* [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs
@ 2020-11-04 16:54 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sven Van Asbroeck @ 2020-11-04 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer
Cc: Russell King, Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam,
NXP Linux Team, Anson Huang, Peng Fan, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel
The i.MX6QP rev 1.1 SoC on my board is mis-identified by Linux:
the log (incorrectly) shows "i.MX6Q rev 2.1".
Correct this by assuming that every SoC that identifies as
i.MX6Q with rev >= 2.0 is really an i.MX6QP.
Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>
---
Tree: v5.10-rc2
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
index 85c084a716ab..703998ebb52e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
@@ -245,8 +245,13 @@ static void __init imx6q_axi_init(void)
static void __init imx6q_init_machine(void)
{
- if (cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() == IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0)
- imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX6QP", IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0);
+ if (cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() >= IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0)
+ /*
+ * SoCs that identify as i.MX6Q >= rev 2.0 are really i.MX6QP.
+ * Quirk: i.MX6QP revision = i.MX6Q revision - (1, 0),
+ * e.g. i.MX6QP rev 1.1 identifies as i.MX6Q rev 2.1.
+ */
+ imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX6QP", imx_get_soc_revision() - 0x10);
else
imx_print_silicon_rev(cpu_is_imx6dl() ? "i.MX6DL" : "i.MX6Q",
imx_get_soc_revision());
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs
@ 2020-11-04 16:54 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sven Van Asbroeck @ 2020-11-04 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer
Cc: Peng Fan, Anson Huang, Russell King, linux-kernel,
NXP Linux Team, Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam,
linux-arm-kernel
The i.MX6QP rev 1.1 SoC on my board is mis-identified by Linux:
the log (incorrectly) shows "i.MX6Q rev 2.1".
Correct this by assuming that every SoC that identifies as
i.MX6Q with rev >= 2.0 is really an i.MX6QP.
Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>
---
Tree: v5.10-rc2
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
index 85c084a716ab..703998ebb52e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
@@ -245,8 +245,13 @@ static void __init imx6q_axi_init(void)
static void __init imx6q_init_machine(void)
{
- if (cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() == IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0)
- imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX6QP", IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0);
+ if (cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() >= IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0)
+ /*
+ * SoCs that identify as i.MX6Q >= rev 2.0 are really i.MX6QP.
+ * Quirk: i.MX6QP revision = i.MX6Q revision - (1, 0),
+ * e.g. i.MX6QP rev 1.1 identifies as i.MX6Q rev 2.1.
+ */
+ imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX6QP", imx_get_soc_revision() - 0x10);
else
imx_print_silicon_rev(cpu_is_imx6dl() ? "i.MX6DL" : "i.MX6Q",
imx_get_soc_revision());
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs
2020-11-04 16:54 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
@ 2020-11-05 1:04 ` Fabio Estevam
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2020-11-05 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sven Van Asbroeck
Cc: Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer, Russell King, Pengutronix Kernel Team,
NXP Linux Team, Anson Huang, Peng Fan,
moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE,
linux-kernel
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 1:54 PM Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The i.MX6QP rev 1.1 SoC on my board is mis-identified by Linux:
> the log (incorrectly) shows "i.MX6Q rev 2.1".
>
> Correct this by assuming that every SoC that identifies as
> i.MX6Q with rev >= 2.0 is really an i.MX6QP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs
@ 2020-11-05 1:04 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2020-11-05 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sven Van Asbroeck
Cc: Peng Fan, Anson Huang, Sascha Hauer, Russell King, linux-kernel,
NXP Linux Team, Pengutronix Kernel Team, Shawn Guo,
moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 1:54 PM Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The i.MX6QP rev 1.1 SoC on my board is mis-identified by Linux:
> the log (incorrectly) shows "i.MX6Q rev 2.1".
>
> Correct this by assuming that every SoC that identifies as
> i.MX6Q with rev >= 2.0 is really an i.MX6QP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs
2020-11-04 16:54 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
@ 2020-11-10 2:21 ` Shawn Guo
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2020-11-10 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sven Van Asbroeck
Cc: Sascha Hauer, Russell King, Pengutronix Kernel Team,
Fabio Estevam, NXP Linux Team, Anson Huang, Peng Fan,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 11:54:18AM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> The i.MX6QP rev 1.1 SoC on my board is mis-identified by Linux:
> the log (incorrectly) shows "i.MX6Q rev 2.1".
>
> Correct this by assuming that every SoC that identifies as
> i.MX6Q with rev >= 2.0 is really an i.MX6QP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>
Applied, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs
@ 2020-11-10 2:21 ` Shawn Guo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2020-11-10 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sven Van Asbroeck
Cc: Peng Fan, Anson Huang, Sascha Hauer, Russell King, linux-kernel,
NXP Linux Team, Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam,
linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 11:54:18AM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> The i.MX6QP rev 1.1 SoC on my board is mis-identified by Linux:
> the log (incorrectly) shows "i.MX6Q rev 2.1".
>
> Correct this by assuming that every SoC that identifies as
> i.MX6Q with rev >= 2.0 is really an i.MX6QP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>
Applied, thanks.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs
@ 2020-11-04 16:52 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sven Van Asbroeck @ 2020-11-04 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shawn Guo
Cc: Russell King, Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam,
NXP Linux Team, Anson Huang, Peng Fan, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel
The i.MX6QP rev 1.1 SoC on my board is mis-identified by Linux:
the log (incorrectly) shows "i.MX6Q rev 2.1".
Correct this by assuming that every SoC that identifies as
i.MX6Q with rev >= 2.0 is really an i.MX6QP.
Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>
---
Tree: v5.10-rc2
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
index 85c084a716ab..703998ebb52e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
@@ -245,8 +245,13 @@ static void __init imx6q_axi_init(void)
static void __init imx6q_init_machine(void)
{
- if (cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() == IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0)
- imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX6QP", IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0);
+ if (cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() >= IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0)
+ /*
+ * SoCs that identify as i.MX6Q >= rev 2.0 are really i.MX6QP.
+ * Quirk: i.MX6QP revision = i.MX6Q revision - (1, 0),
+ * e.g. i.MX6QP rev 1.1 identifies as i.MX6Q rev 2.1.
+ */
+ imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX6QP", imx_get_soc_revision() - 0x10);
else
imx_print_silicon_rev(cpu_is_imx6dl() ? "i.MX6DL" : "i.MX6Q",
imx_get_soc_revision());
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs
@ 2020-11-04 16:52 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sven Van Asbroeck @ 2020-11-04 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shawn Guo
Cc: Peng Fan, Anson Huang, Russell King, linux-kernel,
NXP Linux Team, Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam,
linux-arm-kernel
The i.MX6QP rev 1.1 SoC on my board is mis-identified by Linux:
the log (incorrectly) shows "i.MX6Q rev 2.1".
Correct this by assuming that every SoC that identifies as
i.MX6Q with rev >= 2.0 is really an i.MX6QP.
Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>
---
Tree: v5.10-rc2
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
index 85c084a716ab..703998ebb52e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
@@ -245,8 +245,13 @@ static void __init imx6q_axi_init(void)
static void __init imx6q_init_machine(void)
{
- if (cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() == IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0)
- imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX6QP", IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0);
+ if (cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() >= IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0)
+ /*
+ * SoCs that identify as i.MX6Q >= rev 2.0 are really i.MX6QP.
+ * Quirk: i.MX6QP revision = i.MX6Q revision - (1, 0),
+ * e.g. i.MX6QP rev 1.1 identifies as i.MX6Q rev 2.1.
+ */
+ imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX6QP", imx_get_soc_revision() - 0x10);
else
imx_print_silicon_rev(cpu_is_imx6dl() ? "i.MX6DL" : "i.MX6Q",
imx_get_soc_revision());
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-10 2:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-04 16:54 [PATCH v1] ARM: imx: mach-imx6q: correctly identify i.MX6QP SoCs Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-11-04 16:54 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-11-05 1:04 ` Fabio Estevam
2020-11-05 1:04 ` Fabio Estevam
2020-11-10 2:21 ` Shawn Guo
2020-11-10 2:21 ` Shawn Guo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-11-04 16:52 Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-11-04 16:52 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.