All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Emilio Lopez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: sunxi: Convert DTSI to new CPU bindings
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:05:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMgsD+tK4+ywvLzsWd+mngrP7zGgSFn0naWjSsQLGaUn2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130628200333.GA2756@lukather>

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:15:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:44:02PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> > Hi Arnd, Olof,
>> >
>> > Sorry for steping in so late, but these two patches fixes a warning
>> > introduced by the commit 1ba9bf0a (ARM: 7762/1: kernel: fix
>> > arm_dt_init_cpu_maps() to skip non-cpu nodes) after 3.10-rc7.
>> >
>> > These two patches solve the situation for sunxi. The first one by
>> > Lorenzo is to be applied for 3.10 if it's still possible, and the
>> > second one on top of arm-soc/for-next. Tell me if you prefer a more
>> > formal pull request for these patches
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Maxime
>> >
>> > Lorenzo Pieralisi (1):
>> >   ARM: dts: sunxi: cpus/cpu nodes dts updates
>>
>> The patch above should already be queued in next/dt right ?
>
> Indeed.
>
> Then why the latest patch of your patchset got in 3.10, while the
> patches actually fixing the DT it would have impacted were delayed to
> 3.11?
>
> (And why was it merged so late in the development cycle?)

This. So now we have to scramble because some device trees will
produce warnings at boot.

Russell, the alternative is to revert Lorenzo's patch for 3.10 (and
re-introduce it for 3.11). Do you have a preference?


-Olof

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: sunxi: Convert DTSI to new CPU bindings
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:05:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMgsD+tK4+ywvLzsWd+mngrP7zGgSFn0naWjSsQLGaUn2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130628200333.GA2756@lukather>

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:15:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:44:02PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> > Hi Arnd, Olof,
>> >
>> > Sorry for steping in so late, but these two patches fixes a warning
>> > introduced by the commit 1ba9bf0a (ARM: 7762/1: kernel: fix
>> > arm_dt_init_cpu_maps() to skip non-cpu nodes) after 3.10-rc7.
>> >
>> > These two patches solve the situation for sunxi. The first one by
>> > Lorenzo is to be applied for 3.10 if it's still possible, and the
>> > second one on top of arm-soc/for-next. Tell me if you prefer a more
>> > formal pull request for these patches
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Maxime
>> >
>> > Lorenzo Pieralisi (1):
>> >   ARM: dts: sunxi: cpus/cpu nodes dts updates
>>
>> The patch above should already be queued in next/dt right ?
>
> Indeed.
>
> Then why the latest patch of your patchset got in 3.10, while the
> patches actually fixing the DT it would have impacted were delayed to
> 3.11?
>
> (And why was it merged so late in the development cycle?)

This. So now we have to scramble because some device trees will
produce warnings at boot.

Russell, the alternative is to revert Lorenzo's patch for 3.10 (and
re-introduce it for 3.11). Do you have a preference?


-Olof

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-28 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-28 16:44 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: sunxi: Convert DTSI to new CPU bindings Maxime Ripard
2013-06-28 16:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-28 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: sunxi: cpus/cpu nodes dts updates Maxime Ripard
2013-06-28 16:44   ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-28 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] sunxi: a10s: dtsi: Convert cpu node to the new cpu bindings Maxime Ripard
2013-06-28 16:44   ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-28 17:15 ` [PATCH 0/2] ARM: sunxi: Convert DTSI to new CPU bindings Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-06-28 17:15   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-06-28 20:03   ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-28 20:03     ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-28 20:05     ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2013-06-28 20:05       ` Olof Johansson
2013-06-28 21:45       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-06-28 21:45         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-06-29 18:07         ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-29 18:07           ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-29 19:03           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-06-29 19:03             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-06-29 19:38       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-29 19:38         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-29 20:11         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-06-29 20:11           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-06-29 22:54         ` Olof Johansson
2013-06-29 22:54           ` Olof Johansson
2013-06-29 23:14           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-29 23:14             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-29 23:20             ` Olof Johansson
2013-06-29 23:20               ` Olof Johansson
2013-06-30  9:48         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-06-30  9:48           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-07-05 10:19           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-07-05 10:19             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-07-05 10:19             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-07-12  9:37             ` Maxime Ripard
2013-07-12  9:37               ` Maxime Ripard
2013-07-12  9:37               ` Maxime Ripard
2013-07-02 12:12 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-07-02 12:12   ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-07-02 12:56   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-07-02 12:56     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOesGMgsD+tK4+ywvLzsWd+mngrP7zGgSFn0naWjSsQLGaUn2Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=emilio@elopez.com.ar \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.