page_fault path).
> 
> An additional benefit of eagerly splitting huge-pages is that it can
> be done in a controlled way (e.g., via an IOCTL). This series provides
> two knobs for doing it, just like its x86 counterpart: when enabling
> dirty logging, and when using the KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG ioctl. The
> benefit of doing it on KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG is that this ioctl takes
> ranges, and not complete memslots like when enabling dirty logging.
> This means that the cost of splitting (mainly broadcasted TLBIs) can
> be throttled: split a range, wait for a bit, split another range, etc.
> The benefits of this approach were presented by Oliver Upton at KVM
> Forum 2022 [1].
> 

[...]

Sorry for raising questions about the design lately. There are two operations
regarding the existing huge page mapping. Here, lets take PMD and PTE mapping
as an example for discussion: (a) The existing PMD mapping is split to contiguous
512 PTE mappings when all sub-pages are written in sequence and dirty logging has
been enabled (b) The contiguous 512 PTE mappings are combined to one PMD mapping
when dirty logging is disabled.

Before this series is applied, both (a) and (b) are handled by the page fault handler.
After this series is applied, (a) is handled in the ioctl handler while (b) is still
handled in the page fault handler. I'm not sure why we can't eagerly split the PMD
mapping into 512 PTE mapping in the page fault handler? In this way, the implementation
may be simplified by extending kvm_pgtable_stage2_map(). In the implementation, the
newly introduced API kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() calls to kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked()
and then stage2_map_walker(), which is part of kvm_pgtable_stage2_map(), to create the
unlinked page tables. It's why I have the question.

Thanks,
Gavin



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM.
  2023-02-14  5:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Gavin Shan
@ 2023-02-14  7:33   ` Oliver Upton
  2023-02-14 21:59     ` Ricardo Koller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 30+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2023-02-14  7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gavin Shan
  Cc: Ricardo Koller, pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack, kvm,
	kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta,
	bgardon, ricarkol

Hi Gavin,

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 04:57:59PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On 2/7/23 3:58 AM, Ricardo Koller wrote:

<snip>

> > Eager Page Splitting fixes the above two issues by eagerly splitting
> > huge-pages when enabling dirty logging. The goal is to avoid doing it
> > while faulting on write-protected pages.

</snip>

> I'm not sure why we can't eagerly split the PMD mapping into 512 PTE
> mapping in the page fault handler?

The entire goal of the series is to avoid page splitting at all on the
stage-2 abort path. Ideally we want to minimize the time taken to handle
a fault so we can get back to running the guest. The requirement to
perform a break-before-make operation to change the mapping granularity
can, as Ricardo points out, be a bottleneck on contemporary implementations.

There is a clear uplift with the proposed implementation already, and I
would expect that margin to widen if/when we add support for lockless
(i.e. RCU-protected) permission relaxation.

> In the implementation, the newly introduced API
> kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() calls to kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked()
> and then stage2_map_walker(), which is part of kvm_pgtable_stage2_map(),
> to create the unlinked page tables.

This is deliberate code reuse. Page table construction in the fault path
is largely similar to that of eager split besides the fact that one is
working on 'live' page tables whereas the other is not. As such I gave
the suggestion to Ricardo to reuse what we have today for the sake of
eager splitting.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM.
  2023-02-14  7:33   ` Oliver Upton
@ 2023-02-14 21:59     ` Ricardo Koller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-14 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oliver Upton
  Cc: Gavin Shan, pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack, kvm,
	kvmarm, qperret, catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc,
	alexandru.elisei, suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta,
	bgardon, ricarkol

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 11:33 PM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Hi Gavin,
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 04:57:59PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > On 2/7/23 3:58 AM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > > Eager Page Splitting fixes the above two issues by eagerly splitting
> > > huge-pages when enabling dirty logging. The goal is to avoid doing it
> > > while faulting on write-protected pages.
>
> </snip>
>
> > I'm not sure why we can't eagerly split the PMD mapping into 512 PTE
> > mapping in the page fault handler?
>
> The entire goal of the series is to avoid page splitting at all on the
> stage-2 abort path. Ideally we want to minimize the time taken to handle
> a fault so we can get back to running the guest. The requirement to
> perform a break-before-make operation to change the mapping granularity
> can, as Ricardo points out, be a bottleneck on contemporary implementations.
>
> There is a clear uplift with the proposed implementation already, and I
> would expect that margin to widen if/when we add support for lockless
> (i.e. RCU-protected) permission relaxation.

There's also the issue of allocating 513 pages on fault when splitting PUDs.

>
> > In the implementation, the newly introduced API
> > kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() calls to kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked()
> > and then stage2_map_walker(), which is part of kvm_pgtable_stage2_map(),
> > to create the unlinked page tables.
>
> This is deliberate code reuse. Page table construction in the fault path
> is largely similar to that of eager split besides the fact that one is
> working on 'live' page tables whereas the other is not. As such I gave
> the suggestion to Ricardo to reuse what we have today for the sake of
> eager splitting.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Oliver

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled
  2023-02-09 12:50     ` Ricardo Koller
  2023-02-09 23:09       ` Gavin Shan
@ 2023-02-15 16:25       ` Ricardo Koller
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-15 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gavin Shan
  Cc: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack, kvm, kvmarm, qperret,
	catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc, alexandru.elisei,
	suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta, bgardon, ricarkol

> > > +
> > > +             next = __stage2_range_addr_end(addr, end, chunk_size);
> > > +             ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(pgt, addr, next - addr,
> > > +                                            cache, cache_capacity);
> > > +             if (ret)
> > > +                     break;
> > > +     } while (addr = next, addr != end);
> > > +
> > > +     return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >   #define stage2_apply_range_resched(kvm, addr, end, fn)                      \
> > >       stage2_apply_range(kvm, addr, end, fn, true)
> > >
> >
> > I'm wandering if stage2_apply_range() can be reused to avoid invent another similar
> > function. the gap are the granularity and conditions to reschedule.
>
> Will try and see what it looks like and report back.
>

Tried and don't like the result very much:

static int _stage2_apply_range(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t addr,
phys_addr_t end,
                               int (*fn)(struct kvm_pgtable *, u64,
u64),
                               bool fn_ignore_failures, bool
fn_drop_mmu_lock,
                               struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache, int
cache_capacity,
                               bool resched)

The generic function would require too many arguments to work for all cases.

Thanks,
Ricardo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split()
  2023-02-09 22:48         ` Gavin Shan
@ 2023-02-15 17:43           ` Ricardo Koller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-15 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gavin Shan
  Cc: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack, kvm, kvmarm, qperret,
	catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc, alexandru.elisei,
	suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta, bgardon, ricarkol

On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:48 PM Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/10/23 3:17 AM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> > "(> > > +     if (data->mc_capacity < nr_pages)
> >>>> +             return -ENOMEM;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +     phys = kvm_pte_to_phys(pte);
> >>>> +     prot = kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(pte);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +     ret = kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(data->mmu->pgt, &new, phys,
> >>>> +                                              level, prot, mc, force_pte);
> >>>> +     if (ret)
> >>>> +             return ret;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +     if (!stage2_try_break_pte(ctx, data->mmu)) {
> >>>> +             childp = kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops);
> >>>> +             kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(mm_ops, childp, level);
> >>>> +             mm_ops->put_page(childp);
> >>>> +             return -EAGAIN;
> >>>> +     }
> >>>> +
> >>>> +     /*
> >>>> +      * Note, the contents of the page table are guaranteed to be made
> >>>> +      * visible before the new PTE is assigned because stage2_make_pte()
> >>>> +      * writes the PTE using smp_store_release().
> >>>> +      */
> >>>> +     stage2_make_pte(ctx, new);
> >>>> +     dsb(ishst);
> >>>> +     data->mc_capacity -= nr_pages;
> >>>> +     return 0;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> I think it's possible 'data->mc_capability' to be replaced by 'mc->nobjs'
> >>> because they're same thing. With this, we needn't to maintain a duplicate
> >>> 'data->mc_capability' since 'data->mc' has been existing.
> >>
> >> Ah, nice, yes. That would be simpler.
> >>
> >
> > Actually, there's a complication. The memcache details are hidden
> > inside of pgtable.c,
> > so different types of memcaches (for vhe and nvhe) can be used for allocations.
> > Specifically, the memcache objects are passed as an opaque pointer ("void *")
> > and can be used with "struct hyp_pool" and "struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache".
> >
> > So, here are all the options that I can think of:
> >
> >          1. stage2_split_walker() is just used on the VHE case with the
> >          "struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache" memcache, so we could just use it
> >          instead of a "void *":
> >
> >                  kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(..., struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);
> >
> >          However, it could be used for the NVHE case as well, plus
> >          this would go against the overall design of pgtable.c which tries
> >          to use opaque objects for most things.
> >
> >          2. add a "get_nobjs()" method to both memcaches. This is tricky
> >          because "struct hyp_pool" doesn't directly track its capacity. I
> >          would rather not mess with it.
> >
> >          3. This whole accounting of available pages in the memcache is
> >          needed because of the way I implemented stage2_split_walker() and
> >          the memcache interface.  stage2_split_walker() tries to allocate
> >          as many pages for the new table as allowed by the capacity of the
> >          memcache. The issue with blindingly trying until the allocation
> >          fails is that kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc() WARNs and tries to
> >          allocate using GFP_ATOMIC when !nobjs. We don't want to do that,
> >          so we could extend kvm_pgtable_mm_ops.zalloc_page() with a
> >          NO_GFP_ATOMIC_ON_EMPTY (or similar). This flag would have to be
> >          ignored on the hyp side.
> >
> >          4. what this patch is currently doing: tracking the capacity by
> >          hand.
> >
> > I prefer options 4 and 3. WDYT?
> >
>
> Yeah, stage2_split_walker() is currently only used by VHE and it calls to
> stage2_map_walker() to create the unlinked page table, which is shared by
> VHE and nVHE. I think option 3 would be better than 4 because we generally
> just want to fetch the pre-allocated page table, instead of allocating a
> new page table with GFP_ATOMIC. However, I'm also fine with option 4. I

Going with option 4 then for version 3.

> think this can be improved in the future if you agree.

Definitely!

Thanks,
Ricardo

>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> +int kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
> >>>> +                          void *mc, u64 mc_capacity)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +     struct stage2_split_data split_data = {
> >>>> +             .mmu            = pgt->mmu,
> >>>> +             .memcache       = mc,
> >>>> +             .mc_capacity    = mc_capacity,
> >>>> +     };
> >>>> +
> >>>> +     struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> >>>> +             .cb     = stage2_split_walker,
> >>>> +             .flags  = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> >>>> +             .arg    = &split_data,
> >>>> +     };
> >>>> +
> >>>> +     return kvm_pgtable_walk(pgt, addr, size, &walker);
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>>    int __kvm_pgtable_stage2_init(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
> >>>>                              struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops,
> >>>>                              enum kvm_pgtable_stage2_flags flags,
> >>>>
> >>>
>
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region()
  2023-02-09  6:02   ` Gavin Shan
@ 2023-02-15 17:47     ` Ricardo Koller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Koller @ 2023-02-15 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gavin Shan
  Cc: pbonzini, maz, oupton, yuzenghui, dmatlack, kvm, kvmarm, qperret,
	catalin.marinas, andrew.jones, seanjc, alexandru.elisei,
	suzuki.poulose, eric.auger, reijiw, rananta, bgardon, ricarkol

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 10:02 PM Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On 2/7/23 3:58 AM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> > Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() as a preparation for a future
> > commit to look cleaner and more understandable. Also, it looks more
> > like its x86 counterpart (in kvm_mmu_slot_apply_flags()).
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > index 9bd3c2cfb476..d2c5e6992459 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > @@ -1761,20 +1761,27 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> >                                  const struct kvm_memory_slot *new,
> >                                  enum kvm_mr_change change)
> >   {
> > +     bool log_dirty_pages = new && new->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
> > +
> >       /*
> >        * At this point memslot has been committed and there is an
> >        * allocated dirty_bitmap[], dirty pages will be tracked while the
> >        * memory slot is write protected.
> >        */
> > -     if (change != KVM_MR_DELETE && new->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) {
> > +     if (log_dirty_pages) {
> > +
> > +             if (change == KVM_MR_DELETE)
> > +                     return;
> > +
>
> When @change is KVM_MR_DELETE, @new should be NULL. It means this check
> isn't needed?

If you don't mind, I prefer not risking making this commit change some
functionality.

>
> >               /*
> >                * If we're with initial-all-set, we don't need to write
> >                * protect any pages because they're all reported as dirty.
> >                * Huge pages and normal pages will be write protect gradually.
> >                */
> > -             if (!kvm_dirty_log_manual_protect_and_init_set(kvm)) {
> > -                     kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(kvm, new->id);
> > -             }
> > +             if (kvm_dirty_log_manual_protect_and_init_set(kvm))
> > +                     return;
> > +
> > +             kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(kvm, new->id);
> >       }
> >   }
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-15 17:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-06 16:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_WALK ctx->flags for skipping BBM and CMO Ricardo Koller
2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: arm64: Rename free_unlinked to free_removed Ricardo Koller
2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: arm64: Add helper for creating unlinked stage2 subtrees Ricardo Koller
2023-02-07 14:51   ` Ricardo Koller
2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() Ricardo Koller
2023-02-09  5:58   ` Gavin Shan
2023-02-09 12:40     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-02-09 16:17       ` Ricardo Koller
2023-02-09 22:48         ` Gavin Shan
2023-02-15 17:43           ` Ricardo Koller
2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() Ricardo Koller
2023-02-09  6:02   ` Gavin Shan
2023-02-15 17:47     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu() Ricardo Koller
2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] KVM: arm64: Export kvm_are_all_memslots_empty() Ricardo Koller
2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE Ricardo Koller
2023-02-08 11:05   ` Gavin Shan
2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled Ricardo Koller
2023-02-09  6:26   ` Gavin Shan
2023-02-09 12:50     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-02-09 23:09       ` Gavin Shan
2023-02-15 16:25       ` Ricardo Koller
2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] KVM: arm64: Open-code kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked() Ricardo Koller
2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG Ricardo Koller
2023-02-09  6:29   ` Gavin Shan
2023-02-06 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: arm64: Use local TLBI on permission relaxation Ricardo Koller
2023-02-14  5:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Gavin Shan
2023-02-14  7:33   ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-14 21:59     ` Ricardo Koller

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.