Why the PF_SUPERPRIV flag is cleared?

Why the PF_SUPERPRIV flag is cleared?

[Parmenides]

Hi,

     When forking a child process, the copy_process() function will by
default clear the PF_SUPERPRIV flag, which indicates whether a process
use superuser privileges. That means a  superuser process will create
a child process does not has superuser privileges. I think the child
process of a superuser process should also be a superuser one, while
the child process of a normal process by default should also be a
normal one (except that the setuid bit of the child executable is turn
on). In both cases it is not necessary that the PF_SUPERPRIV flag to
be cleared.  So, I wonder why the PF_SUPERPRIV flag is cleared by
defult.

Why the PF_SUPERPRIV flag is cleared?

[rohan puri]

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Parmenides <mobile.parmenides@gmail.com>wrote:

> > This flag PF_SUPERPRI, indicates used superuser privileges and not use
> > superuser privileges.
> I get it. This is really a misunderstanding. Thanks a lot.
>
> 2011/9/8 rohan puri <rohan.puri15@gmail.com>:
> > Hi,
> >
> >     When forking a child process, the copy_process() function will by
> > default clear the PF_SUPERPRIV flag, which indicates whether a process
> > use superuser privileges. That means a  superuser process will create
> > a child process does not has superuser privileges. I think the child
> > process of a superuser process should also be a superuser one, while
> > the child process of a normal process by default should also be a
> > normal one (except that the setuid bit of the child executable is turn
> > on). In both cases it is not necessary that the PF_SUPERPRIV flag to
> > be cleared.  So, I wonder why the PF_SUPERPRIV flag is cleared by
> > defult.
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This flag PF_SUPERPRI, indicates used superuser privileges and not use
> > superuser privileges. Which in any case, INDEPENDENT of all the processes
> > which have superuser privileges, whether they had used them or not and
> for
> > those processes which do not have superuser privileges needs to be
> cleared
> > for the child of them (since the child process has been just created and
> at
> > this point in time it has not used the superuser privileges) Its a kind
> of
> > initialization you can think of.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rohan.
> >
>
Welcome :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110909/951c4c4b/attachment.html 

Why the PF_SUPERPRIV flag is cleared?

[Parmenides]

> This flag PF_SUPERPRI, indicates used superuser privileges and not use
> superuser privileges.
I get it. This is really a misunderstanding. Thanks a lot.

2011/9/8 rohan puri <rohan.puri15@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> ? ? When forking a child process, the copy_process() function will by
> default clear the PF_SUPERPRIV flag, which indicates whether a process
> use superuser privileges. That means a ?superuser process will create
> a child process does not has superuser privileges. I think the child
> process of a superuser process should also be a superuser one, while
> the child process of a normal process by default should also be a
> normal one (except that the setuid bit of the child executable is turn
> on). In both cases it is not necessary that the PF_SUPERPRIV flag to
> be cleared. ?So, I wonder why the PF_SUPERPRIV flag is cleared by
> defult.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This flag PF_SUPERPRI, indicates used superuser privileges and not use
> superuser privileges. Which in any case, INDEPENDENT of all the processes
> which have superuser privileges, whether they had used them or not and for
> those processes which do not have superuser privileges needs to be cleared
> for the child of them (since the child process has been just created and at
> this point in time it has not used the superuser privileges) Its a kind of
> initialization you can think of.
>
> Regards,
> Rohan.
>

Why the PF_SUPERPRIV flag is cleared?

[rohan puri]

Hi,

    When forking a child process, the copy_process() function will by
default clear the PF_SUPERPRIV flag, which indicates whether a process
use superuser privileges. That means a  superuser process will create
a child process does not has superuser privileges. I think the child
process of a superuser process should also be a superuser one, while
the child process of a normal process by default should also be a
normal one (except that the setuid bit of the child executable is turn
on). In both cases it is not necessary that the PF_SUPERPRIV flag to
be cleared.  So, I wonder why the PF_SUPERPRIV flag is cleared by
defult.


Hi,

This flag PF_SUPERPRI, indicates used superuser privileges and not use
superuser privileges. Which in any case, INDEPENDENT of all the processes
which have superuser privileges, whether they had used them or not and for
those processes which do not have superuser privileges needs to be cleared
for the child of them (since the child process has been just created and at
this point in time it has not used the superuser privileges) Its a kind of
initialization you can think of.

Regards,
Rohan.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20110908/eca848bf/attachment.html