GDM alternative?

GDM alternative?

[Adam Lee]

Hello everyone, I am sure this has been asked before but I haven't found a
solution.

I am currently integrating GDM to my XFCE image. I was hoping that it's as
easy as adding GDM as the graphical init manager (in local.conf), but it
looks like PolicyKit, Console Kit, PAM, gconf, gconf-sanity (as per
meta-angstrom) all need to be correctly configured for GDM to work. This
integration of multiple frameworks is not what I had in mind. So I am now
searching for alternative - something more lightweight and with less
dependency.

meta-oe contains another login manager 'slim', except it's no longer
maintained and has been moved to nonworking directory within the tree. I
don't see any other.

Thank you,

Adam

Re: GDM alternative?

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Adam Lee schreef op 18-02-14 22:24:
> Hello everyone, I am sure this has been asked before but I haven't found
> a solution.
> 
> I am currently integrating GDM to my XFCE image. I was hoping that it's
> as easy as adding GDM as the graphical init manager (in local.conf), but
> it looks like PolicyKit, Console Kit, PAM, gconf, gconf-sanity (as per 
> meta-angstrom) all need to be correctly configured for GDM to work. This 
> integration of multiple frameworks is not what I had in mind. So I am
> now searching for alternative - something more lightweight and with less 
> dependency.

GDM works without the pk-gnome and ck libdir symlinks, but it's a pain in
the ass to get it working with a non-GNOME session by default.

To get autologin working again:

https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/meta-oe/commit/26d1cca7ef9bb2e656ba6998adc4c99810654fb9

This used to work, but I'm debugging why it doesn't anymore:

https://github.com/Angstrom-distribution/meta-angstrom/blob/angstrom-v2013.12-yocto1.5/recipes-tweaks/gdm/angstrom-gdm-xfce-hack.bb

I'm slowly debugging GDM issues for Angstrom v2013.12 and will send patches
to meta-oe/master soon(-ish).

But to answer your question: Andreas uses 'lxdm' in his xfce images in the
meta-misc layer. It's on my list to try out so I can't say if it works right
now.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iD8DBQFTBGSoMkyGM64RGpERApCvAJ9N9N+3YY6DvDXJMAi+hLmgR/aw8QCgq9Qc
NUOrhTxjxhLllVNETM8QU00=
=m7et
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: GDM alternative?

[Andreas Müller]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone, I am sure this has been asked before but I haven't found a
> solution.
>
> I am currently integrating GDM to my XFCE image. I was hoping that it's as
> easy as adding GDM as the graphical init manager (in local.conf), but it
> looks like PolicyKit, Console Kit, PAM, gconf, gconf-sanity (as per
> meta-angstrom) all need to be correctly configured for GDM to work. This
> integration of multiple frameworks is not what I had in mind. So I am now
> searching for alternative - something more lightweight and with less
> dependency.
>
> meta-oe contains another login manager 'slim', except it's no longer
> maintained and has been moved to nonworking directory within the tree. I
> don't see any other.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Adam

I am using lxdm for my XFCE-image.

Andreas

Re: GDM alternative?

[Adam Lee]

Thank you Koen and Andreas. That has been really helped in clearing up my
confusion and setting the path forward.

I think I will try LXDM in meta-misc in meta-oe. Is there any special
configuration that I should be aware of (other then setting it as the
graphical init manager)?

Regards,

Adam

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Andreas Müller <
schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello everyone, I am sure this has been asked before but I haven't found
> a
> > solution.
> >
> > I am currently integrating GDM to my XFCE image. I was hoping that it's
> as
> > easy as adding GDM as the graphical init manager (in local.conf), but it
> > looks like PolicyKit, Console Kit, PAM, gconf, gconf-sanity (as per
> > meta-angstrom) all need to be correctly configured for GDM to work. This
> > integration of multiple frameworks is not what I had in mind. So I am now
> > searching for alternative - something more lightweight and with less
> > dependency.
> >
> > meta-oe contains another login manager 'slim', except it's no longer
> > maintained and has been moved to nonworking directory within the tree. I
> > don't see any other.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Adam
>
> I am using lxdm for my XFCE-image.
>
> Andreas
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

Re: GDM alternative?

[Andreas Müller]

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you Koen and Andreas. That has been really helped in clearing up my
> confusion and setting the path forward.
>
> I think I will try LXDM in meta-misc in meta-oe. Is there any special
> configuration that I should be aware of (other then setting it as the
> graphical init manager)?

meta-misc is my personal playground - it might have dependencies to
other layers and some things might not work as expected...

Andreas

Re: GDM alternative?

[Adam Lee]

Andreas, LXDM from meta-oe works well with minimal configuration on my part
:)
I didn't have to add another layer to satisfy dependencies. Thanks :)

Adam


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Andreas Müller <
schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thank you Koen and Andreas. That has been really helped in clearing up my
> > confusion and setting the path forward.
> >
> > I think I will try LXDM in meta-misc in meta-oe. Is there any special
> > configuration that I should be aware of (other then setting it as the
> > graphical init manager)?
>
> meta-misc is my personal playground - it might have dependencies to
> other layers and some things might not work as expected...
>
> Andreas
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

Re: GDM alternative?

[Stephen Arnold]

Is there any interest in reviving slim?  I'm using it on gentoo-arm on
several devices; works just like x86.  Since I haven't tried it or
otherwise looked at it in oe yet, I have no idea why it's in a non-working
state.  That said, it was on my todo list until I noticed lxdm, so I'll
probably check it out at some point; never a bad idea to have another
lightweight alternative...

Steve


On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com> wrote:

> Andreas, LXDM from meta-oe works well with minimal configuration on my part
> :)
> I didn't have to add another layer to satisfy dependencies. Thanks :)
>
> Adam
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Andreas Müller <
> schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thank you Koen and Andreas. That has been really helped in clearing up
> my
> > > confusion and setting the path forward.
> > >
> > > I think I will try LXDM in meta-misc in meta-oe. Is there any special
> > > configuration that I should be aware of (other then setting it as the
> > > graphical init manager)?
> >
> > meta-misc is my personal playground - it might have dependencies to
> > other layers and some things might not work as expected...
> >
> > Andreas
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

Re: GDM alternative?

[Adam Lee]

Are there any obvious advantages over one another between LXDM and Slim?
I love how LXDM doesn't require complicated authentication framework like
GDM.

Adam


On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Stephen Arnold
<stephen.arnold42@gmail.com>wrote:

> Is there any interest in reviving slim?  I'm using it on gentoo-arm on
> several devices; works just like x86.  Since I haven't tried it or
> otherwise looked at it in oe yet, I have no idea why it's in a non-working
> state.  That said, it was on my todo list until I noticed lxdm, so I'll
> probably check it out at some point; never a bad idea to have another
> lightweight alternative...
>
> Steve
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Andreas, LXDM from meta-oe works well with minimal configuration on my
> part
> > :)
> > I didn't have to add another layer to satisfy dependencies. Thanks :)
> >
> > Adam
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Andreas Müller <
> > schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > Thank you Koen and Andreas. That has been really helped in clearing
> up
> > my
> > > > confusion and setting the path forward.
> > > >
> > > > I think I will try LXDM in meta-misc in meta-oe. Is there any special
> > > > configuration that I should be aware of (other then setting it as the
> > > > graphical init manager)?
> > >
> > > meta-misc is my personal playground - it might have dependencies to
> > > other layers and some things might not work as expected...
> > >
> > > Andreas
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

Re: GDM alternative?

[Stephen Arnold]

It's a bit more subtle than just "obvious advantage" since the deps are
different, config options are different, etc.  Slim is probably "lighter"
than lxdm, in both features and dependency bloat.  The former pretty
depends only on X11 libs and png (with optional pam and dbus/consolekit
integration).  OTOH, lxdm has about the same pam/consolekit features, but
depends on gtk[2|3].  So, a bit fancier and a little more bloat.  Which one
do you think is easier to theme?  ;)


On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Adam Lee <adam@gumstix.com> wrote:

> Are there any obvious advantages over one another between LXDM and Slim?
> I love how LXDM doesn't require complicated authentication framework like
> GDM.
>
> Adam
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Stephen Arnold
> <stephen.arnold42@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Is there any interest in reviving slim?  I'm using it on gentoo-arm on
> > several devices; works just like x86.  Since I haven't tried it or
> > otherwise looked at it in oe yet, I have no idea why it's in a
> non-working
> > state.  That said, it was on my todo list until I noticed lxdm, so I'll
> > probably check it out at some point; never a bad idea to have another
> > lightweight alternative...
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Andreas, LXDM from meta-oe works well with minimal configuration on my
> > part
> > > :)
> > > I didn't have to add another layer to satisfy dependencies. Thanks :)
> > >
> > > Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Andreas Müller <
> > > schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > Thank you Koen and Andreas. That has been really helped in clearing
> > up
> > > my
> > > > > confusion and setting the path forward.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think I will try LXDM in meta-misc in meta-oe. Is there any
> special
> > > > > configuration that I should be aware of (other then setting it as
> the
> > > > > graphical init manager)?
> > > >
> > > > meta-misc is my personal playground - it might have dependencies to
> > > > other layers and some things might not work as expected...
> > > >
> > > > Andreas
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

Re: GDM alternative?

[Stephen Arnold]

And I think I just convinced myself I need to get slim working...


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Stephen Arnold
<stephen.arnold42@gmail.com>wrote:

> It's a bit more subtle than just "obvious advantage" since the deps are
> different, config options are different, etc.  Slim is probably "lighter"
> than lxdm, in both features and dependency bloat.  The former pretty
> depends only on X11 libs and png (with optional pam and dbus/consolekit
> integration).  OTOH, lxdm has about the same pam/consolekit features, but
> depends on gtk[2|3].  So, a bit fancier and a little more bloat.  Which one
> do you think is easier to theme?  ;)
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Adam Lee <adam@gumstix.com> wrote:
>
>> Are there any obvious advantages over one another between LXDM and Slim?
>> I love how LXDM doesn't require complicated authentication framework like
>> GDM.
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Stephen Arnold
>> <stephen.arnold42@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>> > Is there any interest in reviving slim?  I'm using it on gentoo-arm on
>> > several devices; works just like x86.  Since I haven't tried it or
>> > otherwise looked at it in oe yet, I have no idea why it's in a
>> non-working
>> > state.  That said, it was on my todo list until I noticed lxdm, so I'll
>> > probably check it out at some point; never a bad idea to have another
>> > lightweight alternative...
>> >
>> > Steve
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Andreas, LXDM from meta-oe works well with minimal configuration on my
>> > part
>> > > :)
>> > > I didn't have to add another layer to satisfy dependencies. Thanks :)
>> > >
>> > > Adam
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Andreas Müller <
>> > > schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > Thank you Koen and Andreas. That has been really helped in
>> clearing
>> > up
>> > > my
>> > > > > confusion and setting the path forward.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I think I will try LXDM in meta-misc in meta-oe. Is there any
>> special
>> > > > > configuration that I should be aware of (other then setting it as
>> the
>> > > > > graphical init manager)?
>> > > >
>> > > > meta-misc is my personal playground - it might have dependencies to
>> > > > other layers and some things might not work as expected...
>> > > >
>> > > > Andreas
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> > > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> > > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>> > > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>
>
>

Re: GDM alternative?

[Adam Lee]

Thanks Stephen for your response :)
I think I will give slim a spin this weekend on my desktop. Ultimately a
lighter DM will be appreciated on my embedded boards.

Adam


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Stephen Arnold
<stephen.arnold42@gmail.com>wrote:

> It's a bit more subtle than just "obvious advantage" since the deps are
> different, config options are different, etc.  Slim is probably "lighter"
> than lxdm, in both features and dependency bloat.  The former pretty
> depends only on X11 libs and png (with optional pam and dbus/consolekit
> integration).  OTOH, lxdm has about the same pam/consolekit features, but
> depends on gtk[2|3].  So, a bit fancier and a little more bloat.  Which one
> do you think is easier to theme?  ;)
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Adam Lee <adam@gumstix.com> wrote:
>
> > Are there any obvious advantages over one another between LXDM and Slim?
> > I love how LXDM doesn't require complicated authentication framework like
> > GDM.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Stephen Arnold
> > <stephen.arnold42@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any interest in reviving slim?  I'm using it on gentoo-arm on
> > > several devices; works just like x86.  Since I haven't tried it or
> > > otherwise looked at it in oe yet, I have no idea why it's in a
> > non-working
> > > state.  That said, it was on my todo list until I noticed lxdm, so I'll
> > > probably check it out at some point; never a bad idea to have another
> > > lightweight alternative...
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Andreas, LXDM from meta-oe works well with minimal configuration on
> my
> > > part
> > > > :)
> > > > I didn't have to add another layer to satisfy dependencies. Thanks :)
> > > >
> > > > Adam
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Andreas Müller <
> > > > schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > Thank you Koen and Andreas. That has been really helped in
> clearing
> > > up
> > > > my
> > > > > > confusion and setting the path forward.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think I will try LXDM in meta-misc in meta-oe. Is there any
> > special
> > > > > > configuration that I should be aware of (other then setting it as
> > the
> > > > > > graphical init manager)?
> > > > >
> > > > > meta-misc is my personal playground - it might have dependencies to
> > > > > other layers and some things might not work as expected...
> > > > >
> > > > > Andreas
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > > > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > > > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

Re: GDM alternative?

[Stephen Arnold]

Haven't gotten to slim yet (other things intervened) but I did add lxdm to
my xorg image.  Got it working with a bbappend for an init script package,
upstream automake broke it, so I had to fix it again (along with some other
stuff).  Anyway, the latter patches are in the ML queue; works fine so far,
although the session menu isn't populated since it only uses the mini_x
session for openbox.


On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Stephen for your response :)
> I think I will give slim a spin this weekend on my desktop. Ultimately a
> lighter DM will be appreciated on my embedded boards.
>
> Adam
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Stephen Arnold
> <stephen.arnold42@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > It's a bit more subtle than just "obvious advantage" since the deps are
> > different, config options are different, etc.  Slim is probably "lighter"
> > than lxdm, in both features and dependency bloat.  The former pretty
> > depends only on X11 libs and png (with optional pam and dbus/consolekit
> > integration).  OTOH, lxdm has about the same pam/consolekit features, but
> > depends on gtk[2|3].  So, a bit fancier and a little more bloat.  Which
> one
> > do you think is easier to theme?  ;)
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Adam Lee <adam@gumstix.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Are there any obvious advantages over one another between LXDM and
> Slim?
> > > I love how LXDM doesn't require complicated authentication framework
> like
> > > GDM.
> > >
> > > Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Stephen Arnold
> > > <stephen.arnold42@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there any interest in reviving slim?  I'm using it on gentoo-arm
> on
> > > > several devices; works just like x86.  Since I haven't tried it or
> > > > otherwise looked at it in oe yet, I have no idea why it's in a
> > > non-working
> > > > state.  That said, it was on my todo list until I noticed lxdm, so
> I'll
> > > > probably check it out at some point; never a bad idea to have another
> > > > lightweight alternative...
> > > >
> > > > Steve
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Andreas, LXDM from meta-oe works well with minimal configuration on
> > my
> > > > part
> > > > > :)
> > > > > I didn't have to add another layer to satisfy dependencies. Thanks
> :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Adam
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Andreas Müller <
> > > > > schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Adam Lee <adam.yh.lee@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Thank you Koen and Andreas. That has been really helped in
> > clearing
> > > > up
> > > > > my
> > > > > > > confusion and setting the path forward.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think I will try LXDM in meta-misc in meta-oe. Is there any
> > > special
> > > > > > > configuration that I should be aware of (other then setting it
> as
> > > the
> > > > > > > graphical init manager)?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > meta-misc is my personal playground - it might have dependencies
> to
> > > > > > other layers and some things might not work as expected...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Andreas
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > > > > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > > > > >
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > > > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > > > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>