* KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE not used anywhere
@ 2017-11-07 13:46 Alan Martinovic
2017-11-07 17:47 ` Bruce Ashfield
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alan Martinovic @ 2017-11-07 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yocto-mailing-list
Hi,
I'm trying to get yocto to build the kernel with an in-tree defconfig.
For that I found references to the variable KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE.
However, I've been experiencing that the kernel is being built with
some default defconfig, and not the in-tree one that came with the
kernel and I defined with the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE.
I've looked through all yocto sources for where the
KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is actually used, and found it only in my
kernel recipe. So I decided to dissect my recipe.
There is a:
inherit kernel
in my recipe for which, besides others, defines how the kernel config
will be selected.
Looking at the sources of oe/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass exposes how
the kernel configuration happens:
kernel_do_configure() {
# fixes extra + in /lib/modules/2.6.37+
# $ scripts/setlocalversion . => +
# $ make kernelversion => 2.6.37
# $ make kernelrelease => 2.6.37+
touch ${B}/.scmversion ${S}/.scmversion
if [ "${S}" != "${B}" ] && [ -f "${S}/.config" ] && [ ! -f
"${B}/.config" ]; then
mv "${S}/.config" "${B}/.config"
fi
# Copy defconfig to .config if .config does not exist. This allows
# recipes to manage the .config themselves in do_configure_prepend().
if [ -f "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" ] && [ ! -f "${B}/.config" ]; then
cp "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" "${B}/.config"
fi
${KERNEL_CONFIG_COMMAND}
}
I'm planning a workaround by overriding the do_configure in my recipe
to select the correct defconfig from the kernel. It does seem however
like the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is exactly here to not have to do
the workarounds.
Anyone has experiences with successfully using KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE?
Is it a specific poky feature (I'm not using poky but specific open
embedded layers and bitbake)?
Be Well,
Alan
Ref.
https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE not used anywhere 2017-11-07 13:46 KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE not used anywhere Alan Martinovic @ 2017-11-07 17:47 ` Bruce Ashfield 2017-11-09 13:11 ` Alan Martinovic 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2017-11-07 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Martinovic, Yocto-mailing-list On 11/07/2017 08:46 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to get yocto to build the kernel with an in-tree defconfig. > For that I found references to the variable KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE. > > However, I've been experiencing that the kernel is being built with > some default defconfig, and not the in-tree one that came with the > kernel and I defined with the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE. > > I've looked through all yocto sources for where the > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is actually used, and found it only in my > kernel recipe. So I decided to dissect my recipe. What is your kernel recipe ? Something you wrote, or something from a vendor ? > > There is a: > > inherit kernel > > in my recipe for which, besides others, defines how the kernel config > will be selected. > Looking at the sources of oe/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass exposes how > the kernel configuration happens: > > kernel_do_configure() { > # fixes extra + in /lib/modules/2.6.37+ > # $ scripts/setlocalversion . => + > # $ make kernelversion => 2.6.37 > # $ make kernelrelease => 2.6.37+ > touch ${B}/.scmversion ${S}/.scmversion > > if [ "${S}" != "${B}" ] && [ -f "${S}/.config" ] && [ ! -f > "${B}/.config" ]; then > mv "${S}/.config" "${B}/.config" > fi > > # Copy defconfig to .config if .config does not exist. This allows > # recipes to manage the .config themselves in do_configure_prepend(). > if [ -f "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" ] && [ ! -f "${B}/.config" ]; then > cp "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" "${B}/.config" > fi > > ${KERNEL_CONFIG_COMMAND} > } > > > I'm planning a workaround by overriding the do_configure in my recipe > to select the correct defconfig from the kernel. It does seem however > like the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is exactly here to not have to do > the workarounds. > > Anyone has experiences with successfully using KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE? > Is it a specific poky feature (I'm not using poky but specific open > embedded layers and bitbake)? That is a feature of kernel-yocto, so if your recipe is inheriting kernel-yocto you can use what you are looking for. But note, in the documentation you are referencing you have to replace KMACHINE with your actual machine .. not use the string KMACHINE. i.e. in your recipe (or bbappend) # for cases where the KMACHINE (KERNEL MACHINE) and bitbake # machine match, just do this: KMACHINE=$MACHINE KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_${KMACHINE}="your defconfig" i.e. it is just a standard bitbake variable with a machine OVERRIDE to make it specific to the machine you are building. Bruce > > Be Well, > Alan > > Ref. > https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE not used anywhere 2017-11-07 17:47 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2017-11-09 13:11 ` Alan Martinovic 2017-11-09 14:13 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Alan Martinovic @ 2017-11-09 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Yocto-mailing-list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4833 bytes --] > > What is your kernel recipe ? Something you wrote, or something > from a vendor ? Something I inherited. It does seem to have been based on linux-yocto-custom.bb. SECTION = "kernel" DESCRIPTION = "Mainline Linux kernel" LICENSE = "GPLv2" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d7810fab7487fb0aad327b76f1be7cd7" COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(senic-hub-beta|senic-hub)" inherit kernel require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc KBRANCH = "senic/4.13" SRCREV = "e469b218af6fe7cb8c50c4395ae9f3204f8033ae" PV = "4.13+git${SRCPV}" S = "${WORKDIR}/git" KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_senic-hub-beta="senic_defconfig" SRC_URI = "git:// github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git;nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH} \ " Running it with: bitbake -v linux-senic It fails with: ERROR: linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme: Could not configure senic-hub-beta-standard ERROR: linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme: Function failed: do_kernel_configme (log file is located at /home/alan/senic-o s/build/tmp-glibc/work/senic_hub_beta-senic-linux-gnueabi/linux-senic/4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0/temp/log.do_kernel_configme.5641) ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /home/alan/senic-os/build/tmp-glibc/work/senic_hub_beta-senic-linux-gnueabi/linux-senic/4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b2 18af-r0/temp/log.do_kernel_configme.5641 Not sure when "-standard" got appended...? A more exact error seems to be: linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme: + configs=[ERROR]: no configuration queue found in outdir (.kernel-meta) Could it be expecting a "linux-yocto style" with the meta branches? On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > wrote: > On 11/07/2017 08:46 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm trying to get yocto to build the kernel with an in-tree defconfig. >> For that I found references to the variable KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE. >> >> However, I've been experiencing that the kernel is being built with >> some default defconfig, and not the in-tree one that came with the >> kernel and I defined with the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE. >> >> I've looked through all yocto sources for where the >> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is actually used, and found it only in my >> kernel recipe. So I decided to dissect my recipe. >> > > What is your kernel recipe ? Something you wrote, or something > from a vendor ? > > > >> There is a: >> >> inherit kernel >> >> in my recipe for which, besides others, defines how the kernel config >> will be selected. >> Looking at the sources of oe/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass exposes how >> the kernel configuration happens: >> >> kernel_do_configure() { >> # fixes extra + in /lib/modules/2.6.37+ >> # $ scripts/setlocalversion . => + >> # $ make kernelversion => 2.6.37 >> # $ make kernelrelease => 2.6.37+ >> touch ${B}/.scmversion ${S}/.scmversion >> >> if [ "${S}" != "${B}" ] && [ -f "${S}/.config" ] && [ ! -f >> "${B}/.config" ]; then >> mv "${S}/.config" "${B}/.config" >> fi >> >> # Copy defconfig to .config if .config does not exist. This >> allows >> # recipes to manage the .config themselves in >> do_configure_prepend(). >> if [ -f "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" ] && [ ! -f "${B}/.config" ]; then >> cp "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" "${B}/.config" >> fi >> >> ${KERNEL_CONFIG_COMMAND} >> } >> >> >> I'm planning a workaround by overriding the do_configure in my recipe >> to select the correct defconfig from the kernel. It does seem however >> like the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is exactly here to not have to do >> the workarounds. >> >> Anyone has experiences with successfully using KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE? >> Is it a specific poky feature (I'm not using poky but specific open >> embedded layers and bitbake)? >> > That is a feature of kernel-yocto, so if your recipe is inheriting > kernel-yocto you can use what you are looking for. > > But note, in the documentation you are referencing you have to replace > KMACHINE with your actual machine .. not use the string KMACHINE. > > i.e. in your recipe (or bbappend) > > # for cases where the KMACHINE (KERNEL MACHINE) and bitbake > # machine match, just do this: > KMACHINE=$MACHINE > > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_${KMACHINE}="your defconfig" > > i.e. it is just a standard bitbake variable with a machine OVERRIDE > to make it specific to the machine you are building. > > Bruce > > > >> Be Well, >> Alan >> >> Ref. >> https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev. >> html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file >> >> > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7523 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE not used anywhere 2017-11-09 13:11 ` Alan Martinovic @ 2017-11-09 14:13 ` Bruce Ashfield 2017-11-09 15:53 ` Alan Martinovic 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2017-11-09 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Martinovic; +Cc: Yocto-mailing-list On 2017-11-09 8:11 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote: > What is your kernel recipe ? Something you wrote, or something > from a vendor ? > > > Something I inherited. > It does seem to have been based on linux-yocto-custom.bb > <http://linux-yocto-custom.bb>. > > > SECTION = "kernel" > DESCRIPTION = "Mainline Linux kernel" > LICENSE = "GPLv2" > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d7810fab7487fb0aad327b76f1be7cd7" > > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(senic-hub-beta|senic-hub)" > > inherit kernel > require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > > KBRANCH = "senic/4.13" > SRCREV = "e469b218af6fe7cb8c50c4395ae9f3204f8033ae" > > PV = "4.13+git${SRCPV}" > S = "${WORKDIR}/git" > > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_senic-hub-beta="senic_defconfig" > > SRC_URI = > "git://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git;nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH} > <http://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git;nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH}> > \ > " > > > Running it with: > > bitbake -v linux-senic > > > It fails with: > > ERROR: linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme: > Could not configure senic-hub-beta-standard > ERROR: linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme: > Function failed: do_kernel_configme (log file is located at > /home/alan/senic-o > s/build/tmp-glibc/work/senic_hub_beta-senic-linux-gnueabi/linux-senic/4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0/temp/log.do_kernel_configme.5641) > > ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: > /home/alan/senic-os/build/tmp-glibc/work/senic_hub_beta-senic-linux-gnueabi/linux-senic/4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b2 > 18af-r0/temp/log.do_kernel_configme.5641 > > > Not sure when "-standard" got appended...? That's just part of the localversion processing in the bbclass, so no worries there. > A more exact error seems to be: > > linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme: + > configs=[ERROR]: no configuration queue found in outdir (.kernel-meta) > > Could it be expecting a "linux-yocto style" with the meta branches? > Nope. Well, you do need some sort of configuration available, but it doesn't have to be in that format. That error is indicating that no configuration was found (no defconfig or fragments). A couple more questions, and I can probably sort this out. - what branch/release of yocto are you using ? - can you try just using: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG="senic_defconfig" For that second one, I'm wondering if the variable expansion is not working with the machine override. .. and finally, the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG processing is meant to pick up in-tree defconfigs for use in the build, so whatever you reference must bein in arch/<your arch>/configs/<kbuild defconfig> .. so make sure that is the case with senic_defconfig. You can always add the defconfig directly to the SRC_URI as well (i.e. copy it into your layer and call it 'defconfig' and add it to the SRC_URI like any other element. Bruce > > > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Bruce Ashfield > <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> wrote: > > On 11/07/2017 08:46 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote: > > Hi, > I'm trying to get yocto to build the kernel with an in-tree > defconfig. > For that I found references to the variable > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE. > > However, I've been experiencing that the kernel is being built with > some default defconfig, and not the in-tree one that came with the > kernel and I defined with the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE. > > I've looked through all yocto sources for where the > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is actually used, and found it only in my > kernel recipe. So I decided to dissect my recipe. > > > What is your kernel recipe ? Something you wrote, or something > from a vendor ? > > > > There is a: > > inherit kernel > > in my recipe for which, besides others, defines how the kernel > config > will be selected. > Looking at the sources of oe/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass exposes how > the kernel configuration happens: > > kernel_do_configure() { > # fixes extra + in /lib/modules/2.6.37+ > # $ scripts/setlocalversion . => + > # $ make kernelversion => 2.6.37 > # $ make kernelrelease => 2.6.37+ > touch ${B}/.scmversion ${S}/.scmversion > > if [ "${S}" != "${B}" ] && [ -f "${S}/.config" ] && [ ! -f > "${B}/.config" ]; then > mv "${S}/.config" "${B}/.config" > fi > > # Copy defconfig to .config if .config does not exist. > This allows > # recipes to manage the .config themselves in > do_configure_prepend(). > if [ -f "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" ] && [ ! -f > "${B}/.config" ]; then > cp "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" "${B}/.config" > fi > > ${KERNEL_CONFIG_COMMAND} > } > > > I'm planning a workaround by overriding the do_configure in my > recipe > to select the correct defconfig from the kernel. It does seem > however > like the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is exactly here to not have to do > the workarounds. > > Anyone has experiences with successfully using > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE? > Is it a specific poky feature (I'm not using poky but specific open > embedded layers and bitbake)? > > That is a feature of kernel-yocto, so if your recipe is inheriting > kernel-yocto you can use what you are looking for. > > But note, in the documentation you are referencing you have to replace > KMACHINE with your actual machine .. not use the string KMACHINE. > > i.e. in your recipe (or bbappend) > > # for cases where the KMACHINE (KERNEL MACHINE) and bitbake > # machine match, just do this: > KMACHINE=$MACHINE > > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_${KMACHINE}="your defconfig" > > i.e. it is just a standard bitbake variable with a machine OVERRIDE > to make it specific to the machine you are building. > > Bruce > > > > Be Well, > Alan > > Ref. > https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file > <https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file> > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE not used anywhere 2017-11-09 14:13 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2017-11-09 15:53 ` Alan Martinovic 2017-11-09 15:59 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Alan Martinovic @ 2017-11-09 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Yocto-mailing-list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8130 bytes --] > > - what branch/release of yocto are you using ? Morty > - can you try just using: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG="senic_defconfig" Yup, same error. .. and finally, the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG processing is meant to pick > up in-tree defconfigs for use in the build, so whatever you reference > must bein in arch/<your arch>/configs/<kbuild defconfig> .. so make > sure that is the case with senic_defconfig. Yup, it's in there. You can always add the defconfig directly to the SRC_URI as well > (i.e. copy it into your layer and call it 'defconfig' and add it > to the SRC_URI like any other element. Yup, am using that as a workaround . What is the difference between do_kernel_configme and do_configure? Not quite clear on why both exist. I ask because I originally wanted to override do_configure as a fix, and it seems that wouldn't have helped because it fails at do_kernel_configme. On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > wrote: > On 2017-11-09 8:11 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote: > >> What is your kernel recipe ? Something you wrote, or something >> from a vendor ? >> >> >> Something I inherited. >> It does seem to have been based on linux-yocto-custom.bb < >> http://linux-yocto-custom.bb>. >> >> >> SECTION = "kernel" >> DESCRIPTION = "Mainline Linux kernel" >> LICENSE = "GPLv2" >> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d7810fab7487fb0aad327b76f1be7cd7" >> >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(senic-hub-beta|senic-hub)" >> >> inherit kernel >> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc >> >> KBRANCH = "senic/4.13" >> SRCREV = "e469b218af6fe7cb8c50c4395ae9f3204f8033ae" >> >> PV = "4.13+git${SRCPV}" >> S = "${WORKDIR}/git" >> >> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_senic-hub-beta="senic_defconfig" >> >> SRC_URI = "git://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git; >> nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH} >> <http://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git;nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=$%7BKBRANCH%7D> >> <http://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git; >> nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH}> \ >> " >> >> >> Running it with: >> >> bitbake -v linux-senic >> >> >> It fails with: >> >> ERROR: linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme: >> Could not configure senic-hub-beta-standard >> ERROR: linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme: >> Function failed: do_kernel_configme (log file is located at >> /home/alan/senic-o >> s/build/tmp-glibc/work/senic_hub_beta-senic-linux-gnueabi/li >> nux-senic/4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0/temp/log.do_kernel_configme.5641) >> >> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /home/alan/senic-os/build/tmp- >> glibc/work/senic_hub_beta-senic-linux-gnueabi/linux-senic/4. >> 13+gitAUTOINC+e469b2 >> 18af-r0/temp/log.do_kernel_configme.5641 >> >> >> Not sure when "-standard" got appended...? >> > > That's just part of the localversion processing in the bbclass, so > no worries there. > > A more exact error seems to be: >> >> linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme: + >> configs=[ERROR]: no configuration queue found in outdir (.kernel-meta) >> >> Could it be expecting a "linux-yocto style" with the meta branches? >> >> > Nope. Well, you do need some sort of configuration available, but it > doesn't have to be in that format. > > That error is indicating that no configuration was found (no defconfig > or fragments). > > A couple more questions, and I can probably sort this out. > > - what branch/release of yocto are you using ? > - can you try just using: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG="senic_defconfig" > > For that second one, I'm wondering if the variable expansion is not > working with the machine override. > > .. and finally, the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG processing is meant to pick > up in-tree defconfigs for use in the build, so whatever you reference > must bein in arch/<your arch>/configs/<kbuild defconfig> .. so make > sure that is the case with senic_defconfig. > > You can always add the defconfig directly to the SRC_URI as well > (i.e. copy it into your layer and call it 'defconfig' and add it > to the SRC_URI like any other element. > > Bruce > > >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Bruce Ashfield < >> bruce.ashfield@windriver.com <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> >> wrote: >> >> On 11/07/2017 08:46 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I'm trying to get yocto to build the kernel with an in-tree >> defconfig. >> For that I found references to the variable >> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE. >> >> However, I've been experiencing that the kernel is being built >> with >> some default defconfig, and not the in-tree one that came with the >> kernel and I defined with the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE. >> >> I've looked through all yocto sources for where the >> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is actually used, and found it only in >> my >> kernel recipe. So I decided to dissect my recipe. >> >> >> What is your kernel recipe ? Something you wrote, or something >> from a vendor ? >> >> >> >> There is a: >> >> inherit kernel >> >> in my recipe for which, besides others, defines how the kernel >> config >> will be selected. >> Looking at the sources of oe/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass exposes >> how >> the kernel configuration happens: >> >> kernel_do_configure() { >> # fixes extra + in /lib/modules/2.6.37+ >> # $ scripts/setlocalversion . => + >> # $ make kernelversion => 2.6.37 >> # $ make kernelrelease => 2.6.37+ >> touch ${B}/.scmversion ${S}/.scmversion >> >> if [ "${S}" != "${B}" ] && [ -f "${S}/.config" ] && [ ! >> -f >> "${B}/.config" ]; then >> mv "${S}/.config" "${B}/.config" >> fi >> >> # Copy defconfig to .config if .config does not exist. >> This allows >> # recipes to manage the .config themselves in >> do_configure_prepend(). >> if [ -f "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" ] && [ ! -f >> "${B}/.config" ]; then >> cp "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" "${B}/.config" >> fi >> >> ${KERNEL_CONFIG_COMMAND} >> } >> >> >> I'm planning a workaround by overriding the do_configure in my >> recipe >> to select the correct defconfig from the kernel. It does seem >> however >> like the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is exactly here to not have to >> do >> the workarounds. >> >> Anyone has experiences with successfully using >> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE? >> Is it a specific poky feature (I'm not using poky but specific >> open >> embedded layers and bitbake)? >> >> That is a feature of kernel-yocto, so if your recipe is inheriting >> kernel-yocto you can use what you are looking for. >> >> But note, in the documentation you are referencing you have to replace >> KMACHINE with your actual machine .. not use the string KMACHINE. >> >> i.e. in your recipe (or bbappend) >> >> # for cases where the KMACHINE (KERNEL MACHINE) and bitbake >> # machine match, just do this: >> KMACHINE=$MACHINE >> >> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_${KMACHINE}="your defconfig" >> >> i.e. it is just a standard bitbake variable with a machine OVERRIDE >> to make it specific to the machine you are building. >> >> Bruce >> >> >> >> Be Well, >> Alan >> >> Ref. >> https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev. >> html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file >> <https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev >> .html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file> >> >> >> >> > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 11764 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE not used anywhere 2017-11-09 15:53 ` Alan Martinovic @ 2017-11-09 15:59 ` Bruce Ashfield 2017-11-09 16:31 ` Alan Martinovic 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2017-11-09 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Martinovic; +Cc: Yocto-mailing-list On 11/09/2017 10:53 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote: > - what branch/release of yocto are you using ? > > > Morty > > - can you try just using: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG="senic_defconfig" > > > Yup, same error. > > .. and finally, the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG processing is meant to pick > up in-tree defconfigs for use in the build, so whatever you reference > must bein in arch/<your arch>/configs/<kbuild defconfig> .. so make > sure that is the case with senic_defconfig. > > > Yup, it's in there. > > > You can always add the defconfig directly to the SRC_URI as well > (i.e. copy it into your layer and call it 'defconfig' and add it > to the SRC_URI like any other element. > > > Yup, am using that as a workaround . > > What is the difference between do_kernel_configme and do_configure? do configure is the existing/traditional/common/simple kernel.bbclass way to copy a defconfig and make sure it gets into the build. do_kernel_configme has more processing and logic to deal with kernel config fragments and wasn't something that was desired to be imposed on all build (but I do have a streamlined version that moves the logic into the core class now .. that will be out for review shortly). Things like the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG that you are trying to use, are that extra level of processing that weren't needed/wanted in the core part. > Not quite clear on why both exist. > I ask because I originally wanted to override do_configure as a fix, > and it seems that wouldn't have helped because it fails at > do_kernel_configme. Are the recipes / kernel tree something I can find ? If I can just launch a build, I'm sure I can point out what is wrong pretty quickly. Bruce > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield > <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> wrote: > > On 2017-11-09 8:11 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote: > > What is your kernel recipe ? Something you wrote, or something > from a vendor ? > > > Something I inherited. > It does seem to have been based on linux-yocto-custom.bb > <http://linux-yocto-custom.bb> <http://linux-yocto-custom.bb>. > > > SECTION = "kernel" > DESCRIPTION = "Mainline Linux kernel" > LICENSE = "GPLv2" > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = > "file://COPYING;md5=d7810fab7487fb0aad327b76f1be7cd7" > > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(senic-hub-beta|senic-hub)" > > inherit kernel > require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc > > KBRANCH = "senic/4.13" > SRCREV = "e469b218af6fe7cb8c50c4395ae9f3204f8033ae" > > PV = "4.13+git${SRCPV}" > S = "${WORKDIR}/git" > > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_senic-hub-beta="senic_defconfig" > > SRC_URI = > "git://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git;nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH} > <http://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git;nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=$%7BKBRANCH%7D> > <http://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git;nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH} > <http://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git;nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=$%7BKBRANCH%7D>> > \ > " > > > Running it with: > > bitbake -v linux-senic > > > It fails with: > > ERROR: linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 > do_kernel_configme: Could not configure senic-hub-beta-standard > ERROR: linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 > do_kernel_configme: Function failed: do_kernel_configme (log > file is located at /home/alan/senic-o > s/build/tmp-glibc/work/senic_hub_beta-senic-linux-gnueabi/linux-senic/4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0/temp/log.do_kernel_configme.5641) > > ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: > /home/alan/senic-os/build/tmp-glibc/work/senic_hub_beta-senic-linux-gnueabi/linux-senic/4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b2 > 18af-r0/temp/log.do_kernel_configme.5641 > > > Not sure when "-standard" got appended...? > > > That's just part of the localversion processing in the bbclass, so > no worries there. > > A more exact error seems to be: > > linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme: + > configs=[ERROR]: no configuration queue found in outdir > (.kernel-meta) > > Could it be expecting a "linux-yocto style" with the meta branches? > > > Nope. Well, you do need some sort of configuration available, but it > doesn't have to be in that format. > > That error is indicating that no configuration was found (no defconfig > or fragments). > > A couple more questions, and I can probably sort this out. > > - what branch/release of yocto are you using ? > - can you try just using: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG="senic_defconfig" > > For that second one, I'm wondering if the variable expansion is not > working with the machine override. > > .. and finally, the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG processing is meant to pick > up in-tree defconfigs for use in the build, so whatever you reference > must bein in arch/<your arch>/configs/<kbuild defconfig> .. so make > sure that is the case with senic_defconfig. > > You can always add the defconfig directly to the SRC_URI as well > (i.e. copy it into your layer and call it 'defconfig' and add it > to the SRC_URI like any other element. > > Bruce > > > > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Bruce Ashfield > <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>>> wrote: > > On 11/07/2017 08:46 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote: > > Hi, > I'm trying to get yocto to build the kernel with an in-tree > defconfig. > For that I found references to the variable > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE. > > However, I've been experiencing that the kernel is > being built with > some default defconfig, and not the in-tree one that > came with the > kernel and I defined with the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE. > > I've looked through all yocto sources for where the > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is actually used, and found > it only in my > kernel recipe. So I decided to dissect my recipe. > > > What is your kernel recipe ? Something you wrote, or something > from a vendor ? > > > > There is a: > > inherit kernel > > in my recipe for which, besides others, defines how the > kernel > config > will be selected. > Looking at the sources of > oe/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass exposes how > the kernel configuration happens: > > kernel_do_configure() { > # fixes extra + in /lib/modules/2.6.37+ > # $ scripts/setlocalversion . => + > # $ make kernelversion => 2.6.37 > # $ make kernelrelease => 2.6.37+ > touch ${B}/.scmversion ${S}/.scmversion > > if [ "${S}" != "${B}" ] && [ -f > "${S}/.config" ] && [ ! -f > "${B}/.config" ]; then > mv "${S}/.config" "${B}/.config" > fi > > # Copy defconfig to .config if .config does > not exist. > This allows > # recipes to manage the .config themselves in > do_configure_prepend(). > if [ -f "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" ] && [ ! -f > "${B}/.config" ]; then > cp "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" "${B}/.config" > fi > > ${KERNEL_CONFIG_COMMAND} > } > > > I'm planning a workaround by overriding the > do_configure in my > recipe > to select the correct defconfig from the kernel. It > does seem > however > like the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is exactly here to > not have to do > the workarounds. > > Anyone has experiences with successfully using > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE? > Is it a specific poky feature (I'm not using poky but > specific open > embedded layers and bitbake)? > > That is a feature of kernel-yocto, so if your recipe is > inheriting > kernel-yocto you can use what you are looking for. > > But note, in the documentation you are referencing you have > to replace > KMACHINE with your actual machine .. not use the string > KMACHINE. > > i.e. in your recipe (or bbappend) > > # for cases where the KMACHINE (KERNEL MACHINE) and bitbake > # machine match, just do this: > KMACHINE=$MACHINE > > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_${KMACHINE}="your defconfig" > > i.e. it is just a standard bitbake variable with a machine > OVERRIDE > to make it specific to the machine you are building. > > Bruce > > > > Be Well, > Alan > > Ref. > https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file > <https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file> > > <https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file > <https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file>> > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE not used anywhere 2017-11-09 15:59 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2017-11-09 16:31 ` Alan Martinovic 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Alan Martinovic @ 2017-11-09 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Yocto-mailing-list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11825 bytes --] Sure. The layer that will fetch all the other layers by running make: https://github.com/getsenic/senic-os The kernel source being used: https://github.com/getsenic/senic-os-linux/tree/senic/4.13 Things like the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG that you are trying to use, are > that extra level of processing that weren't needed/wanted in the > core part. Alrighty, think I'm getting it now. do_kernel_configme has more processing and logic to deal with > kernel config fragments and wasn't something that was desired to be > imposed on all build (but I do have a streamlined version that moves > the logic into the core class now .. that will be out for review > shortly). Cool, would like to see how the discussion will go. On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com > wrote: > On 11/09/2017 10:53 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote: > >> - what branch/release of yocto are you using ? >> >> >> Morty >> >> - can you try just using: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG="senic_defconfig" >> >> >> Yup, same error. >> >> .. and finally, the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG processing is meant to pick >> up in-tree defconfigs for use in the build, so whatever you reference >> must bein in arch/<your arch>/configs/<kbuild defconfig> .. so make >> sure that is the case with senic_defconfig. >> >> >> Yup, it's in there. >> >> >> You can always add the defconfig directly to the SRC_URI as well >> (i.e. copy it into your layer and call it 'defconfig' and add it >> to the SRC_URI like any other element. >> >> >> Yup, am using that as a workaround . >> >> What is the difference between do_kernel_configme and do_configure? >> > > do configure is the existing/traditional/common/simple kernel.bbclass > way to copy a defconfig and make sure it gets into the build. > > do_kernel_configme has more processing and logic to deal with > kernel config fragments and wasn't something that was desired to be > imposed on all build (but I do have a streamlined version that moves > the logic into the core class now .. that will be out for review > shortly). > > Things like the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG that you are trying to use, are > that extra level of processing that weren't needed/wanted in the > core part. > > Not quite clear on why both exist. >> I ask because I originally wanted to override do_configure as a fix, >> and it seems that wouldn't have helped because it fails at >> do_kernel_configme. >> > > Are the recipes / kernel tree something I can find ? If I can just > launch a build, I'm sure I can point out what is wrong pretty > quickly. > > Bruce > > >> >> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield < >> bruce.ashfield@windriver.com <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>> >> wrote: >> >> On 2017-11-09 8:11 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote: >> >> What is your kernel recipe ? Something you wrote, or >> something >> from a vendor ? >> >> >> Something I inherited. >> It does seem to have been based on linux-yocto-custom.bb >> <http://linux-yocto-custom.bb> <http://linux-yocto-custom.bb>. >> >> >> SECTION = "kernel" >> DESCRIPTION = "Mainline Linux kernel" >> LICENSE = "GPLv2" >> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = >> "file://COPYING;md5=d7810fab7487fb0aad327b76f1be7cd7" >> >> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(senic-hub-beta|senic-hub)" >> >> inherit kernel >> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc >> >> KBRANCH = "senic/4.13" >> SRCREV = "e469b218af6fe7cb8c50c4395ae9f3204f8033ae" >> >> PV = "4.13+git${SRCPV}" >> S = "${WORKDIR}/git" >> >> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_senic-hub-beta="senic_defconfig" >> >> SRC_URI = >> "git://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git; >> nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH} >> <http://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git;nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=$%7BKBRANCH%7D> >> <http://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git; >> nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=$%7BKBRANCH%7D> >> <http://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git; >> nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH} >> <http://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git; >> nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=$%7BKBRANCH%7D>> >> >> \ >> " >> >> >> Running it with: >> >> bitbake -v linux-senic >> >> >> It fails with: >> >> ERROR: linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 >> do_kernel_configme: Could not configure senic-hub-beta-standard >> ERROR: linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 >> do_kernel_configme: Function failed: do_kernel_configme (log >> file is located at /home/alan/senic-o >> s/build/tmp-glibc/work/senic_hub_beta-senic-linux-gnueabi/li >> nux-senic/4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0/temp/log.do_kernel_configme.5641) >> >> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: >> /home/alan/senic-os/build/tmp-glibc/work/senic_hub_beta-seni >> c-linux-gnueabi/linux-senic/4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b2 >> 18af-r0/temp/log.do_kernel_configme.5641 >> >> >> Not sure when "-standard" got appended...? >> >> >> That's just part of the localversion processing in the bbclass, so >> no worries there. >> >> A more exact error seems to be: >> >> linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme: + >> configs=[ERROR]: no configuration queue found in outdir >> (.kernel-meta) >> >> Could it be expecting a "linux-yocto style" with the meta >> branches? >> >> >> Nope. Well, you do need some sort of configuration available, but it >> doesn't have to be in that format. >> >> That error is indicating that no configuration was found (no defconfig >> or fragments). >> >> A couple more questions, and I can probably sort this out. >> >> - what branch/release of yocto are you using ? >> - can you try just using: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG="senic_defconfig" >> >> For that second one, I'm wondering if the variable expansion is not >> working with the machine override. >> >> .. and finally, the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG processing is meant to pick >> up in-tree defconfigs for use in the build, so whatever you reference >> must bein in arch/<your arch>/configs/<kbuild defconfig> .. so make >> sure that is the case with senic_defconfig. >> >> You can always add the defconfig directly to the SRC_URI as well >> (i.e. copy it into your layer and call it 'defconfig' and add it >> to the SRC_URI like any other element. >> >> Bruce >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Bruce Ashfield >> <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com >> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> >> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com >> >> <mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>>> wrote: >> >> On 11/07/2017 08:46 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I'm trying to get yocto to build the kernel with an >> in-tree >> defconfig. >> For that I found references to the variable >> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE. >> >> However, I've been experiencing that the kernel is >> being built with >> some default defconfig, and not the in-tree one that >> came with the >> kernel and I defined with the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE. >> >> I've looked through all yocto sources for where the >> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is actually used, and found >> it only in my >> kernel recipe. So I decided to dissect my recipe. >> >> >> What is your kernel recipe ? Something you wrote, or >> something >> from a vendor ? >> >> >> >> There is a: >> >> inherit kernel >> >> in my recipe for which, besides others, defines how the >> kernel >> config >> will be selected. >> Looking at the sources of >> oe/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass exposes how >> the kernel configuration happens: >> >> kernel_do_configure() { >> # fixes extra + in /lib/modules/2.6.37+ >> # $ scripts/setlocalversion . => + >> # $ make kernelversion => 2.6.37 >> # $ make kernelrelease => 2.6.37+ >> touch ${B}/.scmversion ${S}/.scmversion >> >> if [ "${S}" != "${B}" ] && [ -f >> "${S}/.config" ] && [ ! -f >> "${B}/.config" ]; then >> mv "${S}/.config" "${B}/.config" >> fi >> >> # Copy defconfig to .config if .config does >> not exist. >> This allows >> # recipes to manage the .config themselves in >> do_configure_prepend(). >> if [ -f "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" ] && [ ! -f >> "${B}/.config" ]; then >> cp "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" >> "${B}/.config" >> fi >> >> ${KERNEL_CONFIG_COMMAND} >> } >> >> >> I'm planning a workaround by overriding the >> do_configure in my >> recipe >> to select the correct defconfig from the kernel. It >> does seem >> however >> like the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is exactly here to >> not have to do >> the workarounds. >> >> Anyone has experiences with successfully using >> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE? >> Is it a specific poky feature (I'm not using poky but >> specific open >> embedded layers and bitbake)? >> >> That is a feature of kernel-yocto, so if your recipe is >> inheriting >> kernel-yocto you can use what you are looking for. >> >> But note, in the documentation you are referencing you have >> to replace >> KMACHINE with your actual machine .. not use the string >> KMACHINE. >> >> i.e. in your recipe (or bbappend) >> >> # for cases where the KMACHINE (KERNEL MACHINE) and bitbake >> # machine match, just do this: >> KMACHINE=$MACHINE >> >> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_${KMACHINE}="your defconfig" >> >> i.e. it is just a standard bitbake variable with a machine >> OVERRIDE >> to make it specific to the machine you are building. >> >> Bruce >> >> >> >> Be Well, >> Alan >> >> Ref. >> https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev. >> html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file >> <https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev >> .html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file> >> <https://www.yoctoproject.org/ >> docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file >> <https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev >> .html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 17220 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-09 16:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-11-07 13:46 KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE not used anywhere Alan Martinovic 2017-11-07 17:47 ` Bruce Ashfield 2017-11-09 13:11 ` Alan Martinovic 2017-11-09 14:13 ` Bruce Ashfield 2017-11-09 15:53 ` Alan Martinovic 2017-11-09 15:59 ` Bruce Ashfield 2017-11-09 16:31 ` Alan Martinovic
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.